Critique of “Caring for Critically Ill Patients with the ABCDEF Bundle: Results of the ICU Liberation Collaborative in over 15,000 Adults” by Pun et al. (2019)

You will evaluate the quality of a research article by completing an in-depth critique using a standardized form, adding definitions of each criterion to guide your analysis. Instructions to complete the critique are largely the same for both group and individual assignments, with exception of workload.  You will use a different assigned article for each critique.
Requirements:
You will complete the entire critique independently (including the “Synopsis section”) and submit by the due date listed on the course calendar.  
For this module’s assignment, use this research study from the Module Learning Resources: Pun et al., (2019).  Caring for critically ill patients with the ABCDEF bundle: Results of the ICU Liberation Collaborative in over 15,000 adults.
Using the criterion definition to guide you, determine if the authors met or did not meet the standard for each criterion.
Provide evidence from the article to clearly explain and support your decision.
For individual critiques only: Under “Synopsis section,” clearly answer the questions and provide rationale for your decisions.
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEach critique question (1-20) can earn 3 points. This assignment is worth 60 total points (3×20=60).
Grade each question baed on: defining the criterion, reporting if criterion was met/unmet, and providing evidence from the article supporting the decision.
For “Synopsis Section,” clearly answered all questions providing sound rationale for decision.
3=Outstanding work that clearly and correctly answers all elements.
2=Very good work but may not be as clear as possible or is missing one element
1=Average work and/or is missing two elements.
0=Not submitted, not acceptable and/or three or more elements are missing.