“The Iran-Contra Affair and its Impact on Public Perception of Presidential Leadership and Accountability in the United States” “The Iran-Contra Affair: Its Impact on American Politics and Public Opinion during the Reagan Administration”

instructions: Complete a research paper on a topic of your choice. ( I’ll include my topic in later lines) Length: 1400 words (4-6 pages double spaced, size 11 font, not including headings). Sourcing: You must include at least five trustworthy sources, two of which are primary sources. You must cite the sources parenthetically in the text, as well as in a properly formatted bibliography following the text. (MLA Style)
rubric- Thesis: Paper has a clear and complex thesis statement answering a question related to United States history from 1818-2008. The information presented in the paper clearly defends the thesis. Organization: Paper is clearly organized into paragraphs with clear topic sentences. Paper flows smoothly and organizes information clearly. Paper presents the information in a compelling and readable format. Information+Research: Paper is well researched, and contains relevant, in depth information taken from a variety of sources that argue the thesis statement. Information is well-synthesized from the sources, and not copied. Writer shows the ability to understand and accommodate perspective in sources.
Style: Paper observes the grammatical standards of written English. Paper uses correct spelling, grammar and is formatted with a heading/title. Paper does not use first person, strong voice or other unsuitable academic language. Sourcing: Paper uses a minimum of five trustworthy sources, two primary and three secondary sources in MLA style. Paper uses appropriate parenthetical citations. Sources are accurately documented in a bibliography following the text.
teacher instruction: (Question – In order to write a research paper, you first need to develop a question related to American history. Your question can cover anything. Make your question specific, although one that you can still answer with research. )
MY : TOPIC- QUESTION
How did the Iran-Contra Affair shape public perception of President Ronald Reagan, particularly regarding his leadership, integrity, and adherence to democratic principles, and what lasting effects did it have on perceptions of presidential power and accountability in the United States?
TEAXHER INSTRUCTION Thesis – Your thesis statement should be a 1-2 sentence statement that provides your answer to your question, that you will argue in your essay. This can change as you conduct more research, and develop a stronger thesis statement. MY Thesis:
The Iran-Contra Affair significantly eroded public confidence in President Ronald Reagan’s leadership, as revelations of secretive operations and disregard for democratic principles undermined his perceived integrity. Moreover, the scandal underscored concerns regarding unchecked presidential authority and the necessity for effective accountability mechanisms within the executive branch, shaping enduring perceptions of presidential power and oversight in the United States.
Sources – You do not need to find all of your sources immediately, but you do need to conduct some introductory research on your topic prior to developing a thesis. Provide the citations for two sources that help support your thesis, one primary and one secondary. Then write a brief summary on how this source helps you with your topic. Source One (Primary Source): “President Reagan’s Address to the Nation on the Iran-Contra Affair.” DocsTeach, 12 Aug. 1987, www.docsteach.org/documents/document/iran-contra-affair. How does this source assist my research?This primary source offers direct access to Reagan’s official communication to the nation regarding the Iran-Contra Affair, allowing for a comprehensive understanding of his explanations, justifications, and attempts to manage public perception. By examining Reagan’s words and tone in this address, researchers can assess his level of accountability, transparency, and leadership effectiveness in addressing the controversy. Additionally, analyzing this source enables a deeper exploration of the broader historical context and impact of the Iran-Contra Affair on American politics and public opinion during the Reagan administration.
Source Two (Secondary Source):“Iran-Contra Affair – Definition, Timeline, President.” History.Com, A&E Television Networks, www.history.com/topics/1980s/iran-contra-affair. Accessed 13 Mar. 2024. How does this source assist my research?The secondary source provides a detailed account of the Iran-Contra Affair, outlining the secretive arms deals, political implications, and fallout from the scandal. It helps to contextualize the events surrounding the affair, including President Reagan’s involvement and the subsequent investigations. By summarizing the key points and analyzing Reagan’s response, this source aids in understanding the impact of the scandal on public perception of presidential leadership and accountability. Additionally, it contributes to a broader examination of the Reagan administration’s handling of foreign policy and its implications for American politics during the 1980s.

Comments

Leave a Reply