Read: M. Guggenheim & R. Hertz, Evolving Standards in Juvenile Justice; From Gault to Graham & Beyond, J.D.B. and the Maturing of Juvenile Confession Suppression Law, pp. 509-521.
Question: What is the journey of juvenile confession law as reflected in the various cases in the article? (Gault, Graham, J.D.B.)
What are the implications of such rules/policies in juvenile confessions? Do the cases strike an appropriate balance? Do you think the authors got it right?
Be sure to fully discuss your answer. Your piece should not be more than two full pages, double spaced.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.