“Finding Meaning in Suffering: A Critique of Viktor Frankl’s Man’s Search for Meaning and Its Relevance to Nursing Theory and Practice”

I am including almost everything needed:
Assignment 3.1: Frankl Book Critique  
Directions 
Please read Man’s Search for Meaning by Viktor Frankl and review Part I pp. IX–93 and Part II pp. 97–165 reading selections from this week and last week. 
Describe, in one paragraph, the primary thesis of Man’s Search for Meaning and how Frankl’s theory on Logotherapy was developed. 
How is nursing theory similarly developed? 
How is this book and Logotherapy relevant to nursing theory and development? Make a connection between Frankl’s experiences and his observations on meaning-making amidst his suffering and how his story relates to other nursing theorists, their observations, and their experiences that led to the development of their theories. Provide 1–2 examples of nursing theory relevance. 
Discuss the book’s relevance and provide examples to nursing knowledge and advanced practice. 
What is your opinion of the book? 
Assignment Details 
3- to 4-text pages (not including the title and reference pages), written in current APA format. Your paper must be double spaced, and you must use an APA approved 12–point font. 
Please provide a title and reference page 
Must follow the following rubric 
Assignment 3.1: Critique Rubric 
Criteria 
Ratings 
Pts 
Summary 
15 pts 
Excellent 
The paper is written with a brief but comprehensive summary of what the work is about and what the author is trying to convey. 
13.75 pts 
Satisfactory 
The paper is written with a brief but satisfactory summary. 
12.75 pts 
Needs Improvement 
The paper is written with a brief but partial summary. 
12 pts 
Unsatisfactory 
The paper is written with an inadequate summary. 
0 pts 
Incomplete 
No summary is provided. 
/ 15 pts 
Nursing Theory Discussion 
20 pts 
Excellent 
A thoughtful and analytic discussion regarding the works relevance to nursing theory specifically is provided with examples from nursing theory and specific theorists’ work. 
18.25 pts 
Satisfactory 
A satisfactory discussion is provided. 
17 pts 
Needs Improvement 
A partial discussion is provided. 
16 pts 
Unsatisfactory 
An inadequate discussion is provided. 
0 pts 
Incomplete 
No discussion of theory is provided. 
/ 20 pts 
Nursing Relevance to Knowledge and practice Discussion 
20 pts 
Excellent 
A thorough discussion of the work’s relevance and or relationship to nursing knowledge and advanced practice is provided. 
18.25 pts 
Satisfactory 
A satisfactory discussion is provided. 
17 pts 
Needs Improvement 
A partial discussion is provided. 
16 pts 
Unsatisfactory 
An inadequate discussion is provided. 
0 pts 
Incomplete 
No discussion of relevance or knowledge is provided. 
/ 20 pts 
Conclusion 
10 pts 
Excellent 
A thoughtful opinion of the work and conclusion is provided. 
9.25 pts 
Satisfactory 
A satisfactory discussion is provided. 
8.5 pts 
Needs Improvement 
A partial discussion is provided. 
8 pts 
Unsatisfactory 
An inadequate discussion is provided. 
0 pts 
Incomplete 
No opinion or conclusion is provided. 
/ 10 pts 
Clarity, Writing Mechanics, and References 
10 pts 
Excellent 
The paper is written in correct APA format with the rules of grammar, spelling, and page length accuracy. Use and integration of other nursing theory sources is provided. 
9.25 pts 
Satisfactory 
APA, grammar, page length and integration of other nursing theory sources is satisfactory. 
8.5 pts 
Needs Improvement 
APA, grammar, page length and integration of other nursing theory sources is partial. 
8 pts 
Unsatisfactory 
APA, grammar, page length and integration of other nursing theory sources is inadequate. 
0 pts 
Incomplete 
APA format is not used, the page requirement is not met, and/or nursing theory sources were not provided or integrated. 
/ 10 pts 
Total Points: 0