Brisk Writers

Author: admin

  • “The Impact of Literature on the Renaissance Era: A Historical Analysis” Introduction The Renaissance era, spanning from the 14th to the 17th century, was a period of great cultural, intellectual, and artistic rebirth in Europe.

    Must be atleast 6 pages, I included a sample template to help as well 🙂 Please make sure to cite all sources. 3 sources are required, but you are not limited to only using 3.
    The paper is a research paper about how literature influenced the renaissance era.

  • Title: Anemia in a Patient with Chronic Kidney Disease: Diagnosis and Treatment Considerations

    A 50-year-old woman presents to the office with complaints of excessive fatigue and shortness of breath after activity, which is abnormal for her. The woman has a history of congestive heart failure with decreased kidney function within the last year. The woman appears unusually tired and slightly pale. Additional history and examination rules out worsening heart failure, acute illness, and worsening kidney disease. The CBC results indicate hemoglobin is 9.5 g/dL, which is a new finding, and the hematocrit is 29%. Previous hemoglobin levels have been 11 to 13g/dL. The patient’s vital signs are temperature 98.7°F, heart rate 92 bpm, respirations 28 breaths per minute, and blood pressure 138/72. The practitioner suspects the low hemoglobin level is related to the decline in kidney function and begins to address treatment related to the condition. 
    Answer the following:
    Which test(s) should be performed to determine whether the anemia is related to chronic disease or iron deficiency, and what would those results show?
    Should the practitioner consider a blood transfusion for this patient? Explain your answer.
    Which medication(s) should be considered for this patient?
    What considerations should the practitioner include in the care of the patient if erythropoietic agents are used for treatment?
    What follow-up should the practitioner recommend for the patient?
    REQUIREMENTS:
    The paper should be formatted per current APA and 2 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract and references page.
    Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
    *WILL BE SUBMITTED AGAINST TURNITIN, NEEDS LESS THAN 20% SIMILARITY SCORE*

  • Title: Case Studies in Ethical Dilemmas in Healthcare Case Study 1: End-of-Life Care Dilemma Introduction End-of-life care is a sensitive and complex issue in healthcare. It involves making decisions about medical treatment,

     
    Submission Instructions:
    You must complete both case studies
    Your initial post should be at least 500 words per case study, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources

  • The Interrelationship Among Theory, Practice, and Research: A Vital Triad in Advancing Knowledge and Practice Introduction Theory, practice, and research are three essential components that are closely interconnected in the fields of social sciences, education, healthcare,

    Theory, Practice, & Research
    Discuss the interrelationship among theory, practice, and research.
    Submission Instructions:
    Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
    NO AI PLEASE!!!!

  • Exploring the Impact of Social Media on Society 1. The Rise of Social Media: In recent years, social media has become an integral part of our daily lives. With the advent of platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, people are

    one paragraph per discussion. they’re all numbered and would like about 150 words each. in the pdf untitled 18 it has everything

  • “Examining the See-Judge-Act Process: A Critical Analysis of Justice Issues in Society”

    The paper should be specific in its narrative and analysis. Be sure to include quotes and/or paraphrases from the course materials provided for the justice issue you have chosen. No outside research is required. The Brigman reading should be used when discussing the See-Judge-Act process. I will attach the rubric and readings you will need to use. down below. If possible, follow the the necssary requirements on the rubric

  • Title: Compliance Policies for a Large Medical Facility

    Module 03 Content
    Are you ready to present the policies for your two compliance plans in a way that all employees will understand at a large medical facility where you are the Compliance Officer?
    In 4-page paper describe the policies for each of the two compliance plans.
    Break each policy section into 2 pages each.
    Remember to support your policies for the two plans with a total of three research sources, cited at the end in APA format. (That’s 1-2 research sources per plan).
    Then, summarize your plan in a 5-8 slide PowerPoint presentation.
    Polices you should consider covering for each plan come under the key compliance elements:
    Compliance Standards
    High-Level (personal) Responsibility
    Education
    Communication
    Monitoring/Auditing (for Safety)
    Enforcement/Discipline
    Response/Prevention
    Look these over in your research, and then select just two of these key elements and write your policies under them for each of your two compliance plans. (Your policies for each plan can zero in on different key elements.)
    Example:
    A compliance plan about washing hands between patients might describe policies for High Level (personal) Responsibility and Monitoring/Auditing (for Safety)
    A compliance plan about charging patients for Diabetes Management Education as a Physician Visit might describe policies for Compliance Standards and Enforcement/Discipline.

  • Title: Ethical Issues in Healthcare: A Case Study and Response

    Thread Prompt:
    Identify a news story that discusses an ethical issue in healthcare; the story must have been published within the 30 days preceding the due date of this discussion. You may find this through a web search, library research (https://www.liberty.edu), professional journals, professional association websites, newspapers, etc. In your initial post:
    -Briefly explain the situation and the parties involved.
    Identify the ethical issue(s).
    -Explain how you would have prevented this situation and would now respond, including support from a second source and a Biblical worldview perspective.
    The above is the thread that needs to be written. Please use the attachment for the instructions on how to write it. If you have questions do not hesitate to ask me, please. Thank you.

  • “Exploring the Social and Political Commentary in Octavia Butler’s Parable of the Sower: A Historical Analysis”

    Your assignment is to write a five-page historical analysis of Parable of the Sower we have
    read that you have not already written about. Use specific examples from the chosen
    work to support your analysis and a minimum of eight sources other than the text itself.
    Use one of the two questions of Historical Criticism listed below to guide your research
    and analysis.
    Historical critics try to answer questions such as these:
    1. What worldview was typical of the author’s time? What aspects of this worldview
    seem prevalent in this work? Does the author seem to accept or rebel against
    this worldview?
    2. What events, issues, concerns of the time are manifested in the work? What
    does the work say about life at the time?
    As with other interpretive strategies we’ve studied, Historical Criticism provides a
    framework for building context to help you understand and interpret a work of
    literature. Here you use what you learn about the time the work was written to justify
    your critique.
    Process
    While there are different strategies for approaching this work, you might
    consider following these steps.
    1. Re-read and/or review margin notes in the chosen work.
    2. Construct a Foundation Summary of the chosen work using the elements
    of summary listed below (if you have not done so already).
    a. Who is the story about?
    b. What is the story about?
    c. When does the story take place?
    d. Where does the story take place?
    e. Why did the author write the story? (In other words, what does the
    author intend to communicate to the reader?)
    f. How does the story take place? (In other words, who is telling the
    story or from what point of view is it being told?)
    3. Convert your “why” for the work into a critique by framing it in terms of a
    social, moral, or political issue (which you will then justify through your
    historical analysis).
    4. Choose one of the Historical Criticism questions to guide your analysis and
    research.
    5. Conduct an initial round of exploratory research to develop a better
    understanding of time in which the work was written and the effectiveness
    of the research tools you employed. If your research tools are not
    producing enough credible results, consider adding additional research
    tools and consulting with a librarian (try the 24/7 chat on the college
    library homepage) or myself. Use the social, moral, or political issue that
    is the focus of your critique to narrow the scope of your research.
    6. Conduct another round of research until you have more than the
    minimum number of credible sources required for the assignment.
    7. Review your sources for credibility and discard any that may not be
    sufficiently credible or that are noticeably less credible than your other
    sources. Create a works cited page for the remaining sources. (You can
    always delete any you don’t end up using.) This will help you create
    accurate in-text citations as you draft your paper.
    8. Ask yourself “Why do I think so?” about your critique and use several
    reasons generated in this way to organize your support/ body paragraphs
    in the development of your paper.
    9. Refine your research and select several examples from the time period
    that best justify each reason and your critique — that are most relevant to
    justifying your interpretation. Conduct additional research as needed.
    10. Select relevant, specific examples from the chosen work to illustrate the
    support you have already gathered and help develop your reasons.
    11. Write a first draft that is at least 2 – 3 pages in length and incorporates at
    least four sources.
    12. Write a final draft of at least five pages. This draft should incorporate at
    least eight sources and parenthetical citations as needed. Include your
    works cited page. Bring three copies to the final draft workshop.
    13. Conduct a final round of editing and revising based on the feedback you
    receive and using any additional research you conduct (if any). Submit
    this revision for a grade.

  • “Exploring Advanced Quantitative Methods in Psychology through Data Science: A Comprehensive Analysis”

    it is Advanced Quantiteve Methods in Psychology, i couldn’t find this subject and data science is closest one to it. 
    i need to ask to go through guiedeline attached, check if you really understand what to do, i’ve done this before myself, i normally always do myself, but this time i failed, and it’s my last chance and i need it to be done perfectly. if needed i can also share comment on previous work, so you can see, what shouldn’t be done. all needed attachments below.Â