In your reflection, please include your own perspective, thoughts, insights,
what you learned, and what you want to remember about each of the readings/videos this week.
Author: admin
-
Title: Reflection on This Week’s Readings and Videos This week’s readings and videos covered a range of topics, from the importance of empathy and compassion to the power of positive thinking. As I engaged with each piece, I found myself reflecting
-
Literature Summary Literature Summary “Critical Analysis of Five Articles on a Selected Practice Issue” “Late Assignment Penalty Policy”
Literature Summary
Assignment
Purpose
The purpose of this assignment is to find and appraise resources related to the PICOT question from Week 2. The focus of this assignment is to evaluate pertinent literature that supports the practice change intervention.
Course Outcomes
This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO 1: Examine the role of research and evidence from nursing and related fields in advancing healthcare outcomes and equity. (POs 4, 5)
CO 4: Apply evidence-based models to enhance advanced nursing practice. (POs 4, 5)
CO 5: Develop professional competencies in scientific inquiry and translating scholarship into practice. (POs 4, 5)
Due Date
Submit the Literature Summary Worksheet to the Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with a penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.
Total Points Possible
This assignment is worth 200 points.
Preparing the Assignment
Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.
General Instructions
Select and review five research articles related to the practice issue and proposed intervention of your PICOT question. These articles may include quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods studies (original research); systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or meta-syntheses (synthesis); or clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Complete one table for each selected article.
Use the Literature Summary TemplateLinks to an external site. to complete the assignment.
Use of the template is required. A 10% deduction will be applied if the template is not used. See the rubric.
Follow APA grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation rules consistent with formal, scholarly writing.
Abide by Chamberlain University’s academic integrity policy.
Include the following sections (detailed criteria listed below and in the grading rubric).
State the PICOT question, including
Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome
Timeframe
Use standard PICOT sentence format
For each article, select the correct table and complete with the information appropriate for the type of article selected, including
Full APA reference
Purpose
Methods/search strategy/systematic review of literature
Sample and participants/discussion of inclusion criteria/stakeholders and peer review
Findings
Limitations/strength of recommendations
Relevance to the identified practice issue or proposed intervention
Ensure each article meets the following
Article is published in a peer-reviewed, provider-focused journal or is a current clinical practice guideline
Publication date is current within five years
Rubric
NR585NP_W5_Literature Summary Rubric
NR585NP_W5_Literature Summary Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePICOT Question
6 Required Criteria
1. Population
2. Intervention
3. Comparison
4. Outcome
5. Timeframe
6. Use standard PICOT sentence format
10 pts
Excellent
All requirements met.
9 pts
Very Good
5 requirements met.
8 pts
Satisfactory
3-4 requirements met.
5 pts
Needs Improvement
1-2 requirements met.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 1
7 Required Criteria
1. Full APA reference
2. Purpose
3. Methods/ search strategy/ systematic review of literature
4. Sample and participants/discussion of inclusion criteria/stakeholders and peer review
5. Findings
6. Limitations/strength of recommendations
7. Relevance to the identified practice issue or proposed intervention
30 pts
Excellent
All requirements met.
27 pts
Very Good
6 requirements met.
25 pts
Satisfactory
4-5 requirements met.
15 pts
Needs Improvement
1-3 requirements met.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 2
7 Required Criteria
1. Full APA reference
2. Purpose
3. Methods/ search strategy/ systematic review of literature
4. Sample and participants/discussion of inclusion criteria/stakeholders and peer review
5. Findings
6. Limitations/strength of recommendations
7. Relevance to the identified practice issue or proposed intervention
30 pts
Excellent
All requirements met.
27 pts
Very Good
6 requirements met.
25 pts
Satisfactory
4-5 requirements met.
15 pts
Needs Improvement
1-3 requirements met.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 3
7 Required Criteria
1. Full APA reference
2. Purpose
3. Methods/ search strategy/ systematic review of literature
4. Sample and participants/discussion of inclusion criteria/stakeholders and peer review
5. Findings
6. Limitations/strength of recommendations
7. Relevance to the identified practice issue or proposed intervention
30 pts
Excellent
All requirements met.
27 pts
Very Good
6 requirements met.
25 pts
Satisfactory
4-5 requirements met.
15 pts
Needs Improvement
1-3 requirements met.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 4
7 Required Criteria
1. Full APA reference
2. Purpose
3. Methods/ search strategy/ systematic review of literature
4. Sample and participants/discussion of inclusion criteria/stakeholders and peer review
5. Findings
6. Limitations/strength of recommendations
7. Relevance to the identified practice issue or proposed intervention
30 pts
Excellent
All requirements met.
27 pts
Very Good
6 requirements met.
25 pts
Satisfactory
4-5 requirements met.
15 pts
Needs Improvement
1-3 requirements met.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle 5
7 Required Criteria
1. Full APA reference
2. Purpose
3. Methods/ search strategy/ systematic review of literature
4. Sample and participants/discussion of inclusion criteria/stakeholders and peer review
5. Findings
6. Limitations/strength of recommendations
7. Relevance to the identified practice issue or proposed intervention
30 pts
Excellent
All requirements met.
27 pts
Very Good
6 requirements met.
25 pts
Satisfactory
4-5 requirements met.
15 pts
Needs Improvement
1-3 requirements met.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
30 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle Quality
5 Required Criteria
Each of the five articles meets the following:
• Article is published in a peer-reviewed, provider-focused journal
• Publication date is current within five years
Articles 1-5
20 pts
Excellent
All requirements met.
18 pts
Very Good
4 requirements met.
16 pts
Satisfactory
3 requirements met.
10 pts
1-2 requirements met.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
No requirements met.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format
Citation and Reference Formation
Use the current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.
10 pts
Excellent
0-1 errors.
9 pts
Very Good
2-3 errors.
8 pts
Satisfactory
4-5 errors.
5 pts
Needs Improvement
6-7 errors.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
More than 7 errors.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Requirements
Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.
10 pts
Excellent
0-1 errors.
9 pts
Very Good
2-3 errors.
8 pts
Satisfactory
4-5 errors.
5 pts
Needs Improvement
6-7 errors.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
More than 7 errors.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUse of Template
10% will be deducted if the template is not used.
0 pts
No Points Deducted
Template used.
0 pts
Points Deducted
20 (10%) points will be deducted if the required template is not used.
0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLate Penalty Deductions
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment. Quizzes and discussions are not considered assignments and are not part of the late assignment policy.
0 pts
No Points Deducted
Assignment submitted on time. No points deducted.
0 pts
Points Deducted
-10% points/day up to 3 days late
0 pts
Total Points: 200
PreviousNext -
Sorting Algorithm Comparison Sorting Algorithm Comparison Instructions: 1. Download the SortComparison.zip file and unzip it. 2. Open the SortComparison project in Visual Studio. 3. Open the Sorter.cpp file located in the SortComparison folder. 4.
Download the zip file below. SortComparison.zipDownload SortComparison.zip
Unzip it, open it up in the VS. All the instructions are located in the ReadMe file. You goal is to fill out the Sorter.cpp file with your own code. Assignment- Implement heapSort.
required including:- testInsertionSort testPartition
testQuickSort
testMerge
testMergeSort
testPmd
testHeapify
testHeapSort
What to submit:1. Your SortComparison project zipped. 2. Screenshot with gtest results for this project -
“Financing Options for Starting a Business: Exploring Corporate Financing Methods”
Action ItemsParty A graduated from business school and has learned the details about running a successful business. He is ready to utilize his education and does not want to work for anyone. Party A had decided to sell the fifty thousand rulers that his Uncle gave him. He knows that he will have to purchase additional supplies.You are his business advisor, and he wants to know how he can raise the money to finance his business and if he should take out a loan. Discuss the two main ways that corporations are financed? Submission InstructionsComplete and submit this assignment per your professor’s instructions.
Grading Criteria0 – 5 points
——————————————— -
“Analyzing the Top Telecom Companies: A Statistical Approach to Finding the Best Investment” Introduction: The telecommunication industry has been rapidly growing and evolving, with companies constantly competing for market share and consumer loyalty. In this assignment, we will be comparing three
You are comparing companies AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile. Choose based on a stats point of view on what company should be the best investment. Also follow all the directions in the links I have added.
-
Exploring Public Opinion on Government Spending on Healthcare: An Analysis of the 2018 General Social Survey Data
SPSS usage is required to get data, im using the 2018 GSS data set, Originally was going to do the project on NATHEAL which is about people’s views on how much our nations spends on improving and protecting our nations health. You can go ahead and choose another Variable to do the research on if you’d like. if you need to cut space to reach the 6 pages the final limitations and summary section at the end can be shorter. (food for thought prof checks papers for heavy AI use) Rest of info about format etc in the attached files.
-
Title: “Exploring Virtual Interviews: A Case Study Analysis Using Atlas ti Web Tool”
There are 6 virtual interviews ready.
The attached work is 70% complete (1. Introduction,2. Literature Review,3. Research Methodology + the 6 virtual interviews) and I would like to write the last two chapters (4. Results, 5. Discussion) using the Atlas ti web tool mentioned in chapter 3.
I attach with you the pdf with the instructions from the university as well as the interviews I prepared on which the analysis should be made.
The work, as you will see, is a case study, mainly with interviews.
I’m waiting for the teacher to do the final OK so I can move on to chapters 4 and 5, so I may have to make a few more corrections when he responds. The first draft should be ready by 13/7 so that I can see it myself and send it for correction where they will logically reply to me at the end of August. -
“The Life and Legacy of Leonard Bernstein: An Interview with the Music Legend” The Musical Journey of Leonard Bernstein: From Humble Beginnings to International Fame
Interview with Leonard Bernstein
Time Magazine has the honor of interviewing the Person of the Year, Leonard Bernstein! Leonard Bernstein is a legend in the music realm. Born into a Jewish family, he grew up with a passion for music. From a windup Victrola to the composer of musical novelties such as Candide, and Jeremiah. I’m Elizabeth Muh, here to interview Leonard Bernstein at Tanglewood. Today, December 10, 1980, shortly after you were rewarded with the Kennedy Center Honor for Lifetime of Contributions to American Culture through the Performing Arts, let’s see how it all unfolded.
EM: So glad to have you here, Leonard Bernstein! Let’s start. Music is your life! How did it all start?
LB: It all started with a piano. When we were over at my parent’s friend’s house, they had a piano they would play. Whenever they did, my two-year-old self would press his ear to the closed door and cry, “Moynik! Moynik!”, “Music! Music!”. Same with the wind-up Victrola. I would howl, tears streaming down, thirsting for the jingles of the Victrola. I had already become crazy in love with music.
EM: As a child, you spent many summers in Sharon, your summer home. How would you spend your time there?
LB: I had the most fun there! Summers at Sharon were something out of fairytales. My friends and I put on productions of plays and operas, such as Carmen, The Mikado, H.M.S Pinafore, and Aida. The summer we did Carmen we did it in drag. I played Carmen, red wig, mantilla, chiffon dress and all. The dresses were so see-through, my underwear was showing! (laughs good-naturedly) For H.M.S Pinafore operetta by Gilbert and Sullivan, we had taken our maid for the opera. I had noticed her voice was so sweet, so utterly pure. I just knew she just had to sing in the opera. We had also taken Mom’s car. Mom was not pleased about that.
EM: (laughs) I’m sure she wasn’t. Let’s talk about your father. He discouraged you from becoming a musician, it must have been hard for you. How did you deal with it?
LB: It was rough, to routinely hear that if I pursued a music career, I would become a “klezmer,” or a broke musician in Russian. I had started lessons with Miss Coates for six dollars an hour, and when my father heard, he was enraged. Six dollars an hour? Outrageous. He refused to pay for my lessons. So I had to earn my own money. I barely scraped by, playing for different events, just like the klezmer my father denied me to be. If anything, his opposition made me more determined to be a musician.
EM: You’ve studied under numerous music legends such as Aaron Copland, Serge Koussevitzky, and Dimitri Mitropoulos. What was that like?
LB: It’s incredible how I had the opportunity to study with these otherworldly geniuses. They all shaped me into the person I am today. I studied conducting under Dr. Fritz Reiner and had piano lessons with Madame Isabelle Vengerova. Both scared me stiff! They demanded absolute perfection. Reiner expected his students to have the whole scores memorized, and know the part of every instrument. But ultimately, we came to good terms and became friends. I also attended Tanglewood and trained under Serge Koussevitzky. He’d opened the Berkshire Music Center at Tanglewood to teach promising American musicians.
EM: What was your experience going through World War Ⅱ?
LB: Even before World War Ⅱ I’d experienced anti-Semitism, especially during my time at Harvard. To raise money for the USO and British Relief, Kouss asked me to conduct a concert at Tanglewood. I’d drafted multiple times for the army and both times were rejected with a 4-F, due to my asthma. I didn’t see it at the time but it was a blessing in disguise. I never would have wound up working with the New York Philharmonic.
EM: After graduating from Curtis, you had to make a living for yourself. It was rough going. How’d you end up with a job working for the New York Philharmonic?
LB: After graduating I barely scraped by to make a living for myself. I worked odd jobs from performing to coaching vocalists. Eventually, I got a job with Irving Caesar, transcribing jazz, arranging piano, and writing pop music. A publisher was interested in publishing two of my compositions, Jeremiah and Extension of a Theme by Adolph Green. At that point, my salary doubled to $50 a week. Things were looking up. By a stroke of luck, a miracle, Artur Rodzinski was considering me as an assistant director for the New York Philharmonic. I met up with him and accepted his offer.
EM: After you conducted the New York Philharmonic on November 14, 1943, you became an overnight success! Impossible! Who would have imagined that? What was it like for you?
LB: I certainly didn’t! Even after I’d become famous, it was still like a dream to me, unreal. I couldn’t believe it, ME, little Lenny Bernstein was famous! It was a miracle what a hit I’d become after that one night. I went on stage that day in front of thousands of people, not expecting anything. I was a wreck inside. So nervous, I would have fainted if I hadn’t had a job to do. The entrance to the piece was very tricky. But as soon as I gave the upbeat, the orchestra came in perfectly, and I knew everything would be fine.
EM: What was your inspiration for West Side Story, one of your most popular works?
LB: Jerome Robbins approached me with the idea to do a modern version of Romeo and Juliet. I agreed. At first, we came up with the concept of a clash between two different religious families, Jews and Irish Catholics, the experience really resonated with us. But then after putting off the project for years, we realized that it wouldn’t appeal to the audience. In the end, the conflict is between two gangs, the Sharks and a group of Puerto Ricans.
EM: Fancy Free was a sensation! In its first year, it was played 200 times, a sellout every time. Then it became a Broadway show, On the Town. What did you think?
LB: Like everything else, it was a miracle. Who knew it would be such a hit? It exceeded my expectations by becoming a Broadway show. I never considered it to be a possibility.
EM: What inspired you to start a TV show?
LB: TV was just becoming popular. So I had to grasp the opportunity to educate people about the wonders of music. Except I didn’t want to give a dull, boring lecture. I needed to capture the audience’s attention. I wanted to share my passion for music in an entertaining and engaging way. For the first program, Omnibus, I taught about Beethoven’s ingenious Fifth Symphony. I had the floor of the studio painted as the music for his Fifth. As I hopped from note to note, musicians would play them.
EM: We appreciate your time and cooperation. Thank you for so thoughtfully answering our questions. From compositions such as On the Waterfront to Symphony No. 3: Kaddish. You have been an inspiration to so many. Giving the world a new appreciation and perspective on music. Thank you so much for your time. -
“The Neglected Reality: The Disproportionate Impact of Mental Health Illness on Black Women and the Failure of Healthcare Providers to Address it”
It’s supposed to be an argumentative research paper. My topic is mental health illness and the effects on black illness. My stance on it would be that doctors definitely don’t take handling black women with care in dealing with this issue and especially in childbirth