Helping others through blood donation is a form of social solidarity or social responsibility. The blood donors cite a sense of social responsibility as their reason for donating blood, and as a result, the communities value and reward this activity. The following table shows the number of blood donors in a university from 2011–2023. Develop a 3-year moving average forecast and obtain the related statistical measures using excel QM.
Author: admin
-
“Corporate Social Responsibility: The Key to Sustainable Business Practices” Introduction: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a concept that has gained significant attention in recent years, as companies are increasingly expected to go beyond their traditional profit-making goals and contribute to the well
Chapter: You choose one and link it to social responsibility
Not less than 10 and not more than 15
It includes an introduction to the topic, points related to it, an example of any company’s rights, and references -
Title: “The Battle for Internet Privacy: Balancing Personal Rights and Corporate Interests” Introduction The Internet has become an integral part of our daily lives, providing us with endless information, communication, and entertainment. However, with the increasing
ou are to write an research paper dealing with an INTERNET PRIVACY or ETHICS ISSUE that interests you, and has not been resolved through legislation, or other legal means.
You can choose to write it as a research paper on the topic itself, or a research paper with a theme of ″for or against″ the topic you choose. A ″for or against″ paper will still have research completed but will have research that gives support for, and research that gives support against your topic. In either situation the last paragraph will be your stance/opinion on the subject.
The minimum word count for the paper is one thousand (1000) words. You must include a bibliography or list of references (minimum 3 outside sources) at the end of the paper. Follow APA guidelines for your paper
Your discussion of the issue must cover:
The Internet privacy/eithics issue;
Why the issue exists;
What is being done to address the issue, and
What you think should be done to resolve the privacy issue. (This is the final paragraph only) -
Title: Alexander I and Napoleon: A Battle of Man and Disease
Alexander I: The Russians or Typhus which hurt Napoleon more?
* Research that item on the internet so you have a general idea of who or what that person, thing or event is about. The information you find and write up should include:
1. The actual event(s) that happened (or what the individual accomplished or was done to him)
2. The causes of why it (they) happened (or why he did what he did)
3. The results of what happened (or what he did).
Write this up in 2-3 pages. Pinpoint a specific focused topic that you can describe clearly in 2-3 pages.
Go to EBSCO multi-search (in the Touro Library electronic data bases section).[1] You may log in from home. Enter the key words about the event, person, or object. Specify “peer reviewed journals” and “full text articles.” Conduct a Boolean [computer] search.
1. Locate TWO articles written by three different authors that focus on this person or subject. If you have a problem finding articles broaden your search terms or consult with me.
2. Read the articles comparing the different authors’ point of view on the subject. Examine the similarities and differences. Keep this short. (one to two pages)
3. Account for their differences or agreements. (one-two pages for this section—including all the items listed below) This is the most important part of the paper!
4. Possible reasons for differences (or agreements) might be:
1. approach of the author (a political, economic, social, religious, literary or psychological perspective [See what kind of information s/he brings.])
2. where and when s/he lived and who his/her professors were (Often you can find this information on Wikipedia.)
3. the time and place in which the article was researched and written (An earlier article might not have had certain sources available, or the second author might not have had access to certain sources that the other author possessed.) [Compare the sources in the footnotes.])
4. languages each author used in conducting research (Check the footnotes. Were they in the primary languages? [If the author does not know a crucial language, that could hamper his research.])
5. thoroughness of each author’s research (What was the number [& quality] of primary and secondary sources?)
6. apparent perspectives or prejudices (liberal, conservation, communist, fascist, religious [to mention only a few)] that might have influenced the authors’ points of view
7. logical nature of the article based on the available documents (and/or earlier research) -
“Supply Chain Management Analysis and Recommendations for [Company Name]”
Just so you know, you only need to write for the topic based on the Powerpoint I uploaded. Please provide some charts or quantitative things in the writing. Here are further requirements: For each topic area the following sections are required: Current Situation, Analysis, Problem Identification, and Recommendation. The Analysis section should employ the tools taught in the textbook and the class. ▪ Tie everything to the class content including the textbook readings. Everything you say should explicitly tie to the supply chain management concepts we have studied in class and in the textbook. Do not use generic business frameworks like SWOT or PESTLE analysis. ▪ Demonstrate mastery of quantitative methods learned in the course. Alltext, 100% qualitative reports are not sufficient. ▪ Label all charts, tables, and diagrams with titles, units of measure, etc. so there is no ambiguity about what is being displayed. ▪ Include a cover page including full course information and the names of the group members, the date and the professor; Table of Contents with course info, etc.; and include page numbers on all the pages. ▪ Attribute all ideas that are not your own. Do not plagiarize. Put complete citations (footnotes) adjacent to or immediately below the related text, chart, or other content, and hyperlink web sources. Be specific enough for the reader to locate the source. A list of references at the end of a document is insufficient.
-
Coordinating Law Enforcement and Community Services: A Christian Perspective Title: Coordinating Law Enforcement and Community Services: A Christian Perspective Introduction: As a law enforcement leader in my community, it is my responsibility to ensure the safety and well-being
provide a discussion describing the steps you would take to coordinate the law enforcement response and investigations in your community, with the services and programs mentioned on the site.
What would be some specific limitations you would expect to address while coordinating your efforts and why? Integrate a Christian worldview perspective to support your discussion. -
Title: Exploring Organisational Behaviour and Structure: A Case Study Analysis “Embracing Change and Diversity: Exploring the Intersection of Automation, Ethics, and Organizational Culture” “Creating a Diverse and Inclusive Culture: The Role of Equal Opportunities for Ethnic Minority Groups in British Organizations”
Could you write 2x 750 word essays on the case studies in the files attached with the second essay for the sacond case study following directly after the first.
Please include a total of 16 references/sources from the following reading list. 8 for case study 1 and 8 for case study 2
CASE STUDY 1:
What is Organisational Behaviour?
Selznick, P. (1948). ‘Foundations of the theory of organization’, American Sociological Review, 12(11): 25–35.
Individuals – Personality and Motivation
Ibarra, H. (2015). ‘The authenticity paradox: Why feeling like a fake can be a sign of growth’, Harvard Business Review, 93(1–2): 52–59.
Moutafi, J., Furnham, A., and Crump, J. (2007). ‘Is managerial level related to personality?’, British Journal of Management, 18(3): 272–280.
Maslow, A. (1943). ‘A theory of human motivation’, Psychological Review, 50(4): 370–396.
Herzberg, F. (1966). ‘One more time how do you motivate employees?’, Harvard Business Review, 46(1): 53–62.
Deci, E.L., Olafsen, A.H., and Ryan, R.M. (2017). ‘Self-determination theory in work organizations: the state of a science’, Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4: 19–43.
Groups – Group Structure and Teamwork
Further Reading:
Bales, R.F. (1950). ‘A set of categories for the analysis of small group interaction’, American Sociological Review, 15(2): 257–263.
Gratton, L., Voigt, A., and Erickson, T.J. (2007). ‘Bridging faultlines in diverse teams’. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(4): 22–29.
Pentland, A. (2012). ‘The new science of building great teams’, Harvard Business Review, 90(4): 60–70.
Haas, M., and Mortensen, M. (2016). ‘The secrets of great teamwork’, Harvard Business Review, 94(6): 70–76.
Han, S.J., and Beyerlein, M. (2016). ‘Framing the effects of multinational cultural diversity on virtual team processes’, Small Group Research, 47(4): 351–383.
Leadership and Decision Making
Further Reading:
Tannenbaum, R. and Schmidt, W.H. (1973). ‘How to choose a leadership pattern’, Harvard Business Review, 51(3): 162–180.
Avolio, B.J., Waldman, D.A., and Yammarino, F.J. (1991). ‘Leading in the 1990s: The Four I’s of Transformational Leadership’, European Journal of Industrial Training, 15(4): 9–16.
Collins, J. (2005). ‘Level 5 leadership: the triumph of humility and fierce resolve ‘, Harvard Business Review, 83(7): 67–76.
Sutton, R.I. (2017). ‘Memo to the CEO: Are you the source of workplace dysfunction?’, The McKinsey Quarterly, 2017(4): 102–111.
Cohen, M.D., March, J.G., and Olsen, J.P. (1972). ‘A garbage can model of organizational choice’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1): 1–25.
Day, D.V. (2000). ‘Leadership development: A review in context’, Leadership Quarterly, 11(4): 581–613.
Roberts, L.M., Mayo, A., Ely, R., and Thomas, D. ‘Beating the odds: leadership lessons from senior African-American women’, Harvard Business Review, 96(2): 193–208.
CASE STUDY 2:
Elements of Structure and Work design
Further Reading:
Duncan, R.B. (1979). ‘What is the right organization structure? Decision tree analysis provides the answer’, Organizational Dynamics, 7(3): 59–80.
Chandler, A.D. (1992). ‘Organizational capabilities and the economic history of the industrial enterprise’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(3): 79–100.
Parker, S. K., Morgeson, F. P. and Johns, G., (2017). ‘One hundred years of work design research: Looking back and looking forward’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3): 403–420.
Oldham, G.R. and Hackman, J.R. (2010). ‘Commentary Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2-3), 463–479.
D’Auria, G., De Smet, A., Gagnon, C., Goran, J., Maor, D., and Steele, R. (2020). ‘Reimagining the post pandemic organisation’, McKinsey & Company [online] Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/reimagining-the-post-pandemic-organization [Accessed 30 December 2023].
Manyika, J., Chui, M., Miremadi, M., Bughin, J., George, K., Willmott, P. and Dewhurst, M. (2017). ‘A future that works: automation, employment, and productivity’, McKinsey Global Institute, New York, Y, September, https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/featured%20insights/Digital%20Disruption/Harnessing%20automation%20for%20a%20future%20that%20works/MGI-A-future-that-works-Executive-summary.ashx [Last accessed 30th December 2023].
Anyangwe, E. (2018). ‘Sexual harassment: the hidden costs for employers’, Financial Times, 14th March, https://www.ft.com/content/af64eea0-207f-11e8-8d6c-a1920d9e946f [Last accessed 30th December 2023].
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion
Further Reading:
Roberson, Q. M. (2006). ‘Disentangling the Meanings of Diversity and Inclusion in Organizations’, Group & Organization Management, 31(2): 212–236.
Farndale, E., Biron, M., Briscoe, D. R., and Raghuram, S. (2015). ‘A global perspective on diversity and inclusion in work organisations’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(6): 677–687.
Konrad, A. M. (2003). ‘Special Issue Introduction: Defining The Domain Of Workplace Diversity Scholarship’, Group & Organization Management, 28(1): 4–17. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1059601102250013
Frink, D.D., Robinson, R.K., Reithel, B., Arthur, M.M., Ammeter, A. ., Ferris, G.R., Kaplan, D.M., and Morrisette, H.S. (2003). ‘Gender Demography and Organization Performance A two-study investigation with convergence’, Group & Organization Management, 28(1): 127–147. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1059601102250025
Yang, Y. and Konrad, A. M. (2011). ‘Understanding Diversity Management Practices: Implications of Institutional Theory and Resource-Based Theory’, Group & Organization Management, 36(1): 6–38.https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1059601110390997
Technology, Learning and Ethics
Further Reading:
Davenport, T., Guha, A., Grewal, D., and Bressgott, T. (2020). ‘How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48: 24–42.
Iansiti, M., and Lakhani, K.R. (2017) ‘The truth about blockchain’, Harvard Business Review, 95(1): 118–127.
Chatterjee, S., Moody, G., Lowry, P. B., Chakraborty, S., and Hardin, A., (2015). Strategic relevance of organizational virtues enabled by information technology in organizational innovation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32: 158–196.
Sewell, G., and Phillips, N., (2010). ‘Introduction: Joan Woodward and the study of organizations’, In: Phillips, N., Sewell, G., and Griffiths, D. (eds.) Technology and Organization: Essays in Honour of Joan Woodward. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Trist, E.L., and Bamforth, K.W. (1951). ‘Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting’, Human Relations, 4(1): 3–38.
Waters, R. (2017). ‘The impact of cobots on worker’s wellbeing’, Financial Times, 13 September, https://www.ft.com/content/a0b8e562-3734-11e7-99bd-13beb0903fa3 [accessed January 2024]
Dweck, C. (2016). ‘What having a growth mindset actually means’, Harvard Business Review Online, January 13 2016, https://hbr.org/2016/01/what-having-a-growth-mindset-actually-means [accessed January 2024]
Change Management, Innovation and Organisational Culture
Further Reading:
Burnes, B. (2004). ‘Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal’, Journal of Management Studies, 41(6): 913–1056.
Kotter, J.P. (2007). ‘Leading change: why transformation efforts fail’, Harvard Business Review, 85(1): 96–103.
Errida, A., and Lotfi, B., (2021). ‘The determinants of organizational change management success: Literature review and case study’. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 13: 1–15.
Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C.K., and Rangaswami, M.R. (2009). ‘Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation’, Harvard Business Review, 87(9): 56–64.
Christensen, C.M., Raynor, M., and McDonald, R. (2015). ‘What is disruptive innovation?’, Harvard Business Review, 93(12): 44–53.
Ogbonna E. (2019). ‘The uneasy alliance of organisational culture and equal opportunities for ethnic minority groups: A British example’, Human Resource Management Journal, 29: 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12227 -
“Analyzing Data and Testing Hypotheses: A Problem-Solving Approach”
problem solving involving hypothesis testing and other calculations. questions will be attached at around 9 am and you will then have till 7 hours to complete.
-
Title: Understanding Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Its Use in Treating Mental Health Conditions
What is transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and what conditions does it treat? How TMS works? What are the risks, benefits, and side effects?
The student must answer the graded discussion with a substantive reply to the graded discussion question(s)/topic(s) posted by the course instructor by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. Two scholarly source references are required unless stated otherwise by your professor.
The student provides a substantive response to the discussion question or topic on Thursday day and posts a minimum of two additional responses to peers on another day(s). The answers to classmates must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm Eastern Time. We expect each student to participate in the discussion board in a respectful manner.
Remember that a new discussion rubric was approved by the professors, committee members, and a majority of the students. Please review the rubric before posting to ensure a maximum of points.
Here are the categories of the new discussion rubric:
Initial Post relevance to the topic of discussion, applicability, and insight. (20%)
Quality of Written Communication Appropriateness of audience and words choice is specific, purposeful, dynamic, and varied. Grammar, spelling, punctuation. (20%)
Inclusion of APNA standards essentials explored in the discussion as well as the role-specific competencies as applicable.(10%)
Rigor, currency, and relevance of the scholarly references. (Use articles that are below 5 years). (20%)
Peer & Professor Responses. The number of responses, and quality of response posts. (20%)
Timeliness of the initial post and the answers to the peers. (10%) -
“The Hidden Dangers of Genetically Modified Foods: Why We Should Say No to GMOs”
Needs to be an argumentative essay on why genetically modified foods are not good for
people, from my point of view.