Objective: In this digital age where we can make friends with people globally, it’s rare to not have a friend, co-worker, family member or acquaintance who was born and/or raised in a different country than the United States. Your assignment is to find a person in your life who is not from the United States. Associate where they are from with the appropriate chapter in the textbook. A good example would be, if you had a friend who was from Germany, you would choose Chapter 8, Europe. Then, you will write a paper based on specific guidelines using your book by interviewing your subject about their home country, and then using the book to help guide your questioning.
It won’t be a hard, but it will take you a bit of time to develop a quality piece of work. You can start on it and submit your paper at any time during the semester, but it is your final project. There will be no final comprehensive exam that encompasses the entire book/semester. This should be way more interesting than that and should really help you hone in on and become more of an expert on a certain part of the physical world. I hope it also provides you with a cool experience to visit with someone with a different cultural experience than you likely have had.
The final paper in the course is going to involve you conducting an interview to learn more about a person who originates from a different world regional geography than you do. This means, I’d prefer that you do not interview someone from the United States. That sounds quite specific yet open ended, doesn’t it? Let me help you narrow it down with specifics.
In your life, you may know someone who originates from a different country or continent, or, someone who’s roots originate from overseas (or another country on our own continent), from a culture much different from your own. The purpose of this final paper is to have a conversation with someone and allow yourself the chance to be immersed in a cultural geography experience. It could be a relative, friend, co-worker, anyone really. Report back to me what you have learned. Please ask the following questions of your gracious interviewee. These are mandatory questions. You may also add questions of your own as they arise, but the following questions are required.
1- Check out this cool blog written about how to conduct an interview. Now, I know you aren’t trying to collect a life story from someone, but you are trying to gain some insight into a person’s life.
https://blog.enwoven.com/home/2016/5/23/how-to-interview-others-to-capture-their-life-stories
2- Write a paper that is at least 7 pages long (it can be as long as you would like it to be and the cover page does not include that 5-page minimum). Double spaced. 12 point font. Arial Font. Please start the paper at the top of the page with ONLY your name and the name of the person you are interviewing. Your writing style can be conversational. You aren’t writing hard news for your local NBC station. This is supposed to be fun and informative for you and for me. Write like you would talk, but depending on who you are, don’t write like a pirate. Enjoy the process! Seven pages will go fast.
Points to consider when answering questions in the body of your paper:
1- Who are you interviewing, and how do you know them? Why did you choose them? Where are they from (be specific)? (10 points). Describe this in detail.
2- Which chapter is best associated with the person you are interviewing? Choose only one chapter, even if the person you are interviewing has extensive worldly experiences. Be clear about the chapter you choose. (10 points)
3- Choose your own unique questions to ask them based on what you learned in the chapter. These questions are of your own choosing and can relate to anything chapter based which you think could help you learn more about the person you have chosen and their culture (in general, since each chapter is basically about culture and more). Initiate at least 7 questions and list them in your paper along with the answers they provide. (10 points)
4- How do these 7 questions relate to what you read about or learned from a potential guest speaker? Pay special attention to trying to connect what you learned to the interview. Be very specific about how what your interviewee’s experience relate to the chapter WITH citation from your textbook. (20 points)
Each of these 4 points must be answered in the body of your paper. You will be graded on content as well as grammar. Please use spell check. You will not be graded on format. I don’t mind which writing format you choose, just be consistent. This is not English class. You do not need to follow APA.
This paper is worth 120 points. 10 points per point (listed above). 20 points for grammar and spelling. 50 points for quality content and effort.
Make up a person, or choose one you know, it would be fine.
Link to textbook: http://libgen.is/book/index.php?md5=A8728C4A622F0247957C3F4A1408B7CB
Author: admin
-
“Exploring Global Connections: An Interview with a Non-US Native” Connecting Theory to Practice: Insights from a Guest Speaker Interview
-
“MCQ Exam: Test Your Knowledge!”
just need the answers for mcq. paper will be uploaded 14:15 maldives time. total time will be 2hrs 15mins. deadline is 16.30 maldives time.
attached is an example file -
Title: Combating Health Insurance Fraud in Saudi Arabia: A Call to Action for Healthcare Organizations
Health insurance fraud is a problem globally, and Saudi Arabia is not immune. Assume you have been tasked with presenting this problem to your healthcare organization so employees can act appropriately when processing health insurance claims. Be sure to address: Actions that would be considered fraudulent; Key indicators that fraud is present; The impact of fraud on the medical community, health insurance companies, and Saudi Arabia; and How to report health insurance fraud and penalties for those that participate in such behavior. Your presentation should meet the following structural requirements: Be organized, using professional themes and transitions. Consists of seven slides, plus the title and reference slides. Each slide must provide detailed speaker’s notes—a minimum of 100 words. Notes must draw from and cite relevant reference materials. Provide support for your statements on the presentation slides, as well as in the speaker’s notes, with in-text citations from a minimum of four scholarly articles. Two of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures, but the others must be external. The Saudi Digital Library is a good place to find these references. Follow APA and Saudi Electronic University writing standards.
-
Title: The Impact of Autocratic Personality on Democratic Institutions
Analytic Essay. You need to write an analytic essay on autocratic, democratic, or technocratic personality, institution, or culture.
Topic: Focus on one issue in your essay. There are obviously nine possible issues to choose for your essay: Autocratic personality, democratic personality, technocratic personality; autocratic institution, democratic institution, technocratic institution; autocratic culture, democratic culture, technocratic culture.
Source: Read From Autocracy to Democracy to Technocracy: An Evolution of Human Polity(https://www.cambridgescholars.com/from-autocracy-to-democracy-to-technocracy). If you write on autocratic personality, you should read Part II completely so you can develop your ideas on it for a good essay. If you write on democratic institutions, you need to read Part III carefully. If you write on technocratic culture, you must read Part IV thoroughly.
Required Elements: Your essay must tackle these essential elements. For example, if you write on technocratic personality, you need to address (1) what automatic personality is, its main characteristics and behavioral symptoms; (2) what social factors and forces lie under autocratic personality; (3) how autocratic personality molds political leaders, influences common citizens, and shapes social atmospheres; and (4) how autocratic personality might penetrate in democracy and even technocracy while dominating autocracy.
Length: You may write your analytic essay for as long as you like. The minimum is 10 pages.
Format: Font: Times New Roman; Point: 12; Spacing: Double; Margin: one inch on each side.
Submission: You need to submit your analytic essay through Turnitin at our class site on Canvas. Essays showing a similarity rate of 15% or higher will be penalized with a deduction of 1.5 or higher points. For example, an essay identified by Turnitin as having a similarity rate of 21% will automatically lose 2.1 points. Essays showing a similarity rate of 50% or higher will be subject to the double penalties provided by the class policy on plagiarism: (a) you lose all 14 points partitioned to the essay assignment; and (b) you are penalized with a deduction of another 14 points from your earned total score. -
“The Intersection of God’s Works and the Glory of God: Reflections on the Relationship between Psychology and Christianity”
Essay: Reflection on God’s Works and The Glory of God Assignment (Choose 1 of the 2
prompts below on which to comment.)
Reflection on God’s Works
Entwistle noted that “theological reflection typically focuses more on God’s workings in the
world,” while “psychological reflection typically focuses more on the workings of God’s world.”
What implications does this have for the relationship between psychology and ChristianityThe Glory of God
Kepler saw astronomers as “priests of Almighty God” who have “the honour of standing
guard…at the door of the shrine at whose high altar Copernicus performs divine service.” How
might this sentiment apply to all of us who study the book of God’s Works? How can we heed
Kepler’s warning to “not consider the glory of our intellects, but the glory of God” in our
academic and disciplinary pursuits?
References
Entwistle, D. N. (2015). Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity: An Introduction to Worldview Issues, Philosophical Foundations, and Models of Integration. Cascade Books. -
“Challenging Injustice: The Significance of Martin Luther King Jr.’s ‘Letter from Birmingham Jail’”
Watch the video on YouTube “Better from a Birmingham jail background. And the video Martin Luther king jr.’s letter from Birmingham jail: Original copy and Stanford university
(My teacher always gives me the feedback that my essays are just “Basics.” Please be more complexed with it. Thank you. -
Title: The Role of Employee Engagement and Cultural Issues in Organizational Growth: A Case Study Analysis
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Ministry of Education
Saudi Electronic University
المملكة العربية السعودية
وزارة التعليم
الجامعة السعودية الإلكترونية
College of Administrative and Financial Sciences
Assignment 3 Business Ethics and Organization Social Responsibility (MGT 422)
Due Date:13/4/2024 @ 23:59
Course Name: Business ethics and organization social responsibility
Student’s Name:
Course Code: MGT 422
Student’s ID Number: Semester: Second
CRN:
Academic Year:2023-24-2nd For Instructor’s Use only
Instructor’s Name: Students’ Grade:
Marks Obtained/Out of 10
Level of Marks: High/Middle/Low
General Instructions – PLEASE READ THEM CAREFULLY The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated folder.
Assignments submitted through email will not be accepted.
Students are advised to make their work clear and well presented, marks may be reduced for poor presentation. This includes filling your information on the cover page.
Students must mention question number clearly in their answer.
Late submission will NOT be accepted.
Avoid plagiarism, the work should be in your own words, copying from students or other resources without proper referencing will result in ZERO marks. No exceptions. All answered must be typed using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font. No pictures containing text will be accepted and will be considered plagiarism).
Submissions without this cover page will NOT be accepted. Note: All answers should be supported with proper references.
Learning Outcomes:
No
Course Learning Outcomes (CLOs)
CLO-6
Write coherent project about a case study or actual research about ethics
The content is available for free download in knowledge resource from the SEU homepage:
Read the following article available in SDL:
Yadav, R., Gangwar, R., Arora, S., & Andres, F. (2019). Cultural Issues in Employee Engagement: Illuminate, Causes, and Significance. In N. Sharma, N. Chaudhary, & V. Singh (Eds.), Management Techniques for Employee Engagement in Contemporary Organizations (pp. 47-56). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7799-7.ch003.
https://0y11jlx92-y-https-www-igi–global-com.seu…. Answer the following questions:
Discuss the role of employee engagement in the growth of organization as argued by the author. (Not less than 400 words) 3 Marks.
Explain the significance of cultural issues in Employee engagement addressed by the author. (not less than 400 words) 3 Marks.
According to the author, why do cultural issues occur in employee engagement? Explain the techniques to improve employee engagement. (not less than 500 words) 4 Marks. -
“Project Foundation: Process Inventory, Scope Definition, and Final Summary”
Hello. You have completed the previous assignment (YOUR PREVIOUS WORK) and prepared some foundation. Have a look at the TASK document and complete process inventory excel file and scope definition word file documents by using YOUR PREVIOUS WORK and the lecture slides. I have also uploaded a file for you to have a look and see what it is like in a finished project to have an idea (Final Summary Example). Let me know if you need anything. There is no need to use any references
-
Exploring “The Hanging Stranger”: A Comprehensive Analysis through Story Analysis and Reader Response Techniques
Utilizing Techniques of Story Analysis and Reader Response for a Comprehensive Exploration
of “The Hanging Stranger” -
Recognizing the Difference between Science and Pseudoscience: Developing Competency in Research Reading
Your textbook discusses the importance of recognizing the difference between science and pseudoscience. Read the ″Cost of Neglect 1.1: Science and Pseudoscience″ section of chapter 1.
Pseudoscience can appear convincing, but you can learn to recognize it. To identify pseudoscience, ask three questions:
What is the nature of the evidence for the claims?
In what forms is the evidence reported?
What are the affiliations of the supposed scientists?
After reading the above, answer the following question:
What can you do when becoming a competent reader of research to recognize the difference between pseudoscience and science?
Class book: Graziano, A. M., & Raulin, M. L. (2012). Research methods: A process of Inquiry. Pearson.