Read Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc. to page 69 only(the majority opinion) https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/15-3775/15-3775-2018-02-26.html
Brief Zarda. For the Rationale/Reasoning section, answer the following questions. Address each question individually:
1. How does the Fifth Circuit characterize Title VII’s purpose?
2. How does the Court interpret “Because of sex”?
3. What is the “But for” an employee’s sex test?
4. Summarize the Court’s discussion of “Gender Stereotyping.”
5. What is Associational Discrimination, according to the Court?
6. What does the Court say about legislative developments after Title VII?
Finally, included a brief summary of the rationale for the court’s decision, based on the answers you have provided to 1-6.
Your grade will be based on the thoroughness of your answers. Be sure to cite to specific statements made by the Court and note how the Court relies on precedents to support its decision.
Use YOUR OWN words. Do not just cut and paste from the Court’s opinion. Show me that you understood the case.
Do NOT use outside resources (Wikipedia, case brief sites, etc.)
Author: admin
-
Title: Briefing Zarda v. Altitude Express, Inc.: Analyzing the Fifth Circuit’s Interpretation of Title VII’s Purpose and Protections Against Discrimination Based on Sex
-
“Uncovering the Ethical Dilemmas in Modern Society”
using the rough draft provided follow the directions in the ethics paper assignment with examples file to write an essay
-
Mitigating Risks in the Global Supply Chain 1. The sources of risks faced by the global supply chain include natural disasters, geopolitical conflicts, economic instability, supplier failures, transportation disruptions, cyber attacks, and pandemics. These risks can lead
Please answer the following questions after reviewing the reading and lessons for Week 6.
1. What are the sources of risks faced by the global supply chain?
2. How can companies mitigate these risks?
Use video
UENI vs Others | Slam Dunk Your Website – Massive Website Savings This Week – Up To 67% Off (youtube.com) -
“Comparing Cultural Anthropology and Linguistics: Insights into Methodology and Approach” Title: “Exploring Methodology and Approach in Cultural Anthropology and Linguistics: A Comparative Analysis”
in total there are four different slides, you take two to compare and write about 110 words for one comparison. 220 words for all. ( the first one will be the friends “MINE” and marriage “others”, the second comparison is Toledo”mine ” and semana Santa “others”)
1-the lingustic assignment , you have the instrcution and the book uploaded as well for helping with the topic and approach.
choose the one cultural anthropolgy slides and compare toChoose one project of your classmates of Cultural Anthropology and compare it to Choose one project of your classmates of Cultural Anthropology and compare it to
yours: argue why is for you important or revealing in cultural terms. Must consider:
methodology, topic, approach. About 5 lines (110 words).
2-the field trip assignment , also instrcution and book included. choose the lingustic slides and compare to yours.
choose the one cultural anthropolgy slides and compare toChooset one project of your classmates of Linguistics and compare it to yours: argue
argue why is for you important or revealing in sociolinguistic terms. Must consider:
methodology, topics, approach. About 5 lines (110 words). -
Title: “The Vital Role of Community Colleges in Adult Education: A Comprehensive Analysis”
This is a 10 page adult education research paper on the importance of community colleges. The 10 pages are not including the needed reference page and the needed cover page.
There must be 10 peer reviewed professional articles sited in APA format. -
“Education Disparities and Deprivation: A Comparative Analysis of the UK, Italy, and Egypt”
10,000 words dissertation about education system in the UK and children from deprived bacground.
comparative analysis about education between Italy,Egypt and UK.
Use of 50 academic sources only books, peer reviewed journals, online academic websites.
Harvard reference, in text citations and bibliography. no plagiarism or similarity -
“Presenting My Argument Research Paper: From Prewriting to Final Product” Prewriting Assignments: 1. Brainstorming: Before beginning my research paper, I took the time to brainstorm ideas and potential arguments related to my chosen topic.
Write a narration for me to present. Make prewriting assigment that go with my essay that i will insert. The feedback it asks for make examples from a friend that read the essay.
Present your finished Argument Research Paper to the viewer. Do not read the paper as part of your presentation. Instead, explain to the viewer how you completed the research paper.
Introduce your research topic and why you chose the topic. Present the argumentative thesis that you developed about the topic.
Highlight sections of the paper that you are particularly proud of and explain why you think they work well.
Highlight sections of the paper that you think need more work or attention and explain why they need improvement. (Note: ALL written work needs improvement. Don’t pretend that everything is perfect here in hopes of boosting your final paper grade!)
Show the viewer the specific sections of your sources that you used in the Argument Research Paper. Explain why you chose those sections and ignored other parts of the sources. (Have your sources open in separate tabs before you begin the video to streamline this process.)
Show the viewer work from your prewriting assignments that helped you to create the final paper. Explain how you used feedback from those assignments in the final paper. (Have your completed prewriting assignments open in separate tabs before you begin the video to streamline this process.)
Briefly evaluate and explain how you worked to develop counterargument and refutation to strengthen your argument. Show the counterargument and refutation in your research paper.
Conclude your recording with final thoughts about your successes and challenges with the research paper. Comment on why learning these skills has been important and how they will play a role in your future academic life and your future goals. -
“Exploring the Science of Addiction Treatment and Recovery”
https://nida.nih.gov/publications/drugs-brains-behavior-science-addiction/treatment-recovery
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10766371/ -
“The Complexities of War: Exploring Historical and Social Themes in Literature”
war can be historical, and it can be social.
Examples of both include:
A historical war (World War I and II, and the potentiality of World War III)
A “civil war” (North v. South and regionalism)
A culture war (my religion, beliefs, or politicians are correct and yours are not)
Discrimination (race and/or gender)
The people (democracy) v. the State (the republic)
Ideological (a differing value system, such as placing importance on animal life)
Person v. society (who are you? And how does the world influence that?)
Person v. self (internal struggles with opposing goals or viewpoints within the person
You will select a text and argue how the text presents a war.
Your essay will require careful analysis of the evidence in the text.
Conclude the essay with your viewpoint of what can learned from reading the text.
Requirements:
1. Interpret how the text is a war story. What “war”? And how is it presented?
Example of an inappropriate thesis because it’s too factual: Wilfred Owen’s poem,
“Dulce et Decorum Est,” is about World War I. Okay, so what? What does Owen have to
say about World War I?
2. Incorporate and cite direct quotes
3. Explain all quoted material —no dropped quotes.
4. Include a Works Cited page
5. At least two, credible sources should be incorporated for social or historical context (you will need some help understanding some of the history, so research and cite it).
6. Five pages at the minimum (about 2,500 words) with MLA formatting (this is a 200-level college course, so the minimum must be met). Pages will be counted
Clarifications: Due to the rise of AI generators and other means of academic dishonesty, the following issues result in an automatic F for the paper:
-No in-text citations from the literature
-No in-text citations for researched material
-No Works Cited page
-Does not meet the page or word count
-Recycles content from the first paper
“A” papers are marked by:
-An arguable thesis (is debatable)
-Clear explanations of supporting ideas for the thesis statement (reasoning “why?”)
-Well-selected evidence (direct quotes)
-Thoroughly analyzed evidence (discussed quotes)
-Credible sources (written by authorities in the field)
-Ethical incorporation of source material (cited)
write proffessionally but still like you are a college student -
Title: Best Practices for Addressing the Opioid Epidemic in Health Care
For this assessment, research best practices related to a current health care problem. Your selected problem or issue will be utilized again in Assessment 4. To explore your chosen topic, you should use the first two steps of the Socratic Problem-Solving Approach to aid your critical thinking.
Select one of the health care problems or issues presented in the Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills. Write a brief overview of the selected health care problem or issue. In your overview:
Summarize the health care problem or issue.
Describe the professional relevance of this topic.
Describe any professional experience you have with this topic.
Identify peer-reviewed articles relevant to this health care issue or problem.
Conduct a search for scholarly or academic peer-reviewed literature related to the topic and describe the criteria you used to search for articles, including the names of the databases you used. You will select four current scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles published during the past 3–5 years that relate to your topic.
Use keywords related to the health care problem or issue you are researching to select relevant articles.
Assess the credibility and explain relevance of the information sources you find.
Determine if the source is from an academic peer-reviewed journal.
Determine if the publication is current.
Determine if information in the academic peer-reviewed journal article is still relevant.
Analyze academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format. Provide a rationale for inclusion of each selected article. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of references along with key information about each one. The detail about the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about the selected topic. In your annotated bibliography:
Identify the purpose of the article.
Summarize the information.
Provide rationale for inclusion of each article.
Include the conclusions and findings of the article.
Write your annotated bibliography in a paragraph form. The annotated bibliography should be approximately 150 words (1–3 paragraphs) in length.
List the full reference for the source in APA format (author, date, title, publisher, et cetera) and use APA format for the annotated bibliography.
Make sure the references are listed in alphabetical order, are double-spaced, and use hanging indents.
Summarize what you have learned while developing an annotated bibliography.
Summarize what you learned from your research in a separate paragraph or two at the end of the paper.
List the main points you learned from your research.
Summarize the main contributions of the sources you chose and how they enhanced your knowledge about the topic.