Brisk Writers

Author: admin

  • “Analyzing the Role of Change Agents in Successful Safety Initiatives: A Critical Review of an Article on Change Management in the Workplace” Premise: The article “Why Change Initiatives Fail: The Number One Reason” by Jeanne Bradford discusses

    Write an article critique in which you accomplish the following:
    Accurately identify the premise of the article.
    Analyze the author’s points in support of the premise.
    Offer your own opinions as you critically evaluate the merit of the article using strong arguments and evidence. How does the article support this unit’s concepts?
    Your analysis and evaluation should include of the following items:
    an evaluation of a change agent (e.g., definition, purpose, function);
    a summary of the requirements and responsibilities of a safety professional in the role of change agent; and
    your analysis and recommended strategies for a safety professional to remedy the author’s number one listed reason change initiatives fail.
    You are encouraged to offer your opinion and experience. Although your opinion or belief may be based on experience and not necessarily a truth claim, you should always provide a citation and reference that supports your idea or view as a safety professional. 
    Your article critique must be at least two pages. The title page (if used), or any reference pages do not count toward the page requirement. You must use at least two sources, other than the original article, to support your article critique. All sources used must have citations and references properly formatted in APA Style. APA formatting of the assignment is otherwise not required.
    The following resources can assist you with this assignment:
    For help on searching the CSU Online Library databases, view the Searching Library Databases video. 
    The CSU Success Center Article Critique Example can assist you with the development of an article critique.

  • “The Necessity of International Bans on Chemical Weapons: A Moral Imperative for Global Security”

    write an argumentative essay in the topic of politics specifically international bans on chemical weapons. requirements are attached below. 3 pages only. everything needs to be brief (citations)

  • 1. What is the purpose of clarifying paper details before starting to work on an order? Clarifying paper details before starting to work on an order ensures that the writer fully understands the requirements and expectations of the assignment. This helps to avoid any

    Answer each question in proper sentences, and provide MLA citations to references
    Important Info
    The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
    Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
    Type of paper and subject
    Number of sources and formatting style
    Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

  • Evaluating the Credibility and Usefulness of a Source for an Argument “Evaluating Source Credibility and Usefulness: A Comprehensive Analysis” “Improving Writing Skills: Overcoming Frequent Errors in Grammar, Punctuation, and Formatting”

    ASSIGNMENT: For this essay, you will select one of the sources that you intend to support your argument. Which source you choose is up to you; however, it should be substantial enough that you will be able to talk about it at length, and intricate enough that it will keep you (and your reader) interested.
    The introduction of this paper will involve introducing the source: After you recap your research paper’s central argument argument, provide the author, the title, and the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)
    You will then go on to evaluate the source on two levels:
    Credibility (at least one full paragraph): Using the information in this unit as a guide, evaluate the source’s authenticity and reliability. Look at all the information that you can find about the source to establish the author’s (or sponsor’s) trustworthiness.
    Usefulness (at least one full paragraph): Using a combination of summary and analysis, examine the source on a critical level. Determine what the source’s purpose (thesis) is, and how it arrives at that goal. Examine its value to you and the project you are working on. How will it help you prove your own points? How might it come in handy to back up a claim (or address a counter-claim)?
    Finally, you will include a conclusion which shows your final assessments on both counts.
    Sample Touchstone
    In order to foster learning and growth, all work you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any plagiarized or recycled work will result in a Plagiarism Detected alert. Review Touchstones: Academic Integrity Guidelines for more about plagiarism and the Plagiarism Detected alert. For guidance on the use of generative AI technology, review Ethical Standards and Appropriate Use of AI.
    A. Assignment Guidelines
    DIRECTIONS: Refer to the list below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines. Refer to the Sample Touchstone for additional guidance on structure, formatting, and citation.
    1. Source IdentificationThe introduction of this paper will be introducing the source:
    ❒ Have you recapped your research paper’s central argument?❒ Have you provided the author’s name?❒ Have you provided the source title?❒ Have you provided the context (where you found the source, where it was originally published, who sponsored it, etc.)?❒ Have you ended the introduction with a thesis statement that sums up your evaluation of the source’s credibility and usefulness?2. Source Evaluation❒ Have you provided an evaluation on the source’s credibility in at least one full paragraph?❒ Have you used specific, accurate page/paragraph-numbered examples from the source to illustrate your evaluation on credibility?❒ Have you provided a judgment on the source’s usefulness in at least one full paragraph?❒ Have you used at least two specific quotations (cited with accurate page/paragraph-numbers) from the source to illustrate your evaluation of its usefulness?❒ Did you include a reference list with complete source data such as author(s)’ name(s), date of publication, title, publication outlet or journal, an URL address (if available)?3. Reflection❒ Have you answered all reflection questions including specific and concrete examples that provide thoughtful insight in all responses?
    ❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?B. Reflection Questions
    DIRECTIONS: Below your assignment, include answers to all of the following reflection questions.
    What types of questions did you ask yourself when evaluating the credibility and usefulness of your source? (2-3 sentences)
    How do you feel this evaluation practice will help you as you continue to move through the research process? (2-3 sentences)
    C. Rubric
    Advanced (100%)Proficient (85%)Acceptable (75%)Needs Improvement (50%)Non-Performance (0%)
    Thesis Statement
    Provide a clear thesis statement with sufficient support. (20%)The thesis statement consists of an original observation that is clear, focused, and well-supported.The thesis statement consists of an original observation that is adequately supported.The thesis statement consists of an identifiable main idea that is generally supported.The thesis statement consists of an identifiable main idea, but it is not well supported or does not match most of essay’s content.The thesis statement is missing or completely unsupported.
    Evidence and Analysis
    Evaluate a single source based on the characteristics of credibility and usefulness. (40%)
    The analysis includes specific and accurate examples from a correctly identified source as support; claims for credibility and usefulness are fully developed.The analysis includes accurate examples from the a correctly identified source as support; claims for credibility and usefulness are adequately developed.The analysis includes some accurate examples from a correctly identified source, though they are potentially vague or abstract; claims for credibility and usefulness are established but need further development.The analysis includes one or two accurate examples from a correctly identified source, but they are of a vague, abstract nature; claims for either credibility or usefulness are missing.The analysis includes no examples or inaccurate examples for support, the source is not correctly identified, and/or there are no established claims for either credibility or usefulness.
    Organization
    Exhibit competent organizational writing techniques. (10%)
    Presents all of the required components of a source evaluation essay, including an engaging introduction with background information and a clear thesis, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s credibility, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s usefulness, and a conclusion with a concluding statement.Presents all of the required components of a source evaluation essay, including an introduction with background information and a clear thesis, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s credibility, a body paragraph or paragraphs addressing the source’s usefulness, and a conclusion with a concluding statement.Presents nearly all of the required components of a source evaluation essay; however, one component is missing.Presents most of the required components of a source evaluation essay, but is lacking two components; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are sometimes unclear and the reader may have difficulty following the progression of the essay.Lacks several or all of the components of a source evaluation essay; sequences ideas and paragraphs such that the connections between ideas (within and between paragraphs) are often unclear and the reader has difficulty following the progression of the essay.
    Style
    Establish a consistent, informative tone and make thoughtful stylistic choices. (10%)
    Demonstrates thoughtful and effective word choices, avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a wide variety of sentence structures.Demonstrates effective word choices, primarily avoids redundancy and imprecise language, and uses a variety of sentence structures.Demonstrates generally effective style choices, but may include occasional redundancies, imprecise language, poor word choice, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Frequently includes poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.Consistently demonstrates poor word choices, redundancies, imprecise language, and/or repetitive sentence structures.
    Conventions
    Follow conventions for standard written English. (10%)
    There are only a few, if any, negligible errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are occasional minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are some significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are frequent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.There are consistent significant errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, capitalization, formatting, and usage.
    Reflection
    Answer reflection questions thoroughly and thoughtfully. (10%)
    Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; consistently includes specific and concrete examples that provide thoughtful insight, following or exceeding response length guidelines.Demonstrates thoughtful reflection; includes multiple specific and concrete examples that provide thoughtful insight, following response length guidelines.Primarily demonstrates thoughtful reflection, but some responses are lacking in detail or insight; primarily follows response length guidelines.Shows limited reflection; the majority of responses are lacking in detail or insight, with some questions left unanswered or falling short of response length guidelines.No reflection responses are present.
    D. Requirements
    The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
    Composition must be 2-3 pages (approximately 500-750 words).
    Double-space the composition and use one-inch margins.
    Use a readable 12-point font.
    All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
    Composition must be original and written for this assignment.
    Use of generative chatbot artificial intelligence tools (ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Bard) in place of original writing is strictly prohibited for this assignment.
    Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
    Submission must include your name, the name of the course, the date, and the title of your composition.
    Include all of the assignment components in a single file.Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.
    E. Additional Resources
    The following resources will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment:
    Purdue Online Writing Lab’s APA Formatting and Style GuideThis site includes a comprehensive overview of APA style, as well as individual pages with guidelines for specific citation types.
    Frequently Asked Questions About APA StyleThis page on the official APA website addresses common questions related to APA formatting. The “References,” “Punctuation,” and “Grammar and Writing Style” sections will be the most useful to your work in this course.
    APA Style: Quick Answers—ReferencesThis page on the official APA Style website provides numerous examples of reference list formatting for various source types.

  • Border Searches: Necessary or Invasive? Border searches refer to the examination and inspection of individuals, their belongings, and vehicles at the borders of a country. These searches are governed by the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which protects against unreasonable searches

    Criminal procure class 
    Week 9 Assignment Dropbox
    Assignment Content
    This week you learn about border searches. Please briefly explain the law in this area and then take a position as to whether you are in favor or against the law as it currently exists. (Remember to support your position with reasons and / or examples and to always cite to the textbook with page numbers. )

  • “Analyzing and Recommending Changes to an Organization’s Strategy and Structure: A Comprehensive Presentation to the Board” “SWOT Analysis and Strategic Recommendations for [Organization Name]” Slide 1: Introduction – Brief overview of the organization – Purpose of the presentation – Agenda for the presentation Slide 2: External Threats – Competition from other Organization Analysis Presentation “Strategic Recommendations for Organizational Success” Title: The Importance of Diversity and Inclusion in the Workplace

    SCENARIO: Select an organization you are familiar with or have worked for (currently or in the past). You are tasked with analyzing the organization both internally and externally using some of the tools and frameworks you have learned in this course. You are also tasked with recommending changes to the organization’s strategy and structure, in addition to considering associated ethical implications. This assignment requires you to apply SWOT analysis, PESTEL analysis, Porter’s Five Forces of Industry Analysis, Porter’s Generic Strategies, and organization design concepts related to strategy-structure fit. You will prepare a slide deck containing your analysis and recommendations that could be presented to the organization’s Board.
    ASSIGNMENT: Your presentation will be 11-14 slides long, not including the title and references slides. It must include the following slides:
    Title
    Executive Summary
    Organization Background
    Internal Strengths
    Internal Weaknesses
    External Opportunities
    External Threats
    Macro Environment Analysis: PESTEL
    Micro Industry Analysis: Porter’s Five Forces
    Generic Strategy Recommendations
    Organization Design Recommendations
    Ethical Considerations
    References
    If you’ve never used a presentation tool like PowerPoint or Google Slides before, don’t worry! The assignment template below will help you create slides for a basic slide presentation. Then you’ll be able to practice using the presentation technology as you put the finishing touches on your presentation.
    Touchstone 4 Template
    Touchstone 4 Sample
    Before you get started, let’s look at how you’ll be building the presentation, step by step
    A. Directions
    Step 1: Choose an Organization
    Select an organization that you are familiar with.
    The most successful learners select an organization that is a public company with readily available information to meet the analysis requirements of the rubric. These successful learners do not rely solely on their personal knowledge but instead use evidence from references to support points in the touchstone.
    Learners that struggle with this touchstone are those who select an organization that is small, hyper-local, non-profit, or governmental; this includes municipalities or the company they work for. We suggest you avoid organizations in these categories.
    Organizations that should NOT be used include:
    Amazon
    Amnesty International
    US Bank
    Walmart
    Tesla
    Step 2: Create Presentation Slides
    Use a presentation tool like PowerPoint or Google Slides to outline and organize your presentation. Your presentation must include the following:
    SlideComponent
    Title SlideYour title slide will be the first slide and should include your name, the date, and the name of the organization you selected.
    Executive SummaryAn executive summary should include the main points of your presentation in 1-2 slides (no more than 2). It should also include your recommendations in 1-3 bullet points. As a general rule, it is usually best (and easiest) to write the executive summary last—after the rest of your presentation is completed.
    Organization BackgroundThe organization background should be brief—no more than 1-2 slides. It should include a brief history of the organization, in addition to the major products or services offered and the markets that are served. Other possible categories include the founding date, mission statement, annual profits, sales regions, etc.
    Internal StrengthsUsing what you have learned about SWOT analysis, identify 4-6 strengths internally within the organization. You may have to make some inferences based on what you know or perceive about the organization.
    Internal WeaknessesUsing what you have learned about SWOT analysis, identify 4-6 weaknesses internally within the organization. You may have to make some inferences based on what you know or perceive about the organization.
    External OpportunitiesUsing what you have learned about SWOT analysis, list 4-6 opportunities facing the organization externally. Opportunities and threats are generally easier to identify than internal strengths and weaknesses, and are typically shared across the same industry.
    External ThreatsUsing what you have learned about SWOT analysis, list 4-6 threats facing the organization externally. Opportunities and threats are generally easier to identify than internal strengths and weaknesses, and are typically shared across the same industry.
    Macro Environment Analysis: PESTELApplying the PESTEL framework to the organization, identify 1-3 factors for each of the following: Political Factors, Economic Factors, Sociocultural Factors, Technological Factors, Environmental Factors, Legal Factors.
    Micro Industry Analysis: Porter’s Five ForcesAnalyze the industry the organization competes in by applying what you have learned about Porter’s Five Forces of industry analysis. You should list 2-3 observations for each of the following factors: Threat of New Entrants, Threat of Substitutes, Supplier Power, Buyer Power, and Industry Rivalry.
    Generic Strategy RecommendationsGiven what you have learned from your internal and external analysis of the organization, are they pursuing the right strategy? If so, why? If not, what might you recommend? Is the recommended (or current) strategy the right “fit” for the environment in which the organization competes? Be sure to select one of Porter’s three generic strategies and provide your rationale: Cost Leadership, Differentiation, or Focus.
    Organization Design RecommendationsIs the organization optimally designed (structured) for either your recommended or their current strategy? For example, if they are pursuing a Cost Leadership strategy, do they have a low-cost operating model? The objective here is to determine and demonstrate the degree of “fit” between strategy and structure.
    Ethical ConsiderationsWhat are some of the ethical considerations for your recommended (or current) strategy? Is the organization positioned for long-term sustainability? Are there issues which may ultimately affect the organization’s ability to attract and retain talented employees or maintain the credibility of their brand? Are there potential ethical dilemmas in executing any recommended changes? The need to potentially layoff thousands of workers or stop paying for benefits such as healthcare to lower operating expenses, for example?
    ReferencesThis touchstone requires you to use at least four sources, including the course tutorials. Ideas for outside sources include (but are not limited to) organization websites, annual reports, or news articles from reputable magazines or newspapers. Following APA formatting, your sources should appear in alphabetical order.
    Step 3: Add Speaker Notes
    For this assignment, you are not actually giving a presentation, but rather just preparing a slide deck that summarizes your findings and recommendations.
    An important step in the preparation of a speech is writing speaker notes. Speaker notes are notes added to a slide presentation as a reference for the presenter and can be found below each slide. For this touchstone, add your speaker notes to explain your analysis using information from your sources. If you were giving an oral presentation, these notes wouldn’t be visible to your audience when you’re in Presenter View. But you would be able to see them, and they would guide you through your presentation.
    Your speaker notes will be used to evaluate your project, so make sure you write in complete sentences and pay attention to spelling and grammar. Also, make sure you’re citing the information from your sources using in-text citations in APA style. These citations should include the author’s last name and the year of publication for the source, for example, (Mitchell, 2014).
    Most presentation software will automatically display a field for speaker notes. If using Keynote, you can access the speaker notes by clicking on View, then Show Presenter Notes.
    Step 4: Submit Presentation
    Once you have completed your slides and corresponding speaker notes, it is time to submit your presentation. If you are using PowerPoint, you simply need to save your presentation and upload this file to Sophia. If you are using another slide presentation technology, download the slide deck as a Microsoft PowerPoint (.pptx) and upload this version to Sophia.
    B. Rubric
    Advanced (100%)Proficient (85%)Acceptable (75%)Needs Improvement (50%)Non-Performance (0%)
    Depth and Comprehensiveness of Organization Background
    A researched discussion of the organization’s history and background is provided. (10%)Background slide(s) demonstrate in-depth knowledge of the organization’s history, major products or services, and markets, and reference relevant external sources.Background slide(s) demonstrate ample knowledge of the organization’s history, major products or services, and markets, and reference relevant external sources.Background slide(s) demonstrate basic knowledge of the organization’s history, major products or services, and markets, and reference relevant external sources.Background slide(s) demonstrate some knowledge of the organization’s history, major products or services, and markets, but may be unclear, confusing, or make no reference to external sources.Background slide is missing, or so little work has been done that no credit may be given.
    Application of SWOT Framework
    A SWOT analysis of the organization is conducted. (17%)
    At least 4 strengths, weaknesses, threats, and opportunities are each identified. SWOT analysis is specific and evidence-based (makes reference to sources).At least 3 of each factor are identified at the advanced level. Or, at least 4 of each are identified but analysis is less specific and may not be evidence-based.At least 3 of each factor are identified, but analysis is vague and may not be evidence-based.At least 2 of each factor are identified, but analysis is vague and may not be evidence-based.Few or no strengths, weaknesses, threats, or opportunities are identified, or so little work has been done that no credit may be given.
    Application of PESTEL Framework
    A macro environmental analysis of the organization is conducted. (17%)
    At least 2 macro environmental factors for each PESTEL category are identified. Analysis demonstrates a thorough understanding of the PESTEL framework and the macro environment of the organization.At least 1 macro environmental factor for each PESTEL category is identified. Analysis demonstrates a moderate understanding of the PESTEL framework and the macro environment of the organization.Macro environmental factors for some, but not all, PESTEL categories are identified. Analysis demonstrates a limited understanding of the PESTEL framework and the macro environment of the organization.Macro environmental factors for some, but not all, PESTEL categories are identified. Analysis demonstrates confusion about the PESTEL framework and the macro environment of the organization.Few or no macro environmental factors are identified, or so little work has been done that no credit may be given.
    Application of Porter’s Five Forces Framework
    A micro environmental analysis of the organization is conducted. (17%)
    At least 2-3 observations for each of Porter’s Five Forces are made. Observations demonstrate a thorough understanding of Porter’s Five Forces and the micro environment of the organization.At least 2-3 observations for each of Porter’s Five Forces are made. Observations demonstrate a moderate understanding of Porter’s Five Forces and the micro environment of the organization.At least 1 observation for each of Porter’s Five Forces is made. Observations demonstrate a limited understanding of Porter’s Five Forces and the micro environment of the organization.Micro environmental observations for some, but not all, of Porter’s Five Forces are made. Observations demonstrate confusion about Porter’s Five Forces and the micro environment of the organization.Few or no micro environmental observations are made, or so little work has been done that no credit may be given.
    Strategy Recommendations
    Strategy recommendations are made and supported with evidence. (17%)
    Organization’s current strategy is identified and defended, or one of Porter’s three generic strategies is recommended with rationale. Strategy recommendations are highly specific and supported by SWOT and environmental analyses.Organization’s current strategy is identified and defended, or one of Porter’s three generic strategies is recommended with rationale. Strategy recommendations are moderately specific and supported by SWOT and environmental analyses.Organization’s current strategy is identified and defended, or one of Porter’s three generic strategies is recommended. Strategy recommendations are somewhat vague or unsupported by SWOT and environmental analyses.Organization’s current strategy is identified and defended, or one of Porter’s three generic strategies is recommended. Strategy recommendations may be very unclear or unsupported by SWOT and environmental analyses.No strategy recommendations are made, or so little work has been done that no credit may be given.
    Organization Design Recommendations
    Organization design recommendations are made and supported with evidence. (10%)
    Analysis of “fit” between the current organizational structure and strategy is comprehensive, and any recommendations for or against design changes are explained with evidence.Analysis of “fit” between the current organizational structure and strategy is present but abbreviated. Recommendations for or against design changes are explained with evidence.Analysis of “fit” between the current organizational structure and strategy is present but abbreviated. Recommendations for or against design changes may be unclear or unexplained.Analysis of “fit” between the current organizational structure and strategy may be missing. Recommendations for or against design changes may be unclear or unexplained.Organizational structure is not considered, or so little work has been done that no credit may be given.
    Ethical Considerations
    Ethical considerations for strategy recommendations are analyzed. (6%)
    Analysis of ethical considerations for current or recommended organizational strategy is relevant and insightful. Awareness of issues related to business ethics is strong.Analysis of ethical considerations for current or recommended organizational strategy is present but less well-developed. Awareness of issues related to business ethics is moderate.Analysis of ethical considerations for current or recommended organizational strategy is present but limited. Awareness of issues related to business ethics is somewhat weak.Analysis of ethical considerations for current or recommended organizational strategy is present but unclear or irrelevant to strategy. Awareness of issues related to business ethics is very weak.Ethical considerations are not analyzed, or so little work has been done that no credit may be given.
    Formatting and Mechanics
    Conventions for standard written English are followed and sources are included. (6%)
    Presentation is polished and professional, and contains one or no grammar, spelling, or formatting errors. At least four sources are provided in the reference slide.Presentation is mostly professional, but may contain a few grammar, spelling, or formatting errors. Three sources are provided in the reference slide.Frequent grammar, spelling, or formatting errors detract from the overall professionalism of the presentation. Two sources are provided in the reference slide.Presentation is unprofessional and/or contains a large number of grammar, spelling, or formatting errors. One source is provided in the reference slide.Presentation is unreadable, or so little work has been done that no credit may be given. No sources are provided in the reference slide.
    C. Requirements
    The following requirements must be met for your submission:
    All content must be appropriate for an academic context.
    Composition must be original and written for this assignment.
    Reference slide must include at least four sources.
    Presentation must include speaker notes for every slide.
    Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
    Submission must include your name and the date.
    File format must be .pptx.

  • “The Conflicting Financial Values of Public and Private Hospitals in the US Healthcare System”

     Public and private hospitals jointly serve healthcare needs in the United States, but each entity has its own set of values, accountability, funding, and delivery models, which may often be conflicting in nature. One area of such conflict is related to financial values. For example, whereas public hospitals work on the principle of service, private hospitals mostly work on the principle of making a profit. Such conflicting financial values often have an impact on other stakeholders, the healthcare system, and financial decisions related to health policies and laws.
    In your initial post, describe the roles of public and private hospitals in healthcare and include the following:
    Identify three conflicting financial values of public hospitals (government hospitals) and private hospitals (for-profit and nonprofit).
    Describe how values influence the financial models of public and private hospitals.
    Compare the financial values of public and private hospitals and how these values affect health policies and laws.
    Reading: Essentials of Health Policy and Law, Chapter 9 
    Textbook link:https://bncvirtual.com/vb_econtent.php?ACTION=econtent&FVENCKEY=AD9EE8D798DCAFC7E76B5FB7C978DD86&j=43766531&sfmc_sub=1597096465&l=23329524_HTML&u=695880241&mid=524003857&jb=40753&utm_term=10242022&utm_source=transactional&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Direct_Ebooks

  • Title: The Impact of Criminal Justice Research on Correctional Policies: A Case Study of Rehabilitation Programs in Prisons Introduction: Criminal justice research plays a crucial role in shaping correctional policies, procedures, and practices. With the evolution of correction

    How has criminal justice research impacted corrections policy, procedure, or practice? Discuss a specific example.

  • “The Struggle for Universal Freedom: Examining African American Political Participation and the Youth Vote in America”

    Students are required to write a 5 page reaction paper on American Politics: The African American Quest for Universal Freedom or Is Voting for Young People by Martin Wattenbergy Walton and Hanes.

  • Title: Implementing AI and AIR in Three New Business Proposals for Company X

    Please address the following questions for Part 2: 
    Continue with the company you chose and wrote about in Part 1.
    What are three new business proposals/options to consider for your identified company? 
    What type of AI or AIR would you suggest for each of these three business options?
    Include at least three specific examples illustrating how each proposal and AI or AIR would be used and  benefit the company.
    Did you find these applications in use in any other companies? If any issues, did they resolve them in the other company? How did they resolve? 
    Explain how each of your suggestions could be successful for your company.
    Prepare your narrative response in APA format the same as Part 1, using headings, following APA Sample Paper. This is your draft to be part of your final Week 7 Part 3 Project.