Author: admin

  • “Protecting PHI in the Age of Telehealth: Best Practices and Risks to Consider” “Interprofessional Staff Update: Protecting Patient Data on Social Media” Interprofessional Staff Update: Protecting Patient Data on Social Media Introduction: In today’s digital age, social media has become an integral part of our personal and professional lives. While

    PLEASE USE CORRECT APA FORMAT (grade will be effected if APA format is incorrect)
    PLEASE FOLLOW THE GRADING RUBRIC AS BRST YOU CAN TO ENSURE THE BEST GRADE! THANK YOU SO MUCH! PLEASE READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS LISTED BELOW VERY CAREFULLY AND FOLLOW EACH ONE!
    TOPIC CHOSEN: TELEHEALTH SERVICES
    First, select one of the health care settings described in the following resource:
    Assessment 02 Supplement: Protected Health Information [PDF] Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Protected Health Information [PDF]
    As a nurse in this setting, you are asked to create the content for a staff update containing a maximum of two content pages that address one or more of these topics:
    Social media best practices.
    What not to do: social media.
    Social media risks to patient information.
    Steps to take if a breach occurs.
    This assessment is not a traditional essay. It is a staff educational update about PHI. Consider creating a flyer, pamphlet, or one PowerPoint slide (not an entire presentation). Remember it should not be more than two pages (excluding a title and a reference page).
    The task force has asked team members assigned to the topics to include the following content in their updates in addition to content on their selected topics:
    What is protected health information (PHI)?
    Be sure to include essential HIPAA information.
    What are privacy, security, and confidentiality?
    Define and provide examples of privacy, security, and confidentiality concerns related to the use of technology in health care.
    Explain the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to safeguard sensitive electronic health information.
    What evidence relating to social media usage and PHI do interprofessional team members need to be aware of? For example:
    What are some examples of nurses being terminated for inappropriate social media use in the United States?
    What types of sanctions have health care organizations imposed on interdisciplinary team members who have violated social media policies?
    What have been the financial penalties assessed against health care organizations for inappropriate social media use?
    What evidence-based strategies have health care organizations employed to prevent or reduce confidentiality, privacy, and security breaches, particularly related to social media usage?
    Notes
    Your staff update is limited to two double-spaced content pages. Be selective about the content you choose to include in your update so you can meet the page length requirement. Include need-to-know information. Omit nice-to-know information.
    Many times people do not read staff updates, do not read them carefully, or do not read them to the end. Ensure your staff update piques staff members’ interest, highlights key points, and is easy to read. Avoid overcrowding the update with too much content.
    Also, supply a separate reference page that includes two or three peer-reviewed and one or two non-peer-reviewed resources (for a total of 3–5 resources) to support the staff update content. As you begin to consider the assessment, it would be an excellent choice to complete the Breach of Protected Health Information (PHI) activity. The activity will support your success with the assessment by creating the opportunity for you to test your knowledge of potential privacy, security, and confidentiality violations of protected health information. The activity is not graded and counts towards course engagement.
    To successfully prepare to complete this assessment, complete the following:
    Review the settings presented in the Assessment 02 Supplement: Protected Health Information [PDF] Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Protected Health Information [PDF] resource and select one to use as the focus for this assessment.
    Review the infographics on protecting PHI provided in the resources for this assessment, or find other infographics to review. These infographics serve as examples of how to succinctly summarize evidence-based information.
    Analyze these infographics and distill them into five or six principles of what makes them effective. As you design your interprofessional staff update, apply these principles. Note: In a staff update, you will not have all the images and graphics that an infographic might contain. Instead, focus your analysis on what makes the messaging effective.
    Select from any of the following options, or a combination of options, as the focus of your interprofessional staff update:
    Social media best practices.
    What not to do: social media.
    Social media risks to patient information.
    Steps to take if a breach occurs.
    Conduct independent research on the topic you have selected in addition to reviewing the suggested resources for this assessment. This information will serve as the source(s) of the information contained in your interprofessional staff update. Consult the BSN Program Library Research Guide for help in identifying scholarly and/or authoritative sources.
    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
    Competency 1: Describe nurses’ and the interdisciplinary team’s role in informatics with a focus on electronic health information and patient care technology to support decision making.
    Describe the security, privacy, and confidentially laws related to protecting sensitive electronic health information that govern the interdisciplinary team.
    Explain the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration to safeguard sensitive electronic health information.
    Competency 2: Implement evidence-based strategies to effectively manage protected health information.
    Identify evidence-based approaches to mitigate risks to patients and health care staff related to sensitive electronic health information.
    Develop a professional, effective staff update that educates interprofessional team members about protecting the security, privacy, and confidentiality of patient data, particularly as it pertains to social media usage.
    Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication to facilitate use of health information and patient care technologies.
    Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for citations and references.
    Create a clear, concise, well-organized, and professional staff update that is generally free from errors in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

  • Title: Diagnosing Organizational Problems: A Qualitative Study of a Multicultural Non-Profit Organization

    Project 3: Organization Study Project
    This project is about conducting a problem assessment and analysis of causes of the problem within an organization, using the knowledge you gained about research designs/methods in previous period. You can either choose one method (qualitative or quantitative). The paper should provide some background about the organization, identify a focal problem, propose and justify probable causes explaining why the problem exists, methods of addressing a focal problem, and include results of preliminary information collected. The requirement of this project is to collect and analyze some diagnostic evidence within this organization. For choosing a sample organization, it should be multicultural/global and can be a business or a non-profit, with employees from diverse cultures. It can also be a unit within a larger multicultural organization. The organization or unit chosen should have 5 or more employees and should not be the organization or unit in which you currently work to avoid any bias. Due to the compressed schedule of a semester, the data collected and results reported are only preliminary. Lastly, provide a brief reflection from a Christian perspective as regards your learning from conducting this organizational diagnostic.
    Sample: For a qualitative method, three samples are required for interview and five interview questions. For a quantitative study using a survey method, ten samples are needed for a basic statistical analysis. Format: The length is between 3000-3500 words; double space, excluding references and appendix; APA style. Ten minimum academic references.
    make sure to include a appendix Evaluation Method: See the rubric in the assignment folder.

  • “Exploring the Intersection of Arts, Sociology, and Psychology: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Understanding Human Behavior and Society”

    Follow the criteria and instructions, it is a research paper blending arts and sociology as well as psychology. 

  • Title: The Disruptive Power of Wonder Woman: A Summary and Response to Charlotte E. Howell’s “Tricky” Connotations

    Recalling that a summary is a condensed version of other material in your words, write a one paragraph summary of Charlotte E. Howell’s “‘Tricky’ Connotations: Wonder Woman as DC’s Brand Disruptor.” Some important points to keep in mind: 1) Make sure the summary is in your words and focuses on what you deem is important in the article; 2) Do not simply repeat everything Howell has to say—she covers a lot of ground, but you need only focus on her main ideas; 3) Your summary must be different from any abstract associated with the article (but that can serve as a kind of model); 4) Stay in the objective, third person point of view; save your opinion for the analytical response of the article.
    For the response, offer an opinion about the article and its theory of representation in popular culture. You do not need to write exclusively about film or Wonder Woman, but your discussion should focus on some aspect of popular media (film, television, literature, comics, music, etc.) and representation of a particular idea or identity. You can reasonably expect your audience’s familiarity with the popular culture references, and so consider them “common knowledge,” not requiring citation. Try to use specific examples as part of your support, and make sure your response has a thesis of its own to focus narrowly on the point selected.  Try to narrow your topic as much as you can.You must cite or paraphrase at least twice from the Howell article and include an MLA-style Works Cited page. You may use up to two additional sources beyond the Howell article for support. Also, be sure you continue to use the objective third person point of view throughout the response.
    Your response essay should stay focused on supporting your thesis, a personal response to the essay that you prove with three main reasons (key ideas associated with body paragraphs) that are in-turn supported by specific evidence and examples. 

  • “Racism in Healthcare Organizations: Impact on Employees and Patients” “Promoting Ethical Responsibility in the Workplace: Combating Racism and Discrimination in Nursing” “The Importance of Inclusivity and Anti-Racism Efforts in Healthcare: A Call to Action for Nursing Staff”

    or illegal behaviors in organization or specifically those engaging in bigotry,0:05
    sexism, racism, or showing favoritism. However, more specifically, my PowerPoint will be on racism in healthcare organizations.0:10
    Just a small introduction is that there of course can be scenes, amounts of discrimination and prejudice in health.0:21
    Many of us have never seen it. Experience. They come across it in some type of way with our patients or with our peers.0:28
    And the tendency tends to be that it is something that can be normalized, that it’s a job,0:35
    that is something that can just be passed off, and that it becomes a normal part of the culture where we work.0:39
    But it can have its negative impacts, and we can see this in employees and in the profession.0:46
    So an ethical situation is where an individual owners can be disrespected and discriminated against.0:53
    And in turn, this constant bullying or harassment can impact the way that they practice nursing ethically.1:01
    If there is a nurse who is of a minority race or ethnicity and they feel discriminated by the whole organization or by management and leadership,1:10
    it’s going to impact the way that they’re working and can even impact their mental and physical health.1:21
    Administration and leadership need to be able to correct these situations before they worsen, and that it can trickle down to the patient care level.1:26
    Discrimination and racism has been shown to decrease job satisfaction,1:34
    diminish the mental health and physical health that I was speaking about earlier,1:38
    and that patients can suffer because they sometimes get the negative end and they get the1:42
    attitude or the residual effects that the person is feeling when they have internal conflict.1:47
    More specifically, in one survey, 63% of nurses say that they have experienced racism in the workplace.1:52
    60 of those stayed. That racism comment came specifically from their management or leadership team and that they felt intimidated.2:00
    Half of these individuals stated this prejudiced attitude admitted to it,2:09
    affecting their professionalism and their ability to work properly in 50% 57 I’m sorry,2:15
    percent of these cases the individual attempted to correct this racism or this discrimination in some type of way,2:22
    but half of them saw no changes or any effects put into place to correct this behavior from those that perpetrated it.2:29
    This is a graph showing the percentage of orange in the workforce and their associated race and ethnicity.2:39
    So as we can see, 73.3% of Arne’s are white non-Hispanics, while 26.7% are other minorities, which we can see,2:44
    10.2% are Hispanic or Latino, 7.8% are black non-Hispanic, 5.2% are Asian, non-Hispanic, uh, very small trace.2:55
    Other ones are Native American, Hawaiian Pacific Islander, other races that are not, uh, mentioned,3:05
    but it shows how white Caucasians tend to be the majority of the orange in the workforce at this time.3:13
    Now more specifically into these larger minority groups.3:21
    92% of black nurses state that they have felt racism in their workplace, compared to 73% of Asian nurses, 69% of Hispanic nurses,3:24
    and a very smaller percent of white nurses have felt some type of racism while there in their organization.3:36
    Now the code of ethics for nurses. There are several different types of provision.3:45
    However, the one that stood out to me the most.3:50
    Says that the nurse, through individual or collective effort, establishes, maintains and improves the ethical environment of the work,3:52
    setting and conditions of employment that are conducive to safe, quality health care.3:58
    So nurses, when they are being negatively impacted,4:05
    have difficulty maintaining safe and quality health care and their discrimination and prejudice or unfairness of any kind.4:07
    Something has to be done to improve this.4:15
    And nurses, although they may not be the ones personally experiencing this type of discrimination and racism,4:18
    also have accountability and a responsibility to improve those conditions in the workplace as4:24
    a whole for themselves or for their peers who may not be able to speak up or feel intimidated.4:29
    The first ethical principle that also comes to mind is that of justice.4:36
    Justice, more specifically, is defined as the fair and appropriate treatment of all individuals,4:40
    and this goes from nurse to nurse, nurse to management, any type of peer, any discipline, any other department.4:45
    And most specifically, of course, to our patients, nurses and staffing and leadership have a particular obligation to maintain this work base,4:51
    to maintain the morale and the culture and the positive environment so that people can work properly and efficiently and fairly,4:59
    that they do not feel that they have to be coerced to say or not say anything,5:05
    because it’s important that we’re honest with each other and that we’re honest with our patients and to ourselves.5:11
    If an offense is committed, nurses have the responsibility to self evaluate,5:16
    and they have a duty to themselves and others to will certainly speak up and5:20
    make sure that this occurrences are either decreased or that they can see.5:24
    In short, is truth telling. This means that we have a responsibility to leadership, and most certainly ourselves, to tell the truth.5:39
    And this, of course, ties into the fact that we have to tell the truth to anyone who is either discriminating or causing this racism,5:48
    but more importantly, to take it to the higher authorities.5:55
    Any type of HR organization, ethnic, ethnic committee, union that can help us to diminish the occurrences like it says.5:58
    No allyship. Pretty self-explanatory, but it just describes itself as the, uh, the relationship the one has with the person who may be of a minority,6:11
    who may come from any type of disability in this case, ethnic background, and how we can help one another because we all work in the same team.6:25
    We all work in the same type of healthcare. In this case, maybe even the same type of organization.6:34
    And we have to be able to help one another. So in the red zone we have the avoid zone.6:39
    This is when the person may feel uncomfortable directly assessing racism.6:44
    And they may not be able to say anything or they may not be able to formulate words.6:51
    And although the person may not be a bad person or even the person accountable,6:55
    they have to be able to step out of that zone and move along further in the ring.7:01
    And so where we have the carry zone,7:06
    which is that the person is aware that this exists and they have to be able to be responsible in their own learning or sometimes unlearning of racism.7:07
    Support zone. For others, it a little bit more where it shows that racist ideologies and unfair treatment need to be put an end.7:17
    Or you can stand with your coworkers, with your peers, with your team,7:24
    and speak up for them and be their advocate, just as we are advocates for our patients.7:29
    And in the green zone, we become a little bit more self aware. We are. We have the ability to evaluate and be able to educate ourselves sometimes,7:34
    and our peers on how sometimes racism or prejudice benefits us unknowingly.7:42
    And then in the leader zone. Pretty self-explanatory as well. And you’re able to promote anti-racist policies further build to be able to work with7:47
    other anti-racist leaders and promote policies that prevent this from happening.7:55
    The highest reviews, of course, allyship,8:00
    where this is a very active process and it shows that the nurses have an ethical responsibility, just like how we do to justice,8:02
    autonomy, advocacy and veracity to not allow these things to continue,8:12
    having to not let them go unspoken and be able to advocate for our friends and for our teams and peers.8:17
    This unethical behavior also has several different types of impact.8:24
    The health care force in the United States, although it has become more diverse in the last couple of years,8:28
    that does not directly correlate and mean that it has also become more inclusive.8:33
    As a matter of fact, it has been shown to not be particularly inclusive.8:38
    Um, nursing staff members of health care who are not Caucasian have been victims of racism, harassment and bullying,8:41
    and it has become very difficult for them, including to progress to any type of state of management or leadership,8:51
    either for their own personal gain or to be able to help out ethnic disease and race of other countries,8:58
    or even of their own, so that they can help take care of each other and represent for their, um, ethnicity.9:05
    There is initiatives to pursue anti-racism efforts, and and it positively impacts those who are working there and the patients.9:12
    We don’t ever want our patients to suffer. We want to be able to help them help ourselves and prove that the cultural environment of where9:20
    we’re working and where patients are coming to seek help is a good one for all of those,9:27
    and not just for them. So in conclusion, studies have demonstrated that where there is strong leadership, strong management, inclusivity, uh,9:31
    anti-racist policies and inclusion, there is diminished amounts of racist comments, um, and any type of prejudice and discrimination.9:39
    But it is essential that we not only hold ourselves accountable, we educate our peers.9:50
    We allow ourselves to those who need us the most,9:54
    and we’re able to provide quality and safe health care for our patients and, you know, increase our own job satisfaction.9:57
    Feel like we’re purposeful in that. As nurses, we’re continuing to, um, promote our ethical duties wherever we go.10:04
    Thank you. These are my references.10:12

  • “Exploring the Cutting-Edge: The Role of CRISPR-Cas9 in Genetic Engineering” “Exploring the Revolutionary CRISPR-Cas9 Technology in Genetic Engineering: A Research Analysis”

    Library Assigment Content
    Library Assignment: Exploring the Role of CRISPR-Cas9 in Genetic Engineering
    Objective:We’re excited to announce a special Library Assignment aimed at enhancing your understanding of a cutting-edge topic in biological sciences: “The Role of CRISPR-Cas9 in Genetic Engineering.” This assignment is designed to strengthen your information literacy skills, critical analysis abilities, and deepen your appreciation for the latest advancements in the field.
    Assignment Details:
    Topic Assignment:You are tasked with analyzing a specific article or abstract related to CRISPR-Cas9 technology in genetic engineering. The relevant material will be shared with you below.
    Task:Your mission is to conduct a thorough analysis of the assigned material, covering the following key aspects:Introduction: Briefly introduce CRISPR-Cas9 and explain its significance in genetic engineering.
    Summary: Provide a concise summary of the article, highlighting key findings, methods, and implications.
    Analysis: Critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the study. Discuss experimental design, results, and the potential impact of CRISPR-Cas9 technology.
    Connection to Course Material: Relate the content to concepts covered in our General Biology course. Explain how CRISPR-Cas9 aligns with or challenges existing knowledge.
    Documentation:Your analysis should be presented in a well-organized document with the following structure:Title Page: Include your name, student ID, date, and the title of the assigned material.
    Introduction: Introduce CRISPR-Cas9 and state the objective of your analysis.
    Summary: Provide a concise summary of the assigned material.
    Analysis: Critically evaluate the material, addressing experimental design, results, and implications.
    Connection to Course Material: Relate the content to concepts covered in our General Biology course.
    Personal Reflection: Share your thoughts on the significance of CRISPR-Cas9 in genetic engineering and its potential applications.
    Submission:Please adhere to the following formatting guidelines when submitting your assignment:
    4.1 Document Format:Your assignment should be typed in a legible font (e.g., Times New Roman, Arial) with 12-point font size.
    Maintain 1-inch margins on all sides.
    Double-space the entire document.
    4.2 Title Page:Include a title page with the following information:Your Full Name
    Student ID
    Submission Date
    Title of the Assigned Material (as provided)
    4.3 Structure of the Assignment:Your analysis should be organized into the following sections:Introduction:
    Clearly introduce CRISPR-Cas9 and briefly outline the objectives of your analysis.
    Summary:
    Provide a concise summary of the assigned material, covering key findings, methodologies, and the significance of the research.
    Analysis:
    Critically evaluate the material by discussing experimental design, results, and the broader implications of CRISPR-Cas9 technology.
    Connection to Course Material:
    Relate the content to concepts covered in our General Biology course. Explain how the material aligns with or challenges existing knowledge.
    Personal Reflection:
    Share your personal thoughts on the significance of CRISPR-Cas9 in genetic engineering and its potential applications.
    4.4 Length:Your assignment should be well-considered and concise. Aim for approximately 3 to 5 pages, excluding the title page.
    4.5 Citations:If you refer to external sources or additional readings, ensure proper citation using an appropriate citation style (APA)
    4.6 Submission Deadline:Submit your assignment by 04/17/2024 by 11:59pm. Late submissions may incur a penalty.
    4.7 Submission Method:Submit your assignment through Blackboard.
    Grading:The Library Assignment contributes 5% to your final grade.
    Your assignment will be evaluated based on the following criteria:5.1 Depth of Analysis (30 points):Exceptional (25-30 points): Demonstrates an in-depth understanding of the assigned material. Provides insightful analysis, considering various aspects of the research.
    Proficient (15-24 points): Presents a solid analysis with a clear understanding of key concepts, but may lack some depth.
    Basic (5-14 points): Provides a basic analysis, touching on key points but lacking in-depth exploration.
    5.2 Clarity of Expression (20 points):Exceptional (17-20 points): Communicates ideas clearly and effectively. Well-organized with seamless transitions between sections.
    Proficient (10-16 points): Communicates ideas effectively but may have some minor organizational issues.
    Basic (3-9 points): Expression is somewhat unclear, and the organization may be challenging to follow.
    5.3 Documentation (20 points):Exceptional (17-20 points): Properly cites sources (if used) following the specified citation style. Accurate and consistent referencing.
    Proficient (10-16 points): Citations are generally accurate, with minor inconsistencies or omissions.
    Basic (3-9 points): Citations are incomplete or significantly deviate from the specified format.
    5.4 Integration of Course Concepts (15 points):Exceptional (12-15 points): Demonstrates a strong connection between the assigned material and concepts covered in the General Biology course.
    Proficient (7-11 points): Shows a reasonable connection, though it may lack depth in relating concepts.
    Basic (2-6 points): Demonstrates limited integration of course concepts.
    5.5 Personal Reflection (15 points):Exceptional (12-15 points): Offers thoughtful and insightful reflections on the significance and potential applications of CRISPR-Cas9 technology.
    Proficient (7-11 points): Provides reflections, but they may lack depth or originality.
    Basic (2-6 points): Reflections are minimal or fail to convey a clear understanding of the material’s significance.
    5.6 Overall Presentation (10 points):Exceptional (8-10 points): The assignment is well-structured, free of grammatical errors, and adheres to formatting guidelines.
    Proficient (5-7 points): Generally well-organized, with minor issues in structure or grammar.
    Basic (1-4 points): The assignment lacks organization and may have significant grammar issues.
    Important Notes:This assignment is mandatory for all students enrolled in the General Biology course.
    Late submissions may incur a penalty, so adhere to the specified deadline.
    If you face challenges during your research, feel free to consult the instructor or librarians.
    This assignment aims to develop critical thinking skills, research proficiency, and a deeper understanding of the revolutionary CRISPR-Cas9 technology in genetic engineering. Embrace this opportunity to engage with cutting-edge research!

  • Title: Reflective Essay on the Alignment between Social Work Values and Personal Values

    Assessment Details and Instructions
    This reflective essay is designed to provide feedback early in the trimester. You are required to submit a 1500 word reflective essay in relation to your developing knowledge of the social work profession and the alignment between the profession’s values and your own. In your written reflection, you should address the following:
    • What are the reasons that you decided to study social work and what key strengths do you bring to your future role. (250 words)
    • What is the role, mission and purpose of the profession of social work in the contemporary context? (500 words)
    • Provide an analysis of 2 key values of the profession and how these values intersect with your own personal and cultural values. (750 words) 
    You must also include a minimum of six (6) scholarly references that are cited correctly, using the APA 7th referencing style.
    Early Feedback
    Academic skills development is essential for your development as a student and as a beginning practitioner. It is important to gain academic support and knowledge from a range of sources.
    Please make sure one of the reference is from the reading materials i have attached to this order. 

  • Title: Patient Teaching on the Proper Use of Inhalers and its Benefits

    1.https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vSwavAxCHRfKlAAcLV9-_Ot93N2dNPQW/edit
     link  one above is the grading Rubric i need you to use when writing the work.
    2.https://docs.google.com/document/d/12UKuuk4zRBTEJpXHVZEg3vaQbLD5xUEa/edit#bookmark=id.gjdgxs 
    the link two is an example i need you to look  at  follow same format and writing a patient teaching on the topic. “How to use inhalers and it’s benefit”. i want it done APA format 3 to 4 page with 3 source of intext citation. use this  textbook below as one source and then any other two.
    Harding, M. M., (2020). Lewis’s medical-surgical nursing: Assessment and management of clinical problems (11th ed.). Elsevier.

  • Title: “Navigating the Intersection of Policy and Politics in Healthcare Organizations: A Literature Review”

    Instructions
    1. Prepare a literature review on Policy and Politics in Healthcare Organizations
    3. Use APA references format, no more than 1000 words
    no plagiarism