Author: admin

  • Title: Examining Mediation and Moderation Effects Using the Hayes Process Model

    Use the “mediation data file” and “moderation data” file
    uploaded in files section below to run HAYES PROCESS models 1 and 4. 
    Upload the outputs of both
    analyses.
    You can use SPSS, JASP, or JAMOVI to run the process models. 
    Please refer to uploaded PDF for extra guidance if required
    Video to view for support:

  • Title: Exploring Sociological Interests and Navigating Scholarly Literature

    Research Skills Assignment 2 will guide you through developing a research question.  The first step of this process involves thinking about and identifying a broader “personal interest” related to a researchable sociological topic.
    Think about some sociological personal interests that you have.  List at least two of these personal interests you have and discuss why you are interested in them.  Remember, this needs to be a sociological interest, so it might be helpful for you to first read the short blog entry “What Makes a Research Question Sociological?”
    Interest One: 
    Interest Two:
    Q2. Building your understanding (2 parts – Q2a. and Q2b.)
    Early in the research process we often consider what we know about our interests and what we need to know to develop our foundational knowledge of the subject.  Consider this – if my research interest is “college student food insecurity,” then I might need to know about how many college students are food insecure, how the concept of “food insecurity” is defined, and even just general knowledge about college attendance in the United States.  Gathering such knowledge requires me to engage with the scholarly (including government-published) research literature on this topic.  
    Q2a. Choose one of the research interests you mentioned above.  Discuss your general knowledge about the topic – what do you know?  How do you know this to be true/accurate?  Explain in 3 to 5 sentences.
    Q2b. Now consider what you don’t know.  Think about three pieces of foundational knowledge that you might need to know related to this interest.  These can be definitions of concepts, the general scope / scale of the sociological phenomenon of interest, or even why such an issue is worthy of investigation.  Below, list these three pieces of information you need to know and explain why this knowledge is foundational for exploring your selected research interest:
    Q2b.1: 
    Q2b.2: 
    Q2b.3:
    Q3. Locating literature (3 parts – Q3a., Q3b., Q3c.)
    Now it is time to begin your investigation.  Consider Q2b.1, Q2b.2, and Q2b.3.  Use what you learned about navigating scholarly literature to locate a peer-reviewed research article that answers or attempts to answer (not necessarily exhaustively) one of the “holes” in your understanding from Q2b.  Read the article and answer the following questions:
    Q3a. Provide a citation for the article written in ASA (American Sociological Association) or APA (American Psychological Association) formatting style. 
    Q3b. What is something noteworthy you learned about the topic through reading this article?  What did you learn anything about the concepts/knowledge you discussed in Q2b and anything else you learned?  Explain in 3 to 5 sentences.
    Q3c. What research method was used by the author(s) of the research article you selected?  Was this research quantitative, qualitative, or perhaps something else (e.g. mixed methods)?  Explain in 2 to 3 sentences.
    Q4. Reflecting on Reading Scholarly Research
    Accessing and reading scholarly literature like peer reviewed journal articles can be challenging, especially for a novice.  Reflect on your experience reading the article you located.  What was your experience like?  Were there any sections of the article that were particularly challenging to comprehend or navigate?  Explain in at least 3 to 5 sentences.

  • Title: “Case Analysis: Mr. Jackson’s Eye Issue and Treatment Plan”

    The Assignment:
    After reviewing the case and the accompanying case analysis questions, included in the document, answer the questions directly in a word document. When providing evidence to support your answers, be sure they evidenced-based, current (no more than 5 years old), and follow current standards of care. Follow APA 7th edition formatting, including a cover page and references. 
    Mr. Raymond Jackson is a 68-year-old who is in the office today, on Monday, complaining of right eye pain. He states this started rather suddenly over the weekend. He has redness, itching, burning along the edge of his right eye lid. He reports no trauma, he thinks it started while he was sleeping Saturday night. Otherwise, he is in fair health, he has a history of Diabetes type 2, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and seborrheic dermatitis which he has seen a dermatologist for in the past. He still works part time as a school crossing guard at the neighborhood elementary school. He has been a widower for 2 years and he has 3 children who live out of the area. He worked for many years in construction, until the work
    became more physically demanding. He has social security, and his medical coverage is through a Medicare Advantage plan, he does not qualify for Medicaid in his state. VS: BP 138/84 Pulse 88 Resp 18 Temp 97.8 02 Sat 96% Ht 70 inches Wt 190 lbs PMH: As stated in case presentation, also history of chronic low back pain. Allergies: NKDA Medications:
    Glucophage 500mg 1 po BID
    Metoprolol 25mg po daily Lisinopril 10mg po daily
    Atorvastatin 20mg po daily
    Ibuprofen 200mg 2 po very 6 hours as needed for back pain Social History: As described in case presentation. Also, he lives independently in a small apartment; he doesn’t know his neighbors very well but has some close friends from his old neighborhood. He uses public transportation to shop, visit friends and get to his medical appointments. He does not smoke, does not drink alcohol. ROS: Back pain today 2/10, right eye itching, feels like his right eye is very dry. Diagnostics/Assessment: Last HgA1c, 2 months ago, was 6.5
    ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS:
    1. What is the likely diagnosis of Mr. Jackson’s eye issue? List 3 differentials as well.
    2. What are some contributing factors for your diagnosis? List 3 contributing factors.
    3. What physical examination and diagnostic tests would you complete for Mr. Jackson at this visit?
    4. Describe your treatment plan for this visit, including any follow up or referrals.
    5. What Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) would you include in your plan?
    6. Briefly describe a Medicare advantage plan.
    I have upload the Soap templete to be used as an attachment.

  • Title: Maintaining Organizational Integrity: A Reflection on “You Scratch my Back”

    Read the Case You Scratch my Back on page 200 and provide a substantive response to the question below the case . Remember to follow APA when you write and support your POV with sources and ay least two intext citation.  
    This means sources to support your POV.
    You may want to look or research Organizational  Integrity or Ethical Policies or Transparency and see what articles or sources say about it.  In this assignment be certain not to write “I think, I think, I think  with out a source to support your POV> 
    And then remember to provide that in your content as an intext citation.
    What do you think the reaction of Adam’s regional manager was to the initial news of the loss of Dr. Green’s business? 
    Do you think Zach’s company supported his willingness to provide Dr. Green’s “marketing funds”?  
    What do you think will happen to Zach and Dr. Green now?  

  • Title: “Leadership Training: Choosing the Right Theory for Organizational Success”

    Course Project: Leadership Training
    It will take more than a week’s effort to adequately complete this major assignment. Plan time to start the research and other work for this assignment earlier than the week in which it is due.
    The organization you selected in Week 1 is designing training for all the managers at all levels. It wants to base the training on one leadership theory.
    Tasks:
    Write a paper recommending a leadership theory. Address the following:
    Summarize key details about the organization and two or three of the most important insights you have developed so far about the organization during your course project. This one paragraph summary should provide just enough information that someone who has not read any of your papers so far would have a brief background for understanding your project organization.
    Why do you believe your chosen leadership theory is the best for your organization? What is your rationale? What research can you cite to support your choice? What are the factors in your organization that make your selected leadership theory the best choice?
    How will using this theory positively impact the following variables?
    Managers’ behavior toward subordinates and its effect on subordinates
    Communication
    Motivation of subordinates
    Group and team behavior
    Decision making
    Culture
    Be sure that you conduct the research necessary to support your conclusions and cite your sources appropriately.

  • Annotated Bibliography Case Study: Exploring Literary Connections in “Hills Like White Elephants” by Ernest Hemingway

    I have uploaded the task that was given to me by my college professor for writing and literature. please read through the uploads so you may understand the task at its full extent. The reading that I’ve chosen to do the annotated bibliography case study in literary connections is, Hills Like White Elephants” by Ernest Hemingway!

  • Title: The Terry Schiavo Case and the Concept of Substantive Due Process

    Question
    The Terry Schiavo case http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/25/schiavo.qa/
    (Links to an external site).
    riveted the nation during the first half of 2005. This case centered on
    her husband Michael’s decision to remove her feeding tube, and her parent’s fight to keep her alive. One side of the argument suggests that
    Terry possessed a fundamental right to die https://time.com/3763521/terri-schiavo-right-to-die-brittany-maynard/
    (Links to an external site)., while the other suggests she had a fundamental right to be given food and water.
    Both arguments find support in the concept of substantive due process. The former would point to the concept that there is a fundamental right to privacy under the 5thand 14thAmendments, while the latter would argue that the 5thand 14thamendments guarantee citizens will not be denied life without due process of law.
    Assume that a case similar to the Schiavo one reaches the U.S. Supreme Court and you are a justice. How would you rule if both parties argued that their side was supported by the concept of substantive due process? Does one side hold more legal weight than the other? Why or why
    not? If you find that substantive due process is not implicated in this
    case, how would you rule? Why?
    Instructions
    Respond to the above prompt with a thoughtful essay of about 1,000 words. Cite your sources appropriately, taking care to give credit where credit is due. Please use Chicago style
    Links to an external site.;
    you’re free to choose between the notes system (in which case you do not need a separate bibliography) or the author-date system (in which case you’ll use in-text citations and a bibliography is required).
    Submission
    Submit your response by uploading a document from your computer (PDF or Microsoft Word).

  • Title: The Dangerous Consequences of Spoofing in a Healthcare Organization Spoofing is a type of cyber attack where a malicious actor disguises themselves as a legitimate user or device to gain unauthorized access to a system or network. This breach

    Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
    cybersecurity breach assigned to me was Spoofing, Create a fictional scenario involving the assigned breach spoofing.
    Identify and define your assigned breach spoofing.
    Describe the type of organization in which the spoofing occurred.
    Identify who was involved in spoofing.
    Describe how the spoofing occurred. 
    Examine how the threat could impact the organization. Discuss what consequences the spoofing may cause. 
    Cite 3 scholarly source in the initial post.
    Use current APA format to format citations and references and is free of errors.
    Please answer all those 5 question in paragraphs. 
    Thanks 

  • “Comprehensive Care Plan for Patient with Chronic Heart Failure” Patient Information: Name: John Smith Age: 65 Gender: Male Medical Diagnosis: Chronic Heart Failure Date of Admission: 05/10/2021 Assessment

    everything shoukld be filled out on the care plan
    attached are notes to help you fill out the care plan 
    nothing should be blank !!!
    the reflection page should be 3- 4 sentencedsper question 

  • “Identifying Misinformation and Disinformation: A Critical Analysis of Online Content and News Stories”

    Discussion: 
    I will provide all readings 
    In the discussion  this week, identify an online post or picture, or published news story, that—at least initially—tricked you (or someone close to you) into believing it was true?
    When citing this example of misinformation or disinformation, consider how you would answer these questions:
    Who produced or published the news? Who are the authors? Are they real and credible? 
    What media outlets published the story is published? Are they legitimate? In other words, what’s their mission and purpose?
    What main source is the story based on? Are there supporting sources cited to substantiate the claims? How real and credible are they?
    How do other independent experts with knowledge on the topic view the claim?
    Does the news piece use a sensationalist or shocking headline?
    Does the story surprise you? Does it literally sound too good to be true?
    Does the story confirm your beliefs about the topic, a person, or a group of people? Or does it support a contrarian view that resonates with you and deviates from the mainstream view?
    Link to readings: 
    10 WAYS TO IDENTIFY DISINFORMATION – A GUIDE AND CHECKLIST-
    https://instituteforpr.org/10-ways-to-spot-disinformation/
    Too much information: a public guide to navigating the infodemic-

    Too much information: a public guide to navigating the infodemic


    Understanding Information disorder-

    Understanding Information disorder


    The spread of true and false news online-
    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aap9559