Brisk Writers

Author: admin

  • Title: “The Power of Effective Communication: Tips for Delivering a Successful Presentation”

    Hello, I ordered a PowerPoint presentation with two pages of speaker notes. Please elaborate on the content of the slides as much as possible within the speaker notes because I will have to present this in front of my class. Also, I will return the final product back as many times as I need to if you send me a horrible product. I will return the final product back if you do not follow the instructions. I will ask for a different writer if I have to continuously send the final product back, so please follow all instructions.

  • “Strategic Thinking and Decision Making: Exploring the Process, Key Decisions, and Decision Models in Business Strategy Development”

     
    Read: Gamble, Peteraf, & Thompson: Chapter 3
    PageRead: Rumelt: Chapters 11 – 14
    PageRead: Keller: Chapters 7 – 9
    PageWatch: How to Find Specific Publications Using Journal by Name
    https://watch.liberty.edu/media/t/1_qt7w1hxy/74370641
     
    DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
    Overall Guidance:
    The discussions in this class will focus on a series of questions in the areas of Process
    (steps to be taken), Strategic Thinking (current theory), and Decision Models (decision making
    methodology. The student should organize their main thread by using the bolded headings provided
    and then respond to the question. The student will post a reply to a single main thread and should
    organize their reply by using the bolded headings provided.
    Discussion Thread: Strategy Development, Strategy Decisions, and Decision Models
    Developing strategy begins with thinking strategically and knowing what the key decisions are. The
    decision models that you employ will directly impact the quality of the decisions you make so
    understanding them is critical.
    Minimum of 500 words in the body.
    Minimum of 2 sources from the literature in addition to course texts.
    Use bolded headings below in the discussion.
    Current APA format must be used.
    Use the following outline:
    • Introduction
    • Process: Business Strategy Development – What is the process for developing a business
    strategy? Discuss the process in no less than 200 words.
    • Strategic Thinking: Key Decisions – What are the key decisions necessary for making
    strategy choices and why are they important? Discuss the key decisions and their
    importance in no less than 150 words.
    • Decision Model – What are my current decision models and how do they aid / hinder
    this process. Discuss your current decision models and how they aid / hinder the strategy
    development process in no less than 150 words.
    • Conclusion
    Support your factual assertions with citations.
    Include an Annotated Bibliography, in current APA format, of the 2 additional Sources:
    • Minimum of 250 words in each annotation
    • Use the bolded headings below for each annotation
    Use the following outline:
    • Summary of Key Points
    • Evaluation of the Quality of the Publication
    • Evaluation of the Quality of the Author(s)
    • Where this fits into the discussion
     Discussion Thread: External Environment, Power / Weakness, and Decision Models
    Evaluating the external environment that the company does business in is critical to the process of developing a company’s strategy. When evaluating the external environment, it is important to understand key sources of power or weakness that exist. Decision models continue to impact strategy development and should continuously be evaluated, and others considered.
    For your main thread, perform the following:
    Discuss the process of evaluating the external environment.
    Discuss a key source of power or weakness.
    Discuss your current decision model(s) and others that are being considered.
    Develop an Annotated Bibliography for the additional references used in your discussion.
    Support all of your factual assertions with citations.

  • Title: “Implementing a Multimodal Pain Management Approach for Postpartum Women: A Theory-Guided Research Plan” Research Question: How does the implementation of a multimodal pain management approach affect postpartum pain levels in women?

    The next steps in the design of your research plan is to choose an evidence-based change in practice or intervention to address the identified problem which is: The Evidence-based change in practice to address the identified problem of postpartum pain management chosen is the implementation of a multimodal pain management approach. write a research question, write a hypothesis, and choose a theory that can be used to guide your project. In this activity you are asked to discuss the evidence-based change in practice or intervention you plan to use to address the identified problem, write your planned project’s research question, write your planned project’s hypothesis, and discuss and choose a theory that may be used to guide your project.
    When choosing the theory that will guide a project remember the tenets of the theory must align with the planned evidence-based change in practice or intervention. The evidence-based change or intervention is used as a solution to address the problem that has been identified. For this activity you will discuss at least two potential theories, the tenets of each theory, the alignment of the theory with the evidence-based change or intervention, and the rationale for choosing the one theory you will use to guide your project plan.
    You may choose a nursing, leadership, informatics, or educational theorist, remember chose the theory whose tenets align best with the project’s planned evidence-based change in practice or intervention.

  • Title: The Fallacy of Passion: Why It Should Not Be the Sole Basis for Career Choice Introduction: Passion has long been touted as the key ingredient for a successful and fulfilling career. Many have been encouraged to follow their passions and turn

    For years, many have argued that it is imperative to be passionate about your chosen job/career. More
    recently however, the notion that passion is a poor foundation on which to base your career choice
    has become far more arguable and true.
    Write a discursive essay where you agree with this statement. Give 3 points as to why you agree and 2 counterpoints. Follow the correct format of a discursive essay. 

  • Title: “A Lesson Learned: Overcoming Fear and Finding Confidence” Paragraph 1: Introduction As I stood at the edge of the diving board, my heart was pounding in my chest. I had always been afraid of heights and the

    ASSIGNMENT: Write a THREE paragraph narrative essay about a time you learned something. This could be a skill you learned, a lesson you learned or some kind of information. Be descriptive in your assignment. Let the reader feel what you are feeling. Do not just describe the action.
    Paragraph 1: Introduction:
    Hook – grab the reader’s attention. This should be at the beginning of the paragraph.
    Theme – what you learned from your experience. This should be at the end of the paragraph.
    Paragraph 2: Body:
    This is where you tell your story. It needs to be concise and clear. The action in this paragraph should rise toward a climax. The climax should come at the end of the paragraph and lead in to the conclusion.
    Paragraph 3: Conclusion
    -Thesis – this should be at the beginning of the conclusion – restate the thesis; remind the reader what the point is. If you need to wrap up the action in your story, do that then restate the theme.
    -Wrap up – tie everything up, tell the reader how this lesson has changed you.
    make it grade 9 level but use descriptive words to describe emotions.

  • Title: “Last Minute Catch-Up: Completing Unfinished Assignments and Quizzes in Pearson MyLab for College Math”

    I have an online class on Pearson MyLab for College Math and I need to finish all the assignments/quizzes I didn’t do throughout the semester by Sunday night.
    Important Info
    The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
    Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
    Type of paper and subject
    Number of sources and formatting style
    Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

  • “The Power of Servant Leadership” Servant leadership, to me, is a leadership style that prioritizes serving and supporting others before oneself. It involves putting the needs and well-being of others first, rather than focusing solely on one’s own personal

    Write a 150-word post answering the multi-part questions below. You can type your responses or, if you wish, you can upload a short video or audio file as an option (2-3 minutes).
    Naming your thread: MLCDL_SFC_WOODARD_WEEK5
    What is servant leadership to you? Is it the best way to lead at all times? Why? (M421)

  • Title: Evidence-Based Practice: Identifying and Addressing a Healthcare Problem “Evidence-Based Practice: Implementing a Practice Change for Managing Effects in Clinical Practice” “Properly Citing Sources in Professional Communication: A Guide to Accuracy and Effectiveness”

    Introduction:
    In this task, you will identify a healthcare problem, develop an evidence-based practice (EBP) question, and review selected research-based and non-research-based evidence to find answers to that question.
    Note that while you will be analyzing only one research-based and one non-research-based article in this task, an actual evidence-based practice change would require the support of many high-quality research studies.
    Helpful Links:
    Appendix B: Question Development Tool
    https://eds.p.ebscohost.com/eds/ebookviewer/ebook?sid=c362e7d2-aa6c-4c2b-90fd-16ac931cd1ae%40redis&ppid=pp_267&vid=0&format=EB
    Appendix E: Research Evidence Appraisal Tool
    https://eds.p.ebscohost.com/eds/ebookviewer/ebook?sid=89595023-a2e9-4fa3-87a8-b4cb334c3bc2%40redis&ppid=pp_281&vid=0&format=EB
    Appendix F: Non-Research Evidence Appraisal Tool
    https://eds.p.ebscohost.com/eds/ebookviewer/ebook?sid=3230c1d3-73de-4108-b34f-249809dbf198%40redis&ppid=pp_291&vid=0&format=EB
    Requirements:
    B: Discuss the impact of a clinical practice problem on the patient or patients and the organization it affects. B1: Identify each of the following PICO components of the clinical practice problem.
    * P: patient, population, or problem
    * I: intervention
    * C: comparison
    * O: outcome
    B2: Develop an evidence based practice (EBP) question based on the clinical problem discussed in part B and the PICO components identified in part B1.
    C: Select a research-based article that answers your EBP question from part B2 to conduct an evidence appraisal. (the article you select should not be more than five years old.)
    C1: Discuss the background or introduction (i.e., purpose) of the research base article.
    C2: Describe the research methodology used in the research-based article.
    C3: Identify the level of evidence for the research based article using the John Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice model.
    C4: Summarize how the researcher analyzed the data in the research based article.
    C5: Summarize the ethical considerations of the research based article. If none are present, explain why.
    C6: Identify the quality rating of the research based article according to the JHNEBP model.
    C7: Analyze the results or conclusions of the research based article.
    C7a: Explain how the article helps answer your EBP question.
    D: select a non-research based article from a peer reviewed journal that helps to answer your EBP question from part B2 to conduct an evidence appraisal.
    D1: Discuss the background or introduction (i.e., the purpose) of the non-research based article.
    D2: Describe the type of evidence (e.g., case study, quality improvement project, clinical practice guideline) used in the non-research based article.
    D3: Identify the level of evidence in the non-research based article using the JHNEBP model.
    D4: Identify the quality rating of the non-research based article according to the JHNEBP model.
    D5: Discuss how the authors recommendations in the non-research based article help answer your EBP question.
    E: Recommend a practice change that addresses your EBP question using both the research-based and non-research-based articles you selected from part C and part D.
    E1: Explain how you would involve three key stakeholders in supporting the practice change recommendation.
    E2: Discuss one specific barrier you may encounter when implementing the practice change recommendation.
    E3: Identify one strategy that could be used to overcome the barrier discussed in E2.
    E4: Identify one outcome (the O component in PICO) from your EBP question that can be used to measure the recommended practice change. F: Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
    G: Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
    Rubric:
    B: Clinical Practice Problem
    The submission includes a discussion of the clinical practice problem that logically addresses its impact on the patient or patients and the organization it affects.
    B1: PICO Components
    The submission includes each of the given PICO components of the clinical practice problem. Each of the given components is accurate and complete.
    B2: Evidence-Based Question
    Submission includes an evidence based practice (EBP) question that appropriately addresses the clinical practice problem and includes all the PICO components.
    C: Selection of a Research-Based Article The selected article is researched based and answers the EBP question from part B2.
    C1: Background or Introduction of the Research-Based Article The submission accurately discusses the background or introduction of the research-based article.
    C2: Research Methodology in the Research-Based Article
    The submission includes a description that accurately describes the research methodology used in the research-based article.
    C3: Level of Evidence in the Research-Based Article
    The submission accurately identifies the level of evidence for the research-based article that is based on the JHNEBP (John Hopkins Nursing Evidence Based Practice) model.
    C4: Analysis of the Data
    The submission includes a summary that accurately describes how the researcher analyzed the data in the article.
    C5: Ethical Considerations of the Research-Based Article The submission includes a summary that logically describes the ethical considerations of the research-based article. Or, if no ethical considerations are present, the submission includes a logical explanation of why none are present.
    C6: Quality Rating of the Research-Based Article The submission accurately identifies a quality rating of the research-based article according to the JHNEBP model.
    C7: Results or Conclusions of the Research-Based Article The submission includes an analysis that logically evaluates the results or conclusions of the research-based Article C7a: How the Article Answers the EBP Question
    The submission appropriately explains how the article helps answer the EBP question.
    D: Selection of a Non-Research-Based Article The selected article is a non-research-based article and answers the EBP question from part B2.
    D1: Background or Introduction of the Non-Research-Based Article The submission accurately discusses the background or introduction of the non-research-based article.
    D2: Type of Evidence in the Non-Research-Based Article
    The submission accurately describes the type of evidence used in the non-research-based article.
    D3: Level of Evidence in the Non-Research-Based Article
    The submission accurately identifies the level of evidence for the non-research-based article according to the JHNEBP model.
    D4: Quality Rating of the Non-Research-Based Article
    The submission accurately identifies the equality rating for the non-research based article according to the JHNEBP model.
    D5: Author’s Recommendations in the Non-Research-Based Article The submission includes a discussion that logically explains the author’s recommendations help answer the EBP question.
    E: Recommended Practice Change
    The submission includes a practice change recommendation that appropriately addresses the EBP question and accurately uses both the research based and non-research based articles to show how the change should be made.
    E1: Involvement of Key Stakeholders
    The submission includes an explanation of how 3 key stakeholders would appropriately support the practice change recommendation.
    E2: Barrier of Implementing the Practice Change
    The submission includes a discussion of 1 specific barrier that might feasibly be encountered during implementation, and the barrier discussed is appropriate for the practice change recommendation.
    E3: Strategy for Overcoming the Barrier
    The submission identifies one strategy that could logically be used to overcome the barrier discussed in part E2.
    E4: Outcome to Measure the Recommended Practice Change
    The submission identifies 1 outcome from the EBP question that appropriately measures the recommended practice change.
    F: Sources
    The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized in a reference list that accurately identifies the author date, title, and source location as available.
    G: Professional Communication
    Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively convey the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar, promote accurate interpretation and understanding.

  • “Revolutionizing Numerical Differentiation: The Discovery of Rung-Kutta Iterations”

    You are tasked to write an academic article on a ground breaking methodology your research lab has discovered called “Rung-Kutta” iterations for numerical differentiation. Although this method actually exist, this assignment should be done as if you are the one who have discovered it and are hereby trying to publish it.

  • “Engaging in Informed Discussions: Responding with Evidence and Sources”

    Please use however many sources are needed when responding to the discussion posts. There are 6 different posts to respond to in 100 or more words. 1 post consists of a claim and evidence. I highlighted what has to be done.