Brisk Writers

Author: admin

  • Title: Company Directive for Adoption of 2-Factor Authentication for IT Equipment Access Introduction: As the Information Security Director for our company, I would like to address the recent ransomware attack that resulted in a loss of $500,000.

    You are the Information Security Director for a medium sized company. You recently experienced a ransom-ware attack that cost the company $500,000.00. After the attack your CEO held a meeting and informed you and the other IT professionals that it “WILL” not happen again. Write a Directive to the employees of the company summarizing the requirement for all personnel to adopt the new 2-factor authentication for IT equipment access. Include a 30-day timeline to adopt, and the consequences of not adhering to the new policy.
    Instructions:
    •    Write a 400-500 word policy using APA format.
    •    Your essay should include an introductory paragraph and a conclusion.
    •    Follow APA format for structure. An APA template is attached here. Conduct research associated with 2-factor authentication and at a minimum cite 3 credible references beyond the course materials. Please note Wikipedia, Investopedia and similar websites are not credible academic references.

  • “Sensory Transduction: Understanding Pain Sensation through a Lab Simulation” Sensory Transduction: Understanding Pain Sensation through a Lab Simulation “Lab Report Analysis: Exploring the Results and Implications of a Simulation” “Mastering the Art of Writing a Lab Report: A Step-by-Step Guide”

    Touchstone: Sensory transduction: Learn why you feel pain when you get hit by a rock Lab Report
    ASSIGNMENT: In this unit, you will complete the lab titled Sensory transduction: Learn why you feel pain when you get hit by a rock. Now it is time to write up your lab report describing the hypothesis and conclusions you drew from the lab experience.
    By completing the lab report, you will demonstrate your ability to do the following:
    Describe the lab’s overall objective and make a hypothesis
    Introduce relevant background knowledge on the topic
    Summarize the steps taken in the lab simulation
    Explain any obtained results
    Discuss the conclusions and implications
    Download the lab report file. IMPORTANT: You must submit this completed template file as your Touchstone.
    Lab Report – Sensory Transduction: Learn why you feel pain when you get hit by a rock
    The document is a Microsoft Word file. You will type your answers directly into the boxes provided and submit it as a Word file. Any other submission file or format will be returned ungraded.
    In order to foster learning and growth, all work you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any plagiarized or recycled work will result in a Plagiarism Detected alert. Review Touchstones: Academic Integrity Guidelines for more about plagiarism and the Plagiarism Detected alert. For guidance on the use of generative AI technology, review Ethical Standards and Appropriate Use of AI.
    A. Directions
    Step 1: Download and review the lab report file.
    Step 2: Complete the simulation and fill in each part of the lab report file as you work through the Activity. Prompts in the lab report will help you develop your responses.
    Follow the process presented to you in the How to Write a Lab Report lesson to ensure you write a thorough lab report entry.
    Review the grading rubric (below) to make sure you have an understanding of how your lab report will be graded.
    Step 3: Once you’ve completed the lab simulation and your lab report, review the submission requirements (below) and update your lab report to ensure it meets the recommended requirements.
    Step 4: Once your lab report template is complete, submit it for grading.
    Refer to the checklist below throughout the Touchstone process. Do not submit your Touchstone until you meet these guidelines.
    ❒ Did you review the Lab Manual before starting the simulation?❒ Did you complete the lab simulation?❒ Did you refer to the lesson on How to Write a Lab Report?❒ Did you complete all 5 sections of the Lab Report file?❒ Did you review the Touchstone rubric and compare it to your lab report❒ Did you submit the provided Lab Report file as your Touchstone for grading?B. Rubric
    Advanced (100%)Proficient (85%)Acceptable (75%)Needs Improvement (50%)Non-Performance (0%)
    Objective and Hypothesis
    Describe the overall objective of the simulation and make a hypothesis (if applicable). (18%)Clearly describes the purpose of the simulation and makes a hypothesis. Purpose and hypothesis are well-aligned with the simulation and are paraphrased in the student’s own words.Describes the purpose of the simulation and makes a hypothesis. Both are aligned with the simulation and are paraphrased in the student’s own words, but are less clear and specific.Describes a purpose and a hypothesis that are only loosely aligned with the simulation.Either the description of the simulation’s purpose or the hypothesis is missing, or they are not paraphrased in the student’s own words.Does not describe the purpose of the simulation or a hypothesis. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
    Background Knowledge
    Introduce relevant background knowledge on the topic described in the simulation. (18%)
    Lists at least 3 examples of relevant background knowledge on the topic from the simulation Lab Manual or other resources.Lists at least 2 examples of relevant background knowledge on the topic from the simulation Lab Manual or other resources.Lists at least 1 example of relevant background knowledge on the topic from the simulation Lab Manual or other resources.Lists at least 1 example but its connection to the simulation is unclear.Response does not offer any background knowledge on simulation. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
    Summary and Steps
    Summarize the steps taken in the simulation. (18%)
    Summarizes all steps taken in the simulation and all equipment and techniques used. Summary is organized in a way that the reader understands the logical flow of the lab.Summarizes most of the steps taken in the simulation and lists some equipment and techniques used. Summary is organized in a way that the reader mostly understands the logical flow of the lab.Summarizes some of the steps taken in the simulation and lists some of the equipment and techniques used. Summary is organized in a way that the reader somewhat understands the logical flow of the lab.Summary is missing most of the steps in the simulation and most of the equipment and techniques used. Summary may contradict the simulation or be organized illogically.Summary does not include any steps taken in the simulation, or equipment and techniques used. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
    Results
    Explain the obtained results from the simulation. (18%)
    Accurately explains most of the obtained results of the simulation, if the results were expected or unexpected, and why.Accurately explains some of the obtained results of the simulation, and if the results were expected or unexpected.Explains some of the results of the simulation, but may contain some inaccuracies. Does not explain if the results were expected or unexpected.Explanation of results is entirely inaccurate or contradicts the simulation. Does not explain if the results were expected or unexpected.Does not explain any obtained results or if the results were expected or unexpected. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
    Conclusions and Implications
    Discusses the conclusions and implications of the simulation. (18%)
    Clearly and specifically summarizes how the results of the simulation relate to the original purpose and hypothesis; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Summarizes the results of the simulation but their relationship to the original purpose and hypothesis may be less clear; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Completes 2 of 3 tasks: summarizes how the results of the simulation relate to the original purpose and hypothesis; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Completes 1 of 3 tasks: summarizes how the results of the simulation relate to the original purpose and hypothesis; correctly identifies systematic sources of error; and reflects on what was learned.Completes none of the tasks. Response may be totally off-topic or absent.
    Conventions and Proofreading
    Submission follows conventions for standard written English. (10%)
    There are almost no errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization.There are minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that do not impede readability.There are frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that somewhat impede readability.There are consistent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that significantly impede readability.Submission does not meet the minimum threshold for points to be awarded.
    C. Requirements
    The following requirements must be met for your submission to be graded:
    Use the provided lab report file completed with a readable 11- or 12-point font.
    Composition must be original and written for this assignment and all writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
    Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
    Submission must include your name and the date.
    Only submit the completed lab report file saved in .doc or .dox format as your assignment submission.
    D. Additional Resources
    The following resources will be helpful to you as you work on this assignment:
    How to Write a Lab Report lesson
    Activity Page

  • Title: The Nature vs Nurture Debate: Exploring the Role of Genetics and Environment in Human Development 1. Summary of the Topic: The nature vs nurture debate is a long-standing controversy in psychology and other fields of study that examines the relative

    1. Summarize the topic from the information provided in your textbook or elsewhere in this module. (topic i aam choosing is nature vs nurture)
    2. Next, do some internet research that delves deeper into the topic than the information provided in your textbook. Summarize findings from at least two separate sources and and discuss what you learned.
    Format
    incorporate findings from at least two internet sites in item #2
    number each part of your response to the prompt
    APA style writing (use appropriate “in-text citations”and provide a reference section indicating where you obtained your information)
    300 words minimum 
    Below are the info on nature vs nuture given in class: 

  • Title: “Exploring the Impact of Social Media on Mental Health: A Literature Review” Introduction and Purpose: Social media has become an integral part of our daily lives, with billions of people using various platforms to connect, share, and

    Continue to work on your Literature Review (what you started in Milestone #6). 
    If you have finished the body sections of your review, this draft should include a sample of your Introduction and Purpose and Conclusion sections. 
    If you are not yet done with the body, this milestone should build on the body before you can move onto the Introduction and Purpose and Conclusion sections. 
    Again, this is considered a draft of your literature review. Therefore, it does not need to be complete. It does, however, need to show growth since Milestone #6. 

  • “Global Health Inequalities: An Analysis of Factors and Solutions”

    The file should be PPT and 800 words
    I have uploaded a file containing the instructions 
    Please use so much data and at least one statistical test and take data from WHO global health observatory GHO
    And at least 30 references 
    No plagiarism and AI 

  • Nursing Advocacy: Shaping Policy and Politics through Legislative Action

    As a nurse, how often have you thought to yourself, If I had anything to do about it, things would work a little differently? Increasingly, nurses are beginning to realize that they do, in fact, have a role and a voice.
    Many nurses encounter daily experiences that motivate them to take on an advocacy role in hopes of impacting policies, laws, or regulations that impact healthcare issues of interest. Of course, doing so means entering the less familiar world of policy and politics. While many nurses do not initially feel prepared to operate in this space effectively, the reward is the opportunity to shape and influence future health policy.
    To Prepare:
    Select a bill that has been proposed (not one that has been enacted) using the congressional websites provided in the Learning Resources.
    The Assignment: (1- to 2-page Legislation Grid; 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement)
    ***Be sure to add a title page, an introduction, purpose statement, and a conclusion. This is an APA paper.
    Part 1: Legislation Grid
    Based on the health-related bill (proposed, not enacted) you selected, complete the Legislation Grid Template. Be sure to address the following:
    Determine the legislative intent of the bill you have reviewed.
    Identify the proponents/opponents of the bill.
    Identify the target populations addressed by the bill.
    Where in the process is the bill currently? Is it in hearings or committees?
    Part 2: Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement
    Based on the health-related bill you selected, develop a 1-page Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement that addresses the following:
    Advocate a position for the bill you selected and write testimony in support of your position.
    Explain how the social determinants of income, age, education, or gender affect this legislation.
    Describe how you would address the opponent to your position. Be specific and provide examples.
    At least 2 outside resources and 2-3 course specific resources are used.
    PLEASE USE REQUIRED RESOURCES
    Required Readings
    Short, N. M. (2022). Milstead’s health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (7th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
    Chapter 5, “Policy Enactment: Legislation and Politics” (pp. 97–117)
    Chapter 10, “Financing Health Care” (pp. 239–249)
    Congress.govLinks to an external site.. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.congress.gov/
    Taylor, D., Olshansky, E., Fugate-Woods, N., Johnson-Mallard, V., Safriet, B. J., & Hagan, T. (2017). Corrigendum to position statement: Political interference in sexual and reproductive health research and health professional education. Nursing Outlook, 65(2), 346–350Links to an external site..
    United States House of RepresentativesLinks to an external site.. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.house.gov/
    United States SenateLinks to an external site.. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2018, from https://www.senate.gov/
    United States Senate. (n.d.). Senate organization chart for the 117th CongressLinks to an external site..  https://www.senate.gov/reference/org_chart.htm

  • Title: “The Power of Mindfulness: Cultivating Peace and Happiness in a Busy World” Ladies and gentlemen, esteemed guests, thank you for joining me today as I discuss a topic that is close to my heart – mindfulness. In this

    I just need a written speech I already have the speech outline which I have attatched and a visual aid is also needed to presnt while I read the speech. In the speech also needs to   have the citations verbally cited some where in the speech.

  • Title: Exploring Primary and Secondary Sources in Social Studies Education Part 1: In this module, I have learned about the importance of using primary and secondary sources in social studies education. The course materials have helped me to accomplish the Module Level

    Identify a primary source
    Identify a secondary source 
    Task: 
    Below is a list of course materials (including articles/chapters to read, video clips to watch, images to analyze, questions to consider, and possibly more). Please take time to read/view these materials carefully and critically.  
    Part 1:  After you have read/viewed all the materials, write one paragraph (approximately 150 words) explaining how the materials in this module helped you accomplish, reach, and/or demonstrate the Module Level Objective(s) (listed above). Be specific and provide evidence from the course materials (from at least two sources) that support your claims. Cite/reference the items you include in your assignment answers (with proper APA citation—use the formal references listed below to help you with your “Reference” List). 
    Part 2: Then write a second paragraph (approximately 150 words) that makes connections between your life (e.g., personal experiences, current events, and/or previous modules in this course [if applicable]). Then reflect on how you might utilize this learning in your future classroom. 
    Part 1:  
    Name each of module level objectives listed for the assignment and explain how you can accomplish, reach, and/or demonstrate each one.  
    Provide evidence or examples from at least 2 of the readings/course materials, linking the evidence back to each specific learning goal 
    Use proper APA in-text citations and a “References” list at the end of the assignment  
    Part 2 : 
    Make connections between these readings and “life”—for example, to your personal experiences, current events, and/or previous modules in this course (when applicable) 
    Reflect on how the learning in this module relates to your previous and present understandings of the topic(s) at hand 
    Reflect on how you might utilize this learning in your future classroom—in particular, how it could impact/affect your future teaching about social studies

  • Title: Defining Knowledge Worker, Perception, and Reasoning: An Exploration of Terms and Concepts in the Modern Workplace

    Part 1:
    Please define these as well please.
    Knowledge worker
    Perception
    Reasoning Part 2:
    In this assignment (more details below), you will be providing several definitions to various terms/concepts. Many of those definitions can be found throughout your Week 1-2 Learning Resource, in the UIC library, and/or on reference links provided on the course site.
    For one of the terms/concepts you are defining, you must contribute at least 1 additional current journal article that is not included in the weekly learning materials and is found from doing a library search. Though you must find definitions for each of your assigned terms/concepts, you must find an outside journal article for only one. However, be sure to cite and reference where you found each of your definitions.
    You are required to add a quote from this outside journal article somewhere on your Wiki page, then make sure to add that resource to your Team Wiki Reference Page in APA format.
    Part III: Collaboration using Wiki

  • “Mastering Synthesis: A Guide to Effective Literature Reviews”

    As per instructons received… This must be a synthesis vs. an Annotated bibliography.
    Literature review In scholarly work and in creating a
    literature review:
    a
    summary tells us ‘so what was this about’..a synopsis.
    Here is another way of thinking about/working with
    synthesis:  Most students are able to
    tell us the difference between a summary (annotation/book report style) vs a
    synthesis.. However when the sit down to work on their SYNTHESIS
    assignment, they do not provide a synthesis. Synthesis was explained earlier
    however I’ll explain in perhaps another way below that might be helpful:
    Imagine you are hosting a party at your house (wearing
    a mask of course ;-)) with some famous scholars..they are coming to discuss
    some research on your area of study. You are in the kitchen making coffee,
    slicing up the coffee cake and listening..you are hearing the back
    and forth discussion of these scholars talking about the pros/cons of
    the research, what the real problem is and how these research studies fit that
    problem..you’re taking note the entire time while waiting to serve the coffee
    and cake. You finally listen to the group, chime in a bit with your findings
    and then after they leave, you will write a summary on what was noted by these
    scholars..the problem noted in those works, the pros/cons found in that
    research relevant to the problem, where the topic is now, where its heading and
    general thoughts on this..you will take this info as a whole to tell your
    understanding of this living room conversation on this topic. You will not say
    ‘Grant said (2021), Smith then said (2021)..INSTEAD, you will give a general
    explanation of the topic, with the info I noted above..you will of course site
    them as it was THEIR idea initially but we want your overall, holistic
    view of this conversation..THAT is synthesis..does that make sense?