Read the case study attached and answer the reflective questions. Please provide evidence-based rationales for your answers. APA, 7th ed. must be followed. NO MORE THAN 10 % PLAGIO
1 PAGE
DUE DATE MAY 22, 2024
Author: admin
-
Title: Reflective Analysis of a Case Study: Addressing Ethical Dilemmas in Healthcare
-
Discussion Participation Guidelines “Understanding Others: The Role of Personal Characteristics in Forming Impressions”
Participation Expectations
For each discussion activity, you are responsible for posting at least one substantive initial response to the discussion questions posed, as well, as a reply to at least two other postings made by your classmates.
Your initial substantive posting should be a thoughtful reflection on at least one aspect of the discussion theme or question posed and can either initiate a line of discussion or be in response to someone else’s posting (i.e., adding your own perspective or additional research to it). Keep in mind that quality is better than quantity and “me too” and “I agree” type postings add little to the conversation. Your postings should demonstrate that you have read and thought about the course material. You are encouraged to reference your course textbook in your postings as well as other relevant outside literature.
Some points to keep in mind:
Be clear and to the point in your postings.
Edit your work. Your posts should be coherent and use proper grammar and spelling.
Keep postings to 300-350 words. Quality is better than quantity.
Contribute your own thoughts about the material you have read.
Support your thoughts by referencing the textbook or other outside literature.
Raise additional questions or points of discussion to stimulate further discussion.
If you have questions, show that you have already tried to find a solution.
Respect the viewpoints of your peers. Ask for clarification if you don’t understand a point. Assume good intentions.
Use the proper terminology introduced in the course readings.
When using literature in your postings, make sure to provide references in proper APA Style.
Show respect and sensitivity to peers’ gender, cultural and linguistic background, political, and religious beliefs.
You are strongly encouraged to take the time to review the following documents on writing quality discussion posting and on taking roles in discussions.
PREPARING TO WRITE
1. Read assigned material—critically—and take notes as you read: Who wrote this material (a respected expert? an activist with a specific aim or belief?) Do they have any possible biases? Are studies reliable and valid? (What kind of research was performed?) When was this material written? Are the definitions/conditions/opinions described still accur vant? ate/rele Is an opinion expressed? How might someone disagree? How does this material relate to other concepts and theories you are studying? (Remember, instructors choose readings with a plan in mind—try to imagine why they have assigned this reading) Does the article complement other things you have learned? Is it in opposition? 2. Read and understand the discussion question or topic provided by your instructor • What are you asked to do? (Formulate an opinion? Respond to a question? Explain a concept or theory?) • How are you asked to do this? What kind of information are you expected to include (e.g., supporting quotations or references, examples, etc.) Do you need to bring in outside research? 3. Sort out the finer details • Is there a word maximum? Minimum? (Most posts will be 1‐2 paragraphs maximum). • How many times are you expected to post? (Find out if you are required to post a certain number of times per question, per week, etc.) • How much of your grade is this component worth?Each post? Budget your time accordingly
A.re you expected to respond to other students’ posts? What proportion of original posts versus responses are you asked to provide?
INITIAL POSTS – An initial post is a response to the original question presented by the course instructor, or the opening post on a particular topic (i.e., not responding to other students’ posts). Consider each post a “mini‐thesis,” in which you state a position and provide support for it. If you are responding to a question, be sure to 1. Take a position: Provide a clear answer to the question (incorporate some of the wording of the question in your answer if possible). 2. Offer a reasoned argument: Provide an explanation for your point of view, and use evidence from your text, notes, or outside research (where appropriate) to support your point. 3. Stay focused: End with a summary comment to explain the connection between your evidence and the question (how your evidence proves your point). Your post might also introduce a question or idea that others can follow up on. But make sure you have answered the question first!
Discusssion Marking rubric.
A+ Discussion Post A+
Initial Post
/2.5 points
deliver information that is full of thought, insight, and analysis • make insightful connections to course content • make insightful connections to real-life situations • contain rich and fully developed new ideas, connections, or applications • contain no spelling errors and typos
Question of discussion is –
How do you think of others? Use this discussion area to complete the discussion activity in Unit 03.
Think about a person that you either like or dislike a lot. What characteristics does this person have? How did you form the impression that you have of this person? Does this person have vivid, rare, or extremely positive or negative characteristics? *Remember to exhibit sensitivity when writing your response. -
“Policy Approaches to Addressing Health Disparities” Policy Approaches to Addressing Health Disparities Health disparities refer to the differences in health outcomes and access to healthcare services among different population groups. These disparities can be attributed to various factors
Instructions
1. Describe how Policy approaches to address health disparities
2. Submit before Wednesday
3. Please use 2 APA references, no more than 400 words
4. Reply to 2 students no less than 200 words using 1 APA reference before Saturday 06/01/2024 -
Title: “Evaluating Employee Performance in Healthcare Organizations: The Importance of Key Performance Indicators and Rewarding Performance” In any organization, including healthcare organizations, evaluating employee performance is crucial for maintaining a high level of productivity and achieving organizational goals
Please share your thoughts on the Discussion topic posed below. Your responses to this Discussion should be at least 250 words.
Please read Chapters 12 of Organizational Behavior and Theory in Healthcare: Leadership Perspectives and Management Applications
What are some examples of key performance indicators that you will want to use in evaluating employees in a healthcare organization? Explain why the examples you chose are important. How can recognizing and rewarding employee performance establish a healthy organizational culture? -
“Pharmacology Concept Maps of Commonly Used Maternal Child Medications”
Research and create pharmacology concept maps of commonly used Maternal Child medications. Increasing your knowledge of these medications will help you as you progress through the course. Template attached below
Prenatal Vitamins
Oxytocin
Nalbuphine
Rh Immune Globulin
Vitamin K injection
Erythromycin eye ointment
You will need to upload your reference page separately. Reference page attached below. -
“Ethical Dilemma in Nursing: Evaluating the Use of Placebos in Clinical Practice”
Choose a case from the AMA Journal of Ethics Case IndexLinks to an external site. and take a position. For this assignment you will evaluate the ethical arguments for or against the issue. Identify the potential legal arguments (consider current federal guidelines), indicate any potential professional code conflicts you foresee, and support your position with an explanation of your own ethical/moral foundation.
In your 2-3 page paper:
Identify the issue and state your ethical position.
How might this scenario play out or impact you in your role as a nurse practitioner? Defend your position with legal, ethical, and professional evidence.
As part of your position, propose strategies and solutions for addressing the issues.
What other ethical issues does this case bring to light, if any?
Support your position with at least one scholarly source (it may be your text). Be sure to cite the article you choose, use APA format, and include a title page and reference page.
Review the rubric for further information on how your assignment will be graded.
Rubric
NURS 521 DE Paper/Essay Rubric
NURS 521 DE Paper/Essay Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20 to >17.2 ptsProficient
The writer clearly and effectively responds to the assignment.
17.2 to >15.0 ptsApproaches Proficiency
The response to the assignment is generally adequate, but may not be thorough.
15 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
The writer does not respond to the assignment.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus and Detail
18 to >15.48 ptsProficient
There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main ideas are clear and are well supported by detailed and accurate information.
15.48 to >13.5 ptsApproaches Proficiency
There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main ideas are clear but are not well supported by detailed information.
13.5 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
The topic and main ideas are not clear.
18 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
14 to >12.04 ptsProficient
The introduction is inviting, states the main topic, and provides an overview of the paper. Information is relevant and presented in a logical order. The conclusion is strong.
12.04 to >10.5 ptsApproaches Proficiency
The introduction states the main topic and provides an overview of the paper. A conclusion is included.
10.5 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
There is no clear introduction, structure, or conclusion.
14 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and APA
8 to >6.88 ptsProficient
The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. No grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.
6.88 to >6.0 ptsApproaches Proficiency
The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly.
6 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet Expectations
The assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing.
8 pts
Total Points: 60
PreviousNext -
Conducting a Training Needs Assessment for Improving Patient Safety and Quality of Care in a Hospital Setting
Scenario
Imagine you are a human resource manager at a hospital that is facing a high rate of medical errors and lawsuits. You want to conduct a needs assessment for employee training to improve patient safety and quality of care. To conduct the needs assessment, you need to collect data from multiple sources including patients and employees. You need to analyze the data to identify the gaps between the current and desired levels of knowledge, skills, and abilities of the staff. You also need to prioritize the training needs based on their urgency and impact.
Instructions
In a 1–2-page paper, respond to the following:
Note: You should use your readings and other Learn resources to support this activity. You may make any assumptions necessary.
Describe how you would conduct a training needs assessment based on the scenario.
Would it be reactive or proactive? Why?
Define the problem and align it with a business need.
Describe the types of gaps or deficiencies you might expect to uncover from your training needs assessment.
Create three training objectives and prioritize them based on the training and business needs.
Explain why it is important that HR managers follow a strategic process when determining employee training needs and how this process can help ensure that the training results in measurable improvements for the employees and organization.
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The library is your home for SWS assistance, including citations and formatting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. -
Title: Improving the Delivery of Healthcare to Underserved Populations: A Critical Appraisal of the Evidence
A. Written Content
1. Purpose: A brief paraphrased description of the clinical issue and the aims of your research to improved the delivery of health care and/or education to the targeted population. Answer the “So What Question?” Identify each PICOT element. State your CRQ.
2. Background: Provide an overview of the clinical issue. Include a paraphrased synopsis of the background information in your finalized Chapter 1. Length: Minimum 150 and Maximum 200 words
3. Evidence Search: Evaluation of the literature reviewed (study designs; methodological quality; study participant characteristics, intervention(s) and comparison used in the study, review of study outcomes, potential confounding and bias. Ensure to paraphrase. Do not copy paste from you MHSc Practicum Report. This should be your largest section. Maximum length: 250 words maximum of written text. Using visual presentations of the data (table, chart, graph, etc.) will minimize the word length of text.
4. Evidence Quality and Relevance: Number of literatures excluded and reason for exclusion; old, duplicate, or lack of evidential quality for the PICOT question. Number of articles determined as relevant to the retrieved and saved. Paraphrased description of relevance to your CRQ.
5. Summary of Findings: Paraphrase the main findings of the studies you selected by evidence (themes, topics, or categories), and observed patterns or trends. Summarize your critical analysis of the quality and consistency of the evidence provides answers to your CRQ. Maximum length: 100 words.
6. Strengths and Weaknesses: Paraphrase the strengths and limitations of the studies identified and selected based on the level of quality and relevance. Summarize gaps or inconsistencies in the evidence. Maximum length: 100 words.
7. Moving Forward: State your analysis of the implications for PA practice, patient education, and/or further research.
8. References: Add five additional references in APA 7 format not included in the appraisal of literature table. If you did not use the appraisal table, include 10 references. Make sure that any source cited in your poster is identified as a reference.
B. Graphics!!
Appealing to the eye
If you can, use graphics that you created or developed.
If you use graphics from any other source, make sure they are referenced by placing the URL under the graphic.
C. Citations and References
Peer-reviewed!
Include citations in APA 7 (2020) format as appropriate.
Make sure the references are within the 5 years limit (2018-2024).
D. Additional Considerations
Do not copy from your MHSc Practicum Report!
Paraphrase
Paraphrase
Paraphrase some more
Less is always more.
Not too many words
Leave open spaces on your poster.
Follow the “Three C’s” of poster development:
Clear
Concise
Complete -
Title: The Use of Humor, Wit, and Irony in Gothic Literature: A Comparative Analysis of “Harrison Bergeron” and “Vincent”
Your topic is the use of wit, irony, and/or humor in “Harrison Bergeron” and the short film “Vincent” (you can find it in this link: https://youtu.be/0owXeJbhdvY ) Humor, wit and/or irony is a commonly used tool in Gothic literature.
I need to include 4 other other sources of literary criticism alongside the 2 primary sources of Harrison Bergeron and Vincent. Make sure to emphasize all points for which Humor, wit, and irony significance in gothic literature(the significance, purpose, and effect of using them) Use literary criticism sources from only:
eBook Central or EBSCO Ebook Collection
Literary Reference Center
Literature Resource Center
Try to diversify but if you can’t understand. Try to find sources that give insightful information on the primary sources or sources that talk directly about gothic tools using humor, wit and irony. I already provided 1/4 literature crit sources(you find 3 more): the one I provided talks about the history of tim burton creating the film Vincent so incorporate context of the video creation into the essay somewhere. If you can post a screenshot of the source, but if you can’t, just make sure to provide me the name and I’ll do it myself. -
Title: Understanding the Differences and Similarities between Quality Improvement and Process Evaluation Approaches in Healthcare.
Imagine that you need to explain to a community of stakeholders the difference between a quality improvement approach and a process evaluation approach. What would you summarize as being unique to each approach? What are the similarities between the two approaches? How would you decide which approach to implement? What challenges rest with each approach? Refer to the information you learned this week on Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) and the tools used in the approach, as well as the process evaluation and the data collection methods used in that approach. You may choose to present this project as either: A 4-5 page essay