Author: admin

  • “Exploring the Role of Culture in Literature: An Analysis of Three Texts”

    I’ve attached the instructions to this essay, also provided three texts to read through that will help you find the passages.

  • “Understanding Research Studies in Education Psychology: Abstract Writing and Critical Evaluation”

    Instructions for Research Assignment
    To complete this
    assignment, you will begin by reading each of the TWO research studies (attached) carefully and thoroughly.  After you have
    read the studies, you will write an “Abstract” or
    “Summary” for each of the studies. In a total of 150 to 200 words (maximum) each.
    In a total of 150 to 200 words (maximum),
    you will provide a succinct and accurate abstract/summary, outlining the
    objectives of the study, the research design, and findings of the research
    study, including the following:   
    Information
    to Include:
    Grading
    Weight
    Accurately
    state the research question(s) or objectives(s);
    1 point
    Accurately
    identify the type of research design and methods (using keywords such as
    experimental, longitudinal, case study, action research, etc.);
    1 point
    Clearly
    describe the participants in the research study;
    1 point
    Accurately and succinctly summarize of
    the research results and conclusions
    2 points
    Developing an accurate title
    for the research study
    Bonus: 1 point
    Objective of the assignment
    -Become familiar with the format and style
    of research studies in Education Psychology
    -Apply knowledge about research methods to
    understand research inquiry
    -Demonstrate and understanding of research
    data and how conclusions are drawn
    -Develop the capacity to critically evaluate
    educational research findings. *Is it to help future research studies?
    Small recap:
    1.    
    Literature review
    –      
    Provided at the beginning of
    the published research
    –      
    Identifies the research problem
    and the foci of the research investigation of the present study
    –      
    Provides information gathered from
    previous research that shed light on the research problem of foci of the
    research investigation
    –      
    Identifies key concepts and
    operationalize the terms: eg what is “narrative comprehension”? What does “achievement”
    refer to?
    –      
    Explains the hypothesis or framework
    of the present study
    2.    
    The present study
    –      
    What are the research questions
    and/or objectives?
    –      
    What research methods were used
    in this research study?
    –      
    Who were the participants
    recruited for this research study?
    –      
    What tools/research instruments
    were used in the data collection?
    3.    
    Data Analyses and Results
    –      
    How did the research analyze
    the data gathered for the present study?
    –      
    What were the main results of
    this study?
    Are the data analyses used to find a cause
    effect relationship or it the data analyses used to find a correlation of the
    relationship? Descriptive part to focus on!
    4.    
    Discussions of Data and
    Conclusions
    –      
    What conclusion were drawn from
    the study?
    –      
    What are some of the limitations
    of this present research study? What would be pursued in the future research of
    this nature?

  • An Investigation into the Impact of Business Intelligence and Information Systems on the Management of Information and Decision Making within the Case Study Organisation

    Module
    Assessment Guide
    Introduction
    Please note that each week there will be an
    Assignment Building Activity in which you will carry out some of the necessary
    research work to enable you to complete the Assignment. 
    Assessment Brief
    As an individual
    student you are required to produce a report entitled:
    “An Investigation into
    the Impact of Business Intelligence and Information Systems on the Management
    of Information and Decision Making within the Case Study Organisation”
    The report should
    research, critically assess and analyse the issues and challenges in the
    management of information systems, the application of business intelligence,
    the role of information and business analytics in supporting the development of
    strategies, and the management of effective information flows within the Case
    Study Organisation.
    The findings should be
    evaluated, and practical recommendations should be made for improvements in
    information systems management, business intelligence and business analytics,
    for management decision making and the management of information flow within the
    Case Study Organisation.
    Report Structure:
    Section 1: Introduction (250 words).
    Section 2: A critical assessment of contemporary issues
    and challenges in the management of information systems, including big data
    management, analytics, and cloud systems within the Case Study Organisation
    (400 words).
    Section 3: A critical analysis of the application and
    impact of business intelligence within the Case Study Organisation (400 words).
    Section 4: A critical analysis of the role of information
    and analytics in supporting the development of strategies within the Case Study
    Organisation (400 words)
    Section 5: A critical evaluation of the practical
    techniques used for the design and management of effective information flows
    within the Case Study Organisation. (400 words)
    Section 6: Recommendations for improvements in
    information systems management, business intelligence and business analytics,
    for management decision making and the management of information flow within
    the Case Study Organisation. (400 words).
    Section 7: Conclusion (250 words)
    The Report should be professionally written
    and produced and be 2500 words in length.
    The content of your
    report should be supported by the academic material contained in the module
    canvas topic and by your own reading of the core textbooks referred to in the
    module canvas topic. You should also demonstrate wider reading by the inclusion
    of appropriate books, journals and case studies from the module recommended
    reading list and other appropriate sources. All textbooks, journals and case
    studies included should be referenced using Harvard Referencing. 
    Please also include illustrations of models and frameworks (can be in appendices section)
    Assessment
    Marking Criteria and Rubric
    Percentage
    Criteria
    15%
    Critical assessment of contemporary issues and challenges
    in the management of information systems, including big data management,
    analytics, and cloud systems within the Case Study Organisation 
    15%
    Critical analysis of the application and impact of
    business intelligence within the Case Study Organisation 
    15%
    Critical analysis of the role of information and
    analytics in supporting the development of strategies within the Case Study
    Organisation 
    15%
    A critical evaluation of the practical techniques used
    for the design and management of effective information flows within the Case
    Study Organisation 

  • “Urgent Math Tests Assistance Needed”

    I will give you a username and password to a separate site where you will need to complete 2 small math tests, each of which will take about 15 minutes. I need to do this today but I really don’t have time, so I’m really hoping for your help.

  • “Corporate Responsibility and the Opioid Crisis: The Case of Purdue Pharma and the Sackler Family”

    Module: Health Policy & Legal Aspects of Healthcare
    Description: In this lesson, we will delve into the complex relationship between business ethics, legal accountability, and the public health implications of the opioid crisis, with a particular focus on Purdue Pharma, OxyContin, and the Sackler Family’s role. Through individual and collaborative efforts, we will explore the nuances of corporate responsibility and its legal ramifications.
    Objectives:
    Understand the concepts of abatement, bankruptcy, civil and criminal law, and other key terms.
    Analyze the case of Purdue Pharma and its impact on the opioid epidemic.
    Evaluate the legal and ethical accountability of business owners in the healthcare industry.
    Discuss the broader implications of corporate decisions on public health.
    Warm-Up Activity: Reflect on the question of business owners’ accountability for their companies’ actions 
    Vocabulary Exercise: Before you begin, familiarize yourself with the provided vocabulary list. Understanding these terms is crucial for grasping the complexities of the case study.
    Introduction: Review a video clip and an article to set the context for the case study.
    Application: Watch the assigned video clips and read the accompanying notes to gain a deeper insight into the Purdue Pharma case, the Sackler family’s involvement, and the opioid crisis.
    Closure Activity: Synthesize the information from this lesson to articulate the primary problem, the outcomes, and propose solutions supported by evidence from the video clips.
    Assignment Submission:
    Share your responses to the video clips and article notes in the designated Canvas assignment section.
    Post your closure activity response in a 500-word essay on 

  • Barriers to Progress in Advanced Practice Nursing and Strategies for Overcoming Them Introduction Advanced practice nursing (APN) is a rapidly growing field that encompasses a wide range of specialized roles, including nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, certified nurse mid

    Describe three barriers that have slowed down the progress of advanced practice nursing and strategies to help overcome these barriers. (Saunders, 2014)
    Submission Instructions:
    Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.

  • Title: Understanding the Concept of Nation-States: Characteristics and Comparison of Modern, Strong, Weak, and Failed States

    Preamble: In this lesson activity you are prompted to define through research what it identifies a nation-state? What are the characteristics that can identify a modern state in comparison to strong, weak or failed state. Is a nation comes first? or the State is created first? Justification: Through research and comprehensive analysis you will be able to identify the definition of a ‘nation-state’ that will help you compare modern states nature vs weak or failed states. Therefore are the strong states defined as modern or post modern, and are there successful democracies? Considering their history some may have derived from regimes.
    Task and Mission: Write 300-500 words of bullet points or paragraph suggesting your opinion and choices
    Try to use terminology, facts from the Chapters and Links.
    Suggested Research Guidelines: Utilize the Online Library, ebooks selected in the syllabus and Links under Module 2! Submission Format:
    Use up to 3-5 resources in your ‘Bibliography’ not Wikipedia or any other open source multimedia.
    see Announcement tab and links… on 2 ebooks free 
    https://commons.libretexts.org/book/socialsci-18213Links to an external site.
    https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Political_Science_and_Civics/Introduction_to_Comparative_Government_and_Politics_(Bozonelos_et_al.)Links to an external site.

  • Title: Selecting a Correctional Issue for Research: An Exploration of Historical Perspectives

    The research paper for this course is to select one of the four main areas of corrections:
    historical perspectives, alternatives to imprisonment, institutional corrections or
    correctional clients and research the historical perspective of the issue.
    Instructions:
    Submit a paper identifying the specific correctional issue you choose to do your
    research paper on and why you chose this particular issue.
    Requirements:
    • Remember only to identify the specific issue you will be writing your research
    paper on and why you selected that particular issue.
    • Submit a Word document in APA format.
    • One page in length, excluding the Title and Reference pages.
    • At least two resources.

  • “Constructing a Full Outline for Your Paper with Citations and References”

    DIRECTIONS
    This week, you will construct a full outline for your paper including citations and references. First, read “Outlining” in The Norton Field Guide pp. 335-337 and The Little Seagull Handbook W-3 under “Organizing and Drafting.” You may also review the sample outline below. You can construct it yourself or use the template downloadable here.
    Click the graphic below to review an annotated example student submission using the downloadable template.
    Complete your own outline for this week’s writing assignment.
    Outline Format
    I. Introduction (Your full intro, revised based on the feedback from the Week 3 Discussion Board)
    Opening sentence or hook
    Explanatory sentence about topic/problem
    Thesis statement
    II. Supporting Claim 1
    Topic Sentence: What is the first claim that supports your argument?
    Source #1: What evidence have you found that supports your claim?
    Explain how this evidence supports your claim. Include some APA in-text citations, i.e. (Ford, 2020, p. 1).
    Transitional Phrase: ___________________
    III. Supporting Claim 2
    Topic Sentence: What is the second claim that supports your argument?
    Source #2: What evidence have you found that supports your claim?
    Explain how this evidence supports your claim. Include some APA in-text citations, i.e. (CDC, 2020, p. 25).
    Transitional Phrase: ___________________
    IV. Supporting Claim 3
    Topic Sentence: What is the third claim that supports your argument?
    Source #3: What evidence have you found that supports your claim?
    Explain how this evidence supports your claim. Include some APA in-text citations, i.e. (Rousseau et al., 2020, para. 29).
    V. Conclusion 
    Note the most important claim you are making
    Reiterate your thesis statement. (Be sure to state your thesis statement differently than you did in the introduction paragraph.)
    Reflective sentence or call to action
    VI. References (at least three. Your final paper needs at least four, with at least three coming from the university library databases.)
    VII. Opposing Viewpoints
    Good arguments must consider an alternate point of view. You can do this in a separate paragraph or within one of your supporting paragraphs.
    What alternate point of view are you presenting? Identify a source that presents this objection and cite it, i.e. (Smith & Ruiz, 2019, para. 3).
    How do you respond to or rebut the counterargument described above? You may use a source to refute this opposing point as well.
    Your outline should include the following elements:
    A fully written introduction (revised from the Week 3 Discussion)
    A thesis that ends your introduction (revised from Week 2’s assignment and the Week 3 Discussion)
    Three sections, each with its own topic sentence, research, and brief explanation
    At least one reasonable objection and how you plan to overcome it.
    Click here for a guide to working with counterpoints.
    Quotations and citations from three academic journal sources from Keiser’s Library (from Week 2);
    Remember, your final paper requires the use of a total of four sources.
    Contact your instructor if you have questions regarding the fourth or any additional sources.
    Transitional phrases are required. 
    Click here for a YouTube video discussion of transitional phrases.
    Or, click here for a Purdue OWL discussion of transitional phrases.
    Comments to be included in your conclusion 
    Minimum of three APA formatted references in your reference list.