Brisk Writers

Author: admin

  • Title: “Objectives of the Japanese during the Leyte Operation”

    For the Japanese, what do you believe were (1) the strategic objective; 
    (2) the theater-strategic objective; and (3) the operational objective during the Leyte operation? As part of your answer explain how these objectives are connected / aligned with
    one another.
    reference:
    Vego, Milan. Joint Operational Warfare, Theory and Practice. Newport, RI: Naval War
    College, 2009. Read: II-3 – II-20, “Military Objectives and the Levels of War.”
    (Government)  

  • “Decreasing Incidence of Tuberculosis in New York City: A Comparison of Pre- and Post-Intervention Data” Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) is a highly infectious disease caused by the bacteria Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It primarily

    Select a disease in a specific city, add numerical data, comparing before implementing the action to after with results, reference no more than 5 years.

  • Title: “Getting to Know [Name]: A Personal Profile of a Familiar Face”

    Directions:
    1. Identify an individual whom you personally know; they should be someone whom you know well.
    2. Reflect on your relationship with this person. Discuss this person with others whom may know them well.
    3 Answer each of the following questions, and include as much detail as possible.
    4. Use complete sentences.
    5. Do not delete the questions; treat this document like a worksheet.
    1.) Who will you write about? Why do you want to write about this person? How do you know this person?
    2.) What kind of profile will you write? For example, will you focus on a specific moment in the person’s life, an average day, a moment when he or she had 15 minutes of fame, or a psychological examination? (Note: The time period should range from a few hours to several months.)
    4.) What do I want readers to know about this person? Why?
    5.) What questions will I ask my subject during the interview process? How will I approach difficult or unpleasant topics?
    6.) Have I talked to others who understand my subject or might see my subject with different eyes? What insight have or will they be able to give me?
    7.) Do I understand what motivates my subject, and will I make that clear to readers? How will I make my story rich with vivid, memorable details about my subject?
    8.) How is my subject different from others? How is my subject the same as others?
    Part II (60 Points): Outline/Planning
    Outline/Planning
    Directions:
    1. Complete the outline template on page 2 of this document.
    2. Fill in all sections.
    3i
    Use complete sentences for the hook, thesis statement, topic sentences, and concluding sentences.
    4. Click here for help with paragraph development.
    5. Do not delete the questions; treat this document like a worksheet.
    2
    I Introduction
    A. Hook (1-3 complete sentences
    B. Thesis Statement (1-2 complete sentences – must directly refer to profiled individual and their traits/qualities, which you will “show” throughout the writing; it cannot be an announcement
    II. Body Paragraph 1
    A. Complete Topic Sentence:
    1. Planned Support (summary of supporting points):
    B. Complete Concluding Sentence:
    III. Body Paragraph 2
    A. Complete Topic Sentence:
    1. Planned Support (summary of supporting points):
    B. Complete Concluding Sentence:
    III. Body Paragraph 3
    A. Complete Topic Sentence:
    1. Planned Support (summary of supporting points):
    B. Complete Concluding Sentence:
    Note: Continue to add sections for as many body paragraphs as you will need.
    IV. Conclusion
    A. Summary of plan to tie everything together.

  • Aligning Resources with the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook “Aligning Concepts with the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook: A Reflection on R Recordings” Introduction As a doctoral student, it is crucial to have a thorough understanding of the requirements and guidelines outlined in the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook.

    Select 2–3 resources from the SOBTH Doctoral Networking and Support: Resources and then summarize their main points and relevance to the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook.
    For this assessment, you will delve into the SOBTH Doctoral Networking and Support: ResourcesLinks to an external site. to select and review 2–3 webinars, videos, or recordings focusing on various aspects of writing a Capstone project, such as Problem Statements, Gaps in Practice, Purpose Statements, Project Questions, Project Techniques, and Theoretical Frameworks. Afterward, you will analyze and align the key concepts from these resources with the sections of the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook, summarizing the main points conveyed by the presenters and highlighting their relevance to the guidebook’s requirements in a 2-page reflection.
    Go to the SOBTH Doctoral Networking and Support: Resources. Review 2–3 webinars, videos, or recordings related to writing a Capstone project. You may choose any recordings that involve content such as Problem Statements, Gaps in Practice, Purpose Statements and Project Questions, Project Techniques, Theoretical Frameworks, or other recordings.
    Requirements:
    Download and save the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook [PDF]. In a 2-page reflection, explain which sections of the Capstone Project are aligned with the webinars, videos, or recordings you reviewed in SOBTH Doctoral Networking and Support: Resources. For each recording you view, what were the main points the presenter conveyed, and how do those concepts align with the requirements in the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook?
    In your reflection, be sure to include the following:
    List at least two specific webinars, videos, or recordings you chose for review and briefly explain why you selected them. Mention any particular topics or concepts you expected to find.
    For each resource you reviewed, summarize the main points or key concepts presented by the speaker or presenter. Be concise and provide enough detail to convey the essence of each resource.
    Identify the sections or elements of the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook that align with the concepts discussed in the webinars, videos, or recordings. Specify which sections of the guidebook are relevant to each resource.
    Reflect on how the concepts presented in the selected resources align with the requirements or guidelines provided in the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook. Discuss the similarities and connections between the two.
    Remember to maintain clarity, brevity, and coherence throughout your reflection, focusing on the most significant points and their alignment with the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook.
    As you complete your assessment, be sure it meets the following guidelines:
    Written communication: Use error-free, doctoral-level writing with original (non-plagiarized) content, logical phrasing, and accurate word choices.
    APA formatting: All resources and citations should be formatted according to current APA style and formatting guidelines. 
    Length: Two typed, double-spaced pages.
    Font and font size: Consistent, APA-compliant font, 12 point.
    For this assessment, you are required to follow the Standard Naming Convention requirements for any files you upload. You will find the requirements on the DBA Submissions Requirements page.
    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
    Competency 1: Write abbreviated project proposals to conceptualize ideas, which are valid and meaningful to leadership professionals.
    List the specific webinars, videos, or recordings selected for review and provide a brief explanation for the selection, including any expected topics or concepts.
    For each resource reviewed, provide concise yet comprehensive summaries of the main points or key concepts presented by the speaker or presenter
    Clearly specify which sections or elements of the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook align with the concepts discussed in the selected webinars, videos, or recordings.
    Accurately reflect on how the concepts from the chosen resources align with the requirements or guidelines in the Doctoral Capstone Guidebook, including the similarities and connections between the concepts, emphasizing their relevance and significance in relation to the guidebook.
    Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

  • Title: Preventing Childhood Obesity: A Primary Intervention Using the Health Belief Model

    Case Portfolio #4
    Select a single prevention intervention (primary, secondary, or tertiary) for your topic This should be based on one of the three interventions proposed in Assignment 3
    Answer the following questions in three pages.
    What is the topic you are focusing on? Why is this important
    What is your proposed intervention (primary, secondary, tertiary)? Explain what this intervention will entail.
    What population or community is targeted for this intervention? Why?
    What Health Behavior Model informs your recommended intervention? Explain how. (Choose at least 1)
    Health Belief Model
    Transtheoretical Model/Stages of Change
    Socioecological Model
    Theory of Planned Behavior
    Others Not Discussed In Class: Diffusion of Innovation Theory, Social Cognitive Theory, Social Norms Theory… etc
    5. What health promotion does the intervention focus on? Explain your recommendation– Why is this focus needed?
    On an individual basis
    Part of a targeted group by, e.g., gender, age, lifestyle or location
    Initiated by the individual
    Imposed on the individual
    Changes to the wider environment in which we live
    Population-wide health protection activities are provided 
    6. What model of health education and promotion does the intervention operate under? Explain
    Medical Model/Negative Health Model
    Behavior Change or Modification Model
    Informed Choice Model
    Client-focused Model
    Collective or Societal Model
    7. What is the intended impact on the targeted community or population?
    Formatting Guidelines:
    Title page
    3 pages of written content.
    12-font, double-spaced
    All writing must be original. Do not use quotes.
    Summarize full sentences and paragraphs.
    Use in-text citations.
    Use APA guidelines. 

  • “Enhancing Your Chronological Resume for a Career in Finance: Adding Relevant Skills and Keywords for Financial Inspector/Examiner, Accountant, or Financial Analysis Positions”

    I have attached my current resume. I need my Chronological resumé to be updated and include information relevant to the position you are applying for, which is Financial inspector/examiner or accountant or financial analysis. It needs to contain core industry keywords for finance specified  job descriptions. 

  • Title: The Impact of Business Processes and Lines of Business on AIS Design

    How do organisation’s business processes and lines of business affect the design of its 
    AIS? Give several examples of how differences among organisation’s are reflect in their AI

  • “Navigating Self-Selection Bias in Convenience Sampling: Strategies for Reducing Bias in Research Studies” Introduction In research studies, the selection of participants is crucial in obtaining accurate and reliable results. However, the process of selecting participants can be influenced by

    Using the assigned readings, presentations, and videos as a guide, address the following issue:  Some people decline to participate in a study because they are too busy, do not like the topic, or are just uninterested.  Some people are overly interested and have an agenda to push.  This opportunity to choose can create self-selection bias, and it leads to a biased or non-random sample. If a researcher must use convenience sampling for their study, describe how this form of sampling is conducive to self-selection bias and the steps researchers should take (supported by scholarly sources) to reduce this bias.

  • Title: “Navigating the Search for a Critique of a Quantitative Research Study: A Guide for Nurses” Finding a critique of a quantitative research study can be a daunting task, but it is an important step in evaluating the validity and

    Describe the process necessary to find a critique of a quantitative research study.  
    As a nurse where do you access research?  How do you know if a study is quantitative or qualitative?

  • “Improving Sepsis Prevention at Henry Ford Health: A Quality Improvement Project” Type of paper and subject: This assignment is a Quality Improvement Project on sepsis prevention at Henry Ford Health in Detroit, Michigan. Number of sources and formatting style

    Sepsis prevention Henry Ford Health Detroit,MI is the QI projects topic and info can be found on HCAPS and Henry Fords website. Must use citations APA style. Must use the following as one of the sources: Spath, P. (2018). Introduction to healthcare quality management (3rd ed.). Healthcare Administration Press.
    Important Info
    The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
    Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
    Type of paper and subject
    Number of sources and formatting style
    Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)