Category: Architecture

both of those are the instructions for the assignment they are two different assignments
i have an image of what the outcome for the last one should look like but it needs to be based on my model
and then I have one more assignment

Ever wonder about how architecture is represented in science fiction, fantasy, crime, drama, comedy, or anime films? This assignment has you critically engage with how architecture is represented and how it’s represented in movies. You will choose a movie (not a television show, series, or limited series) but a feature-length film, and answer the questions below. You then will submit these elements in a single page pdf (under 2MB) with the image of your film still and your responses to the following questions about your selection. Answer all three questions utilizing any information or terminology gained from your ARCH 151 coursework. 
Choose one film. Your selected movie can be from any genre or period but the assignment requirements must represent and describe an architectural or urban scene. Capture one film still (screenshot) from your selected movie, and then include these and the following in your submission:
Film Still: Include a single image of your selected film (still or screenshot), its title, release date, and a sentence or two describing the setting and plot.
Architectural Space: Describe the architectural space in your selected scene, its formal and structural elements (walls, floors, ceilings, structure, openings, stairs), materials and lighting condition, shadows, and colors, etc.). (70-100 words) [5 points]
Scene and Action: Describe the scene and actions in the selected location. (70-100 words) [5 points]
Architectural Critique: Write an architectural critique of the selected scene describing how the architecture facilitates, empowers, or challenges the film’s narrative and its theme. (70-100 words) [5 points]
Note: You are encouraged to read articles and reviews about your selected film, but your submission must be your own work. In case of intentional plagiarism, you will receive a failing grade on the assignment with no make-up opportunity.  
Assignment 2: Architecture on Screen
Assignment 2: Architecture on Screen
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArchitectural Space
7 pts
Accurate and Detailed Description
The architectural space is accurately described using formal and structural elements, materials, and lighting.
5.6 pts
Good Description
A good description of the architectural space but could have provided more details or had one or two minor inaccuracies.
4.2 pts
Missing Some Details
The description is missing one or two details (structural, materials, lighting) or is hard to follow.
2.8 pts
Incorrect or Missing Most Details
The space is described using incorrect information or is missing all three details (structural, materials, lighting) in the description.
1.4 pts
Limited Description
A description is provided but does not describe any architectural elements.
0 pts
No Description/Connection to Architecture
The scene description is missing or has no details about the scene’s architecture.
7 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScene and Action
5 pts
Accurate and Detailed Description
Thoughtfully described the scene and actions in the selected location with details relating to the architectural space.
4 pts
Good Description
A good description but was missing a few details or had minor inaccuracies.
3 pts
Lacking Connection/Details
The description tries to connect the scene and actions to the architecture in the space but is missing details, is not clear, or could have provided more details.
2 pts
Incorrect or Missing Most Details
Incorrect information or missing some details about the scene or action.
1 pts
Limited Description
A description was written but does not relate to architectural space or the action of the scene.
0 pts
Missing Description/No Connection to Architecture
The description is missing or has no details about the scene and actions at the location.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArchitectural Critique
9 pts
Detailed and Thoughtful Critique
Well thought out critique that draws from the architectural space using correct terminology while referencing the film’s narrative.
7.2 pts
Good Critique
A good critique of the scene but could have created a stronger connection to the architecture.
5.4 pts
OK Critique
The critique was hard to follow, or the connection was too general but still tried to reference the architecture in the scene.
3.6 pts
Incorrect Information or Missing Details
The critique used incorrect terminology or was missing details related to the architecture in the scene.
1.8 pts
Limited Critique
The critique has no connection to architecture or the film’s narrative.
0 pts
Missing Critique
No critique.
9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeImage: Still, Title, Date, Short Description
4 pts
Full Marks
2 pts
Not all elements are included.
0 pts
No Marks
4 pts
Total Points: 25

Instructions will be uploaded later.
Important Info
The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

2000 word essay about the colauration of interior design and human physcolgey  task number 1 in photo below 

Executive summary includes vision, mission statement and objectives.
– Service/ product description.
– Responsibility towards clients and community.
– Formal and Legal requirements to stablish their business.
– Required Teamwork qualifications
– Financial plan: Initial Cost and Running cost
for 5 students:
each memeber’s role within the business.
– Operation: The business plan cycle
– Marketing plan
– Sample of used contact format and How they will charge their services.

Answer the following question “How has George McRae’s design of the QVB impacted the ways in which the building has been understood and used since its construction?” The building we are writing about is the queen Victoria building in Sydney Australia 

I need 3 discussion posts for three different Architecture modules
Select two of the themes presented during this module and write how these two themes are connected. Use a case study to help illustrate your points. 
each discussion post should be a minimum of 300 words. Include images and links where applicable. 

Select two of the themes presented during this module and write how these two themes are connected. Use a case study to help illustrate your points. 
This post should be a minimum of 300 words. Include images and links where applicable. 

For this you will choose ONE of the following topics and write a 500-750 word well composed, informative essay that address the selected topic.
Your essay should include the following:
It should be at least 500-750 words long. It can be longer but cannot be shorter.
Add the name of the topic as a clear title at the top of your essay.
The essay should be composed of 3 paragraphs, the first will be a thorough introduction to the topic, the 2nd would be the body of the essay which includes the important required information, and the final paragraph would be your final personal reflection on the topic.
The essay should be informative, and well composed. It should include good examples and good images.
You need to cite the essay. You can use the lecture slides, study guide, personal notes, and any other reliable references for this. You must cite your essay in-text and at the end in MLA style. 
You should NOT copy-paste from references. I want to hear you and your thoughts and opinions! 
—————————————————————————————————-
Topic #1
The “Guggenheim Museum” in NY, by FLW and the “Notre-Dame-du-Haut Chapel” in Ronchamp, France, by Le Corbusier are two great works of two great pioneers of the Modern Movement. 
In a well composed essay, following the instructions mentioned above, compare and contrast the strokes of genius expressed in both works by the two architects.
Also explain how each work expresses the personal style of each architect while still embracing the fundamental ideas and principles of the Modern Movement and International style.
Support your answer with sufficient content, information, and good images. 

prompt:
The key claim(s) that you make should be made explicit to the reader at the start of the paper. The body of your paper should develop your argument by identifying key issues, providing evidence (written and visual references), connecting your work to broader discursive contexts of architectural theory, etc., and finally providing a concluding summary. While this sequence may be a typical structure, we encourage you to conceptualize the structure of your work in a manner that most effectively tells the story you wish to tell.  
Title: provide a title that provides a unique and compelling description of the content of your paper.
Keywords: provide 5 keywords that identify your paper’s topic(s) and object(s) of study.
Images: your images should be carefully integrated with the text. Images should be captioned (no more than 1 sentence) + image sources provided with citations.
This a critical analysis that makes a claim, unpacks it with an argument, identifies broader issues at stake, and references relevant sources. Your paper should take a position and connect to broader discursive contexts and architectural theories – i.e. a community of ideas. It should be structured in both a sequential and consequential manner. Rather than a dry presentation of singular facts, analysis, and/or interpretations, it should have a clear and compelling narrative arc that extends from start to finish.
This is my claim: Prioritizing passive design methods, the investigation seeks sustainable approaches to ensure comfortable temperatures without excessive energy use while maximizing learning performance of school students.
My aim is to mainly focus on the architecture of learning spaces in tropical climates. Please offer visual examples of types of learning spaces that achieve AND fail and integrate into the body of your argument. I included a draft of my paper to understand what I am trying to argue, but it is very poorly written, several of the paragraphs are circular with statements that do not build on one another and have broad generalities that don’t seem to clarify: for example the sentences following my introduction of Barclay & Crousse, seem to go in circles, restating the same points in varying ways. However, if you can please include most of what I written and use buildings that support my claim that would be great. 
Please include images of the project to illustrate and provide specific details of how the building forms/designs achieves the goals I state. Also, my visuals come at the end without captions or figures. They’re currently disconnected and it’s difficult to find relevance with respect to my text. Please integrate the visuals within the body of your argument.
My text currently has no citations, quotes, or paraphrases from the sources I cite in my bibliography, and it currently reads as though these are opinions rather that evidence-based statements. PLEASE fix this, please cite or foot notes.
These were my 5 keywords : 
solar orientation 
shading strategies
evaporative cooling 
microclimate analysis
informal encounters
you can either keep or change these to make it go along with the paper. These dont need to be include in the essay. You can put these at the very end 
I dont have a title please come up with a title