Category: Criminal justice

How would you handle if you were a supervisor and a woman/man comes in with marks on the body? In your life and work experience how would you handle situation when the injured person tells you they fell or bumped into the wall? You know they are lying and you spoke to the victim and he/she will not disclose? How as the supervisor would you handle this?
Remember to think about HIPPA laws and Failure to Supervise policies? Remember YOU are LAW ENFORCEMENT!!!

PLEASE SEE ATTACHED INSTRUCTIONS FOR THIS Assignment. . Please follow instructions. I have attached all chapters

Competency
In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competency:
Analyze the criminalization of technology
Scenario
Someone has come into your station to file a police report. This person has been the victim of email bank fraud. An example of the type of email the victim received can be seen below. The victim provided bank information and, as a result, his savings account has been drained. He is actively working with his bank to have the funds returned. Your agency has seen a rise in crimes of this nature. You are planning to present at a Victim Offender Impact Panel to educate your community about cybercrimes. These Victim Offender Impact Panels are community-based meetings where victims can share their experiences and criminal justice professionals can educate and empower their community.
Nice to Know You
Dear Beloved Friend,
I know this message will come to you as surprised but permit me of my desire to go into business relationship with you.
I am Miss a daughter to late At-badari of Libya whom was murdered during the recent civil war in Libya in March 2011, before his death my late father was a strong supporter and a member of late Moammar Gadhafi Government in Tripoli. Meanwhile before the incident, my late Father came to Cotonou Benin republic with the sum of USD 4,200,000.00 (US$4.2M) which he deposited in a Bank here in Cotonou Benin Republic West Africa for safe keeping.
I am here seeking for an avenue to transfer the fund to you in only you’re reliable and trustworthy person to investment the fund. I am here in Benin Republic because of the death of my parent’s and I want you to help me transfer the fund into your bank account for investment purpose.
Please I will offer you 20% of the total sum of USD4.2M for your assistance. Please I wish to transfer the fund urgently without delay into your account and also wish to relocate to your country due to poor condition in Benin, as to enable me continue my education as I was a medical student before the sudden death of my parent’s/ Reply to my alternative email:miss @hotmail.com, Your immediate response would be appreciated.
Remain blessed,
Miss Directions
In this assignment, you are preparing for an impact panel on cybercrime for your community. Create a presentation with speaker notes that addresses the following required elements. Your presentation should be at least six slides in length, not including introduction and reference slides.
Describe what happened in the bank fraud scenario above.
What happened to the victim?
Can you recognize this as attempted fraud? If so, how?
Explain other common types of cybercrimes to the audience.
Provide examples of common cybercrimes.
How do cybercriminals appeal to their potential victims?
Explain the challenges of pursuing cybercrimes.
Describe the jurisdictional issues surrounding the investigation of these crimes.
How do local, state, and federal agencies work together to conduct investigations?
Describe the negative impact cybercrimes have on the community.
How does the anonymity of the offenders affect the victim?
How are businesses impacted by these crimes?
Suggest strategies individuals should use to protect themselves from cybercrime.
What to Submit
To complete this project, you must submit the following:
Prep Work: Impact Panel on Cybercrime
Your presentation should be at least six slides in length, not including introduction and reference slides. It should also contain speaker notes. Any sources should be cited according to APA style.

You are to write a 2-3 pg. paper on the topic of “No-Knock Warrants.” A minimum of 3 references will be used to develop your paper. Your paper should include the basic topic description, the history of the topic, the purpose of the topic, how it is used today, and current challenges/issues surrounding the practice.  
You will:
Cite your essay properly with any references you use
Follow APA 7th Ed. guidelines 
Title Page and reference page is required (Do not count as part of the 2-3 pgs)
Wikipedia, Personal Blogs, and Social Media websites ARE NOT acceptable references! Research articles from “peer-reviewed” journals are preferred, but other sources are acceptable if from well-known sources such as National Newspapers, National Magazines, National News media websites, books, and written reports.
12-pt, Times New Roman font is the only acceptable font
All writing will be double-spaced and properly formatted

Question 1
2 Points
In the case of Wilson v. Layne – the court deemed the ride along constitutional.
True
• False
Question 2
2 Points
The first examination of a witness is
A Cross-examination
® Direct examination
© recross-examination
D redirect examination
Question 3
2 Points
The United States Supreme Court’s legal rulings are the supreme law of the land.
True
• False
Question 4
2 Points
The Equal Protection Clause prohibits stopping a person solely because of their race or ethnicity.
True
False
Question 5
2 Points
The exclusionary rule provides that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is:
admissible in a legal proceeding if it is used to prove a fact
®
admissible in a civil suit brought by an individual for breach of contract
inadmissible in a criminal proceeding to prove a fact
•by the prosecution
inadmissible in a criminal proceeding as evidence of guilt
Question 6
2 Points
Persons stopped by the police cannot be forced to answer questions, but can be forced to identify themselves.
True
• False
Question 7
2 Points
Anonymous informants are always credible and reliable.
A
True
®
• False
Question 8
2 Points
There are four elements to an arrest.
A
True
®
• False
Question 9
2 Points
The risk should automatically follow a stop.
A
True
• False
Question 10
2 Points
The plain touch doctrine requires that the object must be immediately apparent as contraband.
True
• False
Question 11
2 Points
Which of the following is an exception to the “fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine”?
A Golden platter
B Harless error
© Purged taint
D Standing
Question 12
2 Points
there are arguments for and against the exclusionary rule.
A
True
®
• False
Question 13
( 2 Points
The protection against double jeopardy is found in the Amendment.
First
B Fourth
• Fifth
Sixth
Question 14
2 Points
Public school lockers can be searched by school administrators based on reasonableness.
True
False
Question 15
2 Points
Probable cause is a lower standard than reasonable suspicion.
True
• False
Question 16
2 Points
Probable cause is to stop and reasonable suspicion is to arrest.
True
• False
Question 17
2 Points
The original term “man of reasonable caution” refers to
A police officers.
B the average “man on the street” judges university professors
Question 18
2 Points
The police may not enter a suspect’s home to make a routine felony arrest without a warrant in the absence of:
A consent
® reasonable suspicion eyewitness testimony
D None of the answers are correct
Question 19
2 Points
Which of the following rights have not been incorporated?
A Fifth Amendment for grant jury review
® The Second Amendment right to gun ownership
The Sixth Amendment right to an attorney D The First Amendment right to freedom of speech
Question 20
2 Points
During a stop based on reasonable suspicion, the police must search the alleged perpetrator.
True
• False
Question 21
2 Points
The Sixth Amendment relates to the right to counsel.
A
True
®
• False
Question 22
2 Points
Terry v. Ohio is the leading case on stop and frisk.
A
True
®
• False
Question 23
2 Points
The trial court in the federal system is the _court.
A Common Pleas
® Criminal
Quarter Sessions
D District
Question 24
2 Points
If there is a conflict between setate or federal law and the United States Constitution, the Constitution prevails.
True
• False
Question 25
2 Points
After the arrest of a suspect by police, the next stage in criminal procedure is booking.
True
• False
Question 26
2 Points
In general, the more intrusive the search the greater the Fourth Amendment protection.
True
• False
Question 27
2 Points
The United States Attorney General represents the government in all legal matters.
True
• False
Question 28
2 Points
Evidence which tends to establish innocence is known as:
• incriminatory evidence
® discriminatory evidence exculpatory evidence
* None of the answers are correct
Question 29
2 Points
The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule does not apply to the activities of private citizens acting totally on their own.
True
• False
Question 30
2 Points
In Illinois V. Gates (1983)for probable cause determination, the United States Supreme Court
A adopted the Aguillar two-prong test
B eliminated the Aguillar reliability of informant prong eliminated the Aguillar reliability of information prong
adopted the totality of the circumstances test
Question 31
2 Points
Probable cause has a lower degree of certainty than reasonable suspicion.
True
• False
Question 32
2 Points
The four categories of exceptions to the exclusionary rule are good faith, inevitable discovery, purged taint, ano independent source.
True
B False
Question 33
2 Points
Reasonable suspicion is sufficient for stop and frisk.
• True
®
• False
Question 34
2 Points
A plea bargain is the popular name given to the process in which a defendant agrees to plead guilty to an offense in exchange for a lower charge, fewer counts, a lower sentence, or other considerations.
True
B False
Question 35
2 Points
In establishing probable cause, officers may rely on their:
intuition
B experience standard operating procedures
D experience of others
Question 36
2 Points
Release on Recognize (ROR) means without monetary bail.
A
True
®
• False
Question 37
2 Points
In searches and seizures without a warrant, the trial judge makes the initial determination of probable cause.
True
• False
Question 38
2 Points
In a criminal trial the prosecutor must prove a case
A to an absolute certainty
® probable cause beyond a reasonable doubt
* preponderance of the evidence
Question 39
2 Points
Random drug testing has been held by the United States Supreme Court to be unconstitutional.
True
• False
Question 40
2 Points
An arrest warrant requires probable cause.
A
True
®
• False
Question 41
2 Points
If a search is conducted without probable cause, the evidence will be suppressed.
True
• False
Question 42
2 Points
What are the two types of seizures?
A Actual and practical
® Actual and destructive
Actual and constructive
Factual and constructive
Question 43
2 Points
The court of last resort for federal cases and cases involving federal law and the United States Constitution is the United States Supreme Court.
True
®
) False
Question 44
2 Points
If the court has the legal authority to hear a case, this means the court has
• precedent
® Equal Protection
Due Process
D urisdiction
Question 45
2 Points
In which of the following proceedings does the exclusionary rule apply?
) Private searches
® Parole revocation hearings
Grand Jury investigations
D None of the answers are correct
Question 46
2 Points
The ban on cruel and unusual punishment and excessive fines and bail is found in the Eighth Amendment.
True
False
Question 47
2 Points
The police can always use deadly force during an arrest of a perpetrator.
True
• False
Question 48
2 Points
In testing for the existence of a reasonable suspicion, officers and judges apply
A the totality of the circumstances test
B only the Aguillar reliability test only the Aguilar reliability of information prong
D both prongs of the Aguillar test
Question 49
2 Points
The silver platter doctrine is still in operation in state courts.
A
True
• False
Question 50
2 Points
The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to
A deter judicial misconduct
® punish citizens who violate constitutional rights protect rights against violation by the legislature
D deter police misconduct

Identify two individual needs and explain how the criminal justice profession helps meet those needs.
Identify three negative stereotypes society has of the criminal justice profession and describe what can be done to remove each negative stereotype. 

Unit 2 Discussion
This week’s discussion is about the Administration of Organizations in Criminal Justice. There are two topics of discussion for this assignment (1 & 2). You must write a minimum of 300-word count for each question and use three scholarly sources. For each discussion topic, one source must be a peer-reviewed journal article published in the past 7 years. You may also use your textbook as a source for this assignment. Use in-text citations and remember to cite your sources in APA format. Make sure to follow instructions and answer each part of the question completely, failure to do so will result in a point reduction. I will check the word count for each question and deduct additional points if the explanation/answer does not meet the minimum requirements stated above. Encyclopedias and Dictionaries are not appropriate research sources at this level. No Wikipedia! General Instructions: Assignment A
Quality of service. Providing quality service is the goal of most organizations – small to large, for-profit to non-profit, private to public. Is the public safety sector a customer service endeavor? Is there a difference between customer service and public service? If there are differences, are there similarities?
General Instructions: Assignment B
Demographic factors such as age, race, gender, and socioeconomic class have all been identified as factors in the crime rate. What are some of the negative impacts that can occur when the demographics of those policing are different than the demographics of those being policed?
Course Text Book:
Allen, J. M., & Sawhney, R. (2018). Administration and Management in Criminal Justice (3rd Ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc. (US). https://savantlearningsystems.vitalsource.com/books/9781506361550
*Friendly reminder: I expect perfect APA technique at this level. Word counts are based on content only. The reference list does not count towards the (assignment) word count minimum. You must have 3 scholarly sources, one source can be the textbook provided in the course and the other source must be a peer-reviewed journal article published in the past 7 years.

Address the discussion prompts.
Discuss how emerging technologies may blur the lines between ethical and unethical conduct and between decision-  and policy-making, when attempting to combat domestic terrorism.
Cite specific examples of AI-related technology (from report attached or external resources) in completing your post.

For this discussion address the following: Each question answered in 150 words
Present a valid and persuasive argument for or against the following proposition: The USA Patriot Act used the cover of fighting terrorism to greatly expand federal law enforcement powers beyond constitutional limits regarding individuals’ civil liberties.
Present a persuasive argument either supporting or opposing unlawful enemy combatants’ constitutional right to challenge their detainment in federal courts when held in territories outside the fifty states over which the U.S. exercises exclusive jurisdiction and control. Include some of the rationale presented in historical U.S. Supreme Court rulings to support your position.

The writing assignment provides an opportunity for you to describe your own views on crime causation and apply the theories covered in this course to your views on crime causation. Through this assignment, I want you to develop your personal explanation of crime causation and consider why your thoughts on crime causation are the way they are (i.e., why you feel the way you do about the causes of crime). Make sure to address the following in your essay and incorporate material from the course:
Your general thoughts on why people break the law.
One or more criminological theories that relate to your general thoughts on why people break the law. Make sure to connect the specific tenants of the theory to your thoughts about why people engage in crime. This section should be the longest section of your essay.
Exceptions or situations that run contrary to your explanation of crime causation. For example, which types of offenses or offenders do not support your position? Crime policies or programs discussed in class that align with your perspective.
Is it really possible to reduce crime in the United States?