Category: Criminology

-Follows screenshot 
– Less than 250 words required 
– Could be 150-200 words
-Sources etc up to you
-No need for name/dates page

-The instructions and template are attached below
-this is four pages of writing excluding the title page and reference page
– this is for an introduction to counseling so please only use counseling-related references.
– Follow the template outline and instructions for all the steps 
– minimum four refernces 

For this assignment, you are to read pages 1-15 of Problem Solving in Practice: Implementing Community.
Policing in Chicago and answer the following questions:
As part of the program, both the police and the residents were trained to handle problems in the same way, using the five-step process. What are the benefits of training them on the same problem-solving process?
What were the 3 measures of problem-solving capacity, and why were they classified this way?
How do social and economic factors affect community policing?
How did the Chicago Police Department employ skills, habits, and practices that support the development of their community policing program?
Please provide some examples.
THE TEMPLETE FOR THIS ASSIGMENT IS ALSO POST PLEASE USE THE TEMPLETE 
the reference to the 1-15 pages is  Skogan, W. G., Hartnett, S. M., DuBois, J., Comey, J. T.,
Kaiser, M., & Lovig, J. H. (2000, April). Problem solving in practice: Implementing community policing in Chicago. Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University.
https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/179556.pdf
also my textbook is also posted in the attchments which chapters 4&5 would help with this as well as the powerpoint in the attachments. You can also use https://law.jrank.org/pages/1649/Police-Community-Policing-Origins-evolution-community-policing.html as a reference 

Please read the article (click on link below) posted by the FBI on a high profile sextortion case. Briefly summarize key facts related to the case. What type of recurring victimization would you classify this as and why? What specific risk factors (as discussed in lecture/assigned reading) enhanced the risk of being victimized in this way? Can you think of additional factors (not discussed in the materials) that may have also contributed to the ability of the perpetrator to continually victimize so many individuals? What policies/safeguards would you recommend being put in place to help prevent this type of crime from occuring?
https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/sextortion

This is the assigned case to use to write the case brief it
needs to be like the sample case provided in the files below.  
Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. 370 (2010)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/560/370/
Follow the instructions listed in the links below it needs to be just like the sample but with this case information.

https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/correction-ben-austen/1142009336?ean=9781250758804
this is the link to the book needed to get this assignment done
below is the attached file being highlighted with the instructional question to answer in the form of a essay.
please stick very closely to the instructions being highlighted in the attached file!

Martha Stewart, a renowned businesswoman and media personality, became a household name through her successful ventures in cooking, entertaining, and home decor. Her career, however, faced a significant setback in 2004 when she was convicted of charges related to insider trading. Stewart’s legal troubles began in 2001 when she sold nearly 4,000 shares of the biopharmaceutical company ImClone Systems based on a tip she received from her broker. This sale occurred just before a public announcement that caused ImClone’s stock to plummet. Although many speculated that she engaged in insider trading, Stewart was ultimately convicted of conspiracy, obstruction of justice, and making false statements to federal investigators, but not insider trading itself. Her five-month prison sentence sparked widespread media coverage and public interest, raising questions about the complexities of securities law and the enforcement of insider trading regulations.
Examine the federal statute on insider trading. 
Does the language of the statute itself help explain why Martha Stewart was not charged with insider trading? Explain your response.

Read: M. Guggenheim & R. Hertz, Evolving Standards in Juvenile Justice; From Gault to Graham & Beyond, J.D.B. and the Maturing of Juvenile Confession Suppression Law, pp. 509-521.
Question: What is the journey of juvenile confession law as reflected in the various cases in the article?  (Gault, Graham, J.D.B.)
What are the implications of such rules/policies in juvenile confessions?  Do the cases strike an appropriate balance?  Do you think the authors got it right?
Be sure to fully discuss your answer.  Your piece should not be more than two full pages, double spaced.

Follow an outline that I will attach. Compare and contrast the differences between Psychopaths and Sociopaths. Minimum of three sources.

Below
are two different posts. Read each post and write a response to each one,
discussing whether you agree or disagree with their
points by providing examples. Likewise, you may elaborate on a specific point.
Each reply must consist of at least two scholarly
citation in APA Format and be at least 150 words. Also, a biblical perspective must be
incorporated.
Post 1-
The topic of HIV testing and treatment for
those incarcerated in a prison or jail is a topic fraught with controversy and
strong opinions. To begin, it is important to highlight what is known to be
true regarding this population and topic. As the textbook discusses, the prison
population is at a higher risk of contracting HIV than the general public
(Gideon & Sung, 2010; Parsons & Cox, 2020). As such, it is important to
continue to measure HIV infection rates in the prison population. This can be
done through HIV testing both during admission and just prior to release. The
purpose of this would not be to amend treatment to those who are HIV positive
such that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) would be violated or in
question. Rather, the purpose of this testing is twofold: First, to gather
valuable data on the rate of infection within each prison environment, and
second, to ensure that those who do test positive for HIV receive the
appropriate treatment during their time incarcerated. 
The topic of segregating those with HIV is
equally fraught with contention. Many may support this practice on fear alone,
that those who are currently HIV negative, including staff, may be at an
increased risk for contracting HIV if segregation is not utilized. Research
seems to indicate that this practice is not necessary to effectively prevent
the spread of HIV, and may in fact be unduly harmful to the inmate (Gideon
& Sung, 2010; Kilty, 2020). The National Commission on AIDS, the National
Commission on Correctional Health Care, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons have
all denounced segregation as an effective or necessary approach to public health
(Gideon & Sung, 2010). Although no U.S. Supreme Court case has been handed
down specifically clarifying the issue, and therefore it may be argued that no
inmate rights would be violated during segregation, it is clear that the
inmates who are segregated are frequently denied access to educational or
religious programs that others in the general population of the prison have
access to (Gideon & Sung, 2010). 
My
approach to HIV prevention and detection, beyond the testing already discussed,
would be through the implementation of a harm reduction needle exchange program
and through the promotion/availability of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)
treatments to those at high risk for contraction of HIV (Parsons & Cox,
2020). This sort of treatment has been supported through research conducted on
the population of men who have sex with men (MSM) and, more recently in Parsons
and Cox’s (2020) work, in the prison drug user population, with promising
results
Post 2-
As an
administrator of a jail, I would suggest making HIV testing inside the prison
system mandatory for all inmates upon their arrival. This strategy would
guarantee the early identification of HIV/AIDS cases, enabling prompt treatment
commencement and the implementation of preventive measures to lessen the likelihood
of transmission among inmates. In 2020, Hotton et al.
Since
the jail population frequently comes from marginalized communities where HIV
and other STDs are more common, mandatory testing upon entry is essential.
Early detection of HIV infection allows for the provision of the required
medical attention and assistance to inmates, as well as the deployment of
suitable infection control measures to safeguard the general prison
population’s health and well-being. 
Moreover,
not only at admission but also at frequent intervals during the prison term, I
would advise HIV testing. Regular testing can assist in detecting any new
illnesses that might arise while the person is in detention, guaranteeing
ongoing disease care and surveillance (Ong et al., 2018). Furthermore, all
offenders should have access to HIV testing before being released from prison,
as this transitional period is a crucial one during which people may be more
vulnerable to catching or spreading the virus (Cohen et al., 2013).
In
regards to the general policy of segregation for offenders who test positive
for HIV/AIDS, I would not advise it. Even while this kind of behavior may have
been more widespread in the past, it is now generally acknowledged to be
against the rights of the offender and to be a source of additional stigma and
prejudice (Haimowitz, 1989). As an alternative, the emphasis should be on
offering complete medical care and support services to HIV-positive inmates who
are part of the general prison population. Additionally, it is essential to
make sure that infection control and universal precautions are in place to
safeguard both staff and inmates (Haimowitz, 1989). 
In
conclusion, I would advise the prison system to require HIV testing at the time
of admission, conduct testing on a regular basis while incarcerated, and do
testing before release. Since it violates their rights and may worsen the
social stigma attached to the illness, segregation of HIV/AIDS positive
criminals must to be avoided. These steps can help manage HIV within the prison
system and improve the general health and well-being of the jailed population
when paired with the proper medical care and support services (Frieden et al.,
2005).