Category: English

***Requires Lopeswrite***
Assessment Description
Refer to the attached document for instructions on completing this assignment.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
General Education Program Information
This assignment assesses the following general education competencies:
Critical Thinking
GED2C1: Construct logical, cohesive, and persuasive arguments.
GED2C2: Locate, verify, evaluate, and correctly cite print and electronic resources.
GED2C3: Exhibit proficiency in Standard American English for academic purposes.
GED2C4: Demonstrate knowledge of the power and ethical ramifications of language choice and communication style.

Write a reflection essay on how Enemy of the state (starring Will Smith ) connects to Information Privacy. The review must be 1,000 words and include a brief summary of the plot (no more than about a paragraph or two) and a critical discussion of the information-based elements included in the move (specifically how they relate to the attachments).

Write one page based on the thesis: Technology flourishes when the virtues of its creators are ingrained within it and when those same virtues are upheld during its usage. 
12th grade level. No big words, no overuse of synonyms. 

This is an Argumentative research paper, that needs to be rewritten due to my original work not being appropriate for an academic research paper

Description:
For this journaling activity, you will work on identifying a topic for your final research paper.
Objectives:
Discover your interests and potential topics using prewriting.
Instructions:
In a Microsoft Word document, compose a 150 – to 200-word “free write” which is an informal paper (or paragraph, in this case) where you simply brainstorm ideas on paper (or WORD, in this case). Please use this assignment to consider what kind of topic you would like to focus on in your final paper. Note, it must be something researchable, not personal. Hence, you cannot write about how much you enjoyed your latest birthday party (because that cannot be academically cited or verified), but you can write about the history of the “Happy Birthday” song or the tradition of pinatas (because these topics do have valid research articles supporting their histories). 
Note: The final paper will be 3-5 pages (double-spaced) not including the Title Page, Abstract Page, and Reference List (which must consist of at least five quality sources). It must be typed in Times New Roman 12 and adhere to APA formatting, as must all of the written assignments in this course. 

*To complete the assignment:
Write a four-page argument paper (not including your Works Cited or References page) that focuses on your issue in North Carolina.
Incorporate and properly cite a minimum of 5 sources
Incorporate one table, graph or infographic from a cited source that is relevant to your argument
Properly cite using MLA or APA citation
*INSTRUCTIONS
You need to complete an argument paper about your issue in North Carolina. You are going to show the following in your paper:
A specific claim that about your topic/issue in North Carolina – Remember, argument is based around the idea that people disagree and/or take various sides on an issue. You need to take a firm stand on how your topic is a problem in our state. Do not simply state a fact, like, “There are many homeless people in North Carolina.” This is not an argument. It is a fact that has been proven with research. However, you could argue, “The increasing homeless population in North Carolina is largely due to mental health issues that are not properly addressed because of state laws.”
Logical reasoning and evidence that prove your claim – You need to craft an organized and logical argument that proves your claim. You must present sound reasoning that is supported with scholarly, relevant and recent evidence. It is also important how your present this information, meaning the research you use should not take the place of your own writing. Remember, research is there to support YOUR reasoning, not take the place of it.
You understand opposing claims/points of view and can refute them – You need to show that you understand the varying points of view on your topic, and that you can analyze, paraphrase or summarize them. Also, you are able to refute these opposing claims using logic, reasoning and evidence (not simply stating that others are “wrong” in their opinion).
The use of a table, graph or infographic that adds emphasis to your argument – Select a relevant and recent table, graph or infographic from a source to incorporate into your argument. It should be tied to your reasoning and used as evidence to support your claim. Properly cite it using MLA or APA citation. *Only use one and it can not be larger than the size of a normal paragraph. Carefully consider the sequence, structure and design of your argument when placing the infographic into your essay.
You understand your college-level audience and write to them in an objective, high style using clear, concise language – Even though this argument is based off your own opinion, you still need to write in a formal manner. Don’t use wording that “hedges” your argument, like, “I believe” and “I think.” Write in a confident tone. You are the authority of this argument. Do not rely on sources too much or have sources take over your essay. Your research should support your voice, not replace your voice as the authority in this argument. You want to continue to show that you have progressed in your writing through this semester. It should be clear, concise and virtually free of basic errors in grammar and mechanics.
You understand how to properly create a full citation and in-text citation using MLA or APA guidelines.

Need an 90% on this essay, no plagiarism no AI, follow the prompt carefully 
Provide page # in the parenthetical citations.Always italicize the title of texts.
Be consistent in the use of the present tense in literary writing.  

1) Carefully read the comments for your Classics essay. Review all the errors marked in line on your essay.
2) Go to Course Modules to the Study Pages with Course Documents and search for the pages that relate to the errors you see marked. Study those pages.
3) Open a new document. As always, add name, course, date and word count in upper left corner. Title this document Classics Corrections.
4) List each of the corrections to the errors. For example, if you mispunctuated the title, go to the Study Pages and find How to Punctuate Titles. 5) List the corrections. For example, if you mispunctuated the title 5 times, list the correctly punctuated title 5 times. If you needed to correct a sentence, only write the correction for that sentence. If you misformatted the Works Cited, include the entire Works Cited correctly formatted etc. You can refer to this video if you needed help with Works Cited format: https://youtu.be/B_eLbiYjr94?feature=sharedLinks to an external site.
6) Check your work, save as a pdf, SUBMIT here.

complete revisions for this essay using the instructors comments and the assumption details. 
Delete your instructor’s comments and those of your classmates.
Rename your file, including “Revision” or “Final” in the new file name.
Highlight any major changes that you have made; focus on overall sentences, paragraphs, or sections that you have extensively revised. Your instructor may also ask you to include comments that track the revisions you have made.
Provide an overall revision statement, either as a separate file or in the assignment comment box. Your revision statement should show awareness of the higher-order criteria (purpose/focus, development, organization) and list the major revisions you made; whenever possible, explain how your revisions have allowed you to better meet the purposes of your draft and better meet the needs and expectations of your audience. You will be expected to do more than show your ability to edit and proofread for simple typos, grammatical accuracy, and spelling mistakes.

Respond thoughtfully and honestly to each of these questions (use the reading to help): Which aspect of the GRAPE framework do you feel most confident in being able to identify and analyze?
Which aspect of the GRAPE framework do you find most confusing?
In your own words, how would you describe the concept of “rhetorical situation”?
How can understanding rhetorical situations be beneficial in your ongoing academic and professional paths?