Category: English

Write an analytical essay of about 600-700 words that analyses and interprets Ray Bradbury’s short story “Lawns of Summer” (attached). The essay must include the five elements below. Remember to make references to the text if you quote directly: “bla bla bla bla” (p. 14, ll. 2-4)
1. Write a paragraph that introduces the overall theme of the story (what can you say generally about the type of situation that it deals with?). Furthermore, this introduction should connect the theme to the story. You must also present the story formally with title and writer. Remember that a short story title should appear in quotation marks.
2. Write a paragraph that characterizes the grandfather. Find inspiration in the toolbox in the back of your textbook, page 244, where it says “How to read a short story”. 
3. Write another paragraph that characterizes Tom.
4. Write a third paragraph where you focus on an element of your choice (elements that you also find in the toolbox), e.g. setting, language, style, title, narration, structure, composition, mood, tone etc. Again, find inspiration in the toolbox.
5. Put the relationship between Tom and his grandfather into perspective with an experience from EITHER your personal life OR what you have heard or read about similar relationships (for example Peter Parker’s relationship with his uncle Ben in Spider-Man). Here, you shoujld also return to the theme(s) of the short story and make a conclusion to your essay.
Tips:
Do not use subheadings
Instead, begin each paragraph with a topic sentence, which tells the reader what the paragraph should be about.
Proofread focusing on the feedback you received on the last essay

Definition Essay experience required for this order. Do not bid if no prior experience. This is a Definition Essay about a monster named Wendigo. Please read instructions to it’s entirety, along with Definition Essay examples. This is a final exam essay. I am a freshmen in college. I require this essay to be simple, not complexed. For example: In your own words. 
If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. Thank you.

Needing a argumentive rhetorical analysis on a speech. I was thinking Barack Obama but anything is fine. I think it says it should be a speech from a movie? The instructions aren’t too clear to me due to my dyslexia 

For this assignment you have to write about a book called oryx and crake specifically about corporate power you need 2 quotes from the book and 2 secondary quotes 

Use your outline and annotated bibliography to write an argumentative research essay.  Have at least 7 credible sources.
Provide one example of a place where you have used rhetorical appeals or source material to support your argument. How does this enhance your essay? (2-3 sentences)
Touchstone 4 is a revision of this draft. What kind of feedback would be helpful for you as you revise? Are there parts of your draft that you’re uncertain of? (3-4 sentences)
Provide one example of a place where you have used rhetorical appeals or source material to support your argument. How does this enhance your essay? (2-3 sentences)
Touchstone 4 is a revision of this draft. What kind of feedback would be helpful for you as you revise? Are there parts of your draft that you’re uncertain of? (3-4 sentences)
Part 2
Provide one example of a place where you have used rhetorical appeals or source material to support your argument. How does this enhance your essay? (2-3 sentences)
Touchstone 4 is a revision of this draft. What kind of feedback would be helpful for you as you revise? Are there parts of your draft that you’re uncertain of? (3-4 sentences)

Ethical Issue: Social Media Platforms Should Be Regulated
• Reason: It helps prevent the spread of misinformation and harmful content. (Consequence)
• Reason: It ensures the protection of users’ data and privacy. (Principle)
• Reason: It promotes a healthier online environment. (Consequence)
These are the topics i submitted to the professor, and i want research and outline recent days.

In the reading, the author notes that “to give writing the most important thing of all—namely, a point—a writer needs to indicate clearly not only what his or her thesis is, but also what larger conversation that thesis is responding to” (page 20).
Using this understanding, attempt to answer the following:
Indicate your thesis for your research (this can obviously be updated as you continue your research).
Describe the larger conversation that your thesis is responding to.
Your post should be between 200- 250 words.

The reflective paper is about the first 3 chapter of the book on the gang paradox by Duran. I attached instructions and the book pdf file. 

The final paper 3000-4000 words (double spaced) will present a specific argument on hunger in light of the material we read. While you’re free to reuse the material you explored for the close reading and exploratory essay, make sure to avoid self-plagiarism: this means do not copy-paste from these past assignments, but show that you’ve carefully thought about how you will tie your “old” observations with the overall argument of the paper. 
Requirements for the final paper: every source that supports your argument on hunger is welcome but make sure to include at least 1 (one) primary source and 1 (one) secondary source included in the syllabus, and 1 primary OR secondary source outside the syllabus. 
Your paper will be graded for its insight, content, coherence, and style. It is necessary to avoid typos and quote and cite accurately to receive full points.  The paper must include a bibliography. Citations can follow MLA or Chicago, as long as you’re consistent.  You can  reschedule an appointment with the librarian or with me for more guidance on how to find sources if you’re looking for more. 
I have attached the sources that need to be added below, only 1 primary and 1 secondary have to be added and the rest can also be from what I provided or your own choice. 
and also 
Sharman Apt Russell, “Hungry Artists” in Hunger. An Unnatural History, pp. 1-16

Thesis and purpose are clear, closely match the writing task, and provide fresh insight,Fully supports thesis & purpose. Sequence of ideas is effective. Transitions are smooth and effective, Substantial, logical, and concrete development of ideas. Assumptions are made explicit. Details are germane, original, and convincingly interpreted, Sentences are varied, complex, and employed for effect. Diction is precise, appropriate, using advanced vocabulary. Tone is mature, consistent, suitable for topic and audience. Adheres to required length, and Essentially error free. Evidence ofsuperior control of diction.