Step 1: Write an alternate ending or the next chapter of your book club book. Be sure to Show a clear understanding of the important characters, settings, and conflicts
Write between 250-750 words
Step 2: Read at least two classmates responses and give them warm and cool feedback in at least three complete sentences. (read last chapter)
Category: English
-
Title: “A New Beginning for the Book Club” Alternate Ending/Next Chapter: As the members of the book club gathered for their next meeting, there was a sense of tension in the air. The last meeting had ended on a sour note
-
“Exploring Native Identity in Tommy Orange’s There There”
7-pages for There There (plus a Works Cited).
Type and double space
Follow MLA format
A Works Cited page is required!
You must have at least five (5) outside sources in your Works Cited and applied throughout your essay. You should use the CCSF library to find your sources to ensure that they are reputable. Study guides, Wikipedia, blog sites, or other non-academic sites should not be included in your paper or your Works Cited.
This research essay must contain a Works Cited page and in-text citations in order to in a Complete!
What kind of sources should you include:
Three academic books or articles that that give critical analysis or historical and social context.
Open choices: two or more other sources—which may include more of the above, including book reviews, interviews, or educational videos, etc.
Your essay should be a thesis driven essay, and the thesis should present a unified (no lists!) college level idea about the texts. Your body paragraphs should begin with topic sentences that state an idea about the texts and should give multiple quotes and pull-out phrases that you analyze and draw conclusions about as you prove your thesis.
All body paragraphs must follow the PIE format and the introduction must follow the introduction format (outline sheets are included here).
Your first 1-2 body paragraphs may present important background or context, but these should begin with topic sentences that state how or why this information is important for understanding the works you will be discussing.
Prompt
Tommy Orange presents multiple examples of how people relate to their Native identity. Using clear evidence from the text, examine at least two characters, one who navigates his/her identity in a healthy way and one who does so in an unhealthy manner. What comment or idea does the novel convey about identity for Native Americans? -
“The Q” Official Movie Trailer [Opening shot of a dark, dystopian cityscape] Narrator (voiceover): In a world where power is everything, one girl will rise up to challenge the system. [Cut to a teenage girl
I need you to create me a movie trailer for the book “the Q” by amy tintera.
This movie trailer has to be in a form which I can upload it to youtube.
Make trailer around 2 minutes
It doesn’t have to be the best quality as long as all instructions are followed
Example video https://youtu.be/PuRdNz]7QgQ?feature=shared -
“Reflecting on My Learning Journey: Insights and Contributions in the Case Study and Course Experience”
rite a final 500-word critical reflective paper, in a Word or Google Document, APA formatted that speaks to your learning goals (those set out in the first critical reflection paper) and your insights and assessment of how you have contributed to the team and cohort learning during the case study in particular, and the course more generally. Review your critical reflections on the strengths and opportunities for growth articulated in the first self reflection. How did you bring those strengths to the table? Were you able to do that? How did the work of the case study contribute to your own understanding and articulation of your critical social location and your learning goals, and to your insights on how you work in teams. Dash, N. (2013). Race and Ethnicity. In T. D & P. B (Eds.), Social Vulnerability to Disasters.
-
“The Power of Education: Unlocking Opportunities and Empowering Individuals”
It needs to be a five paragraph essay with an introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
-
“Peer Review Workshop: Three Points for Successful Writing and Feedback”
hree Points to Remember:
Writing is difficult.
We can assume that all writers’ work first-draft work needs improvement, so engage in Peer Review in that spirit.
Be constructive:
Offer your classmates the quality of feedback that you would like to receive from them, that will assist you with revision.
Sometimes, there is inequal participation in peer groups:
Sometimes people miss deadlines or don’t participate at all. That is challenging in a small peer review group. If someone from your group posts their thesis past the deadline and too late for you to critique it, then you will not be responsible for doing so. If you can and do respond to a late workshop submission, that’s generous, but not mandatory.
If you find yourself in a group in which NO ONE except you has posted by the first deadline – contact me in Canvas message.
How to Participate Successfully:
(A) After choosing your Essay 2 prompt, begin brainstorming an analytical thesis claim that responds to the prompt question and that is structured in a way that it can launch a formalist analysis essay. (Do not approach the thesis as a ‘list of three things’ for a high-school style five-paragraph essay. If you need clarification about this, see me)
(B) Spend enough time on thesis development. It’s critical. Once you have a clear, arguable, thesis statement, you’ll be ready to participate here, in this workshop discussion. The purpose of this peer review workshop is to share your thesis at the draft stage and respond to each other’s ideas-in-progress with focused, constructive feedback that will help each writer rethink, develop and revise in preparation for the essay due at the end of the week.
(C) Since the success of your essay will depend in large part on the strength of your thesis statement, be as specific, thorough and constructive in your peer review of each other’s work as possible. Constructive criticism should be welcomed. The starting assumption should be that the work of everyone in your workshop would benefit from critique and revision. -
“Examining Wealth Distribution in the United States: Benefits, Estimates, and Ideals” Assignment Title: Wealth Distribution and Inequality in the United States: A Comparison and Reflection
There are 2 steps to this assignment.
You must post your initial post for Step 1 in order to be able to access the information to do Step 2.
After you have posted for Step 1, the information for Step 2 will become available on a separate module titled “Week 6: STEP 2 for Discussion.” Read the following instructions in order to read more information about this below.
Step 1: Your Initial Post Your initial post will be your answers to questions below, but you will need to read the following information first:
The questions for Step 1 are going to ask you review the 3 benefits of wealth and then to estimate how wealth is distributed amongst the US population and to tell us your ideal distribution of wealth.
To tell us your estimate and ideal, you will need to think of how all the wealth that currently exists in the U.S. (i.e., 100% of the wealth) is divided up amongst the U.S. population (i.e., 100% of the population). You can think of the U.S. population in terms of quintiles (or, 20% segments). The total population (i.e., 100% of the population) is divided into five quintiles (i.e., five 20% segments). Each quintile (20% segment) has a certain percentage of the total wealth (of 100% of the wealth).
For example, if the population was only 100 people, each quintile (20%) of that population would have 20 people, and each quintile would have a certain amount of the total wealth that exists in that population. Here is a visual to help you better understand:
Keep in mind that there is only 100% wealth to be distributed amongst the five quintiles.
Also keep in mind that it is impossible for each quintile (each 20%) of the population to have more than 20% of the wealth.
A society where each quintile (20%) of the population had 20% of the wealth would be a completely egalitarian society (in other words, everyone has the same amount). In such a case, there would not be a “richest” 20% or “poorest” 20% because everyone would be equal.
We could represent this scenario with the following scenario:
Now that you know have read and watched the assigned content for this week, you have begun to learn what wealth and income are. You have also begun to think about about wealth distribution. Questions for your Initial Post
Click “Reply” and answer the following questions for your initial post. If you need help on how to post onto a discussion board, click here.
Once you have made your initial post for this Step 1, follow the instructions below for Step 2.
List the 3 benefits of wealth and briefly explain each benefit in your own words, referencing details from the assigned course material. If you need to refresh your memory on these, click here. What is your estimate as to the current distribution of wealth in the U.S. To answer this, tell us what percentage of the total wealth you think is currently held by the richest 20%, the poorest 20% and each quintile (20% of the population) in between. Keep in mind that your estimates should add up to 100. Use the following template:Estimate:the wealthiest 20% of the U.S. population owns ____% of the all the wealth
the second wealthiest 20% of the U.S. population owns ____% of the all the wealth
the third wealthiest 20% of the U.S. population owns ____% of the all the wealth
the fourth 20% of the U.S. population owns ____% of the all the wealth
the poorest 20% of the U.S. population owns ____% of all the wealth
You will now tell us what is your ideal distribution of wealth by considering the following: Imagine some supreme being appeared to you and said that the distribution of wealth is going to quickly change and you can have total control over how wealth is distributed amongst the population of the U.S. The catch, though, is that you have no control over where in the distribution you would fall; you have the same chance of ending up in one quintile, such as the wealthiest 20%, as in any other quintile, such as the poorest 20%. You will also have no control over your gender, your race/ethnicity, ability status, etcetera. All you have control over is how the wealth is distributed. How would you distribute the wealth in such a scenario? Remember that your ideal % for each quintile of the population should add up to 100. Use the following template to answer:Ideal:the wealthiest 20% of the U.S. population would own ____% of all the wealth
the second wealthiest 20% of the U.S. population would own ____% of all the wealth the third 20% of the U.S. population would own ____% of all the wealth
the fourth 20% of the U.S. population would own ____% of all the wealth
the poorest 20% of the U.S. population would own ____% of all the wealth
Once you have posted your answers to the above questions, please move on to Step 2.
Step 2: Your Reply
After you have posted your answers to the 3 questions in Step 1, you will have access to the information necessary for you to do Step 2.
To access the information for you to do Step 2 click here, which will take you to the Income Inequality & Wealth Inequality content page (FYI this page now appears in a new module titled “Week 6: STEP 2 for Discussion”). Please read and watch the content on that page and then return here to complete this Step 2.
Questions for Step 2You have now read and watched information about income and wealth inequality. Now read your classmates’ responses to the questions in Step 1.
Then find your own answer to Step 1 and reply to yourself. (For instructions on how to reply to a classmate on a discussion board, click here Links to an external site.and scroll down to “Thread a Discussion Reply” )
How do your answers compare to your classmates’ answers to questions 2 Step 1? In other words, did many or only a few of your classmates have similar estimates of the current distribution of wealth in the U.S.? Why do you think this is the case? Anything else you notice?
How do your answers compare to your classmates’ answers to questions 3 Step 1? In other words, did many or only a few of your classmates have similar ideals of how wealth should be distributed? Why do you think this is the case? Anything else you notice?
Now, compare your answers to the video you watched in Income Inequality and Wealth Inequality content page. Specifically:How do your estimate and ideal compare to respondents’ estimates and ideals as described in the video?
How does your estimate compare to the actual distribution of wealth today?
The original data described in the video on the Income Inequality and Wealth Inequality content page is about 10 years old. Do you think people in the U.S. have become more or less tolerant of wealth inequality since then? Why?
Do you think people in college are more or less tolerant than the average American of wealth inequality? Why do you think that might be? -
Title: Portrayal of Poverty in “Little Women” and “Hard Times”
Discuss the depiction of the poor and dispossessed in Louisa May Alcott’s “Little Women” and Charles Dickens’ “Hard Times”.
Any
primary and secondary sources used should be appropriately cited in a list of references. -
Title: Juveniles Tried as Adults: Appropriate and Inappropriate Circumstances
Week Three: Discussion 1
Contains unread posts
Must post first.
Why is it appropriate to try a juvenile as an adult? What are appropriate circumstances and what are inappropriate circumstances? Please use factual examples and content from the textbook in Chapter 8 to support your answer. Cite your authority using APA format.
You must start a thread before you can read and reply to other threads -
Title: The Impact of a Sentence: A Reflection on Social Justice Today
The impact of a sentence, whether long or short, should be such that anyone who reads it, feels something. Whether the reader becomes angry, enlightened, or is left with any other emotion, the writer’s purpose is always to give the reader something to think about.
For example, in his 1864 speech, “The Mission of the War,” Frederick Douglass spoke on the jolt the Civil War rendered to the United States saying, “It has planted agony at a million hearthstones, thronged our streets with the weeds of mourning, filled our land with mere stumps of men, ridged our soil with two hundred thousand rudely formed graves and mantled it all over with the shadow of death.” This bold statement carries weight generations later.
From your readings this week in Four Hundred Souls, identify a single sentence that expresses your feelings on the state of social justice today. This sentence may be long or short but must express a complete thought. What strategies do you notice the writer using that we’ve explored over the past few weeks that help create such a strong statement?