Category: English

hello i need 1500 word research about ” depression ” i already did my proposal and i will attach it with all the requirements.

Make this sound like a human wrote it. In Tim Burton’s “Big Fish,” the exploration of truth and its perception is woven intricately into the fabric of the narrative, driven primarily by the contrasting perspectives of Will and Edward Bloom. Through their divergent approaches to truth, the film delves into the complexities of storytelling, memory, and the subjective nature of reality. Will, the skeptical son, and Edward, the larger-than-life father, embody distinct philosophical stances on truth, leading to a profound exploration of the nature of reality and the power of narrative to shape our understanding of it.
Will, portrayed by Billy Crudup in the present timeline of the film, serves as the audience’s entry point into the story. He is characterized by his rationality, skepticism, and a deep-seated desire for truth and authenticity. Throughout the film, Will grapples with his father’s penchant for embellishment and storytelling, which he perceives as a barrier to understanding the “real” Edward Bloom. Will’s quest for truth manifests as a journey to unravel the elaborate tales his father has spun over the years, seeking to uncover the man behind the myth. On the other hand, Edward Bloom, portrayed by Ewan McGregor in his youth and Albert Finney in old age, embodies a diametrically opposed perspective on truth. Edward is a consummate storyteller, whose life is characterized by a series of fantastical adventures and improbable encounters. For Edward, truth is not confined to factual accuracy but is rather a fluid and malleable concept shaped by the power of imagination and the transformative potential of storytelling. He embraces the notion of subjective truth, believing that the essence of an experience lies not in its factual details but in the emotional truths it evokes. The tension between Will’s quest for factual truth and Edward’s embrace of subjective truth forms the thematic core of “Big Fish.” As Will delves deeper into his father’s past, he encounters a series of outlandish anecdotes that challenge his preconceived notions of reality. Each story becomes a battleground between Will’s skepticism and Edward’s romanticism, highlighting the inherent subjectivity of truth and the role of perception in shaping our understanding of the world. However, as the narrative unfolds, Will begins to recognize the deeper truths embedded within his father’s stories. He discovers that while the specifics may be exaggerated or embellished, the underlying emotions and themes are grounded in genuine human experiences. Through his interactions with characters from his father’s past, Will gains a new perspective on Edward’s life, realizing that the stories, though fantastical, hold valuable insights into his father’s character and motivations.
By the film’s conclusion, Will undergoes a profound transformation, recognizing the inherent value of his father’s storytelling legacy. He comes to understand that truth is not a binary concept but rather a multifaceted phenomenon that encompasses both objective facts and subjective interpretations. Will learns to appreciate the power of narrative as a means of preserving memories, imparting wisdom, and forging connections with others. In embracing his father’s stories, Will reconciles with the complexities of their relationship and gains a newfound appreciation for the richness of life’s experiences. In essence, “Big Fish” serves as a meditation on the nature of truth and its perception, inviting viewers to contemplate the interplay between fact and fiction, memory and imagination. Through the contrasting perspectives of Will and Edward Bloom, the film illuminates the inherent subjectivity of truth and celebrates the transformative power of storytelling to transcend reality’s confines. Ultimately, “Big Fish” suggests that while truth may be elusive and subjective, the stories we tell have the power to shape our understanding of the world and illuminate the human condition in profound and meaningful ways.
The film’s exploration of truth extends beyond the dichotomy between Will and Edward, delving into the role of memory and nostalgia in shaping personal narratives. Throughout the film, Edward’s stories serve as a lens through which he constructs his identity and grapples with the passage of time. His larger-than-life tales not only entertain but also serve as a form of self-mythologizing, allowing him to preserve and immortalize moments from his past. In this sense, Edward’s storytelling becomes an act of self-preservation, a means of holding onto cherished memories and crafting a narrative of his life that is both meaningful and enduring. However, as Will confronts his father’s stories with skepticism and scrutiny, he begins to question the reliability of memory and the authenticity of Edward’s narrative. Will’s quest for truth is driven by a desire to uncover the “real” Edward Bloom, untainted by embellishment or exaggeration. Yet, in his pursuit of objective truth, Will overlooks the emotional truths embedded within his father’s stories – truths about love, sacrifice, and the complexities of human relationships. It is only through his journey of exploration and reconciliation that Will comes to appreciate the profound impact of his father’s storytelling legacy and the enduring truths it contains.
By the film’s conclusion, both Will and Edward undergo a transformation, albeit in different ways. Will learns to embrace the subjective nature of truth, recognizing that while facts may fade, the emotional resonance of storytelling endures. He comes to understand that his father’s stories, though fantastical, are rooted in genuine human experiences and hold valuable insights into the complexities of life. Conversely, Edward confronts the limitations of his own narrative, acknowledging the need to reconcile with the past and accept the impermanence of life. In the final moments of the film, as Edward recounts his ultimate tale – the story of his own death – he embraces the role of the storyteller, weaving a narrative that transcends the boundaries of time and mortality. In conclusion, “Big Fish” offers a poignant exploration of truth and its perception, inviting viewers to contemplate the interplay between fact and fiction, memory and imagination. Through the contrasting perspectives of Will and Edward Bloom, the film illuminates the subjective nature of truth and celebrates the transformative power of storytelling to shape our understanding of the world. Ultimately, “Big Fish” reminds us that while truth may be elusive and subjective, the stories we tell have the power to transcend reality and illuminate the human experience in profound and meaningful ways. 

Summary:
Reading Assignment 1 – CER Evidence Based Writing
WRITE YOUR RESPONSE (In paragraph form. Minimum 5/6 sentences & Maximum 10/15 sentence).
Begin your response with the topic sentence (Ex: Why you agree/disagree with the statement. Then explain the context, provide evidence (Last name, year, p.), explain your evidence, show relationship between your evidence and topic sentence, and provide a concluding sentence.
ASSIGNMENT TOPIC
Schumann (1976, p.136) hypothesizes that when the social distance between two cultures is great, the learner will have more difficulty learning the second language” (as cited in Wintergerst & McVeigh, 2011, p. 91). 
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
GRADING CRITERIA 
1. Cover page (Reading Assignment 1, Your full name, Instructor’s full name, student ID, School’s name, Topic Question.)
2. Topic sentence
3. Context
4. Evidence 1
5. Evidence 2
6. Explain your evidence
7. Show how your evidence is related to topic sentence
8. Concluding sentence
9. Format (Double space, use a word document, spacing, font size and style)
10. Typographical errors (spelling, punctuation, capitalization, etc.)

In short, all you have to do is do the 2 journal entries the part i picked was option #2 on the last page. the gorup work is for us to do as a group so i will do that just read ove the instructions for the entries.

I have provided two files one being the assginment direction and the other one the essay’s topic (Composting for the Home Gardener). 

Produce a 5-7 page double spaced following MLA 
format that formulates a clear and precise thesis 
statement, focuses on a specific aspect of work or
works, be it a theme, character, scene, passage, or 
narrative style of a text and articulate a clear, well-
developed argument based on your own analysis of the material. Additionally, you must find 2-3 outside critical sources to support your argument. The topic of the essay is discussing the psychoanalytic 
approach to “One Out of Many” which will be 
attatched below, and then finding 2-3 outside 
sources supporting that argument. 

The writer of the article articulates her own point of view, using a variety of argumentative strategies. You need to read the article carefully,  to analyze the argument.
Some students respond emotionally to the writer’s argument, but I would encourage you to respond with the analytical skills.
**Question** (Instructions)
The essay by Hanna Rosin makes an argument about the future of women and men in the workforce. After reading the essay, write an essay in which you:
evaluate the strength of its argument,
and explain to what extent you do (or do not) find it convincing, using examples from your own experiences.
When you refer to specific strategies from the class, you should consider elements such as quoting, research, and counter-argument. When you consider your own experiences, you should consider how to connect your argument in a meaningful way with your own life.
Both elements are essential.
Here are some examples of analysis that you might consider. Does the writer contextualize quotations? Does the writer include credible research? Does the writer anticipate counterarguments? In what ways does the material align with or contradict your own experiences? To what extent are your own experiences representative or informative in addressing the arguments in the article?
Important Notes:
You must quote at least once from the article, but you do not need to include a “works cited” page.
I am looking for a blend of personal experience with analysis of the evidence. You need both elements.
Do not summarize the article unless that summary is necessary to make a point.Analysis, not summary, should be the focus.
No IA or Chat GPT.
Note: need it in an hour and 45 min from time submitted! It’s timed essay. My apologies and thank you!

identify and discuss at least two potential ethical issues that could be of concern for nurses with telehealth-delivered care.
Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources.

Annotated Bibliography Research
Research Question(s):____How was community during the harlem Renaissance?
When assessing for reliability/credibility consider the following:
Learn about the author
-what is their educational background?
-do they have the credentials to speak on this?
Read through the abstract (summary of article) to determine whether or not it may work for your topic/research purposes BEFORE reading the article to save you time
Check the publishing date
-is this relevant to the Harlem Renaissance time period?
>Primary Source: an account from someone who had a direct connection with the topic (original data)
Examples:
Letters
Artifacts
Autobiographies and memoirs
Diaries
Emails
Speech
Interviews
>Secondary source: expands upon primary sources
Examples:
Literature review
Textbooks
Articles
Biographies
Commentaries
Reviews
When choosing sources consider:
Citations from Harlem Renaissance Stations
Try to use 1 source from SpringBoard
Try to use 1-2 sources from EBSCO
Edu sites
Do not use blogs, wikipedia, or.com 

Communities, because they are made up of people, are inherently fallible. In the Unit 3 essay you identified and explained a problem facing a community you belong to. Now, using the five-paragraph essay structure—with an additional counterargument paragraph—argue for a solution to that problem. In other words, compose an essay that answers the following question: What is the solution to the problem, which you wrote about in the Unit 3 essay, facing your community? The additional requirement of a counterargument paragraph is an important component to your successful essay. We will discuss it in detail during this unit. In the meantime, familiarize yourself with the outline below and the attached graphic organizer.
The materials we will read, listen to, study, and discuss during this unit will provide many examples of individuals solving problems facing their communities. You can be as ambitious or as uncomplicated as you wish.
Use five to six (5-6) sources of your choosing to help with your essay’s content. (Do not use quote collection websites such as brainyquote.com, Goodreads, or the like.) Incorporating additional sources will require that the final page of your essay be a separate MLA works cited page. Attribute your sources using the Purdue University Online Writing Lab, the OWLLinks to an external site., and the MLA-related documents I’ve posted under ‘Files’ in Canvas.
Your audience for this assignment consists of your peers—well-informed college students. Your paragraphs must be fully developed, and your essay must be a minimum of 2000 words and no more that 2250.
A Note on the Counterargument
This is sometimes a hard section for writers to develop; who wants to think of the reasons why an argument won’t work? But this can often be the strongest part of an argument, for when you show your audience that you have anticipated their potential objections, and have an answer for them, you defuse the audience’s ability to oppose you and persuade them to accept your point of view. If there are places where you agree with the opposition, conceding their points creates goodwill and respect without weakening your thesis. For instance, if you are supporting parental notification for abortions, you might concede that there are times when girls shouldn’t be expected to get their parents’ permission, such as in abuse or incest cases. But then you might suggest that a court-appointed counselor give permission instead so that the young girl gets an adult’s support in making this decision.
Consider using the following outline to help with your essay’s structure.
I. Introduction
provide background information about the problem facing your community.
introduce the solution you will be discussing in your paragraphs.
grab your audience’s attention.
include a thesis statement at the end of the paragraph that clearly states your answer to the question: What is the solution to the problem facing your community
II. First Body Paragraph
begin with a strong topic sentence that introduces your paragraph and directs your discussion.
use well-developed supportive detail about the solution to your community’s problem.
draw clear connections between your community and why this solution is needed.
discuss a necessity of your solution.
provide a “quote” which supports your solution.
explain your quote in great detail—using the “quote sandwich” method.
conclude with a well-designed transition.
III. Second Body Paragraph
begin with a strong topic sentence that introduces your paragraph and directs your discussion.
use well-developed supportive detail about the solution to your community’s problem.
draw clear connections between your community and why this solution is needed.
discuss a necessity of your solution.
provide a “quote” which supports your solution.
explain your quote in great detail—using the “quote sandwich” method.
conclude with a well-designed transition.
IV. Third Body Paragraph
begin with a strong topic sentence that introduces your paragraph and directs your discussion.
use well-developed supportive detail about the solution to your community’s problem.
draw clear connections between your community and why this solution is needed.
discuss a necessity of your solution.
provide a “quote” which supports your solution.
explain your quote in great detail—using the “quote sandwich” method.
conclude with a well-designed transition.
V. Counterargument (or Refutation)
begin with a strong topic sentence that introduces your paragraph topic and directs your discussion
raise one of the arguments presented by the opposition to your solution and argue against it logically and fairly, in an attempt to disprove it
provide a “quote” which supports your solution.
fully explain your refutation in great detail
provide a conclusion to your paragraph that shows how your counterargument supports the assertion of your thesis
end with a well-designed transition to your next paragraph.
VI. Conclusion
apply your discussion to the “bigger picture”—Answer the question “So what?” in relation to your solution
summarize your discussion and restate (don’t copy and paste) your thesis statement.
explain how your community will be better as a result of solving its problem.
ease your audience out of your subject.
Use the following checklist to help you sharpen your writing and avoid sentence and basic mechanics errors:
use formal (not conversational or casual) language.
consider your audience—use proper tone and voice for a formal essay.
avoid illogical shifts in point of view (i.e., from first person to third person).
follow the page-format guidelines provided in your syllabus.
use active voice instead of passive voice.
employ correct punctuation and grammar.
Must be double-spaced, titled, Times New Roman, 12-point font, with numbered pages that 
include your last name. I have left the previous two essays that tie with this one.