Category: English

  • “The Allure of Seeking Validation: Women Who Pursue Married Men”

    about women who seek out other women men. stroking their egos showering with gifts and money talking bad about his wife on how she treats him bad

  • “The Role of a Nurse Practitioner in Primary Care Settings” Introduction: The healthcare industry is constantly evolving and adapting to meet the changing needs of patients. With an increasing demand for primary care services, there has been a growing emphasis on the role

    Please read the rubric exactly. The rubric should be exactly how the paper is. Let me know what information you need to complete the paper. Do not use any random profession let me know what profession i want and we can go from there.

  • “Analyzing the US Supreme Court’s Rulings on Student Searches: Review of Cases and Personal Perspective” “APA and Grammar & Spelling Evaluation”

    Week Three: Assignment
    Hide Assignment Information
    Turnitin™
    This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin™.
    Instructions
    All weekly assignments are due at the end of each week’s session, which is 11:59 PM PST Saturday of each week. There will be NO credit given for assignments posted after 11:59 pm PST.
    Each assignment must include: week number, student name, and question numbers. Please answer two of the following questions below. Each question response should be between 1 and 2 pages, double-spaced with 12 point font. Assignments must be completed in a Word document and uploaded for submission. No credit will be given for incorrect answers. There will be no credit for assignments turned in after the deadline of each week.
    Answer the following question:
    Review the US Supreme Court cases regarding student searches discussed in Chapter 9. Briefly discuss the facts behind these cases and the Court’s holding. Overall, and in general, do you agree with the direction of the Court’s ruling on these cases?
    Complete all required tasks, and then upload your work for grading. Submit your work as a file attachment. This means you complete all work in a word processing document (e.g., Microsoft Word). Acceptable formats are .doc and .docx. Only work submitted in document form will be graded. Nothing typed in the textbox will be graded. This assignment is worth a total of 50 points.
    Please find below the grading rubric to which all written assignments are graded.
    CJA 337 Written Assignment Rubric – PDF Document (278 KB)
    Due on May 25, 2024 11:59 PM
    Available until May 25, 2024 11:59 PM. Access restricted after availability ends.
    Hide Rubrics
    Rubric Name: written assignment rubric
    Print
    CriteriaExemplaryGood
    Acceptable
    Unacceptable
    Criterion Score
    Purpose
    10 points
    The writer’s central purpose or argument is readily apparent to the reader; clear thesis sentence.
    8 points
    The writing has a clear purpose or argument but may sometimes digress from it.
    6 points
    The central purpose or argument is not consistently clear throughout the paper.
    4 points
    The purpose or argument is generally unclear.
    Score of Purpose,
    / 10
    Content
    10 points
    Balanced presentation of relevant and legitimate information that clearly supports a central purpose or argument and shows a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a significant topic; content is specific, accurate, interesting and appropriate.
    8 points
    Information provides reasonable support for a central purpose or argument and displays evidence of a basic analysis of a significant topic.
    6 points
    Information supports a central purpose or argument at times but often strays from purpose. Analysis is basic or general.
    4 points
    Central purpose or argument is not clearly identified. Analysis is vague or not evident.
    Score of Content,
    / 10
    grid.row2.label
    10 points
    The ideas are arranged logically to support the purpose or argument. Ideas flow smoothly from one to another and are clearly linked to each other. The reader can follow the line of reasoning.
    8 points
    The ideas are arranged logically to support the central purpose or argument. Ideas are usually clearly linked to each other. For the most part, the reader can follow the line of reasoning.
    6 points
    In general, the writing is arranged logically, although occasionally ideas fail to make sense together. The reader is fairly clear about what the writer intends.
    4 points
    The writing is not logically organized. Frequently, ideas fail to make sense together. The reader cannot identify a line of reasoning and loses interest.
    Score of grid.row2.label,
    / 10
    APA
    10 points
    APA format is used accurately and consistently in the paper and on the “References” section; follows APA guidelines with regard to mechanics, sentence structure, and word choice.
    8 points
    APA format is used with minor errors; follows APA guidelines with regard to mechanics, sentence structure, and word choice with few minor errors.
    6 points
    There are frequent errors in APA format.
    4 points
    Format of the document is not recognizable as APA.
    Score of APA,
    / 10
    Grammar & Spelling
    10 points
    All grammar and spelling are correct.
    8 points
    Only one or two errors in spelling/grammar.
    6 points
    A few grammar and/or spelling errors.
    4 points
    Very frequent grammar and/or spelling errors.
    Score of Grammar & Spelling,
    / 10
    TotalScore of written assignment rubric,
    / 50Overall Score
    Exemplary45 points minimum
    Good35 points minimum
    Acceptable25 points minimum
    Unacceptable0 points minimum
    Submit Assignment
    Files to submit
    (0) file(s) to submit
    After uploading, you must click Submit to complete the submission.

  • “Analyzing Rhetoric in ENG12 Plus: A Critical Evaluation of Argumentative Strategies”

    The references at the bottom of my paper “ENG12 Plus” is the title of my paper, you can find the paper instructions on the “Argumentative analysis” file “, in addition my peer reveiwer have me this advice: focus on the rhetoric ONLY, not the ideas behind (even if you feel really passionate about it!) You might still be able to use this, so but, for example, you can phrase it by saying that the data did not add up in his examples and seemed disconnected.
    I already tried to correct it, I mostly just need my essay as polished as possibe. thank you!

  • “The Power of Movement: Exploring the Relationship Between Health and Blockages in Radical Remission and Chinese Medicine”

    Essay 4: Putting it All Together (100 points)
    This semester we have worked on the following writing skills:
    Drafting enticing introductions
    Drafting two-part thesis statements that include a clear focus and provide reasoning
    Drafting summary paragraphs to explain what the experts say (“they say”)
    Drafting response paragraphs that respond to the experts in one of three ways (“I say”)
    Conducting research to help support the positions presented in the essay
    Presenting the positions of those who oppose the views of the essay (planting a naysayer)
    Drafting solid conclusions that tie the essay together
    Citing all sources properly according to MLA style (both in text citation and works cited page format)
    This paper allows you to put all that work together to showcase all you have learned about drafting college level essays. Including all of the bullet points above, please write an essay that answers the following question:
    Many of the healers quoted in this book view health as movement and illness as blockage on either the physical, mental/emotional, or spiritual level. What do you think about this theory?
    To answer this question, you will need to do a few things:
    Take a position: clearly agree or disagree or partially agree with the theory
    Conduct additional research about this topic. You may want to conduct more research into the concept of chi and its role in Chinese medicine.
    In addition to using the Radical Remission text in the paper, include information from at least 2 additional resources that you find on your own. One resource must be from an academic database. The other can be an academic resource of your choice. In other words, you can choose two resources from an academic database or your can use one from the academic database and one from online.
    This essay should be 6 pages (1500 words) not including the Works Cited page.
    I appreciate you so much for this thank you🙏🏾

  • “Constructive Criticism: Strengthening Claims in Critical Response Essays” Student A: Strengths of the claims: Student A’s claim that social media is causing a decline in face-to-face communication is well-supported by personal anecdotes and examples.

    PART 2: Responding to Your Classmates (Students A and B) about 100 words for each student post.
    Think about the claims your peers laid out in their posts. Approach these claims as thoughtful, critical, and curious readers. In your responses, please respond to at least two peers’ posts by commenting on the following:
    What are the strengths of the claims?
    What about the claims could be strengthened in the Critical Response Essay draft?
    What evidence would you expect to see in support of the claims?
    By addressing these questions in your responses, you are providing your peers with invaluable feedback on their initial draft ideas. Responding in this way is also invaluable practice for conducting peer review, which you are asked to do in the next module.

  • The Impact of COVID-19 on My Personal Beliefs and Values in Clinical Practice Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruptions in all aspects of our lives, including healthcare. As a healthcare professional, I have witnessed firsthand the immense

    How has COVID-19 affected your personal beliefs/values in your clinical practice? Include an example.
    Submission Instructions:
    Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources

  • “Media, Politics, and the People: Navigating the Complexities of Current Events and Decision-Making”

    Guideline 
    You are a freelance writer with a multitude of
    political, media and international connections who has been hired to write the
    closing commentary in a popular fiercely independent
    social/politically-oriented magazine.
    The Editor-in-Chief who has hired you has
    specified that you write a balanced yet persuasive piece as a commentary with
    the main focus of expanding the general public’s knowledge in regard to the
    economy, recent national tragedies, ongoing/ending wars and/or changes in
    administration, inequities in spending/budgeting, and/or issues related to the
    environment or public privacy. You are to reflect on the recent issues as
    the 46TH POTUS faces challenges in his first term in office, State
    of the Union and a changing global climate and outlook.
    Your main focus of this commentary is to make
    suggestions and to investigate and reveal the major impact of Mass
    Media/Technology on populous/political decision-making.
    You are a balanced reporter who will provide
    rationale for or against current decisions made about your topic of choice. You may offer general
    or specific suggestions/ conclusions as you address these issues.
    Your years of experience and expertise are
    vital and could have the possibility of affecting the current social/political
    climate and scope of your readers. Take
    caution in your discourse!

  • “The Importance of Proper Expression and Referencing in Academic Writing”

    Appropriate use of expressions and consistent referencing style will be awarded marks
    and the contrary will be penalised.
    Do not cut and paste from the internet. Read and engage with the given texts.  

  • “Enhancing Academic Writing: Strategies for Elevating Language and Tone”

    Make my writing sound more academic without chamging what I’m saying. Notify me when you think I should remove something.