I also attached reading of that chapter please read instustion papaer carefully and follow all step please also first provide me objection so my sir can approved then you can continue on your writing hope that make to understand what i am expecting
TOPIC
“VIRTUE ETHICS”
Category: Ethics
-
“Exploring Virtue Ethics: A Critical Analysis”
-
Title: Addiction, Domestic Abuse, and Faith in Counseling: Perspectives and Implications for Professional Work Addiction is a complex and multifaceted issue that has been debated for centuries. While some argue that addiction is a disease, others believe it
Please answer the following,
Please explain whether you believe addiction is a disease or a choice of behavior, explain how your perspective will impact the philosophy and mission of your day to day professional work. (Please provide data that supports your answer.)
What percentage of men are victims of confirmed domestic abuse in the United States and why many professionals think this number is actually higher than reported?
An ethical counselor must always respect a client’s choice to practice and worship their faith freely. What would be your response if during a substance abuse group session a member said, “I will only stop using when God tells me to stop”.
Please answer each question with at least 250 words in APA format. Please place each answer on its own page. -
“Ethical Training and Responsibilities in the Corporate Setting: A Scenario for a Marketing Firm”
SCENARIO
You are the ethics officer of a marketing firm. The company prides itself on only engaging in ethical business practices. In order to ensure that all of its employees understand corporate ethical policy, new employees must attend an ethics training as part of the onboarding process. Additionally, every employee must attend an annual ethics training. These ethical training programs are developed by the marketing firm’s ethics officer (you), the marketing firm’s human resources (HR) director, and an outside consulting firm.
In a joint development session, the team works through the training development materials that will be presented at this year’s two-day ethics training session. This year, the focus is on two primary topics: employees’ rights and responsibilities in the workplace and employer’s ethical responsibilities toward employees. In addition, hypothetical ethical scenarios are developed to evaluate the employees’ understanding of company ethical standards, general ethical decision-making, and desired courses of action.
REQUIREMENTS
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
A. Take on the role of the ethics officer in the scenario and address the following:
1. Describe three rights and responsibilities of employees based on the scenario.
2. Evaluate two ethical responsibilities of the employer within the context of the employer/employee relationship described in the scenario.
3. Develop one ethical business dilemma that can be used to demonstrate employee understanding of the company’s ethical standards.
4. Evaluate the dilemma from part A3 from a utilitarian and relativistic perspective.
5. Describe two common ethical decisions that reflect corporate ethics and responsibilities that employees can face while working in a corporate setting.
Note: These should be different from the ethical business dilemma in part A3.
6. Explain why each ethical decision in part A5 presents an ethical dilemma and how an individual might justify unethical behavior (e.g., common excuses).
B. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
C. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission. -
“Another Shot: Evaluating and Re-evaluating an Ethical Dilemma” Title: Ethical Dilemma Analysis: Going Back Inside vs. Impact on Business and Employees
Start Here – Paper Assignment – “Another Shot”
In my opinion, the paper assignment is one of the most important parts of this course. The paper subject is called “Another Shot”, where you will be asked to evaluate and re-evaluate an ethical situation that has happened to you in your past.
Learning ethical theories are all fine and good – but if you do not know how to apply these theories to your life – you have learned very little indeed. Ethics is a practice – not just a study.
Every person has some decision in their past that they regret. They made a decision that did not turn out for the best or was based on poor ethical reasoning (or more honest – NO ethical reasoning). This assignment will give you a chance (in a way) to do it over. You will be asked to evaluate this decision and to apply a system that you will learn in this class to see if you would make the same decision again. In a way, you will get ‘another shot’.
Here is the general outline of the paper I wish you to follow:
Part One: Introduction to the Ethical Dilemma:
In this section I expect you to introduce what ethical dilemma or situation that you are covering. Students often struggle before the paper starts because they do not know what to talk about. Do not overthink this portion – every person has a few actions in their past that they are not necessarily proud of or would like to do over. These can be as ‘simple’ as getting out to your car, realizing that one of the items left in your cart was not rung up, and not going back into the store to pay for it. They can also be more complex, a time when you were asked to do something unethical at work and for fear of losing your job did so.
The point of these stories is not to bare your soul or be forced to ‘overshare’ – but to simply have a platform of an ethical decision to analyze and work on. I think this sort of reflection can help the person the next time they find themselves in a similar situation.
Part Two: Analysis of Ethical Dilemma in the attempt to discern relevant facts.
In this part, now that you have introduced the topic, you will do an in depth investigation of your previous actions, to see what ethical system you chose when you committed to the previous action.
For example, I have not paid for an item left in my cart before at a local store. What I find, when I look back at my motivations is that I made excuses because ‘I didn’t have time’ or ‘Didn’t feel like it.’ or even blamed others by saying ‘The cashier should have seen it in my cart.’ This, upon analysis are likely motivated by simple Ethical Egoism. I didn’t want to be bothered, and because it would have taken effort on my part, did not do what I would later deem to be the correct action.
Part Three: Application of an Ethical System to dilemma – showing an understanding of not only the systems mechanics but application.
In this section you need to apply a different ethical system (other than what was used initially) to your situation. Briefly explain the ethical system chosen (such as Utilitarianism) and how the ethical system would view your ethical dillemma.
In the example of the item left in the cart mentioned above, one would have to show how Utilitarianism would view keeping the item or returning to the store to pay for it. In this example much talk of ‘the greatest good for the greatest amount’ must be in the forefront of your discussion.
You must stay on task and relevent to the ethical system being analyzed.
Part Four: What your course of action was.
In this short section simply tell what action you took in the original dilemma.
Part Five: Whether the ethical system you have chose would have deemed your actions moral .
In this section you should analyze what action you took in your original dilemma and see if the ethical system chosen in Part Three of your paper would feel if your action was ethical.
In the example given above, it could be argued that Rule Utilitarianism would not deem keeping the item ethical. My pleasure, of not going back inside, does not outweigh the pain caused to the business. If every person decided to do the same, businesses would go out of business and cause thousands to be unemployed.
Part Six: What you would do differently given another shot.
This is the most personal section of the paper where you would decide if you would do anything different. This does not require you to conclude that you would indeed do anything different, but simply to complete your analysis and deem if you would indeed do something different if given ‘another shot’.
Be thinking about this assignment and a decision you can evaluate. Also, download the paper assignment sheet and read it over, print it off for your binder, and work on it a little at a time. Don’t let this assignment get away from you and try to do it in the last week. It will be obvious to me and you will not get as much out of this assignment as you could.
each part should be on 1 page. Please use the paper below as a reference -
“Exploring Feminist Ethics: A Dialogue with an Instructor” Introduction: Feminist ethics is a branch of ethical theory that focuses on the moral and ethical issues faced by women and marginalized groups. It challenges traditional ethical theories that are often based on
please read instructions first i need to a topic and agrument for approval with my instructor i pick feminist ethics the he ask me questions related to that i will share his SS read chapter #18 i will share as pdf file follow instructions instructions is posted below
-
“Step-by-Step Guide: How to Complete and Submit an Assignment on Canvas” Step-by-Step Guide: How to Complete and Submit an Assignment on Canvas 1. Access the Assignment – Log in to your Canvas account and navigate to the
Instructions
Download this file and follow its instructions. You will save your submission in the provided document in its original .docx format, and press ‘Upload’ when you are ready to turn it in. -
“Submission Instructions and Document Download”
Download this file and follow its instructions. You will save your submission in the provided document in its original .docx format, and press ‘Upload’ when you are ready to turn it in.
-
Title: Combating Noble-Cause and Egoistic Corruption Among Officers: Effective Methods and Their Differences
Write an essay on (or discuss) the best methods to reduce noble-cause corruption among officers. Are they the same methods as those that should be used to reduce egoistic corruption for pecuniary gain? Explain why or why not. Also, explain why you think the selected methods would work.
-
“Module 3, 4, and 5 Homework Assignment Answers: Exploring Key Concepts and Applications”
i need answers for Module 3,4 and 5 answers of homework assignment u can scroll and check the module.
-
The Ethics of Cancel Culture: A Response to The Ethicist In a world where social media has given everyone a platform to voice their opinions, the concept of “cancel culture” has become a hotly debated topic. This phenomenon involves publicly
Choose another question presented to The Ethicist and compose a thoughtful 500-word minimum response to the individual who posed the query. Utilize concepts and ideas discussed in class, drawing from ethical theories such as utilitarianism and Kantianism and any other relevant philosophical frameworks. Address the ethical dilemma posed in the question, providing a well-reasoned analysis that offers guidance and recommendations while considering the broader societal implications. Your response should demonstrate your mastery of ethical theories, critical thinking, and the ability to apply philosophical concepts to real-world situations.
This link will direct you to the New York Times magazine website.
https://www.nytimes.com/column/the-ethicist