Category: Health Care

Rubric Criteria For The Reference
The teaching intervention is “Generate an awareness of effective communication in the healthcare setting”
15 research articles related to the evidence-based teaching intervention chosen
Must be an original research article related to your teaching intervention published in the last five years.
Place the references alphabetically
Insert articles reference in APA format
along with the permalink or other URL that takes you to the original article. The following article types are not acceptable
Case studies,
Reviews of the literature,
Theory papers,
“How to” articles,
Systematic reviews of research, scoping reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses.

Just to clarify this is a Healthcare Finance and Management course
The proposal should be 5 typed double spaced pages of content in length (NOT including cover page, table of contents page, abstract, tables, graphs, or references page), where the student will develop a thorough introduction to the selected health care finance topic. Topic selection must be relevant to this course content and pre-approved by the instructor. .
Instructor will discuss and approve topic with student. References are to be cited in the body of the paper and listed on the reference page. A minimum of five (5) references, including scholarly articles from current literature and journals, must be used in the preparation of this assignment. APA, 7th Edition (or newer if available) format is to be used. Submit assignment. The Final Paper Proposal must include:
1] Cover sheet (one page)
2] Proposed Table of Contents (one or more pages). Please be sure to adhere to APA requirements. 3] Body of Paper Proposal content (five double spaced pages of research content includes Introduction, Review of the Literature, Discussion.) There is NO Abstract required, therefore, one would not be counted in your 5 page Content requirement. If you choose to use an abstract, graphs, charts, diagrams, tables, etc. these would NOT be included in the 5 page minimum requirement for the research aspect of the assignment. 4] References (one or more pages)
In most cases, this assignment submission is the 30% point of your Final Project Paper. Once the instructor returns this paper to you with specific guidance, comments, and a grade, you will be well on your way! Continue to develop and expand your selected and approved topic until the Final Paper Project is completed.
All assignments are to be submitted in Microsoft Word, using Times New Roman font, size 12 ONLY. Review Final Project Paper Guidelines, grading marker narrative, and Rubric in Syllabus.

Please see information below. use the scenario below to as a reference. Also, please find Attached template required. thank you
Patient Scenario
Ronald is a 48 year old male, states he rarely visits the doctor due to his hectic life and tight schedules. Has not had a physical or any medical contact for longer than he is willing to admit. On Ronald’s initial vital signs he had a blood pressure of 156/96, pulse of 102 blood oxygen of 94, hieght 5’10” and weighed 252lbs. Upon completion of the Lifestyle/Hitsory questionnaire Ronald revealed that he has been a pack a day smoker for the past 20 years and his mother was a diabetic. A finger stick was performed blood sugar of 300. Patient states im getting old er and “I need to start to take better care of my self and I will”.
More than 30 million people in the United states have diabetes and its the seventh leading cause of death.1 Healthy people 2030 focuses on reducing diabetes cases, complication and death Some racial/ethnic minorities are more likely to have diabetes. Many people with diabetes don’t know they have it.

Culture drives quality – if an organization does not have a culture where they hold themselves and others accountable, probably, it will not achieve and sustain high-level quality outcomes. Patient safety is defined as freedom from accidental injury; you have seen how medical errors are harmful and that there are second victims who suffer. Remember, quality can be defined as “the cumulative impact of all that happens to a patient while in an organization’s care (Porter, 2012, pg.193).
Culture is essential to creating a high-reliability organization. Recent research indicates that educational programs support the health system’s high-reliability efforts. Assess how education and communication have been key to engaging medical care providers in high-reliability efforts.
A Just Culture gives organizations a template to uniformly address the shortcomings or errors of those who fail. It addresses failures in four different areas, which include 1) human errors and mistakes, meaning unintentional harm, 2) carelessness or at-risk behavior – or not paying attention that results in an error, 3) recklessness or a flagrant disregard for norms where an error occurs unintentionally, but because of recklessness, and 4) those who do not pay attention and have no regard for authority.
In this discussion, you will identify a model that a healthcare organization might use to improve its quality culture and describe whether the ethical theory of Just Culture would enhance the quality and patient safety and why.

Instruction file and the excel document was uploaded,
There are lecture notes as well and links to some websites. Please for excel equations make sure to show how you got the number( when we click the number it shows how we got that number) save as excel. Thank you so much.

Chapters 5-6
Answer each of the following questions:
What are the differences among causal, intervention, and impact theories? What are the relationships among the possible functions of effect theory and the selection of optimal interventions?
Imagine that you have been asked to explain to your colleagues in 10 minutes how to set targets for program objectives. Develop an outline of the steps involved.
Students should review chapters prior to answering questions as it will ensure their answers are correct. Textbook:
Health Program Planning and Evaluation
Issel, Michele and Wells, Rebecca
Jones & Bartlett Learning, 5th Edition, 2022
ISBN: 9781284210057
Photos of requirements have been uploaded

Provide a written response to the 3 post below. Provide at least one reference for each response. Post1: Global health interventions in resource-limited settings are essential for addressing the vast disparities in health outcomes between developed and developing nations (Naghiloo, 2023). These interventions tackle various health challenges, from infectious diseases to chronic conditions and maternal and child health (Naghiloo, 2023). Their significance lies in saving lives and promoting sustainable development and global health equity (Naghiloo, 2023). However, limited resources, cultural barriers, and political instability complicate their implementation (Naghiloo, 2023). Learning from these challenges, stakeholders must collaborate on designing adaptable, context-specific strategies that invest in local healthcare systems, embrace technological advancements, and foster partnerships (Naghiloo, 2023). This approach is vital for achieving health equity for all, regardless of geographical and economic barriers (Naghiloo, 2023).
My thoughts
Developing research ethics capacity in low-resource settings is a task that must be shared equitably with local communities. Their active engagement ensures that research aligns with their needs and values, and their empowerment is critical to providing education and training on research ethics and strengthening local ethics review boards. Collaborative partnerships between high-resource and low-resource settings can facilitate knowledge and resource sharing while developing context-specific ethical guidelines that ensure that research respects local cultural and social norms. By valuing the input of local stakeholders and fostering mutual respect, ethical research practices can be effectively integrated and sustained within the community.
Question:
How can global health initiatives be designed to effectively address the unique challenges of resource-limited settings while promoting sustainability and respect for local cultures?
Reference:
Naghiloo, Z. (2023). Global health interventions in resource-limited settings: Successes and lessons learned. Health Nexus, 1(3), 56–60.
Post 2: People with rare diseases (RDs) often face social and cultural exclusion, lack political visibility and priority, and encounter challenges in obtaining proper diagnosis, treatment, and care (Adachi et al., 2023). The need for consistent epidemiological data across different regions and populations, combined with the low prevalence of these conditions, hampers the implementation of clinical trials and the collection of real-world data (Adachi et al., 2023). This impedes the development of effective and innovative treatments (Adachi et al., 2023). Managing the diagnosis and treatment of RDs is difficult, placing significant emotional, financial, and social burdens on patients, their families, and caregivers (Adachi et al., 2023). Despite substantial disparities between countries, RD management is a global issue (Adachi et al., 2023). Even in developed countries with advanced RD policies, budgets, and clinical guidelines, patients struggle with the healthcare system, leading to significant disparities in the quality of care and access to treatment across different social classes and communities (Adachi et al., 2023).
My thoughts:
Patient advocacy organizations and rare disease institutes can enhance awareness and reach underserved populations with low literacy levels by developing easy-to-understand educational materials that use simple language, visual aids, and culturally relevant content. Partnering with local community leaders and organizations can help build trust and effectively disseminate information. Utilizing various communication platforms, such as social media, radio, and television, can broaden outreach. Organizing community events, health fairs, and workshops provides direct engagement opportunities for personalized education. Training healthcare providers in underserved areas to recognize and refer rare disease cases can further bridge the gap between patients and resources. Collaborating with international organizations and leveraging technology, such as mobile health apps, can facilitate global information sharing. By implementing these strategies, patient advocacy organizations and rare disease institutes can significantly improve awareness and access to resources, enhancing global health equity.
Question:
How can healthcare systems and policymakers address the disparities in diagnosis, treatment, and care for rare disease patients to ensure equitable access and support across different social classes and communities?
References:
Adachi, T., W., A., Jain, R., Nogales Crespo, K. A., Quirland Lazo, C. I., Scarpa, M., Summar, M., & Wattanasirichaigoon, D. (2023). Enhancing equitable access to rare disease diagnosis and treatment around the world: A review of evidence, policies, and challenges. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(6), 4732. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064732 Links to an external site.
Post 3: What are the key enablers and barriers to advancing global health research between academic researchers and communities?
Barriers: Dedicated time, funding, and academic support are common barriers that faculty researchers face in the United States (Anderson et al., 2023). Lack of training is an additional problem that can prevent research in academia (Anderson et al., 2023). Globally, there are literacy and language barriers that hamper research efforts (Saloojee and Pettifor, 2024). In addition, even if the research can be read, getting access to it costs money, which many low-income countries can’t afford; therefore, more open-access articles are needed (Saloojee and Pettifor, 2024). Levine et al. (2017) found logistics, such as lack of standardization of data collection, and limited resources, including the absence of internal review boards, to be additional barriers to global research.
Enablers: Mentorship is associated with improved scholarly activities amongst faculty in the United States (Anderson et al., 2023; King and Lazar, 2023). International organizations that supply or raise money for research and create policies that support and encourage global research are facilitators. For example, the World Health Organization (WHO) has three global health initiatives including
anticipating scientific, technological, and epidemiological shifts;
setting a global research agenda to address gaps, emerging areas, and country priorities; and
strengthening confidence in science (WHO, n.d.).
This last bullet point is particularly important because when communities don’t trust scientific research, they are not likely to volunteer to be subjects, assist with study advancement, or disseminate the results from studies. Educating communities assists with building trust and helps researchers convey the importance of studies and community financial support.
References
Anderson, B., Shannon, K., Baca, K., Crouse, J., Ferguson, A., Margrave, A., Meyers, M., Percuoco, K., Schneider, P., Smith, J., VanNatta, M., Wells, B., Nightingale, L., & Salsbury, S. A. (2023). A scoping review to identify barriers and facilitators of research participation among chiropractic faculty. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 38(1), 50-59. doi:10.7899/JCE-23-7
King, J. S. & Lazar, B. (2023). The benefits of mentorship: Enhancing leadership skills, the workplace environment, and the delivery of health care services: A systematic literature review. Radiology Management, 45(5), 26-34.
Levine, A. C., Barry, M. A., Agrawal, P., Duber, H. C., Chang, M. P., Mackey, J. M., & Hansoti, B. (2017). Global health and emergency care: Overcoming clinical research barriers. Academic Emergency Medicine, 24(4), 484-493. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13142 Links to an external site.
World Health Organization. (n.d.). Research for health. https://www.who.int/our-work/science-division/research-for-health Links to an external site.
Saloojee, H. & Pettifor, J. M. (2024). Maximizing access and minimizing barriers to research in low- and middle-income countries: Open access and health equity. Calcified Tissue International, 114(2), 83-85. Doi.10.1007/s00223-023-01151-7

planning Assess the unique contributions of key personnel to facilitate interprofessional collaboration strategies that can improve the success of the quality improvement initiative. Assess the organization, using tracer methodology, for the substantive data that supports the need for the quality improvement initiative. This data should consist of tracer data, performance improvement data, benchmarks, and any other data points relevant to your organization and quality improvement initiative. Use tracer methodology to determine the data collection requirements that will provide sustainable measurements for the quality improvement initiative. Analyze the organizational processes for barriers to both the flow of survey-required quality data and the communication of the data collected for the initiative. What to Submit Submit your completed Milestone Three assignment as a 3- to 5-page Word document with separate title and reference pages that are not part of the page count. Use at least two scholarly, current (published within the last five years) sources to provide evidence-based support for your work. Follow APA style standards for formatting and citing your sources.

Please create a graph for each tab of the attached excel sheet. Be sure to note the month, hour of ordering the test and duration which is in minutes. The point is to create graphs to help visualize the excel data. Be sure to write a sentence or two describing the chart

I chose option#4 on outline I am attaching.
Apa format
I will have to send paper through TURNITUN to confirm no copying; plagiarism.
10 sources 10 references