Category: Health & Medical

  • “Comparison of Two Health Care Professions Using Bureau of Labor Statistics Data”

    In this assignment you will compare two (2) different professions with material copied from the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
    It will follow the same structure as in your last assignment. The difference will be you are to create a comparison. You will explore two different professions in the Bureau of Labor Statistics. You will cut and paste the exact same information as in the last assignment. After the information is pasted for both professions, you are to write a comparison of the two different sets of information for each heading. You can rank them, give pro’s and con’s, or comment on their similarities & differences. I expect at least 3 substantial sentences for each set of information required.
    So, select two professions in health care (you can use the profession and information from your previous assignment).
    It might be easiest to open 2 windows (one for each profession) and the Word document.
    1. Open a new Word document to enter the requested data points or wording selection under a heading that identifies each section from which it was obtained. 2. Log into https://www.bls.gov/ooh
    3. Enter one of your preferred jobs from our health course.
    4. Click on the top option with a Occupational Handbook entry
    5. Review the summary. Cut and paste the 2021 Median Pay into your Word document under the heading “Median Pay”. Duplicate this process for the second profession and paste the second set of information under the first. Then write your required (3-sentence minimum) comparison statement.
    6. Scroll to bottom and click on “What they Do” to advance.
    7. Cut and paste the opening paragraph into your Word document under the heading “What they Do”. Duplicate this process for the second profession and paste the second set of information under the first. Then write your required (3-sentence minimum) comparison statement.
    8. Scroll to the bottom and click on “How to Become One” to advance.
    9. Cut and paste the three sections indicated below into your Word document under the heading “How to Become One”. Duplicate this process for the second profession and paste the second set of information under the first. Then write your required (3-sentence minimum) comparison statement.
    10. Scroll to the bottom and click on “Pay” to advance.
    11. Cut and paste the opening paragraph into your Word document under the heading “Pay”. Duplicate this process for the second profession and paste the second set of information under the first. Then write your required (3-sentence minimum) comparison statement.
    then
    12. Click on “Job Outlook” to advance.
    13. Cut and paste opening paragraph into your Word document under the heading “Job Outlook”. Duplicate this process for the second profession and paste the second set of information under the first. Then write your required (3-sentence minimum) comparison statement.
    14. Click on “State & Area Data” to advance.
    15. Click on your occupation to advance.
    16. This page will show several US maps that reveal states that offer the highest pay and where more job opportunities are available compared to other states.
    17. Scroll down the page and examine the annual mean wage by state. In your Word document, list two (2) thoughts you have regarding the mean pay differences under the heading “Pay Differences”. Duplicate this process for the second profession and paste the second set of information under the first. Then write your required (3-sentence minimum) comparison statement.
    18. Scroll down the page and examine the location quotient by state. In your Word document, list two (2) thoughts you have regarding the location differences under the heading “Location Differences”. Duplicate this process for the second profession and paste the second set of information under the first. Then write your required (3-sentence minimum) comparison statement.
    19. Save your Word document as a .pdf.
    20. Submit your .pdf document.

  • Environmental Impacts on Personal Health Discussion

    As we have learned more about the environmental impacts on your personal health this week, I think you will find the following video interesting. 1. After watching post your thoughts on the following to the discussion board: (5 points)
    The topic in the video
    The places you have lived and what type of environmental issues to which you may have been exposed. 2. Reply to at least one of your classmates original post (hit the reply button below their original post). Do not reply to a reply. (5 points)
    ——-5 points for your original post and 5 points for replying to your classmates
    As a reminder on your replies:
    5 points for your replies to a classmate original posts, not on a reply they left for another classmate. (Click “Reply” at the bottom of their main post):
    Your reply to a classmate must be at least 3 substantial sentences. The items below are example of brief, vague or “throw-away” response statements and will not receive credit. It is okay to include them in addition to your 3 substantial sentences, but not instead of your 3 substantial sentences.
    Hi David.
    Nice to meet you.
    I like your post.
    Have a good semester.
    I posted the same thing.
    Your replies must be written in proper sentence for with emojis, emoticons, or text abbreviations (e.g. LOL)
    Your reply must relate to what they posted, not only what you posted.
    Your reply must be respectful, but may disagree.
    If you post that you agree, disagree, like, or dislike something in their post, you must state what the item was and why you felt that the way you did.
    Vague or short replies will receive very little credit.
    Asking a question does not count as one of your 3 sentences, but you may ask a question in addition to your required response
    Link

  • Title: “Breaking the Gender Bias in Cardiovascular Research: Understanding the Differences in Heart Attack Symptoms for Women”

    More women now die of heart disease than men, yet cardiovascular research has long focused on men. Watch the following video.
    1. Create a Discussion Post to answer the following question: (5 points)
    Why are symptoms different for women during a heart attack?
    Why are they often missed? 2. Reply to at least one of your classmates original post (hit the reply button below their original post). Do not reply to a reply. (5 points)
    —– 5 points for your original post and 5 points for replying to your classmates.
    As a reminder on your replies:
    5 points for your replies to a classmate original posts, not on a reply they left for another classmate. (Click “Reply” at the bottom of their main post):
    Your reply to a classmate must be at least 3 substantial sentences. The items below are example of brief, vague or “throw-away” response statements and will not receive credit. It is okay to include them in addition to your 3 substantial sentences, but not instead of your 3 substantial sentences.
    Hi David.
    Nice to meet you.
    I like your post.
    Have a good semester.
    I posted the same thing.
    Your replies must be written in proper sentence for with emojis, emoticons, or text abbreviations (e.g. LOL)
    Your reply must relate to what they posted, not only what you posted.
    Your reply must be respectful, but may disagree.
    If you post that you agree, disagree, like, or dislike something in their post, you must state what the item was and why you felt that the way you did.
    Vague or short replies will receive very little credit.
    Asking a question does not count as one of your 3 sentences, but you may ask a question in addition to your required response
    Link

  • “Pareto Analysis and Business Process Flow Charting for Medical Center Procurement” Improving Procurement Processes at LLMC: A Total Quality Management Approach

    Week 7 Activity – Pareto Analysis and Business Process Flow Charting Practice
    Due: Mon May 20, 2024 9:00amDue: Mon May 20, 2024 9:00am
    Ungraded, 30 Possible Points30 Points Possible
    Attempt
    In Progress
    NEXT UP: Submit Assignment
    Add Comment
    Unlimited Attempts Allowed
    Available after Apr 29, 2024 12:00amAvailable after Apr 29, 2024 12:00am
    Details
    This activity consists of two problems.
    Problem One
    Gary Seitz is the director of procurement for the Forest Medical Center in Oak Park, Illinois. His medical center recently purchased more than 300 new side tables for the patient rooms from Quick-and-Cheap Furniture. His team, however, is not happy with the paint quality of these tables. They feel the firm providing the tables was rushed to get the order out and did not do a great job.
    They have examined each of the 312 tables that they have received so far and found the following defects, listed in alphabetical order:
    Table DefectsProblemNumber of Occurrences
    Dirt in paint65
    Off-color17
    Orange peel12
    Other1
    Sad looking43
    Scratch11
    Sealer under8
    Thin paint31
    Instructions
    Use Excel to:
    Create a Pareto Chart for this situation.
    Create and complete a table for this situation using the following headers:Problem.
    Frequency.
    Cumulate Frequency.
    Percentage.
    Cumulate Percentage.
    List the most frequently occurring problem first in the table, then the next more frequently occurring problem second in the table, and so forth.
    In a Word document:
    Draw two conclusions about the quality of the patient tables that Quick Furniture has shipped to the Forest Medical Center.
    Submit both your Word and Excel files.
    Problem Two
    Ted Short, the manager of procurement at the Lake Luna Medical Center (LLMC), is starting a process to examine the general process that is followed at his center for procurement of medical supplies at his facility. His first step is to develop a flowchart for the current process that employees at his center follow. He has asked you to draw that flowchart for him and make any obvious changes to shorten the process.
    Here are the key steps that are followed:
    The LLMC employee fills out a paper requisition and sends that to his department head for approval.
    The department secretary first examines the requisition to see if all the needed information is present. If it is, then she sends it to the department head for approval. If not, she returns to the employee for any needed corrections. The employee then returns the requisition to the department secretary for review again.
    Requisitions with the correct information are sent to the department head.
    The department head reviews the item to determine if the material requested seems appropriate. He may contact his employee to discuss any questions he might have.
    If he feels it is inappropriate, then he rejects the request and sends it back to the employee.
    If he feels it is appropriate, then he checks the budget to see if there are sufficient monies in the budget to pay for this. If there are not, then he rejects the request and sends it back to the employee. If there are sufficient funds, then he approves them.
    If the requisition is approved, then the department secretary sends the requisition to a member of the LLMC Procurement Team.
    The LLMC procurement specialist checks to see if the suggested vendor on the requisition is on the approved vendor list (AVL).
    If not, he sends the request back to the department secretary and the process starts all over if the LLMC employee wants to continue to pursue it. If the employee does not, then the requisition is terminated.
    If the vendor is on the AVL, the LLMC procurement specialist checks to see if a quote is required, either based on the type of equipment and material required or on the amount of the purchase.
    If no quote is required, the procurement specialist transmits the PO to the vendor for execution.
    If a quote is required, then the specialist contacts the vendor and asks for a quote. If the quote is satisfactory based on past purchases of such items, the specialist approves the quote and places the order.
    If the quote is too high, the specialist contacts the LLMC employee and asks for another vendor to check. The procurement specialist then checks the second vendor. Usually, a procurement specialist will have to check only two vendors at most.
    If the specialist cannot find a vendor with it suitable price after two tries, then the PO is canceled.
    When the specialist finds a vendor who submits a suitable quote, she transmits the PO to the vendor for execution by US postal service or by telephone.
    The procurement specialist then logs the transaction into the financial system.
    The procurement specialist then forwards the request to the Accounts Payable Department for payment when the receipt of the materials and equipment ordered, is acknowledged.
    Instructions
    Use Microsoft Word to complete the following:
    Develop a flowchart for this process.
    Suggest three improvements, based on total quality management, that Ted Short can use to make the current process more efficient.
    Submit your Word document(s).
    View Rubric
    Week 7 Assignment – Week 7 Activity – Pareto Analysis and Business Process Flow Charting Practice
    Week 7 Assignment – Week 7 Activity – Pareto Analysis and Business Process Flow Charting Practice
    CriteriaRatingsPts
    Accurate solution, outcome, and/or conclusion is given to address all components presented in the task(s).10.2 to >9.17 pts
    Exemplary
    Solutions, outcomes, and/or conclusions are correct and address all relevant components of the problem(s).9.17 to >8.15 pts
    Competent
    Solutions, outcomes, and/or conclusions address all relevant components of the problem(s) and are mostly accurate, with minor errors in calculations/charts.8.15 to >7.13 pts
    Needs Improvement
    Solutions, outcomes, and/or conclusions address only some of the components of the problem(s) OR there are multiple accuracy errors.7.13 to >0 pts
    Unacceptable
    Solutions/outcomes given are incorrect./ 10.2 pts
    Use appropriate strategy and correct process to solve the problem(s) or answer the question(s).
    9.9 to >8.9 pts
    Exemplary
    Used an appropriate strategy and complete process for solving the problem(s) or answering the question(s).8.9 to >7.91 pts
    Competent
    Used an appropriate strategy but incomplete process for solving the problem(s) or answering the question(s). 1–2 process steps are missing or incorrect.7.91 to >6.92 pts
    Needs Improvement
    Used an inappropriate strategy or application of strategy is unclear. 3–4 process steps are missing or incorrect.6.92 to >0 pts
    Unacceptable
    Used an incorrect strategy or no strategy is shown for solving the problem(s)./ 9.9 pts
    Communicate the relevance of the solution(s) in the appropriate context using evidence/examples where appropriate.
    9.9 to >8.9 pts
    Exemplary
    Communicated the relevance of the solution(s) in the appropriate context using evidence/examples where appropriate.8.9 to >7.91 pts
    Competent
    Communicated the relevance of the solution(s) in the appropriate context.7.91 to >6.92 pts
    Needs Improvement
    Communicated the relevance of the solution(s), but not in the appropriate context.6.92 to >0 pts
    Unacceptable
    Did not communicate the relevance of the solution(s)./ 9.9 pts

  • “Exploring the Benefits and Challenges of Group Psychotherapy Services in Clinical Environments” Group psychotherapy services can be beneficial for both inpatient and outpatient clinical environments. In inpatient settings, group therapy can provide a sense of community and support for patients

    DISCUSSION QUESTIONS1.What are the benefits and the challenges of offering group psychotherapy services within both inpatient and outpatient clinical environments?
    2.Discuss key components of group process that occur during all phases of group development, giving examples of patient-focused activity that occurs during each phase.
    3.Describe how various theoretical orientations could be used when leading short-term group psychotherapy. What patient populations or clinical presentations would be best served by each theoretical framework.
    4.Discuss the benefits and challenges of using one or two group therapists during a psychotherapeutic intervention.
    5.Discuss the importance of identifying ground rules, especially in relation to confidentiality for group psychotherapy services.
    6.Describe how group psychotherapy differs from individual psychotherapy and describe the types of patients who might be better served by group psychotherapy.
    7.Identify a specific group you would like to lead in your practice and discuss the purpose, your target population, how you would screen and recruit participants, establishing a fee schedule, the time frame (open or closed), number of participants, theoretical orientation for the group, selection of a co-therapist or why you do not want a co-therapist, marketing and advertising, and length of each session.
    To reflect, write one or two paragraphs with a minimum of 150 words, scholarly written, APA formatted, and referenced. A minimum of two references are required (other than your text).

  • TQM Contributions in the Medical Field: Applying the Methods of Crosby, Deming, and Ishikawa to a Medical Center or Hospital

    Week 6 Activity – TQM Contributors Practice
    Due: Mon May 13, 2024 9:00amDue: Mon May 13, 2024 9:00am
    Ungraded, 30 Possible Points30 Points Possible
    Attempt
    In Progress
    NEXT UP: Submit Assignment
    Add Comment
    Unlimited Attempts Allowed
    Available after Apr 22, 2024 12:00amAvailable after Apr 22, 2024 12:00am
    Details
    In this week’s readings, you learned about the major contributors to the development of total quality management (TQM). Some of the methods that each developed are more suited to one application versus another. Select three contributors from the list shown here whose TQM methods could be readily applied to the daily business and medical operations of a medical center or hospital.
    Philip Crosby.
    Dr. W. Edwards Deming.
    Armand Feigenbaum.
    Dr. Joseph M. Juran.
    Prof. Kaoru Ishikawa.
    Genichi Taguchi.
    Musaaki Imai.
    In a Word document:
    Describe two of the contributions to the development of TQM for each of the three individuals you selected.
    Apply each of the contributions to a specific situation in the operations of a medical center or hospital. Include examples from both the medical and business operations to illustrate the use of TQM.
    View Rubric
    Week 6 Activity – TQM Contributors Practice
    Week 6 Activity – TQM Contributors Practice
    CriteriaRatingsPts
    Accurate solution, outcome, and/or conclusion is given to address all components presented in the task(s).10.2 to >9.17 pts
    Exemplary
    Solutions, outcomes, and/or conclusions are correct and address all relevant components of the problem(s).9.17 to >8.15 pts
    Competent
    Solutions, outcomes, and/or conclusions address all relevant components of the problem(s) and are mostly accurate, with minor errors in calculations/charts.8.15 to >7.13 pts
    Needs Improvement
    Solutions, outcomes, and/or conclusions address only some of the components of the problem(s) OR there are multiple accuracy errors.7.13 to >0 pts
    Unacceptable
    Solutions/outcomes given are incorrect./ 10.2 pts
    Use appropriate strategy and correct process to solve the problem(s) or answer the question(s).
    9.9 to >8.9 pts
    Exemplary
    Used an appropriate strategy and complete process for solving the problem(s) or answering the question(s).8.9 to >7.91 pts
    Competent
    Used an appropriate strategy but incomplete process for solving the problem(s) or answering the question(s). 1–2 process steps are missing or incorrect.7.91 to >6.92 pts
    Needs Improvement
    Used an inappropriate strategy or application of strategy is unclear. 3–4 process steps are missing or incorrect.6.92 to >0 pts
    Unacceptable
    Used an incorrect strategy or no strategy is shown for solving the problem(s)./ 9.9 pts
    Communicate the relevance of the solution(s) in the appropriate context using evidence/examples where appropriate.
    9.9 to >8.9 pts
    Exemplary
    Communicated the relevance of the solution(s) in the appropriate context using evidence/examples where appropriate.8.9 to >7.91 pts
    Competent
    Communicated the relevance of the solution(s) in the appropriate context.7.91 to >6.92 pts
    Needs Improvement
    Communicated the relevance of the solution(s), but not in the appropriate context.6.92 to >0 pts
    Unacceptable
    Did not communicate the relevance of the solution(s)./ 9.9 pts

  • “Improving Operations Management in Healthcare: An Analysis of HFMA’s ‘How-To’ Guide”

    Article Analysis on:
    https://www.hfma.org/operations-management/how-to-…
    Analysis should answer the following questions in narrative form:
    1. What key questions or problems does the author raise and why?
    2. What information, data, or evidence does the author present to support the purpose of the article?
    3. What key conclusions is the author coming to? Are those conclusions justified?
    4. What are the implications of the author’s reasoning for the field of health
    administration?
    Article analysis assignments must be typed, double-spaced, using 12 point Times New
    Roman font, with 1” margins, and your name and paper title as a header in the upper right hand corner. A copy of the article must accompany the analysis. Papers will be graded based on grammar, format, and on the following criteria:
    -Interpretation of content is completely accurate.
    Identifies and describes precise and explicit supporting evidence (facts).
    Strongly connects new content to previous learning (elaboration).
    Draw accurate conclusion based upon interpretations, connections, and integration.
    Provides strong reason(s) for the conclusion.
    Follows required format
    PLEASE USE ARTICLE FROM LINK , you may have to make an account to access it, please let me know if you are unable.
    https://www.hfma.org/operations-management/how-to-…

  • Title: Exploring the Intersection of Addiction and Disease: A Response to the TED Talk on AIDS and Substance Abuse

    This TedTalk is interesting because it ties our last discussion on AIDS with our Chapter 7 work on substance abuse. Watch the video and then give a thoughtful response to the writing prompt below.(7 pts)
    Remember you must give your opinion related to the Chapter and this TedTalk. Make us believe you saw the Tedtalk by including statements from the Talk.
    1.What are your thoughts on addiction? 2. Some people say it is a lack of will power and the medical community lists it as a disease. Weakness or sickness? 3. What is your reason for believing what you do?
    Remember to reply to at least one other student.(3 pts)
    Your thread should be at least 75 words. Your reply should be at least 30 words.
    Link

  • “Developing a Comprehensive Compliance Plan for Healthcare Organizations: A Guide to Ensuring Organizational Compliance with State Regulations and Federal Guidelines”

    Instructions
    Assignment Instructions:
    Note: As you prepare your Signature Assignment this week, please keep in mind that for your Week 8 Assignment, you will review and respond to the feedback provided for the Week 7 Signature Assignment. Next week, in Week 8, you will also reflect on the course content, concepts, and course competencies, and critically analyze and document how these elements impact and/or advance your career interests and degree program pathway. Use an annotated bibliography to support your ideas. Signature Assignment: Using relevant state regulations and the Federal Guidelines developed by The Office of Inspector General (OIG) for healthcare organizations, you will develop a comprehensive, organization specific, Compliance Plan, including key relevant policies and procedures to support organization wide compliance. Use relevant resources and models of compliance program documents from other healthcare organizations to inform the design and content of your Compliance Manual. Length: A minimum of 5 pages organized with headers and formatted in the style of a resource manual that can be understood by all employees in the organization, not including the title page and reference page.
    References: Include a minimum of 3-5 scholarly resources to support the creation of the Compliance Plan.
    The completed assignment should address all of the assignment requirements, exhibit evidence of concept knowledge, and demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the content presented in the course. The writing should integrate scholarly resources, reflect academic expectations and current APA standards, and adhere to University’s Academic Integrity Policy.

  • Setting Healthy Goals: Personal Assessments for Nutrition and Weight Management

    As we begin to understanding healthy eating and nutrition, it is important to understand where you are currently and what your caloric needs are based upon your weight goals. Assessment 8 is a series of personal assessments that should help you set some healthy goals. Below the links are examples of what your submission should look like.
    BMI Calculator
    Fat Intake Calculator
    Carbohydrate Calculator
    Protein Calculator
    Results:
    BMI
    Result
    BMI = 33.9 kg/m2 (Obese Class I)
    Fat
    Fat Intake Calculator
    Result
    GoalDaily Calorie AllowanceDaily Fat Allowance (20-35%)*Saturated Fat Allowance (10%)*Saturated Fat Allowance to Help Reduce Heart Disease (7%)*
    Weight Maintenance2,684 Calories61 – 107 grams<30 grams<21 grams Lose 1 lb/week2,184 Calories50 - 87 grams<25 grams<17 grams Lose 2 lb/week1,684 Calories38 - 67 grams<19 grams<13 grams Gain 1 lb/week3,184 Calories72 - 127 grams<36 grams<25 grams Gain 2 lb/week3,684 Calories84 - 147 grams<42 grams<29 grams Carb result Carbohydrate Calculator The Carb Calculator estimates the percentage of carbohydrates a person should consume each day. Result It is recommended that carbohydrates comprise 40-75% of daily caloric intake. GoalDaily Calorie Allowance40%*55%*65%*75%* Weight Maintenance2,684 Calories286 grams (10.10 Oz) (0.631 lb)394 grams (13.88 Oz) (0.868 lb)465 grams (16.41 Oz) (1.026 lb)537 grams (18.93 Oz) (1.183 lb) Lose 1 lb/week2,184 Calories233 grams (8.22 Oz) (0.514 lb)320 grams (11.30 Oz) (0.706 lb)378 grams (13.35 Oz) (0.834 lb)437 grams (15.41 Oz) (0.963 lb) Lose 2 lb/week1,684 Calories180 grams (6.33 Oz) (0.396 lb)247 grams (8.71 Oz) (0.544 lb)292 grams (10.29 Oz) (0.643 lb)337 grams (11.88 Oz) (0.742 lb) Gain 1 lb/week3,184 Calories340 grams (11.98 Oz) (0.749 lb)467 grams (16.47 Oz) (1.029 lb)552 grams (19.47 Oz) (1.217 lb)637 grams (22.46 Oz) (1.404 lb) Gain 2 lb/week3,684 Calories393 grams (13.86 Oz) (0.866 lb)540 grams (19.06 Oz) (1.191 lb)638 grams (22.52 Oz) (1.408 lb)737 grams (25.99 Oz) (1.624 lb) Protein result Protein Calculator Result Based on given information, the following are the basic protein intake recommendations from multiple authoritative institutions: American Dietetic Association (ADA): at least 107 - 193 grams/day. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): 65 - 229 grams/day (10-35% of daily caloric intake). World Health Organization safe lower limit: 89 grams/day.