Category: History

  • “Final Essay Draft Submission and Plagiarism Check”

    This week, you will see a link below. This is for you to submit a good, solid draft of your final essay to TurnItIn.com for an originality check. You can still make changes to your paper based on feedback from TurnItin, feedback from our Writing Center, or feedback from other people who read your draft. However, this needs to be a full draft of your final paper.
    You will be able to see the report. A score of 10% to 20% is typical. You will find matches for titles and references. Also, you will see matches for stray phrases and such. That is okay. By the way, quotes show up as matches, too. Most students who use quotes end up quoting far too much. Rarely is it necessary for students to quote their sources. Trust your own voice to summarize, analyze, and synthesize in your own words.
    When you look at the report from TurnItIn, pay special attention to any sentences or paragraphs that match. And look for passages where you relied too much on the words of your sources. That is not okay; you need to use your own words when writing your paper. If you see those sorts of problems, then fix them and resubmit your paper. The best advice I can give is: Do not submit your paper in the first place if you know that you copied and pasted from sources. That is plagiarism.
    Questions about plagiarism? Our Writing Center is ready and willing to assist you.

  • “Uncovering Assumptions and Motivations: Analyzing a Prohibition Leaflet from 1898” “Uncovering Assumptions and Motivations: A Historical Analysis of a Prohibition Leaflet from 1898”

    The primary source mini-essays are intended to introduce students to the importance of using primary sources in history. While historians often use primary sources only as evidence, this assignment asks that we pay close attention to a primary source, reflect on it and, using our historical knowledge of the context as well as our imaginations, see what stories it might be telling us. 
    For this week’s assignment, the primary source is a leaflet, based on a sermon, and illustrated by J. W. Benbough, for the Dominion Alliance for the Suppression of the Liquor Trade. It was probably produced in 1898 for the Dominion referendum on national prohibition, but the information we have is pretty limited. Here is the  document document – Alternative Formats , and here is a link to where it is hosted: https://www.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.08204/1
    What kinds of assumptions does the leaflet make about the reader, their life, and their values? What arguments does it make? To what extent are these religious or political arguments? How does the leaflet try to motivate the reader to care about other people’s drinking? How are Canadians implicated in the liquor trade, even if they themselves don’t drink? 
    The mini-essay should have an essay structure (i.e. several paragraphs, plus an introductory and a concluding paragraph that convey a central claim or argument), and be 750-1000 words or three-five pages in length. The mini-essays should rely on course content (i.e. lectures and the textbook) for evidentiary support, and should not involve external research.
    Referencing should be in Chicago, with footnotes and a bibliography. 
    https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html

  • “Unsung Hero: The Story of [Name], a Key Figure in [Chosen Historical Event]”

    Overview
    In this assignment you will develop a profile of a person involved in the historical event you chose for your Project, based on an analysis of primary and secondary sources. This may be a person who is typically the focus of historical accounts of the event, or it may be an individual who is lesser known. Your profile will discuss how this person’s story may be interesting to people today, and you will explain how an artifact for your museum exhibit relates to the person’s involvement in the historical event.
    Directions
    Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
    Describe an individual involved in your chosen historical event.
    Who was this person?
    How were they involved?
    Is this person typically the focus historical accounts or is the person lesser known?
    Discuss the relevance of the individual’s experience to a contemporary audience.
    What characteristics of this person may people feel a connection to?
    What aspects of their involvement in the event may be of interest to people today?
    Describe two credible secondary sources about the individual.
    Use the SIFT method to support credibility.
    Provide a comparison of the ways each source tells the person’s story.
    Summarize what details both sources include.
    Describe what notable details are left out of either source.
    Explain the impact of bias in each source.
    Describe how an artifact you will select for your exhibit relates to the perspective of this individual.
    What to Submit
    Submit your short paper as a 3- to-4-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA Style.
    Although Brightspace allows the addition of video notes in assignment submissions, you may not use the Video Note tool to complete this assignment.
    Profile of Historical Figure Rubric

  • Title: “The Interplay between Health Outcomes and Race: Uncovering the Legacy of Medical Inequality and Slavery’s Influence” Thesis: The persistent disparities in health outcomes among different racial groups can be traced back to the legacy of slavery

    Develop an essay response of 2 pages to your selected question about the interplay between health outcomes and race. In your response be sure to:
    Include a clear thesis that fully answers the question and provides an informed and rational response. 
    Employ three sources as evidence in support of your response. 
    Proofread before submitting for spelling and grammatical errors. 
    Describe how medical inequality In care today is based on physiological myths perpetuated by slavery ?

  • Title: The Changing Perception of Europe in the Post-Bipolar World: A US Perspective

    Please do topic #10: US perception of Europe in the post-bipolar world.
    Here are the links required to do paper: 
    1) https://www.proquest.com/docview/218396840?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:summon&accountid=9941&sourcetype=Magazines
    2) https://go.exlibris.link/BvGjwtwv (pdf file is attached)
    3) https://www.proquest.com/docview/216428794?accountid=9941&parentSessionId=LUC8p2EgNinUPW4vclcIUFFmvaS1w9%2BpNv8lHYch%2BmY%3D&pq-origsite=summon&sourcetype=Magazines
    Please use at least seven other sources to do this paper, the sources listed above are just the starting point of the research paper. Ideally there should be at least 10 sources in total, which can be of any type, secondary sources such as a historian’s viewpoint, primary source such as a newspaper article, and so on.

  • “The Making of H.R. 2670: An Analysis of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024” The legislative process in the United States is a complex and lengthy one, involving numerous steps and stages before a bill can become

    Write a essay 
    About (H.R. 2670: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024)
    Researching the Law: You will conduct research using print and online sources to study the process from bill to law.
    Reviewing the Law-Making Process: You will learn more about the steps in creating a law. Then, you will use what you learned to create a timeline and outline of the law’s process.
    Outlining the Argumentative Essay: You will create a full outline for the essay as well as an outline of speaking points for your presentation.
    Write the essay 2-3 pages is appropriate using a standard formatting (MLA, APA, Chicago).  Stick with one formatting and citation style.

  • Title: The Impact of Assimilation Policies on Indigenous Communities: A Critical Analysis

    Questions one and two need to be answered without the use of AI and with credible PEER 
    REVIEWED JOURNAL ARTICLE as sources. Question two is referring to Australian Aboriginals and the assimilation policy it is referring to is attached so please use it to answer the question. PLEASE DO NOT USE AI. 

  • Assignment Title: “Navigating the Bay: The Evolution of Transportation in the San Francisco Bay Area” Topic Description: This topic will explore the history and evolution of transportation in the San Francisco Bay Area, from the early days of horse-drawn car

    Pitch Topic Idea: Evolution of Transportation in the Bay Area
    Here’s what you must deliver:
    – First: Topic Title: In no more than 10 words, what is it?
    – Second: Topic Description: (Discuss this in 100-200 words)
    – Third: Learning Objectives: Offer three different Learning Objectives that convey what students will have an understanding of when finished learning about this material. Each learning objective should be clearly conveyed in under 50 words.
    1.
    2.
    3.
    – Fourth: Essential Questions
    1) Why is this material historically important in our understanding of Bay Area Culture? (200-300 words)
    2) How is this material culturally important to our understanding of Bay Area Culture? (200-300 words)
    – Fifth: Materials: What teaching materials will be used to teach this topic? You can include mediums such as literature, poetry, historical documents, articles, journals, images, photography, film, video, music, fine art, murals, street art, posters, and other mediums of art to build your curricula.
    IMPORTANT REQUIREMENT FOR CREDIT: Deliver at least three different teaching materials in at least three different mediums, presented in the form of an MLA works cited page.

  • “Exploring Ethical Dilemmas in Contemporary Society”

    I have attached the assignment directions along with the word document to fill out.  
    I also attached a sample word document to go by.
    I attached the list to choose the two choices from.

  • “Ensuring Quality Work: The Importance of Following Instructions and Utilizing Turnitin Reports”

    Please make sure to carefully review all attached instructions before accepting this assignment. Please! The writers consistently fail to read the instructions and submit incomplete work. Please ensure that you are prepared to submit a Turnitin AI report and a Turnitin plagiarism report.