Category: History

Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
This is an essay for my History class. It is an analysis/close reading of a primary document that will relate to my final project for the class. The topic of the final project is “The effects of the Armenian genocide today and how it is still an ongoing issue.” You will need to pick out a primary source (from the internet) to talk about in the essay and make sure it can relate to this topic. Here are further instructions for the essay:
Please submit a 3-4 full page analysis and close reading of a primary document of your choice that you will be using in your portion of the final project. The student can use any of the primary documents on the syllabus, or choose one that is relevant to the course material and to the topic of their chosen final project.
Identify the primary source you are using, and explain what type of source it is: example a petition to the Sultan, A letter to from a merchant, an excerpt from a memoir… etc, and place it in historical context.
If possible Identify the writer.
Give a short summary of what the document is about, or what the purpose of the document is.
Do a close reading of the document, taking into consideration bias, tone, voice , audience, author, and give your analysis.
Conclude your paper.
The paper does not necessarily have to be in the above order, but needs to include all points.
Be sure to refer to the text in your analysis, and back up any claims you make.
The paper needs to be 3-4 full pages long, and double spaced.
It needs to have a title, and any outside information has to be cited.
All citations have to be Chicago style.
Requirements: 3-4 Full Pages Chicago Style Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced Excluding the Title Page and Bibliography
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure to include an introduction paragraph with a clear thesis statement in the last sentence of the introduction paragraph and a conclusion paragraph.
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions.
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. The assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
Please be sure to include at least one footnote in each body paragraph.

A close reading of the book The Terror of History. What is the book all about? How does it fit into the topics of this course? What do you think? Do not be afarid of being critical. This assignment is NOT a summary of the book, but an attempt to read it critically. 
The topics of the coure are: Europe in the Middle ages and the early modern period, Hersey and Apocalypses: Millennial Dreams in Action, Signicance of May Day: A digression

This is an argumentative research paper,so a 
case have to me stated and made , I would like a paper based on women being challenged with their reproductive rights and how they succeed in the end and anything else in between.Ofcourse all sources needs to be cited and all information has to come from google scholar besides the files I provided(only academic sources can be provided!!).Cornelia Hughes Essay in the book I provided is a great essay to use( page 90) Andrea Tone Essay(page 359) and Anne Valk Essay(page 503) any other information is in the file provided with all the instructions about the paper

List and explain 10 Events, during this course’s chronological period (1865-1970), that contributed to the formation of the United States of America as a people and a Nation. Events should not be broken down into parts. For example, wars begin with causes, include battles and end with the peace treaty. Instructions: Number the events.
Name the event and write a brief description (5-7 sentences) of your reason for choosing this event. This is not a research paper.

You will create your own political party, focusing on FOUR domestic policy issues and TWO foreign policy issues. These issues would be called the planks of your party platform. This information sheet will help you to develop your ideas to incorporate into your political party. Please see attachment Political Party Name, The Bridge Era. Bridge both parties and generations for common interest and policies.
Please dumb down for highschool and use simple words to understand Need poster 8×10, and brochure for party

How did your learnings from Hidden Voices: AAPIs complement what you learned in our other assigned course readings (not from Hidden Voices)? Be specific. If you were updating this K-12 public NYC school curriculum resource, Hidden Voices: AAPIs, what would you assign and why? Please draw on at least 3 academic readings from our course, not from Hidden Voices, to make your argument. Your essay should be about 500 words.
Please use the 3 attached readings as described above.

Pick one OF the four QUESTIONS. ONLY USE THE POWERPOINT PROVIDED Civil Rights. Using your notes and textbooks and material in the Unit Module, answer one of the questions in a 2 to 3 page essay. Follow all MLA rules used for this class. Submit to Canvas via Google Doc. If you cannot for some reason, share the essay to me in an email. Do not use A.I.
1.Were the civil rights gains more a result of the Federal Government’s involvement, individual effort, or some combination of the two?
2.In your historical assessment, explain the most momentous events and/or key figures in the civil rights movement.
3.How did the use of nonviolence and non-governmental actions further the cause of civil rights for African Americans?
4.Why must America study the Civil Rights Movement of African Americans? What repercussions or impact does such a study have for other groups?

Description:
This assignment asks you to create a gallery of antiquities and medieval art by choosing objects from the collections of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, The Getty Villa, and The Louvre Museum. Museum Websites to Source Artworks:
1.Art Collection – The Metropolitan Museum of Art (metmuseum.org)Links to an external site.
2.Home (Getty Museum)Links to an external site.
3.Explore (louvre.fr)Links to an external site.
DIRECTIONS:
1. Choose one object from the collections of the Metropolitan Museum, The Getty Villa, and The Louvre to represent the following historical periods we have studied in AHIS1:
a. Egyptian Art (3200BCE- 500ACE)
b. Mesopotamian Art (3200BCE-500ACE)
c. Greek Art (1000BCE- 300ACE)
d. Roman Art (550 BCE-400ACE)
e. Byzantine Art (500-1100 ACE)
f. Islamic Art (620-1300 ACE)
g. Medieval and Gothic Art (700-1300BCE)
Make sure your object is from the date range provided above.
2. Write a 500-1000 word description of your exhibitions (in total, for all the objects), making comparisons between the objects regarding style, subject matter, materials, symbolism, etc. Discuss the changes in the conventions of representation and aesthetic form. Thank you for completing this course and working so hard to reach the finish line!

Why did the Senators feel that they had to rid Rome of Caesar? Do you agree? Why or why not?
Why do you think the senators believed he had to be put to death? Do you agree? Why? Why do you think that Augustus was allowed to live and rule?
Should the senators have rid the state of him as well? Should he have suffered the same fate as Caesar? Was Rome strengthened or weakened by these two men and in what ways? Explain fully and use specific details details in answering the questions. Fully develop your ideas. I am looking for both mastery of the class material and thoughtful analysis on this one. This must be based only on our course materials and your own analysis. It must contain information from our course materials.

Answer the following question only using this book :Origins and Evolution of the European Union, 2nd edition. 
Please provide a page reference or a quote for each question from the book. DO NOT use footnotes. Each answer to the question should be about 100 words. 
(Times New Roman 12, single-spaced, with one line of blank space between responses), using 1-inch margins); include the assignment title/number; and number your responses precisely in accordance with the assignment. Your responses must be based on the assigned readings (i.e., the use of “outside” material is discouraged); composed in full-sentences; use correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation, as well as appropriate (i.e., mature) style; contain bracketed in-text page-references—e.g., (25) or (34-35)—to the assigned readings
SKIP #1
QUESTIONS:
Watch the video clip for this module (“Churchill in Zurich 1946”) available on Canvas. Free writing … what are your impressions?
Peter Stirk references John Maynard Keynes’s take on the role of Germany for Europe’s economy. Why was/is Keynes’s position problematic/controversial?
According to David A. Messenger, what was the Berlin Blockade? How did it come about? What were its consequences?
Why was fascism in Spain under Franco allowed to continue for another three decades (until 1975) beyond WWII?
From the perspective of John R. Gillingham, what appears to have been the value of the Schuman Plan negotiations?
Jean Monnet and Konrad Adenauer are, at least by some, considered architects of European integration. How so/on what grounds?
Gillingham emphasizes that Europe still lacks its own “demos.” Why, and with what consequences?
According to Wendy Asbeek Brusse, what were Britain’s reservations concerning the customs union?
Craig Parsons argues that it was French insistence on a community Europe that forced Germany, the Benelux countries, and Italy to choose supranationality over cooperation with sovereignty-conscious Britain. Before this was achieved, what were the three competing models of Europe in post-WWII France? Be specific.
How did Guy Mollet manage to get the Rome treaties ratified?
According to Jeffrey Vanke, what may have been Charles de Gaulle’s “certain idea of Europe” between 1940 and 1969? Discuss.
What is the significance of the Elysée Treaty?
According to Richard T. Griffiths, what were the anticipated impacts of CAP (= common agricultural policy) on Britain?
In Ann-Christina L. Knudsen’s assessment, why/how was agriculture able to claim and uphold such a special position in the Federal Republic of Germany and, in fact, throughout Western Europe?
What was the Mansholt Plan, and what was its significance?
Piers Ludlow maintains that, according to the traditional narrative (which he then sets out to challenge), Jacques Delors is credited with a major European revival. How so/on what grounds?
According to Dorothee Heisenberg, there was a lack of public enthusiasm in Europe with regard to EMU (= economic and monetary union). Yet, once it was launched, the Euro was supported by two-thirds of the populace. How would you explain this?
What was the significance of the “two-speed” and “opt-out” EMU debate?
According to Jeffrey J. Anderson, why did the gradualist approach to German reunification fail?
According to Anna Michalski, what are the 1993 Copenhagen criteria? On what grounds have they been criticized?
Why does Turkish membership in the EU (= European Union) appear to be going nowhere?
Desmond Dinan references and quotes Winston Churchill’s 1946 Zurich speech. According to this speech, how was Churchill envisioning Britain’s role with regard to the potential United States of Europe? What are the implications?
According to Berthold Rittberger (citing Geoffrey Garrett and Andrew Moravcsik), what are the key advantages of a supranational court?
According to Desmond Dinan, what is Alan Milward’s thesis/argument in The European Rescue of the Nation State?
Discuss Desmond Dinan’s closing sentences: “As in other areas of EU scholarship, the gap between the specialists’ knowledge and the publics’ [sic] awareness nevertheless remains formidable. Whereas that is true of most academic endeavours, the consequences of the ‘knowledge gap’ for the EU, being such a highly contested form of governance, are particularly regrettable.”