Category: Law

Create a power point Describe the differences between Critical and Narrative Criminology. Also, provide a brief example of both. Due tomorrow by 5pm

For your Unit 4 Complete assignment, write a narrative essay (minimum 1000 words) in which you address and discuss the questions and statements listed below. Use at least three scholarly sources and remember to demonstrate a thorough understanding of the READ and ATTEND sections in your essay. Include your in-text citations and list your sources in APA format at the end of your essay.
What is the purpose of probation? Identify some conditions of probation and discuss the responsibilities of the probation officer.
Should pretrial detainees and convicted offenders be kept in the same institution?
What if you were an inmate? Would you feel that monitoring in prison enhances your safety? Or would you perceive the constant monitoring as an invasion of your privacy? Do you think you should have some privacy? Now imagine you are a corrections officer. Would you feel that monitoring in prison enhances your safety? Do you think inmates should have some privacy?

IMPORTANT: The answers to the questions should be in paragraph format, and should be several paragraphs long. Each should refer to the textbook and the material on Canvas to maximize points. The answers do not need to be full essays, and grammar is not graded. Longer answers tend to earn more points, when they are accurate and referring to course material. 
References to course material do not need to be formal cites. Bold and/or underline your references. For example: Textbook, pg. 11.
Questions (4 and one brief)
1. Thoroughly explain Alternative Dispute Resolution and its potential benefits. Be detailed and include references to specific course material.
2. Watch this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcTHYKX2LfI) to an external site. that brings together a criminal offender and a victim. (A) How well did this activity meet the principles of restorative justice? (B) Did this activity further any of the goals of sentencing? Be detailed and include references to specific course material.
3. Why is it important to have judges who reflect the diversity of the society they work in? Be detailed and include references to specific course material.
4. Read the case summary of Miller v. Alabama (https://www.oyez.org/cases/2011/10-9646) to an external site.. Using both what you’ve learned in this course and your personal opinion, analyze and critique this case. For example, how is the ruling supported by, or not, what you have studied about sentencing? Do you agree with the ruling? Be detailed and include references to specific course material.
BRIEF: Using a brief format that you have learned in other classes (such as Issue-Rule-Analysis-Conclusion), brief the Miller v. Alabama case. The full case is provided at this link (https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/567/460/#tab-opinion-1970507) to an external site. because the case summary provided in question 3 does not give you enough information to do a thorough brief. Be detailed and include references to the Miller v. Alabama case in the analysis section of your brief.
###Questions
1. Thoroughly describe the function of the plea deal in criminal court. What’s good about this process? What are potential downsides? Be detailed and include references to specific course material.
2. Thoroughly describe the role of the defense attorney in the criminal justice process, and be sure to include the power differential between this role and that of the prosecutor.  Be detailed and include references to specific course material.

The Australian Constitution was written in order to create a
federated Australian polity. Since it came into operation over 100 years ago the way in which the High Court
has interpreted it has shifted dramatically.  Explain that shift by describing the way the Constitution was
originally interpreted and also explain the current approach to working out what the
Commonwealth Government can and cannot do under the Constitution.
Centre your explanation in the Engineers’ Case and explain how that case was
instrumental in shifting the balance of power between the state and federal
governments.

USED ATTACHED TRADE LOG
Started with a red paperclip
Note the word count at the beginning of this section. Any words that exceed 1000 will not be read or considered when grading your answer.
1. How did the understanding of the interests of the other party aid in moving negotiations forward? Please be sure to include one or more illustrations from your trades.
2. How did your understanding of trades based on you gaining an item that is worth more to you than the other party (trading based on valuing the same item differently) aid in moving negotiations forward? Please be sure to include one or more illustrations from your trades.
3. How did your BATNA affect the outcome across your negotiations? Please be sure to include one or more illustrations from your trades.
You will recall that your BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) is what happens if you do NOT complete your trade. Your BATNA affects your bargaining power. Your power is based on whether you have a better alternative than the trade under consideration.
Your BATNA is NOT the value of your item. The value of your item is relevant only when figuring out your BATNA. For example, if the item you have is worth $50, you should trade for something that is worth more than $50 on the assumption that you can get something worth $50 by turning to your BATNA and making an even trade.
Your BATNA focuses on whether you can get a better deal elsewhere. If you cannot, you have a weak BATNA and have little bargaining power. If you can do better elsewhere, you have some leverage to ask for more from the person you are negotiating with because if you cannot get it, you can resort to your BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement).
Based on this negotiation experience, which techniques were the most effective ones to use and that you are likely to use in future negotiations? Please be sure to include two to three illustrations from your trades.
4. Identify effective techniques used in these negotiations which you will incorporate in your future negotiation. You must include a minimum of two concrete examples from your trades.
Grading
This trade log and your lessons learned analysis are worth a total of 10% of your overall grade. Review the rubric below for an understanding of how you will be assessed.
Rubric
Paperclip Log Rubric (new) (2)
Paperclip Log Rubric (new) (2)
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNegotiate a series of trades starting with the paperclip and ending with something more valuable.
4 ptsDistinguished
Negotiates minimum of five trades, adhering to all of the rules and resulting in something significantly more valuable.
3 ptsProficient
Negotiates minimum of five trades adhering to all of the rules.
2 ptsAcceptable
Negotiates minimum of five trades adhering to most of the rules, with moderate success in acquiring something more valuable.
1 ptsNeeds Improvement
Negotiates a minimum of four trades adhering to most of the rules.
0 ptsNon-Performance
Negotiates three or fewer trades or fails to adhere to most of the rules.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvide a thoughtful analysis, in the trade log, of what worked and what did not work for each trade with references to key concepts in the course readings and presentations.
4 ptsDistinguished
Provides an insightful evaluation of what worked and what did not work for each trade with applicable references to key concepts in the course readings and presentations.
3 ptsProficient
Provides a thoughtful analysis, in the trade log, of what worked and what did not work for each trade with references to key concepts in the course readings and presentations.
2 ptsAcceptable
Provides an analysis of what worked and what did not work for each trade with limited or tangentially applicable references to key concepts in the course readings and presentations.
1 ptsNeeds Improvement
Provides a minimal description of what worked and what did not work for each trade with limited or no references to key concepts in the course readings and presentations.
0 ptsNon-Performance
Trade log is substantially incomplete.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunicate in a clear, concise, organized, and well-written manner that links reflections to specific concepts found in the course readings and lectures.
4 ptsDistinguished
Communicates in a clear, concise, organized, and well-written manner expected from a legal professional and links reflections to specific concepts found in the course readings and lectures that demonstrates sophisticated mastery of course material.
3 ptsProficient
Communicates in a clear, concise, organized, and well-written manner that links reflections to specific concepts found in the course readings and lectures.
2 ptsAcceptable
Communicate in a manner that is inconsistently clear, concise, organized, and well-written, and/or inconsistently links reflections to concepts found in the course readings and lectures.
1 ptsNeeds Improvement
Communicates in an unclear, verbose, and poorly organized manner with multiple writing errors and/or fails to link reflections to specific concepts found in the course readings and lectures.
0 ptsNon-Performance
Does not communicate in a clear, concise, organized, and well-written manner.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how the interests of the other party moved the negotiations forward including at least one concrete example.
4 ptsDistinguished
Explains how the interests of the other party moved the negotiations forward including multiple concrete examples; demonstrates self-awareness of the negotiator’s role and skill in assessing the other party.
3 ptsProficient
Explains how the interests of the other party moved the negotiations forward including at least one concrete example.
2 ptsAcceptable
Explains minimally how the interests of the other party moved the negotiations forward including at least one general example.
1 ptsNeeds Improvement
Explains minimally how the interests of the other party moved the negotiations forward and fails to include any example.
0 ptsNon-Performance
Fails to explain how the interests of the other party aided moving the negotiations forward and fails to include any concrete example.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain how you used trading based on valuing the same item differently to move the negotiations forward including at least one concrete example.
4 ptsDistinguished
Explains how trading was used based on valuing the same item differently to move the negotiations forward, including at multiple concrete examples; identifies strategic assumptions upon which the valuation was based.
3 ptsProficient
Explains how trading was used based on valuing the same item differently to move the negotiations forward including at least one concrete example.
2 ptsAcceptable
Explains minimally how trading was used based on valuing the same item differently to move the negotiations forward including at least one general example.
1 ptsNeeds Improvement
Explains minimally how trading was used based on valuing the same item differently to move the negotiations forward and fails to include any example.
0 ptsNon-Performance
Fails to explain how trading was used based on valuing the same item differently to move the negotiations forward and fails to include any example.
4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify effective techniques used in these negotiations including a minimum of two concrete examples from your trades.
4 ptsDistinguished
Analyzes effective techniques based on this negotiation including a minimum of two concrete examples from the trades.
3 ptsProficient
Identifies effective techniques based on this negotiation including a minimum of two concrete examples from the trades.
2 ptsAcceptable
Identifies techniques (effective or otherwise) based on this negotiation including a minimum of two moderately pertinent examples from the trades.
1 ptsNeeds Improvement
Minimally identifies effective techniques based on this negotiation or includes fewer than two examples from your trades.
0 ptsNon-Performance
Fails to identify effective techniques based on this negotiation and includes fewer than two examples from your trades.
4 pts
Total Points: 24

have an oral presentation, I need my work to be very easy and clear or my to read as I will me presenting this live. I need all criteria’s to be met
there are 2 questions but only one needs to be done. I want question 1 to be answered only…. aiming for an upper second grade.

In jury trials, the parties are generally entitled to strike any prospective juror for cause, such as some relation to the defendant, or already-formed opinions about guilt. Do you feel that this process protects the integrity of the trial process in coming to a just verdict, or is it possible that the side with the most able and talented attorney is able to manipulate the jury composition in such a manner as to slant the jury one way or another before the trial even starts? Why or why not?
State laws and state court rulings may provide additional rights to people of the state and to criminal defendants within that state, beyond those extended by the Constitution. In your group decide if you agree or disagree with additional rights beyond the Constitution being granted to people within a state. What do you see as the issues associated with people being treated differently within a criminal justice system based on which state they are in? What is the rationale behind your decision?

The student must use all research strategies: primary and secondary sources to locate the relevant case and statutory law on a legal issue. The student prepares an open objective memorandum of law.
PLEASE REFER TO THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS FOR INSTRUCTION ON THE DRAFTING OF THIS DOCUMENT, I AM WILLING TO OFFER HIGHER PAYMENT DEPENDING ON EXPERIENCE LEVEL DRAFTING OPEN OBJECTIVE MEMORANDUMS.  

!!!Follow extremely properly the istructions into the brief uploaded down, is really important 
that everything corresponds to the instrutions.
!!! Minimum grade: 75+
!!! Don’t use IA

Please help me with research about Damages under the CISG (relevant cases neeed to be included)
i will post the guide lines