Category: Law

Description
Assignment Details
When looking at various assessment and diagnostic techniques, an individual must know how to accurately classify offenders. The best way to get this experience is by completing the Adult Offender Matrix. The purpose of the matrix is to assess both the type of crime and the offender.
Adult Offender Matrix
Complete the following:
Complete the Adult Offender Matrix (linked above) by placing an x in the appropriate cells.
In a 2-page Word document, explain how you came to your decisions for offender classification.Were there any classifications of which you were unsure?
What other problems did you come across?
Place your completed matrix and Word document in a .zip file, and submit it to your instructor.

Please label the questions as they are being answered in the paper.
The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) has awarded a public contract to Be Good Contractors, Inc. to build a test facility for developing new smallpox vaccines. The project was initiated in response to a perceived biological warfare threat from a rogue terrorist group. The cost of the building was over $5 million dollars. Three months into the construction, the CIA determined they had overestimated the threat level and there was no real need to pursue development of the smallpox vaccines. The government never notified the builder and then approximately 6 months later, the DHHS notified Be Good Contractors that the project was being canceled and they should vacate the job.
Be Good sued, stating they had $3 million dollars of work yet to be completed on the contract and they should be compensated for their future losses. The government disagreed with the demand.
QUESTION 1:
State the best defense(s) the government has to avoid paying Be Good’s requested relief. Please present a solid legal analysis to support your conclusion.
QUESTION 2:
If the DHHS also informs Be Good it will not be paid for work it has successfully completed, will the DHHS prevail with this position?
Do you feel that this is an acceptable position for the government to maintain? Is this fair and honorable…. did the builder accept the risk that this could happen?  Please, explain your answer, using a sound legal analysis to reach a correct conclusion.

Respond to two peers. 
Respond to Peer 1 500 words
Respond to Peer 2 500 words 
Uploaded Word doc consists of instruction and scenario and both peers that need to be responded to. 
Understand Criminal Law 9th ed, Joshua Dressler
Criminal Law A Contemporary Approach 4th ed, Russell L. Weaver, John M. Burkoff and Catherine Hancock 

Identify the key legal question(s) raised by the case
Summarize the court’s ruling on the question
Explain the court’s reasoning for its decision (including concurrences and/or dissents), and
Explain why you agree or disagree with the ruling
In preparing the essay, read the opinion and consult resources posted on the course WebCampus site, as well as the class reading relevant to the case. This is not a research paper; you are not expected to consult or cite outside sources in order to write the essay. The essay is due by 11:59 p.m. on the due date shown. It should be uploaded to WebCampus as a Word or pdf document.
Each essay is worth 50 points. Your essay will be graded on how well it accomplishes the four objectives listed above (10 points each) as well as the quality and clarity of writing (10 points).
Formatting: Please compose your document using MSWord or a similar program. It should be approx. 700 words, in a readable font (Times New Roman, Cambria) in a readable size (11 or 12), in black text. Name, the class number (JOUR 401), and the assignment name and date in the upper left hand corner. Double space and number the pages. No need for a title, title page, or other fanciness.
Paraphrase and summarize key portions rather than simply quoting them–the purpose of the assignment is to demonstrate that you understand the court’s ruling, not that you can identify the most important passages.
Think about structure and organization. The majority of your 700 words should be focused on summarizing and explaining the court’s ruling and your response to it, not explaining the who/what/where/when that led to the case in the first place. So get past the background in a short paragraph and get to those key points.
Include all of the opinions in your explanation of the court’s ruling–majority/per curiam, concurrences, dissents–they’re all important for precedent, and need to be mentioned explicitly and with the name of the justice concurring or dissenting.
Get the easy things right: writing and grammar count on this assignment, so why give away easy points for misspelling a Justice’s name or getting other basic facts or factors wrong? This is basic professionalism in all media fields.

All-in-One Shipping Liner Ltd (All-in-One) is a South African registered company and its shareholding it is wholly owned by South African national. All-in-One owns a fleet of ships all of which are registered in South Africa and flying the South African flag. All-in-One is largely trading its ships by transporting iron-ore between South Africa and other BRICS member states. The company has gained market share to the point of finding itself short-tonnaged and unable to meet its market with its existing fleet. In order to meet this demand which appear to be short term, the company has recently chartered one more vessel bareboat from a Cypriot Ship owner. The bareboat charter party is set to endure for a period of 4 years and it has no option to purchase. The chartered vessel is registered and is flying the Cyprian flag. The company wishes to register the chartered vessel on the South African register for its own fleet management reasons.
All-in-One seeks your advice on whether parallel or dual ship registration is permissible in terms of the South African ship registration regulatory framework. With reference to authorities, advise All-in-One accordingly.

i want your help with witting this research about the CISG Successes and pitfalls please I will be uploading the gu

I have an oral presentation, I need my work to be very easy and clear or my to read as I will me presenting this live . I need all criteria’s to be met there are 2 questions but only one needs to be done . I want question 1 to be answered only…. aiming for an upper second grade.

INSTRUCTIONS
Action Items
An e-mail is sent to Party B. in order to form a contract. Party A is the sender
of the email. Party A’s identification is located at the top of the e-mail and is
sufficient to show authentication.
Will use of the individual’s initials or name at the end of the message
satisfy the signature requirement, under Article 2B of the Uniform
Commercial Code (the UCC)?

Pleasa write all the answers in the file , avoid plagiarism , the work should be in your own woeds , writie references.and long answer of 300-400 words or more

The instruction is attached in the exam file. answner 3 question, 500 words for each question. I will attach the course syllabus, you can use the readings on the syllabus not other source. Our school have a strong system of checking plagarism and AI writing, so please use your own words. I will also attach some course powerpoint for your reference. If you can’t find the readings, feel free to contact me, and I will send it to you.