Category: Law

A reaction paper should reflect critical analysis, not simply summarize the prescribed reading. I have uploaded 3 prescribed readings, a sample reaction paper, and the session’s PPT. NO need references.

Everything needed is in the brief.
The topic this is based on is the Judicial Protection in the UK and EU segment of law so I would prefer for someone who is experienced in this field to offer their assistance for this. 
The referencing style is Oscola.
Books and journal sources preferred as the first point of contact before google. In text referencing needed as well. 

The State of Utopia, the 51st State in the union, is dedicated to using legislation to make its state the safest, most prosperous state in the entire union.
Senator Killjoy of the Utopia State Legislature drafted a bill entitled “Keeping Utopia’s Female Minority Youth Safe and Sound.” The provisions of this bill would establish a statewide curfew between the hours of 10 p.m and 6 a.m. for non-emancipated Hispanic, African-American, Native American, and Asian females under the age of 18.
The state’s justification for this legislation is nationally accepted research proving that minority females under the age of 18 are disproportionately likely to be assaulted, injured in accidents, or engage in underage sexual activity between the hours of 10 p.m and 6 a.m. The bill was passed by both houses of the state legislature and signed into law by the governor.
Utopians United for Non-Discrimination asks your opinion on three legal questions:
Does this law unconstitutionally discriminate on the basis of race?
Does this law unconstitutionally discriminate on the basis of gender?
Does this law unconstitutionally discriminate on the basis of age? (Hint: See Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia (1976) and Gregory v. Ashcroft (1991)).
Technical details:
Your answer should run about 5-6 pages, double spaced, in Times New Roman 12 font.
You should employ Blue Book citation format.

Research the case Fattore v. Fattore, 458 N.J. Super. 75
In a four to Five paged paper written in APA format,
a) Summarize the facts
b) Explain the court’s rationale
c) Explain whether or not you agree with the court’s decision.
Be sure to support your arguments with a MINIMUM of THREE sources other than your text. Cite your sources in APA format.

Research the case People v. Heitzman, 866 P.2d 1229 (Cal. 1994)
In a three to five paged paper written in APA format,
a) Summarize the facts
b) Explain the court’s rationale
c) Explain whether or not you agree with the court’s decision.  This section should be larger and should be well-supported with sourced information cited in APA format.

all of the information is on the doc. please let me know if you have questions and the last 
name of the first letter is an H.

Research the case Frye v. Medicare-Glaser Corp. 605 N.E.2d 557 ((1992)
In a four to five paged paper in APA format,
a) Summarize the facts
b) Explain the court’s rationale
c) Explain whether or not you agree with the court’s decision.
Incorporate a minimum of three scholarly sources other than your textbook.  

Philip Joseph has recently critiqued the doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty, arguing that greater attention must be paid to the “parliamentary-judicial dynamic in the creation, interpretation and application of legislation.”1 Provide a critical analysis of this argument.
•
In setting out your analysis you should consider:
o
The doctrine of parliamentary sovereignty, including its historical development and underlying rationale
o
The doctrine of separation of powers, and the roles and powers of parliament and the judiciary (remembering that Cabinet is a committee of parliament), including justifiable limits to those powers
It is important that you are familiar with the material covered in the set readings and lectures as well as do some independent research. There is no correct number of references, but in my experience, good essays use between 6 – 10 sources that you have found yourself. It also depends on how you use the sources – they need to be relevant to the assignment, and you need to demonstrate that you have read, understood, and thought about them in the context of your question.

Opine whether seniors are better protected from cyber scams while residing in a nursing facility or living in their own private homes. Provide evidence to support your thoughts through the incorporation of credible sources other than your textbook.  Use APA to cite your sources.

these case briefs are summaries of the facts and outcomes of the cases provided. please keep them brief, NO MORE THAN ONE PAGE PER CASE!! files for the first case will have a 1 in the top corner and page number. there will be 5 files for case one. second case will have a 2 in top corner and page number. the second case will have four files. 
please use the following format to organize the information: 
1) facts of the case
2) procedural history 
3) issue in the case
4) rule issued by the court
5) rationale given by the court
6) conclusion