it is a 60 minute exam. so the content get release and i have 60 minutes to complete and submit it so i need you to be ready to receive and answer the questions within that time period leaveing me with enough time to submit. the file i will attach below is an example of how the exam will appear
Category: Law
-
“Exploring the Relationship Between Social Reaction, Social Conflict, and Delinquency”
CREATE A POWERPOINT PRESENTATION FOR CHAPTER 5. THE CLASS THAT THIS ASSIGNMENT IS CRIME AND DELIQUNCY. THE NAME OF THE CHAPTER IS Social Reaction, Social Conflict, and Delinquency.
-
Title: Case Management in the Criminal Justice System: A Comparison between Community and Correctional Settings
please follow instructions with no use of AI and your paper should be written in your own words
Write a 1,050- to 1,400-word paper in which you identify and describe the differences of case management in the criminal justice system within the community and in a correctional setting.
Include the following in your paper:Differences between community setting and correctional setting case management
How the process will need to be altered for various special populations
Potential clients in need of case management at both settings
Why ethics and confidentiality play an integral role when working with clients
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
Submit your assignment.
i need the paper in 4hrs -
“Promoting Equality and Justice: A Critical Analysis of Legal Frameworks and Approaches in the UK”
Choose ONE Question to answer 1) ‘Equality requires more than restraint from the state. In addition, it calls for a duty upon the state to take positive measures to promote equality’ (‘Providing Equality: Substantive Equality and the Positive Duty to Provide’ Sandra Fredman 2005)
With reference to concepts of justice and equality, critically evaluate and respond to this statement.
2) ‘Intersectionality was a prism to bring to light dynamics within discrimination law that weren’t being appreciated by the courts’ (see Kimberly Crenshaw ‘The intersectionality wars’ Coaston, J, Vox, 28th May 2019)
With reference to at least one human rights or equality law case, evaluate and respond to the claim that the failure of courts to adopt an intersectional approach conceals injustice.
3) ‘Legal aid is critical to the fairness of the justice system, enabling those without sufficient financial means to participate on equal terms with those that can afford representation’ (‘The Future of Legal Aid’ House of Commons Justice Committee, 2021)
Assess this statement critically, with reference to the introduction of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012.
4) Critically evaluate the arguments for and against the abolition of stop and search.
5) The Ministry of Justice’s strategic vision for reform is to create ‘a more effective, less costly and more responsive justice system for the public’ (HM Courts & Tribunals Service website).
Critically evaluate and respond to how effectively that vision has been achieved in reference to the tribunal system in England and Wales.
External Examiner: Dr Anne Smith from the University of Ulster
The essay will assess the learning outcomes for the module:
Knowledge of the development of non-discrimination and equality law in the UK;
Appreciation of the relevance of other legal frameworks to equality and non-discrimination debates;
The ability to engage with relevant critical theoretical perspectives and approaches to legal scholarship and to apply these appropriately;
The ability to produce a substantial piece of written work which provides evidence of independent research and critical thinking skills.
You will be expected at the end of the JES Module to write a 2000 word essay on any of the topics covered. To prepare for this, your formative assessment will be based on how to write a strong introduction to an essay. You will write a 300 word introduction and come with the write up to seminar 2 for group feedback. In addition, you will receive legal research and assessment guidance lectures in due course with the view for you to build your skills and thrive. -
“Uncovering the Legal Implications of Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace: A Critical Analysis of ‘The Rise of the Robot Lawyer’ Article”
This assignment requires the review of a legal scholarly article. I have attached the article
for review and the instructions provided by my professor. -
“The Government’s Role in Balancing Safety and Liberty in Aviation Regulation” In response to Student #2’s post, I agree that regulations are necessary to address the fallen nature of man and ensure safety in aviation. However, I also believe that
Respond to the student’s post with at least 250 words and describe ways that you foresee the government potentially going too far in its attempt to keep man’s sinful nature in check. For example, in the initial post, the government could suppress the liberty entitled to man as God’s image bearers (over-regulation).
1. Student #1:
Aviation has taken a proactive stance in addressing the fallen nature of man through the concept of ‘Human Factors.’ These factors, recognized by the FAA due to our inherent human tendencies, are not easy to quantify. However, it is crucial that we all acknowledge their significant role in ensuring everyone’s safety. This is why the IMSAFE process was introduced, as a shared responsibility for all aviation workers, including pilots, to mitigate the influence of these ‘Human Factors ‘.
2. Student #2:
The fallen nature of man necessitates regulation in aviation for the same reason that the Continental Congress distributed power into three branches:
Sin is in the world.
No one is perfect.
Accountability to others can prevent poor choices or provide fair means for punitive action.
1 Corinthians 10:13 states that God won’t allow for temptations past what we can handle and that he will provide a way of escape (ESV, 2011, 1 Corinthians 10:13). While operating an aircraft, it can feel like we are all alone in the sky and consequence-free, which can lead to temptations like operating recklessly. By having regulations, this can be the way out that God provides us to keep ourselves and others safe, underscoring the crucial role of rules in aviation safety. -
“Applying Legal Strategies: A Lawyer’s Solution to Complex Issues”
To write the essay solving the issues like a
lawyer would
I have uploaded the question with the issues
And the answer type from the midterm if u
Want the question also I have that -
Time and Billing Exercise in Clio Part I: Creating a Cost Ticket in Clio 1. Log into Clio and click on the “Contacts” tab. 2. Click on the “New Contact” button. 3. Enter the client
Week 2, Midweek Assignment: Time and Billing Exercise
One of the most frequent tasks you will have as a paralegal, apart from drafting legal documents for clients and court, is preparing cost tickets and bills—after all, that is how most firms make money and how your salary is paid! Every office has its own procedure for handling billing matters and many use a software program to prepare billing invoices for clients. In this exercise, you will use the billing features of one of two popular legal office management programs.
Part I
You are asked by the partner to produce a cost ticket in Clio for a pre-bill on the case based on the information below:
Initial Consultation—Attorney 1 hour x $200/hour
Client Interview—Paralegal 1 hour x $74/hour
Document Preparation—Paralegal, 2 hours x $74/hour
Part II
Create a final bill for a matter in Clio using the following information:
Initial consultation—Attorney 1 hour x $200/hour
Client Interview—Paralegal 1 hour x $74/hour
Document Preparation—Paralegal, 2 hours x $74/hour
How to create a new contact:
Contacts 101 video
How do I create a contact?
How to set up a new matter:
Matters 101 video
How do I create a new matter?
Billing and time keeping:
Billing 101 video
Activities 101 video
How do I create a Time Entry?
LOG INTO THE CLASS SO YOU CAN CLICK ON THE VIDEOS TO HELP YOU. -
“Land Law Exam: Analyzing a Property Dispute” Land Law Exam: Analyzing a Property Dispute
this is an offer for land law exam question answering based on the extract listed below (examination format) consist of 30 multiple choice question which inclueds question based on the facts of the document below* and land law
-
Title: “The Battle for the Classic Car: A Contract Law Dilemma”
FACTS FOR THIS DISCUSSION – DO NOT ADD OR ASSUME UNSTATED FACTS.
ASSUME THE NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR WAS SITTING IN HIS YARD AND TOOK A VIDEO OF THE WHOLE THING, SO THE FACTS OF THIS HYPOTHETICAL AS RELATED CAN BE PROVED IN COURT.
Victor Tremont has a classic muscle car that he fixed up and has enjoyed drag racing. He has kept it well maintained. Much as he loves the car, Victor finds himself in need of cash. He parks the car on his front yard, with a large sign on the windshield that says, “Cherry of a classic car, For Sale $4,900 or Best Offer. AS-IS.”
Gloria Goget drives by and sees the car. She is immediately enamored and stops to look at it. She is sure the car is worth more than the asking price. When she knocks on the front door, there is no response; she looks around, and decides nobody is home, so she takes her business card and on the back writes, ” I will pay you $5,500 cash for your classic car.” She signs her name, and dates it, including the time, and slips the card onto the windshield of the car under the wiper blade.
About a half hour later, Victor returns. He does not see Gloria’s card because he does not walk around and look at the car. A few minutes after he is home, his buddy, Levi Lord, pulls in to look at the car. Levi has always liked the car and has gone racing with Victor. Levi offers Victor $5,000 even for the car, and Victor accepts. The two men shake hands on the deal. Victor goes in the house to get the car title while Levi writes out a check to Victor for $5,000.
Victor comes out with the title in his hand. As Levi starts to hand him the check, Gloria pulls in. She has an envelope of $5,500 cash for the car. Victor says to Gloria,”sorry, but I have just sold the car to Levi here.” Gloria objects and says she already offered $5,500 earlier.
When Victor says, “No, you didn’t,” she marches him to the car and shows him her card.
“There is my offer, I already left you before. You weren’t home and now I have the money right here,” she said.
Victor turns to Levi, “Sorry, she did leave this offer, I’m going to sell it to her for more money.”
Levi objects, stating, “You just said you already sold it to ME. We shook hands on it. You cannot back out now just because some card was floating around no one knew about. She wasn’t even here! She’s a loser too late!”
While the three of them stand in the yard arguing, Jack Bucksworthy drives in the yard. He gets out of his Cadillac, looks at the muscle car, and moseys over to the three arguing people. He asks, “who owns that hot rod for sale?”
“I do,” says Victor.
“No, I do,” says Levi.
“It’s MY Car,” snaps Gloria.
“I’ll pay whichever of you, $8,000 for that car,” says Jack, “but only if the engine starts.”
Victor answers, “Of course it starts. I accept your offer.”
Levi hollers, “NO! That car is no longer for sale! I bought it! It’s mine! I’m not selling it!” (Waving the check in Victor’s face.)
Gloria stomps over to the muscle car, grabs the sign off it, and sits on the hood. “It’s my car. I was here before all of you and I have real money in hand.” she yells, waving her envelope over her head.
Victor says to Jack,” Pay no attention to them. I have the title — right here. My car. Let’s start the car.”
DISCUSSION PROMPT:
YOU BE THE JUDGE. DECIDE WHO GETS THE CAR.
USING THE ABOVE FACTS, DISCUSS AND ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
identify the contract issues you see here.
Applying common law principles of contract, who gets the car, if anyone, and for how much? Explain your reasoning using the definitions and principles of contract provided in Lessons, required readings and any other research you do.
In terms of making an offer, what is the legal significance of Jack Bucksworthy’s statement, “only if the engine starts?”