Category: Leadership

Introduction: The purpose of the annotated bibliography is to help you prepare for the informative speech (Project 6a) and the persuasive speech (Project 7a).
Directions: Click on this document for instructions on how to complete this project.

Instructions:
An exhaustive review of the literature with a minimum of 30 pages of content.
The literature review is the primary way in which this
connection is established. The review should provide a ‘360-degree’ view of the literature related
to the problem illustrating all sides of the discussion, not just perspectives that support the
researcher’s views or a single perspective. This is accomplished by including both supporting and
contradictory scholarly reference material. Begin this section with an introductory paragraph of
250 top 500 words that provides an overview or ‘roadmap’ of the main elements of the literature
review. 
• Leadership Practices Detailed discussion of the leadership practices related to the
problem being studied. 
• The Problem – Detailed discussion of the background general and specific problems. 
• Concepts – Detailed discussion of the concepts found in the research framework. 
• Theories – Detailed discussion of the theories found in the research framework. 
• Constructs – Detailed discussion of the constructs found in the research framework. 
• Related Studies – Detailed review of related studies presenting all viewpoints, not just
those that support the researcher’s views. 
• Anticipated Themes and Discovered Themes – Detailed discussion of anticipated themes
known prior to the study and discovered themes following the study. 
• The literature review should include only scholarly sources with at least 75% being
published within the last 5 years. 
• The literature review is intended to be exhaustive and may require more than the minimum
number of pages to achieve this goal.
• The literature review should compare and contrast different points of view. 
• Provide a one-page summary of the literature review to include a description of how this
section provides a foundation for the study. 

I wrote the first three chapters and need to add repondences to 110 responces that I already collected for my quetioneries and analyse it and write down chapter 4 and 5

Reflection Paper – Throughout this course, you have learned various leadership concepts,
approaches, and theories. Students will write a 6 page, double spaced, paper using APA 6th
edition formats and citations reflecting on how this leadership information has impacted
their leadership role and understanding. Was your leadership style strengthened by
concepts learned? What strengths and weaknesses did you identify in your leadership
style? Did your leadership style change? These are just a few questions to consider when
reflecting on your leadership and information learned during this session.  

Each reply must incorporate at least 1 citation and reference from a different peer-reviewed article and 1 citation and reference from the textbook in current APA format.
The student must then post 2 replies of at least 200 words.

Based on your self-assessment using the Blake and Mouton Managerial Grid (BMMG), assess your own preferred behavioral leadership style. What are the strengths and challenges for each style? Are there areas where you would like to make changes or improvements that stem from your results?
Provide anecdotal evidence of behaviors in support of your perspective on behavioral leadership using the BMMG. In addition, provide academic research articles in support of your assessment and critique.
Here are some things I’m going to be looking for in the week 2 paper.
Clearly and explicitly explain the main constructs in your paper.  What is the Blake and Mouton Managerial Grid?  What does it measure?  How?  What are the 5 styles it measures?  Provide some insight into the assessment.  Only then can you provide any kind of critique of your own results.
What were your results?  How did you score?  Including your results adds credibility to your paper. Do you think this is an accurate analysis of your own behavioral leadership style?  Explain and critique your results!
Provide examples.  If you state that you are a particular style, provide some anecdotal evidence for this.
Make sure you are addressing ALL PARTS of the assignment.
Do not use the first or second person point of view. You can still write about a personal critique or personal opinion using the third person point of view. Remove yourself from the conversation. For example, rather than say, I scored as an integrative leader on the assessment, you might say, scores on the assessment indicated an integrative leader. I said the exact same thing but took myself out of the picture.
I attached my results to the grid.  My score landed in Integrative leadership.
Here are some articles ( copied and pasted so these formats are definately not APA).  At least 2 refrences are needed.
The managerial grid as a predictor of conflict resolution method and managerial effectiveness. by Bernardin, H. J., & Alvares, K. M.
Administrative Science Quarterly, (1976). Vol. 21(1), 84-92.
Leadership behaviors and subordinate resilience by Harland, L., Harrison, W., Jones, J. R., & Reiter-Palmon, R.
Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, (2004). Vol. 11(2), 2-14.
Use this article for article critique.
Leadership in healthcare: Transitioning from clinical professional to healthcare leader. by Perez, J.
Journal of Healthcare Management, (2021). Vol. 66(4), 280-303.
Leadership styles and Deming’s behavior factors by Sosik, J.J. & Dionne, S.D.
Journal of Business and Psychology(1997), Vol. 11(4), pgs. 447-456.
Robert R. Blake, with recognition of Jane S. Mouton by Cai, D. A., Fink, E. L., & Walker, C. B.
Negotiation & Conflict Management Research, (2021), 14(1), 51-59.
Leadership effectiveness measurement and its effect on organization outcomes by Madanchian, M., Hussein, N., Noordin, F., & Taherdoost, H.
Procedia Engineering, (2017), Vol. 181, 1043-1048.
There are a couple parts of the paper I will obviously have to put my personal critique.  This needs to be in APA 7th edition with the correct format of the headings.  attached is a sample paper of the correct format.

Hello — please put together the final research paper based of the Professors comments on the Draft Paper. All materials are attached here. However, if anything is missing, please let me know immediately.
Professor’s Comments regarding my draft paper:
Put the abstract first, remember to write out the hypothesis statements Ho and Ha You provided a table but also write them under the table. Add the sample n, the method, the Likert Scale and the most impressive results of the study in the abstract section, limiting it to 300 words. You have provided some factual data in the problem statement but you are missing citations in support of the data. Add them Your discussion of the variables on from page 12 requires consistent citations since it is an academic paper. Add them. Each variable must have a minimum of two academic journals and the Y variable must have three citations. Now that you have completed the paper change the entire paper to the past tense. Citations are missing on Page 17.Check to make sure that you have adequately cited your sources. Include a figure to show the associations between the theory and the variable in your study. Remember to use the n any time you are referring to your sample. You have placed the hypotheses under the wrong heading on page 38. Move it under the research questions instead. Each definition of term must have a citation. Add them. When you define terms you must provide citations. Copy and pate the entire survey under the survey section of the paper. You must clearly identify which variables in your linear regression output are significant and which ones are not significant. X2, X6 are the only variables that are significant in your study. Your linear regression reflects some very strong results. Develop a regression table to showcase the results. Revise the conclusion table to include the research questions, the qualitative data and your quantitative results to answer the research questions with the data. Some edits needed. Check the work for grammatical errors and edit the work accordingly.

Attached are the assignment expectations and references that may be used if needed. No need for an introduction or conclusion. Please and thank you.

I have attached what my paper is about. Its Part two. Its about a book called switch: how to change things when change is hard. Then I am supposed to add a few things we have learned of the course of the class. I can send a list of some readings and videos from the class, but everything does not need to be used, just some things added to show I used stuff throughout the course.

Please REVIEW  the attachment & answer the following in detail !
You are to act as a board of executive directors and you are sitting in a meeting reviewing “hand computers powerpoint presentation” (see attachment) Please be detailed and initimate and read the speaker notes.
Review the presentation.
Identify those points that resonated with you, or that you found particularly informative and useful.
Identify those points for which you would have liked more information, or clarification.
Explain why you would or would not adopt the recommendations made by the group.
________________________________________________________
Below is the rubric… which is the expectations of my writing to another groups post(powerpoint).
Understanding of Strategy Management-Please demonstrate a clear focus and exceptional understanding of strategy management. Exhibits integration of research.
Points of Resonance-please Clearly and fully identifies those points that resonated with you, or that you found particularly informative and useful, along with the rationale for this question.
Areas of Clarification-
Please Clearly and fully identifies those points that you would have liked more information, or clarification, along with the rationale for this question.
Recommendation Evaluation-Fully and clearly explains why you would or would not adopt the recommendations made by the group
Research- Decision validation contains more than 5 references to valid (recent, relevant, high-quality) external sources of information pertaining to strategy management.
Mechanics: Organization and Structure; Sentence Structure, Grammar and Spelling-Material is very well organized in a logical fashion (headings, etc.). Writing is entirely free of grammatical, spelling and/or language errors.