Category: Leadership

I have uploaded the Rubric/Guidelines, Module overview, reading and resources, Final Project Rubric/Guidelines (To make sure the not-for-profit organization that is chosen can complete the Final Project Guidelines), and chapters from the textbook. Please follow In your journal assignment, complete the following tasks:
Identify the not-for-profit organization that you have chosen for your final project.
Explain why you chose this not-for-profit organization. What appealed to you? Why is this organization a good candidate for the strategic analysis you will do for the final project?
Confirm there is enough information available to address all milestones and the final project.

The course culminates in a 10-page paper that analyzes an organization – outside of the student’s own organization – through the lens of Schein. To focus the final field-based project, students should analyze and make meaning of the enduring challenges of professional practice that have been experienced by members of the subject organization using Schein’s multiple organizational artifacts/beliefs and values/assumptions. Videos, pictures and relevant interviews are encouraged.
Through the final field-based project, each student will become a more skilled and informed reader of organizational settings and become more awake to how people in particular work contexts (like schools and community-based organizations) make meaning of and shape the organizations in which they work. Consider: What is the most pressing problem or problems of practice undermining the effectiveness of the subject organization?
In the final field-based project, students will use new artifacts/beliefs and values/assumptions to ask better questions and to see enduring problems of practice in the subject organization much more clearly. Students will formally and informally observe the subject organization, review its mission, purpose, goals, values, and any policy documents to see what is revealed. Students may also want to talk with administrators and teachers, or students and their parents, or people who work in or seek the help of the subject organization to understand organizational issues from other people’s perspectives. In sum, students will seek a better sense of the primary values and commitments shaping the subject organization work setting by examining the dominant artifacts/beliefs and values/assumptions shaping the policies and normative practices of the people within it. (10 pages)
Consider: Who is the subject organization serving well? Who struggles to be well-served in the subject organization? What policies and practices promote opportunity and, given what is observed, what ought to be reconsidered? In the written paper for the final field-based project, students should portray an enduring problem of practice – which means a problem that is very difficult to solve and keeps surfacing again and again in the subject organization. For example, students might consider identifying the unique problem of a group or groups of people within the subject organization whose needs are not being adequately addressed or understood. Consider: How might the student as a leader of the subject organization approach working with others to better shape the systems, values, beliefs, policies and practices within the subject organization?
The paper for the final field-based project should be divided into three distinct sections:
Section 1: Portrayal of Culture – Provide a brief overview of the subject organization, including its size and the racial, ethnic and socioeconomic status of the people the subject organization serves. In describing culture, be sure to view aspects of culture that are most relevant to the problem/s of practice addressed in this paper. Also, be sure to portray the dominant culture, subculture/s and counter cultures observed in the subject organization whenever it is relevant for understanding this context and the particular problem/s of practice the student will be focusing on in the paper. Section 2: Organizational Analysis through the Lens of Schein (and other readings assigned in the course) – With all of Schein’s artifacts/beliefs and values/assumptions in mind, students should informally observe the work setting of the subject organization. Students may also informally talk with people and observe the corridors, classrooms, offices and lunchrooms of the subject organization to get a better sense of how this workplace is structured and with what effects. Students may want to interview or talk informally with people who work there to understand what they appreciate in the subject organization, together with what concerns them. Students should pay attention to the issues/problems that arise frequently. Also, if accessible, consider looking at the subject organization’s data to better inform the student’s thinking about the nature of these problems/issues. In this section, the student should clearly articulate enduring problem/s of practice and why each one is particularly problematic. Then, using Schein’s perspectives, analyze each identified problem of practice using multiple perspectives to frame and reframe each problem/issue. Also, consider, what is likely producing each problem or concern and how that was determined (e.g., evidence). Again, students are to explicitly use Schein’s relevant theories from artifacts/beliefs and values/assumptions to achieve deeper understanding of the problem/s of practice identified. Through this section, students will demonstrate an understanding of the subject organization and an ability to frame and reframe specific problems of practice. Through this analysis, students will shed greater light on the systems, policies and everyday practices that may be contributing to each problem/issue identified.
Section 3: Rethinking Organizational Structures, Policies and Strategies – Students are to assume that they are the newly appointed Principal or Executive Director of the subject organization. Based on what was learned during the course, the student will clearly identify how, as a leader, the student would begin to address the problem(s)/issue(s) identified. Consider: How would the student/leader work with others to inspire and shape change in this work setting? What would be the student/leader’s priorities and why? How would the student/leader go about getting others to work with you? This section of the paper is the action plan and should be clearly based on good organizational theory, including relevant citations from Schein and other relevant required course readings. Demonstrated Competencies: Students will be able to: (i) analyze how dominant images of organization systems and behaviors shape our ways of interpreting problems of practice in organizations; (ii) identify cultures, subcultures and counter-cultures in organizations; (iii) understand why different people experience organizational systems, policies and procedures differently; (iv) identify the artifacts/beliefs and values/assumptions driving organizations through the organization’s structure, mission, goals, values, practices and written policies; (v) demonstrate competencies for assessing how current systems and processes enhance or undermine organizational mission, values and goals; (vi) demonstrate competencies in reading and assessing an organizational context using multiple perspectives for framing and understanding organizational problems; and (vii) demonstrate the ability to identify the systems, policies and practices that undermine educational opportunity and equity in work settings.

Creating Your Personal and Professional Leadership Philosophy
LinkedIn is a professional social network focusing on career development. You may use LinkedIn to share your resume, job-hunt, and expand your network by posting updates, sharing articles, and interacting with other professionals.
In this assignment, you will compose your personal and professional leadership philosophy statement in the form of a LinkedIn article.
Step 1. Review
Review readings and your own research to prepare for crafting your personal and professional leadership philosophy statement.
Step 2. Brainstorm
Brainstorm for your personal and professional leadership philosophy statement using the following questions to help guide your thinking:
Which leadership styles, philosophies, and frameworks align most with your personal leadership style?
How can your professional leadership philosophy benefit those you serve?
What are your core beliefs impacting your philosophy?
What are the values and mission of your organization?
What is your overall approach to leading teams?
What are your non-negotiables—the things you would be willing to be terminated for if violated?
What are your strategies for personal self-reflection and self-monitoring?
What accountability measures will you implement to ensure you are self-aware and consistent with your stated philosophy?
Step 3. Establish
Establish a free professional social networking account at LinkedIn if you do not already have an account. From your account home screen, select “Write an article.” Directions for creating an article are linked on the Learning Objects page. (WRITE IN WORD AND I CAN TRANSFER IT TO LINKEDIN)
Step 4. Organize
Organize your answers from your brainstorming in Step 2 to outline your personal and professional philosophy article. Include an introduction, organized components from Step 2, and a conclusion. List your APA-formatted references list at the end of your article.
Step 5. Compose
Compose your 1000- to 1500-word personal and professional leadership philosophy. Conform to APA style and cite at least 3-5 scholarly sources to support your position. The references listed at the bottom of the article are not reflected in the word count.
Step 6. Apply
Apply article text features such as headings, subheadings, bulleted lists, and accompanying graphics to make the article visually appealing and easy to digest.
YOUTUBE VIDEOS THAT MAY BE CITED AND/OR HELPFUL FOR COMPLETING THIS ASSIGNMENT:
Leadership Philosophy by Mr. Gregg Stevens (youtube.com)

Each of us has a predominant conflict style. We use the style to meet our needs in certain conflict situations. Based on the results of your Conflict Styles Assessment completed in week 3 (chapter 5), connect it to a workplace or personal interpersonal conflict; where you relied on the conflict style assessed. 
You are required to:
Provide the results of the Conflict Style Assessment
Discuss the pros/cons of the conflict style
Describe the conflict
What was the cause of the conflict
Provide a comprehensive analysis and formulate alternatives in resolving the conflict
Describe a plan of action to implement the recommendation(s)
In the essay, students are expected to demonstrate synthesis of their acquired knowledge gained from this course. The final essay will be about six (6) pages in length, exclusive of the reference page, double-spaced. The essay should cite at least three (3) sources in addition to the assigned textbook and supplemental readings.
The final essay requires a substantive effort and is required to successfully pass this course.

Hello everyone,
Today, ill talk about great leader who fight hard to makes human equally. He lost half of hes life in preson. He is Nelson Mandela, and there’s three big reasons ill share it with you.
Firstly.
second.
finally.
inbrief or in conclusion.
using very basic English.
smart introduction and ending please.

This request is for Chapter 3 of the proposal: The methodology will be for the participants to be varsity high school football coaches; Quantitative research; Survey – include for Chapter 3 the following:CHAPTER 3 Methodology 47
3.1 Assumptions and Rationale for Quantitative Research 3.2 Explanatory Correlational Design Measures 3.3 Study Participants 3.4 Data Collection Procedures 3.5 Data Analysis Procedures
3.6 Summary

Please REVIEW  the attachment & answer the following in detail !
Review the presentation.
Identify those points that resonated with you, or that you found particularly informative and useful.
Identify those points for which you would have liked more information, or clarification.
Explain why you would or would not adopt the recommendations made by the group.
PLease indocaite these learning outcomes :
Understanding of Strategy Management-Please demonstrate a clear focus and exceptional understanding of strategy management. Exhibits integration of research.
Points of Resonance-please Clearly and fully identifies those points that resonated with you, or that you found particularly informative and useful, along with the rationale for this question.
Areas of Clarification-
Please Clearly and fully identifies those points that you would have liked more information, or clarification, along with the rationale for this question.
Recommendation Evaluation-Fully and clearly explains why you would or would not adopt the recommendations made by the group
Research- Decision validation contains more than 5 references to valid (recent, relevant, high-quality) external sources of information pertaining to strategy management.
Mechanics: Organization and Structure; Sentence Structure, Grammar and Spelling-Material is very well organized in a logical fashion (headings, etc.). Writing is entirely free of grammatical, spelling and/or language errors.