In this essay, you will write a critical analysis of a novel, novella, other pre-apporved work, or long short story that you have read for class. As you have done considerable writing on it for your midterm, Mary Shelley’s FRANKENSTEIN is the only work not eligible for your analysis essay. Also, there is a theme in Robert Louis Stevenson’s THE STRANGE CASE OF DR. JEKYLL AND MR. HYDE that is also off limits: anything to do with the dual nature of man (good vs. evil, etc.). That topic has been beaten to death like poor old Sir Danvers Carew.
However, any other work from the syllabus is eligible. On rare occasions, I approve literary works and other works from popular culture outside of the class, but you must get my approval one month in advance of the deadline for the essay, and your annotated bibliography and working thesis statement must be on the pre-approved work. The analysis must apply a critical approach and make use of five scholarly articles, selected from your annotated bibliography, including at least two from peer-reviewed journals. For this assignment, you will write a critical analysis of approximately 1,300-to-1,600 words in length and in MLA format.
Some things to remember about the literary analysis essay:
Use the terminology–demonstrate your knowledge of your chosen approach by using terms commonly associated with the critical lens you’re applying. Some examples might include: canon, constructed, double-voice, exclusion, gender, Marxist, materialist, patriarchy, sex, and sexist.
Refer to specific passages and highlight the details– in a critical approach, you should focus on the details in the novel that touch directly or indirectly on the central idea or theme of your thesis. Select specific passages that illustrate or exemplify your argument, and spend some time discussing how this passage supports your overall reading of the text.
Have a Clearly Defined Thesis Statement– your thesis statement should convey the gist of your argument and clearly outline which critical lens you’re applying to the text.
Use Secondary Sources to Support– the scholarly articles you choose to use for this essay should support your clearly defined and original argument or should be used as springboards for disagreement. Be sure to embed secondary sources into your argument by summarizing, paraphrasing, or directly quoting the source. Remember to always cite your sources parenthetically and in the works cited page.
Link Each Point Back to the Thesis–link each point to the thesis statement; it is also important that you make links between paragraphs and main ideas in the body of your essay. Use transitional expressions such as: similarly, furthermore, additionally, clearly, obviously, etc.
Category: Literature
-
“Exploring Critical Approaches in Literature: A Analysis of [chosen work]”
-
Title: A Letter from Hamlet to Ophelia Letter: To my dearest Ophelia, I hope this letter finds you well. It has been quite some time since we last spoke, and I must admit, I have missed
To Whom it May Concern:
Choose a character from any story we’ve read for Unit 1 and from their point of view, write a
letter to any of the other characters we’ve encountered in Unit 1 – you can choose another
character from the same story or choose another story altogether. The content of the letter is
entirely up to you, you can discuss an event that takes place in the story you’ve chosen,
real
world current events, or anything in between. However, using your interpretation of the text, you
will need to justify and explain every choice you make.
Requirements:
1. letter around 800 words
2. rational 800 words (around 800 words
Letter (around 800 word Rationale (around 800 words -
Title: The Impact of Technology on Healthcare: A Comparison of the USA and Norway Healthcare Systems
Part 1: You are required to write a research paper about a topic relevant to the healthcare system now or in the future. There is a lot going on in the world of healthcare today and future changes that will give you many topics to choose from.
The Topic is (Technology in Healthcare )
Part 2: Provide a brief description of the country, Norway, health care system. Additionally, compare and contrast the US healthcare system with that country’s healthcare system. The comparison and contrasting can be presented in a tabular format. Below are some requirements of the paper:
1. Include a title page
2. Include your abstract
3. Must be at least a “full” 4 pages in length, double spaced
4. Times New Roman font
5. Size 12 font
6. 1 inch margins on ALL sides
7. Follow APA style for citing within the paper and for references
8. Minimum of 5 valid sources (Wikipedia is NOT a valid source)
• All sources must be cited within the paper to count as a source! Not just listed in the reference page!
9. Your reference page and in text citations must be correct otherwise your paper will be considered plagiarized!
SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS!!!!: Include this thesis statement : “Technology plays a crucial role in healthcare by enabling enhanced diagnosis, informed treatment planning, and improved patient outcomes, with advancements such as MRI, CT, and X-ray providing early detection and effective management of medical conditions.”
Write how technology such as MRI, CT, and X-rays are beneficial in the healthcare system today.
Compare to the USA healthcare system and Norways Healthcare system
Use these three sources provided and include 2 more (5 sources in total) : 1. Computed Tomography (CT). (n.d.). National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering https://www.nibib.nih.gov/science-education/science-topics/computed-tomography-ct#:~:
text=A%20CT%20scan%20is%20particularly
2. National Institute of Biomedical imaging and bioengineering. (2018, July 17). Magnetic
Resonance Imaging (MRI). National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering.
https://www.nibib.nih.gov/science-education/science-topics/magnetic-resonance-imaging
-mri
3. FDA. (2020, September 28). Medical X-ray Imaging. U.S. Food and Drug
Administration.
https://www.fda.gov/radiation-emitting-products/medical-imaging/medical-x-ray-imaging
And include one quote from each source in the writing.