Category: Medicine and Health

This assignment is a literature review. I had already completed Chapter 1 and Chapter 2 of the literature review. I have all the references in the old paper that I have attached as well, please utilize all the same references, tell me if there are any changes made to the references if needed. If any additional references are needed you may add them in and let me know. Ensure the paper is in APA 7 format. I will attach the specific assignment instructions below as well as attach the rubric. Also ensure that there is no plagiarism please. Utilize in text citations. 
Instructions:
Let’s begin Chapter 3
Chapter 3 – Analyzing evidence-based medicine (EBM) literature involves critically evaluating research studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses to determine their validity, relevance, and applicability to clinical practice. Here are some steps to guide you through the process:
Revisit your Clinical Research Question: What was your clinical research question (PICOT) or clinical issue addressed in the literature? This will help you understand the focus of the study and its relevance to clinical practice.
Evaluate Study Design: Review the study designs found in your literature review. Consider whether it is a randomized controlled trial (RCT), cohort study, case-control study, cross-sectional study, systematic review, meta-analysis, or other type of study. Different study designs have varying levels of evidence and potential biases.
Assess Methodological Quality: Evaluate the methodological quality of the study. Consider factors such as randomization, blinding, allocation concealment, sample size, follow-up duration, control for confounding variables, and measures to reduce bias. 
Examine Participants: Evaluate the characteristics of the study participants, including demographics, inclusion and exclusion criteria, baseline characteristics, and any relevant comorbidities. Consider whether the study population is representative of the patients seen in clinical practice.
Analyze Intervention and Comparison: Evaluate the intervention(s) being studied and the comparison group(s) used. Assess the relevance and clinical significance of the interventions, as well as the comparability of the groups.
Review Outcomes: Examine the primary and secondary outcomes measured in the study. Consider whether the outcomes are clinically relevant, objectively measured, and appropriately analyzed. Look for evidence of selective reporting or outcome switching.
Assess Results: Analyze the results of the study, including effect sizes, confidence intervals, p-values, and statistical significance. Consider the magnitude of effect and the clinical relevance of the findings. Look for consistency with prior research and the biological plausibility of the results.
Consider Confounding and Bias: Evaluate potential confounding factors and sources of bias in the study. Consider whether the authors adequately controlled for confounders and minimized bias in the study design, analysis, and interpretation of results.
Evaluate Generalizability: Assess the external validity or generalizability of the study findings to the broader patient population or clinical setting. Consider factors such as patient demographics, clinical settings, and healthcare practices that may influence the applicability of the findings.
Synthesize and Interpret Findings: Synthesize your analysis of the literature to determine the strength of the evidence and its implications for clinical practice. Consider the overall risk of bias, consistency of results across studies, and the balance of benefits and harms of the intervention.
Conclusion: Develop an overall summary of chapter 3. 
By following these steps, you can systematically analyze evidence-based medicine literature to inform clinical decision-making and enhance patient care.

For this assignment, you will write a 4–5-page research-based paper. The title page,
For this assignment, you will write a 4–5-page research-based paper. The title page,
abstract, and reference page do not count as part of the 4–5 pages (1,400–1,800 words).
2. The paper must be formatted in current APA style and will include a title page, abstract,
and reference page, again formatted using current APA style.
3. The paper will focus on the different duties a medical office assistant may have while
performing administrative work, clinical responsibilities, or working the laboratory. You
will research the 3 different positions and describe the duties a medical assistant may
have while conducting each one. In addition, you must discuss how you can practice
professionalism while performing each duty in order to provide excellent customer
service.
4. The paper must include at least 3 scholarly references in addition to the course textbook
and the Bible making for a total of 5 scholarly references. (Do not use Wikipedia.com or
dictionary.com.)

We often learn about concepts such as leadership through our experiences. This assignment is a reflection paper that reflects on some aspect of leadership in which you have seen or participated. The reflection paper will be worth up to five points that will be added to your Quiz 4 grade. Here are the five elements (each worth 1 point):
Provide a distinct experience with details about leadership.
Describe what you learned from the experience.
Explain how the experience could impact you in your future job.
State, in one or two sentences, what you think is important about leadership
Length = 1.5 – 2 pages double-spaced 12-point font.

My professor wants me to write a literature review on the topic of the Gut-Brain Axis Influencing Brain Morphology in relation to the gut microbiome. I want you to include research from
reputable medical journals that prove that gut microbiome can alter brain morphology. Use journals like Nature and Frontiers and also papers on pubmed and google scholar. the more recent the citations the better. I will attach a document that my professor told me to follow the same outline of and the way of writing too. Try to make it similar to the document attached but not too similar because of plagiarism purposes. The citation style sould be harvard style, and add a references page in the end. 
here are some links that can be use for citation:
https://academic.oup.com/ijnp/article/19/8/pyw020/2910071 
https://www.nature.com/articles/tp201642#citeas
https://microbiomejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40168-022-01277-0
https://www.gastrojournal.org/article/S0016-5085(21)00268-7/fulltext 
https://www.cghjournal.org/article/S1542-3565(18)31081-4/fulltext 
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41392-024-01743-1 
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.815885/full 
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4409/11/3/382 
I will attach a sample of an article review that covers the same topic as my literature review, my professor wants me to write something similar to it.

Health disparities are described in the research literature as multifactorial. Discuss these disparities with reference to migrants. 
It is a research and critical analysis essay 

Determine
what criteria you would use in evaluating the credibility of a source. State
your criteria. Identify three to four authoritative sources of information for
public health for your area(s) of interest. How do these sources meet your
stated criteria? Are there any criteria that are not met?

Topics include:
Physiological Systems
POC Systems
Mobile and Wireless Devices
Automated Clinical Care Plans, Practice Guidelines, Pathways and Protocols
Telemedicine/Telehealth
EHR Systems
Research more information about this topic, as well as the privacy and security implications of this system. 
Identify the role that health information management plays in ensuring data integrity and data security in this system. 
What policies and procedures should be in place related to this system? 
Report your findings with sources.

If a universal DNR protocol went into place nationwide for COVID- 19 patients and you were on the committee to design this protocol (even if you disagree with the idea of the protocol), who would be included, who would be excluded. Be specific on what parameters would be used to determine who fits the criteria for this DNR. What would be considered resuscitation in this case, and will there be limits to the amount of time a patient could be kept on a ventilator? This section should be a minimum of 300 words and include specific details.