using this same work, edit and change the intext reference citations, and overall references, but the number of references should still remain same as in the document,
Category: Nursing
-
Exploring the Sacred in Nursing Practice: A Concept Analysis
To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least three of these prompts:
Compare your response with your peers’ response and expand upon the benefits of defining nursing concepts for nursing theory development, research, and practice.
Present new references that support your opinions.
DOI refence link
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
PLEASE RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING POST:
Hello class, I used for this article concept analysis of the “Sacred in Nursing Practice”. The method of concept analysis used in this article involves a thorough examination and exploration of the various dimensions of the concept of the sacred. This method allows for a understanding of how the sacred is perceived, in nursing practice. By breaking down the concept into its defining attributes, the author is able to provide a clear analysis of its significance within the healthcare setting.
The aim and purpose of conducting a concept analysis on the topic of the sacred in nursing practice is to shed light on the role that spirituality and religious beliefs play in the care of patients. Twentieth-century phenomenologist and cultural anthropologist Mircea Eliade (1973) studied cultures and religions throughout the world, arguing that the sacred is an element of the structure of the human consciousness and is a primary mode of human beings (Rader, 2023). By examining how the sacred is integrated into nursing practice, the author aims to highlight the importance of addressing the spiritual and emotional needs of patients in addition to their physical well-being. This analysis also serves to challenge and expand traditional notions of healthcare by recognizing the holistic nature of healing.
Nurses who incorporate the sacred into their practice recognize and honor the sacredness of life, suffering, and healing. This involves being attentive to the spiritual needs of patients, respecting their beliefs and traditions, and providing compassionate care that acknowledges the interconnectedness of mind, body, and spirit.
The concept analysis of the sacred in nursing practice provides valuable insights into the spiritual dimension of healthcare. By understanding and integrating the sacred into nursing practice, healthcare professionals can enhance the quality of care they provide to patients and promote healing on a deeper level. This analysis serves as a reminder of the importance of treating patients with compassion, respect, and reverence, and acknowledges the sacredness of the human experience. -
“Assessment of Unpleasant Symptoms in Patients: A Review of Relevant Tools and Measures” Introduction The theory of unpleasant symptoms, developed by Lenz and colleagues, provides a framework for understanding the experience of symptoms in patients with chronic illnesses (Lenz
Using the theory of unpleasant symptoms as a guide, what would you look for in an assessment tool for patient symptoms?
Please include 400 words in your initial post with two scholarly articles -
Title: “Addressing the Challenges of Managing Cultural Diversity in the Australian Workplace: A Case Study Analysis”
It is a case study of 1800 words. AUSTRALIAN REFERENCES ARE REQUIRED. APA 7th edition Minimum 8 peer-reviewed academic sources (with additional published national legislation LEGISLATION SOURCES sources) AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL Must include in-text citations and reference list
-
“Assessment of Electronic Health Record Implementation: Evaluating the SDLC and Identifying Unintended Consequences” Title: Improving Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement in Provider Enrollment and Certification: A Proposed Remediation Plan
Assignment 1: Evaluation of Information Systems
Review the stages of the systems development life cycle (SDLC) in course readings and presentations. Utilize readings from the textbook, modules, and a search for information sources to formulate your responses.
This assignment is one formal paper that contains two parts.
Part 1
These questions require answers after an electronic health record (EHR) or new EHR application/feature has already been selected and implemented by an organization. For example, an organization may have just implemented a new EHR, replaced an existing EHR, or added new functionality such as clinical decision support system features or a patient portal. Consider which additional or new HIT application/feature interests your DNP practice and will result in improved care.
Part 2
Students will analyze one unintended consequence (e-iatrogenesis) of the proposed EHR or EHR application/feature from Part 1. The unintended result may be either “good” or “bad.” Students will create a visual fishbone diagram that shows the cause(s) and effect(s) of the problem with the EHR/EHR application/feature. Review the readings and the content found in the modules regarding fishbone diagrams and e-iatrogenesis.
Assignment Criteria:
Develop a scholarly paper that addresses the following:
Complete Part 1: System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) Implementation and Evaluation Stages: Proposed EHR/EHR Application/Feature
Briefly define the SSDLC’s implementation and evaluation stages and describe the DNP’s specific and expected role activities as an interprofessional team member during these two stages. Cite one or more sources.
Describe the new EHR or one new EHR feature, function, or application of interest that may benefit or supplement the current EHR for a healthcare organization.
Students should search the Internet for specific names and information about existing commercial products for the selected system application, EHR application/feature, or function.
Students are not designing the application/feature or function for an EHR but selecting an existing, new, or additional product.
Briefly describe the name, purpose, and vendor for the proposed new EHR application/feature or function to be added to an existing EHR or an electronic clinical information system.
Identify the type of healthcare organization (e.g., hospital, clinic, public health agency, healthcare software company, government health information website, private virtual health information site, etc.) that will utilize the proposed system. Explain how the EHR/EHR application/feature is utilized for clinical, administrative, educational, or research purposes.
Explain how this proposed EHR or EHR application/feature meets two Healthy People 2030 objectives for the topic, Health IT (See Modules/Week 2). Cite one or more sources to support your response.
Define” system interoperability” and “medical device integration” and explain how the proposed EHR or EHR application/ feature meets these HITECH standards. Cite sources.
Search the NQF database or other sources and identify and explain one quality metric that can be used to evaluate end-user or stakeholder satisfaction with the system post-implementation.
Discuss the evidence needed to determine whether further training for system users is needed post-implementation. Cite sources.
Identify the name, characteristics, and type of one additional metric you will propose to assess the effectiveness, quality, or safety of the proposed EHR or EHR application/feature. Cite sources.
Complete Part 2: Assessing E-iatrogenesis or the Unintended Consequences of the EHR/EHR application/feature.
Analyze the system in Part 1 for one possible unintended consequence that has or may occur post-implementing the proposed system/feature. Cite sources.
Describe the unintended consequence and cite sources.
Generate a fishbone diagram to show the specific causes and effects of the problem (see Modules/Week 2). https://www.cms.gov/medicare/provider-enrollment-and-certification/qapi/downloads/fishbonerevised.pdf
Create this as Figure 1 and insert it into an appendix.
See the APA 7th edition manual for the format.
Provide one or more priority solutions that could be implemented (proposed Remediation Plan) by the interprofessional team to alleviate the causes and effects of the problem. Cite sources.
The scholarly paper should be in narrative format, 5 to 6 pages, excluding the appendix, title page, and reference page.
Include an introductory paragraph with the purpose of the paper and a conclusion to the paper.
Include level 1 and 2 headings to organize the content of the paper.
Write the paper in the third person, not the first person (meaning do not use ‘’e’’or ‘’’’ and in a scholarly manner. I, we, you, me, or our may not be used. In addition, describing yourself as the researcher or the author should not be used.
To support the paper, include a minimum of five professional, peer-reviewed scholarly journal references (review in Ulrich Periodical Directory). References should be less than five (5) years old unless they are classic or historical articles.
APA 7th edition format required (attention to spelling/grammar, format for a title page and a reference page, use of paraphrasing/quotes, and format for in-text citations).
Submit the assignment to Turnitin before the final submission date, review the originality report, and make any needed changes. -
Title: Quality Management Issues and Barriers in Public Policy and Nursing Practice
For the continued body of your paper, address the following objectives and separate using distinct paragraph headers:
Explain quality management issues you anticipate within the framework of public policy or regulatory procedures
3 or more potential barriers you may encounter when addressing your quality issue
Identify positive or negative effects your quality issue has on nursing practice
For the conclusion:
Sum up the paper without introducing new information in one complete paragraph.
Draw conclusions based on your research and integrate professional opinion. -
Assessment of Leadership and Economic Models in Optimizing EBP Implementation Plans Assessment of Leadership and Economic Models in Optimizing EBP Implementation Plans
Assessment
Description
Discussion
1
After discussion with your preceptor, describe how leadership and
economic models of
health care can be used to optimize EBP to improve patient
outcomes.
Initial discussion question posts should be a minimum of 200 words
and include at least two references cited using APA format.
Discussion 2
Provide an overview of your
implementation plan developed in Topic 5 and discuss any
modifications that
need to be made.
In responses
to your peers, provide suggestions on how the implementation plan can be
improved.
Initial discussion question
posts should be a minimum of 200 words and include at least two references
cited using APA format -
Title: Understanding Cultural Factors in Healthcare: Communicating with Diverse Populations
List factors that predispose Eskimos to risk as a result of the consumption of large quantities of sugar.
Analyze different strategies useful in communicating with the Japanese American family.
When caring for a Russian American client, for the most part, at what distance would a Russian patient feel at most ease? Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.) Incorporate a minimum of 2 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. Journal articles should be referenced according to the current APA style (the online library has an abbreviated version of the APA Manual).
Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
Late work policies, expectations regarding proper citations, acceptable means of responding to peer feedback, and other expectations are at the discretion of the instructor. -
Title: Sampling Methods and Sample Sizes in Quantitative and Qualitative Research: A Comparison and Application to an Evidence-Based Practice Problem
Substantive comments add to the discussion and provide your fellow students with information that will enhance the learning environment.
References and citations should conform to the APA standards.
Remember: Please respect the opinions of others, even if their views differ. In other words, disagree professionally and respectfully.
Plagiarism is never acceptable – give credit when credit is due – cite your sources.
DOI reference link
Responses need to address all components of the question, demonstrate critical thinking and analysis, and include peer reviewed journal evidence to support the student’s position.
PLEASE RESPOND TO THE FOLLOWING POST:
How do the sampling methods and sample sizes vary for the different types of quantitative and qualitative research?
Quantitative and outcomes studies incorporate a variety of probability and nonprobability sampling techniques. The probability sampling method ensures that every member of the population has a greater than zero chance of being chosen for the sample (Gray & Grove, 2017). A noted benefit of random sampling is the decreased likelihood of systemic bias, leaving the selection completely to chance. By additionally minimizing the sampling error, the study’s validity increases (Gray & Grove, 2017). To be able to accommodate these requirements, quantitative sample sizes are typically on a much larger scale. In contrast, qualitative research commonly incorporates non-probability sampling techniques including purposive sampling, quota sampling, and snowball sampling. These methods are specifically designed to choose participants who are capable of offering extensive and precise information about the phenomenon being researched and unlike random sampling, not every member of the population has a chance for selection (Gray & Grove, 2017). Typically, the sample size in qualitative research is smaller. This is due to the previously mentioned emphasis placed on acquiring a thorough understanding of the participants’ experiences and points of view, necessitating considerable data collection and analysis (Gray & Grove, 2017). However, in regard to sample sizes, the most important theme I noted was the sample size and type should be decided based on the study’s objectives, population size, and available resources to conduct the study – without consideration of if it’s quantitative or qualitative research.
Hypothetically, what sampling method would you use to conduct a study of your selected evidence-based practice problem/topic? Why? How would you determine the sample type and size?
After some consideration, purposive sampling would ideally fit my topic best. It would be focused on a population that are specially selected, veterans with PTSD, while trying to understand the phenomenon of supplemental aerobic exercise to behavior therapy in their course of treatment. This fits the criteria from the literature nearly perfect. For purposive sampling specifically, the determining of sample type and size is considered adequate when saturation of information is achieved in the study area (Gray & Grove, 2017). Data saturation occurs when further sampling fails to produce any new information, but rather duplicates previously collected data. When determining the sample size needed to achieve data saturation, it is crucial to consider important factors such as the study’s scope, the topic’s nature, the data’s quality, and the study design (Gray & Grove, 2017). -
“Addressing Social Determinants of Health: The Role of Nurses in Promoting Health Equity in Communities” As nurses, we are well aware of the impact of social determinants of health on individuals and communities. These are the conditions in which people
Review the Social Determinants of Health
on the Healthy People 2030 website.
Select one of the domains and post how nurses can increase focus and awareness on this topic at the level of your community.
Write
an original post on your thoughts,
feelings and experiences. Use at least one reference to support your
ideas.
https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health