Category: Nursing

  • Critical Appraisal of Ozone Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Case Report Study

    critical appraisal of a research article:  
    Faraji, N., Goli, R., Choobianzali, B., Bahrami, S., Sadeghian, A., Sepehrnia, N., & Ghalandari, M. (2021). Ozone therapy as an alternative method for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer: a case report. Journal of medical case reports, 15(1), 234. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-021-02829-y.
    The research should be covered the following aspects:
    a.     
    Describe the problem and purpose of the research
    study (This is a summary). Is the issue of the study discussed in the
    introduction? What is the problem statement? Is the significance of the
    investigation established in the introduction? What is the significance of this
    study?
    b.    
    Describe the research methods, including data
    collection, sampling, and data analysis, for the research study. Identify the research
    question, hypotheses, purpose, and specific aims/objectives. Who were the
    subjects and or participants? What sampling approach was undertaken and why?
    How was the sample size justified? What level of measurement was used for the
    variable(s)? What instrument(s) was used? How were reliability and validity
    established?
    c.     
    Summarize the significant findings and
    conclusions of the study.
    d.    
    Critique the strengths and weaknesses of the
    research methods. The expectation is that you also cite your textbook when
    describing research methods or criteria for evaluating research.  
    e.     
    How is this study relevant to evidence-based
    practice in nursing?

  • Title: Developing a Clinical Judgement Measurement Model and Concept Map for DPC_SMITH

    I have attatched a document to help guide you what pages to work on. 
    please actually fill in the blanks on the level 2 dpcd document for pages: 
    – the clinical judgement measurement model
    – concept map
    HOWEVER, USE THE INFORMATION IN DPC_SMITH TO HELP COMPLETE THOSE PAGES.

  • The Power of Art: Examining the Social Contribution and Controversy of Kara Walker’s “A Subtlety” Kara Walker’s “A Subtlety” is a large-scale sculpture installation created in 2014, using

    Although social justice art is not a topic exclusive to the 20th and 21st centuries, the distribution of information regarding controversial art with gender, race, sexual, and/or environmental themes has increased with the proliferation of media. Choose an example of a social justice work of art from the 20th or 21st centuries from any discipline of the humanities (music, literature, sculpture, film, television, etc.). Then, address the following:
    Identify the work and the medium.
    Based on your example, to what extent does this work of art make a social contribution?
    What aesthetic value does the work have? How does it reflect the human condition? How does it relate to your life?
    Has this work ever been censored? If so, explain the circumstances.
    Are governments ever justified in censoring art? Why or why not?
    Examine some of the influences of this work of art. What was the public reaction to this work? Does it effectively portray its message?
    Argue whether or not this work should be considered art. Explain why using terms learned in this course.
    Include an accompanying statement from the artist(s) and a statement from a critic to support your points.
    Writing Requirements (APA format)
    Length: 1.5-2 pages (not including title page or references page)
    1-inch margins
    Double spaced
    12-point Times New Roman font
    Title page
    References page (minimum of 1 scholarly source and 1 primary source)

  • Annotated Bibliography on the Impact of Chronic Illness on Mental Health

    Select one of the health care problems or issues presented in the Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF] Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Applying Research Skills [PDF]resource. Write a brief overview of the selected health care problem or issue. In your overview:
    Summarize the health care problem or issue.
    Describe the professional relevance of this topic.
    Describe any professional experience you have with this topic.
    Identify peer-reviewed articles relevant to this health care issue or problem.
    Conduct a search for scholarly or academic peer-reviewed literature related to the topic and describe the criteria you used to search for articles, including the names of the databases you used. You will select four current scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles published during the past 3–5 years that relate to your topic.
    Refer to the NHS-FPX4000: Developing a Health Care Perspective Library Guide to help you locate appropriate references.
    https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/NHSFPX4000
    Use keywords related to the health care problem or issue you are researching to select relevant articles.
    Assess the credibility and explain relevance of the information sources you find.
    Determine if the source is from an academic peer-reviewed journal.
    Determine if the publication is current.
    Determine if information in the academic peer-reviewed journal article is still relevant.
    Analyze academic peer-reviewed journal articles using the annotated bibliography organizational format. Provide a rationale for inclusion of each selected article. The purpose of an annotated bibliography is to document a list of references along with key information about each one. The detail about the reference is the annotation. Developing this annotated bibliography will create a foundation of knowledge about the selected topic. In your annotated bibliography:
    Identify the purpose of the article.
    Summarize the information.
    Provide rationale for inclusion of each article.
    Include the conclusions and findings of the article.
    Write your annotated bibliography in a paragraph form. The annotated bibliography should be approximately 150 words (1–3 paragraphs) in length.
    List the full reference for the source in APA format (author, date, title, publisher, et cetera) and use APA format for the annotated bibliography.
    Make sure the references are listed in alphabetical order, are double-spaced, and use hanging indents.
    Summarize what you have learned while developing an annotated bibliography.
    Summarize what you learned from your research in a separate paragraph or two at the end of the paper.
    List the main points you learned from your research.
    Summarize the main contributions of the sources you chose and how they enhanced your knowledge about the topic.
    Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
    Assessment 2 Example [PDF] Download Assessment 2 Example [PDF].
    Additional Requirements
    Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:
    Length: 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
    Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
    APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
    Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
    Content: Provide a title page and reference page following APA style.
    References: Use at least four scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles.
    APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.

  • Weekly Reflection on Health Policy: Connecting Concepts, Personal Experiences, and Critical Thinking

    This weekly reflection assignment is an opportunity for you to solidify your understanding of the course material, explore your personal connections to health policy, and develop your critical thinking skills. Use the prompts under each part to help you develop your reflection. You can reflect on items discussed/posted on either Module 1 or Module 2 for this assignment. 
    Part 1: Key Concepts (1 point)
    Briefly summarize a key concept you learned about health policy this week.
    Explain the significance of this concept in your own words.
    Part 2: Personal Connections (2 points)
    Think about a personal experience (yours, someone you know, or a patient you cared for) that relates to this week’s health policy topic.
    Briefly describe the experience and explain how it connects to the concept you discussed in Part 1.
    Part 3: Reflection (1 point)
    What surprised you the most about this week’s health policy topic?
    What questions do you still have?
    How has this week’s material impacted your understanding of health policy in general?
    Additional Instructions:
    Feel free to use specific examples from the course readings, lectures, or discussions to support your reflections.
    Your reflection should be approximately 1-2 pages long, double-spaced.
    Reflection Assignment Rubric
    Reflection Assignment Rubric
    Criteria Ratings Pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeKey Concepts
    1 to >0.75 pts
    Excellent
    * Clearly and accurately summarizes a key concept. * Explains the significance of the concept in a thoughtful and insightful way. * Demonstrates a strong understanding of the material
    0.75 to >0.5 pts
    Good
    * Summarizes a key concept, but may lack some clarity. * Explains the significance, but the explanation may be basic or generic.
    0.5 to >0.0 pts
    Fair
    * Summarizes a key concept, but it may be incomplete or inaccurate. * Explanation of significance is weak or missing.
    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory/Missing
    * Key concept is missing or not clearly identified. * No explanation of significance is provided.
    1 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonal Connections
    2 to >1.5 pts
    Excellent
    * Provides a relevant and detailed personal experience that clearly connects to the week’s topic and key concept. * Explains the connection between the experience and the concept in a clear and insightful way.
    1.5 to >1.0 pts
    Good
    * Provides a relevant personal experience that connects to the week’s topic. * Explanation of the connection is present, but may lack detail or insight.
    1 to >0.0 pts
    Fair
    * Provides a personal experience, but it may not be directly relevant to the topic or key concept. * Connection between experience and concept is weak or missing.
    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory/Missing
    * No personal experience is provided, or the experience is irrelevant. * No connection to the concept is made.
    2 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection
    1 to >0.75 pts
    Excellent
    * Identifies a surprising aspect of the topic and reflects on its implications. * Asks insightful questions that demonstrate critical thinking and a desire to learn more. * Explains how the material has significantly impacted their understanding of health policy.
    0.75 to >0.5 pts
    Good
    * Identifies something surprising about the topic, but the reflection may be superficial. * Asks questions that demonstrate some interest in the topic. * Explains how the material has impacted their understanding, but the explanation may be general.
    0.5 to >0.0 pts
    Fair
    * Mentions something surprising about the topic, but the reflection lacks depth. * Asks questions, but they may be basic or repetitive. * Mentions how the material has impacted their understanding, but the explanation is weak.
    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory/Missing
    * No reflection on surprising aspects of the topic. * No questions are asked, or the questions lack depth. * No reflection on how the material has impacted their understanding.
    1 pts
    Total Points: 4

  • Developing Competence: A Personal Narrative “Perfecting Your Writing: A Guide to Improving Your Rough Drafts”

    MLA Template 2024.docx (16.293 KB) 
    For your first essay, you will write a narrative about an area of life in which you have developed “competence or knowledge.” This is NOT a “how-to” essay. Instead, it is a chronological series of at least 4 events or memories that trace your relationship with this skill/knowledge over time. Follow the outline and steps below to organize your essay.
    Narrative Essay Outline
    Introduction Paragraph
    Background Details
    Thesis Statement
    1st Body Paragraph
    Topic Sentence for 1st Event
    Details
    2nd Body Paragraph
    Topic Sentence for 2nd Event
    Details
    3rd Body Paragraph
    Topic Sentence for 3rd Event
    Details
    4th Body Paragraph
    Topic Sentence for 4th Event
    Details
    Conclusion Paragraph
    Reiterated Thesis
    Closing Thoughts
    Step 1—Preparation: First read the helpful material in “The Writing Process—Part 1” and “Narrative” (see above).
    Step 2—Choose Topic: Choose a topic that MATTERS emotionally to you. Possible topics include reading and writing; job or technical skills; sports and hobbies; and life skills. 
    Step 3—Prewriting Questions: Use these prewriting questions to help you gather details about your topic.
    When were you first introduced to the topic (skill or knowledge)? Were you motivated by a person, an experience, or your own curiosity?
    How did you feel about this topic at first? Difficult? Boring? Rewarding? Confusing?
    How did your feelings change or grow over time? Why?
    What key moments, memories, or scenes do you remember?  What sensory details do you associate with each one? What emotions or conversations to you recall?
    How would you describe your relationship with this topic now? What has this topic (or writing about it) taught you about yourself? What can others learn from your experience(s), even it they don’t possess this skill or knowledge?
    Step 4—Thesis Statement: Your prewriting details will help you create a thesis statement. Thesis statements consist of a topic and your assertion about that topic. For this class, thesis statements should appear at the end of the introduction, right before the body paragraphs. Here are some examples of “working” thesis statements you can use as a guide for drafting. But don’t forget…As you revise the body paragraphs, you should replace the “working” thesis statement with an updated one that accurately reflects those revisions.
    My first year at Meadows Nursing Home helped me grow from a timid rookie to a confident professional.
    The way my sister dealt with a family emergency taught me to be prepared for the unexpected.
    Managing my anxiety continues to be a struggle, but I am proud of my progress.
    Although coach helped me become good soccer player, it was his teaching style that turned me into a respectable young adult.
    Step 5—Body Paragraphs: Body paragraphs support—or prove—your thesis statement. Each one includes a topic sentence and details. The topic sentence is like a “mini” thesis statement that appears at the beginning of the paragraph and summarizes its main idea.  (HINT: If you have a strong thesis statement, you can often “borrow” key words/ideas from it to create the topic sentences.) Major details support the topic sentence and give the paragraph its structure; minor details support each major detail and add interest.
    Step 6—Rough Draft: When you are ready to begin drafting, open and save the attached MLA Template. Organize your essay according to the outline and be sure to include your introduction and conclusion. Submit your rough draft by the due date. Your essay should be a minimum of 1000 words.
    Step 7—Prepare for revising: Get a head start on revising by reading the helpful material in “The Writing Process—Part 2” and “The Writing Process—Part 3” (see June 17-June 23 folder).
    Step 8—Check My Grades for feedback: To view my feedback, go to My Grades and click on the name of the assignment. You should see a copy of your assignment with my highlights and comments. (If you do not see your assignment, go back to My Grades and make sure you click on the assignment name—for example, Narrative Assignment Two—not the blue bubble.) To the right, you will see the number of points you earned. 
    If you earn full credit: You have the heavy work behind you. Now you can focus mostly on individual paragraphs and sentences.
    If you earn less than full credit:  You have some major corrections to make, but that’s what rough drafts are for—to catch major errors before you move on to the final draft.
    Step 9—Final Drafts: Final Drafts should show improvements based on my feedback AND what you have learned from the reading assignments. Final Draft grades are based on the points you earn for each of the ten categories listed here:
    Grading Categories
    Points earned
    2 = Good
    1 = Average
    0 = Poor/Not Included
    Work Is Complete
    General MLA Format
    Organization 
    Effective Introduction
    Focused Clear Thesis 
    Paragraphs
    Conclusion
    Transitions
    Sentences
    Grammar and Mechanics

  • “Biosynthesis of Serotonin, Dopamine, and Norepinephrine from Tyrosine and Tryptophan” Biosynthesis of Serotonin, Dopamine, and Norepinephrine from Tyrosine and Trypt

    Starting with the precursor substance tyrosine or tryptophan, draw three diagrams showing how the various enzymes convert this substance to serotonin, dopamine and norepinephrine.
    Submission Instructions:
    Your diagrams must be hand-drawn. Scan your diagrams and submit them as an attachment of an image file or PDF. 
    Follow APA 7th Edition formatting guidelines for graphs and figuresLinks to an external site.

  • “Stone Man Syndrome: A Rare and Debilitating Genetic Disorder”

    hello I need a paper on Stone man syndrome I need in in 12 size letter font and APA formate and times new Roman

  • Title: Managing Low Back Pain in a 59-Year-Old Female Patient: Initial Assessment, Treatment Plan, and Patient Education

    Instructions:
    Scenario: A 59-year-old female presents with complaints of low back pain. She reports having difficulty standing upright and must change position frequently when sitting or lying down. She denies any specific incident that preceded the pain, stating that it just started as stiffness, but it has progressively worsened. When asked about pain radiation, the patient confirms that pain is radiating down to her mid-thighs, bilaterally. The patient reports that her activities are limited by the pain despite the use of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and ice. A full physical exam is needed to determine the cause of pain and to identify treatment options.
    The patient reports activity intolerance as a result of the low back pain. What should you include when performing your initial physical assessment?
    What questions should you ask to appropriately gather this patient’s history?
    The patient seems surprised when you begin asking questions about her psychosocial status. Why is a psychosocial evaluation important for patients with low back pain?
    Concerned that “something serious” is going on, the patient insists on having an x-ray to be certain. To warrant an order for an x-ray (radiograph) for acute low back pain (ALBP), what conditions should exist?
    You inform the patient that most ALBP episodes (almost 90%) resolve within 1 to 6 weeks and that pain management will focus on symptom control through pharmacological and nonpharmacological methods. What is your plan of care for this patient? Provide full prescription details if medications are ordered.
    What will you include in patient education and instructions?
    Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

  • Title: Ethical and Policy Issues in Care Coordination: Empowering Nurses to Advocate for Patient Safety and Quality Care “Ethical and Policy Considerations in Care Coordination: Impact on Patients and the Community”

    PLEASE SEE ATTACHED RUBRIC/SCORING GUIDE AND MAKE SURE TO INCLUDE EVERYTHING IT IS ASKING.
    PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL APURCES ARENO MORE THAN 5 YEARS OLD ( I need 3-5 sources)
    ALSO ATTACHED IS THE TOPIC:
    • American Nurses Association: The American Nurses Association is a professionalorganization that represents nurses and advocates for policies that improve patient care
    and safety
    This assessment provides an opportunity for you to develop a presentation for a local community organization, which provides an overview of ethical standards and relevant policy issues that affect the coordination of care. Completing this assessment will strengthen your understanding of ethical issues and policies related to the coordination and continuum of care, and will empower you to be a stronger advocate and nursing professional.
    Your nurse manager at the community care center is well connected and frequently speaks to a variety of community organizations and groups. She has noticed the good work you are doing in your new care coordination role and respects your speaking and presentation skills. Consequently, she thought that an opportunity to speak publicly about contemporary issues in care coordination would be beneficial for your career and has suggested reaching out to a community organization or support group to gauge their interest in hearing from you, as a care center representative, on a topic of interest to both you and your prospective audience. You have agreed that this is a good idea and have decided to research a community organization or support group that might be interested in learning about ethical and policy issues related to the coordination of care.
    For this assessment:
    Use the Assessment 02 Supplement: Ethical and Policy Factors in Care Coordination [PDF] Download Assessment 02 Supplement: Ethical and Policy Factors in Care Coordination [PDF] to select the community organization or support group that you plan to address.
    Develop a PowerPoint with typed speaker notes (the script for your voice recording) and audio voice-over recording, intended for that audience. Video is not required.
    Note: PowerPoint has a feature to type the speaker notes directly into the presentation. You are encouraged to use that feature or you may choose to submit a separate document. See Microsoft Office Software for technical support about the use of PowerPoint, including voice recording and speaker notes.
    For this assessment, develop your presentation slides and speaker notes, then record your presentation. You are not required to deliver your presentation to an actual audience.
    Presentation Format and Length
    You may use PowerPoint (recommended) or other suitable presentation software to create your slides and add your voice over. If you elect to use an application other than PowerPoint, check with your faculty to avoid potential file compatibility issues.
    Be sure that your slide deck includes the following slides:
    Title slide.
    Presentation title.
    Your name.
    Date.
    Course number and title.
    References (at the end of your presentation).
    Your slide deck should consist of 10–12 slides, not including a title and references slide with typed speaker notes and audio voice over. Your presentation should not exceed 20 minutes.
    Create a detailed narrative script for your presentation, approximately 4–5 pages in length.
    Supporting Evidence
    Cite 3–5 credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry publications to support your presentation. Include your source citations on a references page appended to your narrative script.
    Grading Requirements
    The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Ethical and Policy Factors in Care Coordination Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
    Explain how governmental policies related to the health and/or safety of the community affect the coordination of care.
    Provide examples of a specific policy affecting the organization or group.
    Refer to the assessment resources for help in locating relevant policies.
    Be sure influential policies include the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA).
    Identify national, state, and local policy provisions that raise ethical questions or dilemmas for care coordination.
    What are the implications and consequences of specific policy provisions?
    What evidence do you have to support your conclusions?
    Assess the impact of the code of ethics for nurses on the coordination and continuum of care.
    Consider the factors that contribute to health, health disparities, and access to services.
    Consider the social determinants of health identified in Healthy People 2020 as a framework for your assessment.
    Provide evidence to support your conclusions.
    Communicate key ethical and policy issues in a presentation affecting the coordination and continuum of care for a selected community organization or support group. Either speaker notes or audio voice-over are included for a proficient score; both speaker notes and the audio voice over are included for a distinguished score.
    Present a concise overview.
    Support your main points and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.
    As coordinators of care, nurses must be aware of the code of ethics for nurses and health policy issues that affect the coordination of care within the context of the community. To help patients navigate the continuum of care, nurses must be proficient at interpreting and applying the code of ethics for nurses and health policy, specifically, the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Being knowledgeable about ethical and policy issues helps ensure that care coordinators are upholding ethical standards and navigating policy issues that affect patient care.
    By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
    Competency 4: Defend decisions based on the code of ethics for nursing.
    Assess the impact of the code of ethics for nurses on the coordination and continuum of care
    Competency 5: Explain how health care policies affect patient-centered care.
    Explain how governmental policies related to the health and/or safety of a community affect the coordination of care.
    Identify national, state, and local policy provisions that raise ethical questions or dilemmas for care coordination.
    Competency 6: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead patient-centered care.
    Communicate key ethical and policy issues in a presentation affecting the coordination and continuum of care for a selected community organization or support group, using PowerPoint or other appropriate software. Both speaker notes and audio voice-over are included.