Category: Nursing

  • Title: Health Risks and Nutrition for Chronic Diseases: A Case Study of Lenora and HIV Patients

    Scenario 1:
    Lenora is a 57-year-old Jamaican American female who works as a desk clerk. Her job requires her to sit all day from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., then she drives for one hour to go home. She lives alone in a studio apartment. By the time she gets home, she is tired and barely has time to pick up some fast food. She was recently diagnosed with hypertension and diabetes type 2. She is 5’ 5” tall and weighs 180 pounds with a BMI of 30.1. Her blood pressure was 150/105 and her HbA1C of 7.5%. The healthcare team starts Lenora on atenolol (Tenormin) for her hypertension and metformin (Glucophage) for her diabetes.
    Reference: Centers of Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). About chronic diseases. https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/about/index.htm#risks
    Provide at least two (2) risk factors that may contribute to Lenora’s development of hypertension (see Appendix J: Body Mass Index (BMI) of your textbook)
    Describe what is HbA1C and how is it used to monitor diabetes? (see Chapter 20, page 564 of your textbook).
    Scenario 2:
    Navigate to HIVinfo by the NIH.gov: https://hivinfo.nih.gov/understanding-hiv/fact-sheets/hiv-and-nutrition-and-food-safetyLinks to an external site. – read the webpage and scroll to Healthy Living with HIV.
    Describe how foods may affect HIV treatment (provide at least 2 examples).
    Explain how to prevent opportunistic infections through their diet in people living with HIV.
    Submission Instructions:
    Your initial post should be at least 400 words, formatted, and cited in the current APA style with support from the textbook and the sources provided.  

  • Title: The Impact of Technology on Nursing Practice: A Revised Article Summary

    https://oce-ovid-com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/article/00152193-202311000-00014/HTML
    Assigned Article Summary 
    Write a revised version of your Week 4 Assigned Article Summary assignment addressing the major ideas within the article based on feedback from faculty. Appropriate revisions are crucial to maximize success. Include one short direct quotation, with a complete citation, using the assigned sentence for quotation. Include one paraphrased area, with a complete citation, using the assigned sentence for paraphrasing from the Week 4 assignment.
    There should be no prior knowledge, experience, or your own opinion in this section. All paraphrased ideas and facts (including the assigned sentence for paraphrasing) must originate from and be cited to the assigned article. No information should be included from other sources. See rubric for other criteria.
    The length for this section must be 175-200 words.  
    Impact of Technology on Nursing Practice 
    Locate an article from the Chamberlain Library to respond to the following question: How does technology help or hinder nursing practice as it relates to the topic in the Week 4 article? Include one short direct quotation from the article you found with a complete citation. See rubric for other criteria. 
    The length for this section must be 125-150 words.  
    Conclusion
    Write a concise summary of the main points of the paper followed by a concluding statement.  The length for this section must be 75-100 words.  
    References (centered, bold, begins on a new page)
    Type the reference for the assigned article here using hanging indent and double line spacing (under “Paragraph” on the Home toolbar ribbon).  See your APA Manual and the resources in the APA section of Resources for reference formatting.
    Appendix
    Include permalinks from the Chamberlain Library for each article here.
    Article 1 Permalink: 
    Article 2 Permalink:

  • The Relationship between Critical Thinking and Writing in Argumentative Essays Introduction Critical thinking and writing are two essential skills that students need to develop in order to succeed academically and in their future careers. Critical thinking involves analyzing and evaluating information in a

    As a student, it is important to understand the relationship between critical thinking and writing. In this assignment, you will write a 750-1,000-word paper about this relationship, specifically argumentative essays. Include the following in your paper:
    A title page
    A description of at least two differences between argumentative and informative essays
    A description of at least two aspects/points that are needed for an essay to be considered argumentative (reasoning by analogy should be included in some way here)
    At least 2 references on a reference page (one being the book and an outside scholarly source) and accompanying in-text citations when the references are used
    The paper should be formatted in APA style. Use the template provided below to start your paper, as it is already in proper APA format. Be sure to remove the existing text in the template and replace it with your own.

  • Improving PowerPoint Presentation Feedback Title: Enhancing PowerPoint Presentations: Feedback and Improvements

    The second page is the feedback from the previous PowerPoint; please go by paper to see what were missing. Thank you

  • Assessment 2: Translating Common Terms in a Patient’s History and Physical for the Nervous System

    This second assessment continues to explore medical terminology related to various body systems, general structures, and functions of the human body, including the digestive and nervous systems, as well as psychiatry terminology. Our focus in this assessment will be on the nervous system. The nervous system is a complex network of nerves and cells that carries messages to and from the brain and spinal cord to various parts of the body. The nervous system includes the central peripheral nervous systems. Your suggested resources address how the nervous system functions and what jobs it performs. They also focus on diseases, treatments, and diagnostic studies related to the nervous system.
    In the assessment you will review a patient’s history and physical (H&P), another common document found in acute care settings. You will translate the common terms in the H&P into the correct medical terms or abbreviations.
    Review the H&P below for a patient who presented in the emergency room with a number of issues. Pay close attention to the present and past history, medications, allergies, social and family history, review of systems, physician exam, and assessment and plan. Next, download the Patient History and Physical Template [DOCX] and complete all of the following on the template:
    Select 15 common terms from the H&P.
    Translate the 15 selected common terms into medical terms or abbreviations.
    Spell the common and medical terms correctly.
    Cite in correct APA style the references you used to perform your translation. Click Evidence and APA for additional guidance on how to ensure your citations and references conform to APA guidelines.
    Format: Ensure you complete all columns on the Patient History and Physical Template.
    Patient H&P
    History of Present Illness:
    This is a 54-year-old female who presented to the emergency room with a headache in the back of her head and double vision. She also complains of being able to see only from half of her eye. These symptoms began suddenly while she was out walking her dog about 45 minutes ago. A family member brought patient directly to the emergency room for evaluation.
    Past Medical History:
    High blood pressure.
    High cholesterol.
    Irregular, rapid heartbeat.
    IBS.
    Cholelithiasis with cholcystectomy.
    Medications:
    Diovan 80 mg with hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg daily.
    Allergies:
    None.
    Social History:
    Non-smoker, no alcohol.
    Family History:
    Both parents and older sibling died from a stroke. Grandparents had extensive colon polyps.
    Review of Systems:
    She has bilateral vision defects. Denies dizziness, weakness, or numbness. Denies shortness of breath, problems breathing, and chest pain. Denies nausea, vomiting, and blood in stool. No bladder or bowel changes. No edema or skin changes to arms and legs.
    Physician Exam:
    General: Patient appears to be a well-developed, well-nourished female. Alert and oriented to person, place, and time.
    Vital Signs: Stable.
    Skin: No discoloration, no tissue breakdown.
    Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, Throat: Pupils equal, round, and reactive to light; eye muscle movements are intact.
    Chest: Clear.
    Heart: Irregular, rapid rhythm.
    Abdomen: No guarding, some tenderness related to the IBS.
    Arms and Legs: No leg swelling.
    Assessment and Plan:
    Headache in the back of the head with vision changes. Obtain a computed tomography scan and magnetic resonance imaging scan. Depending on test results may need to consider an artery repair procedure.
    High blood pressure: Continue home meds.
    Irregular, rapid heartbeat: Continue home meds.

  • Assessment and Referral for Substance Use Disorder in Pregnant Patient: A Case Study of Jackie

    After studying Module 4: Lecture Materials & Resources, discuss the following:
    Jackie is a 31-year-old pregnant patient (2nd child, two different fathers) single mother of a 6-year-old who is coming for prenatal care since she suspects she is pregnant. She is no longer with the father of Robby, her firstborn. She indicates “pretty serious partying” with the likely father of the baby. By pretty serious partying she means 10-12 drinks per occasion, one to two times per week, plus intermittent methamphetamine use.
    Which clinical information would be most critical for you to collect in the first visit?
    What are the greatest risk factors for substance use disorder for this patient?
    Which harm reduction strategies would you recommend?
    Identify your city. Then refer this patient to three agencies near you that would support positive health outcomes for this patient.   (These agencies must not have been used in past discussion posts). What was your rationale for choosing these three agencies? 
    Submission Instructions:
    Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted, and cited in the current APA style.
    Provide support for your work from at least 2 academic sources less than 5 years old. 
    Your initial post is worth 8 points.
    Read
    Tusaie, K. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2016).
    Chapter 21
    NUR 650 Mental Illness during the Reproductive Cycle.pptx Download NUR 650 Mental Illness during the Reproductive Cycle.pptx
    St. Thomas University. (2022). Mental illness during the reproductive cycle [slides].
    As part of your readings in this module, please also review the following:
    Syllabus
    APA and Research GuidesLinks to an external site.

  • “Locating and Evaluating Sources of Evidence: A Guide to Electronic Database Search Strategies for Nursing Research” “Exploring Non-Scholarly Sources: Evaluating Reliability and Organization”

    Objectives
    Identify electronic database search strategies (e.g., CINAHL, PubMed)
    Locating and evaluating sources of evidence
    Deliverables
    Write a 3-5 page (not including the title and reference pages) paper
    APA 7 formatted paper with an introduction and conclusion.
    APA 7 headings for each section of the paper
    At least 3 peer-reviewed articles 
    Step 1: Research
    Interview a librarian or nursing scholar on methods for locating and appraising health and other relevant research literature and electronic database search on strategies.
    You may want to base this research on your idea from your Capstone Project; however, you may not self-plagiarize your previous work.
    Step 2: Consider
    Write a quality appraisal of the Library and resources.
    What did you learn?
    How do you locate and evaluate sources of evidence?
    Which electronic database would you use most and what types of search words would you use?
    What are the strengths?
    What are the weaknesses?
    Is it adequate? Why or why not?
    Step 3: Write
    Write a paper that addresses the questions above.
    Step 4 Save and submit
    When you have completed your assignment, save a copy for yourself in an easily accessible place and submit a copy to Canvas.
    Post Licensure BSN Assignment 9.2019
    Criteria Ratings Pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntentional Learning and Reflection
    15 pts
    Exemplary
    Identifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides direction for the content that is engaging and thought provoking. The thesis clearly and concisely states the position, premise, or hypothesis and is consistently the focal point throughout the presentation. Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding and careful, critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Compares/contrasts perspectives, considers counter arguments or opposing positions, and draws original and thoughtful conclusions with future implications.
    10 pts
    Accomplished
    Identifies/addresses a relevant topic and a thesis that provides adequate direction for the content with some degree of interest for the reader. The thesis states the position, premise, or hypothesis, and is the focal point of the paper for the most part. Demonstrates an understanding and some critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Adequately compares/contrasts perspectives, counter-arguments, or opposing positions but broader connections and/or implications are not as thoroughly explored
    5 pts
    Developing
    Identifies a research topic but may be too broad in scope and/or the thesis is somewhat unclear and needs to be developed further. Focal point is not consistently maintained throughout the paper. Demonstrates general understanding with limited critical analysis of the research topic and thesis (argument). Summarizes perspectives, counter-arguments, or opposing positions.
    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory – Beginning
    Fails to identify a relevant research topic or is not clearly defined and/or the paper lacks focus throughout. Demonstrates a lack of understanding and inadequate analysis of the research topic and thesis. Analysis is superficial based on opinions and preferences rather than critical analysis.
    15 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDecision Making and Clinical Reasoning
    15 pts
    Exemplary
    Provides compelling and accurate evidence to support in-depth analysis to the central position beyond the required (2) research sources with at least 1 source from a periodical database. Research sources are highly relevant, accurate, recent (less than 5 years old) and reliable and add to the strength of the content.
    10 pts
    Accomplished
    Provides essential, accurate evidence to support the central position with the required (2) research sources including 1 source from a periodical database that are mostly relevant, accurate, recent (less than 5 years old) and reliable.
    5 pts
    Developing
    Provides some evidence to support the central position with less than 2 acceptable research sources. Some sources may not be relevant, accurate, and reliable, greater than 5 years old and may not be from scholarly sources.
    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory – Beginning
    Lacks sufficient research sources to support the central position and/or, if included, are generally not relevant, accurate, or reliable. Contains numerous factual mistakes, omissions, or oversimplifications.
    15 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & Presentation
    15 pts
    Exemplary
    Content is effectively organized. Ideas are arranged logically, flows smoothly, with a strong progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes all required components (introduction, body, conclusion, citations, references, etc.). For a slide presentation, the design, font size, style, and spacing are optimal for audience viewing
    10 pts
    Accomplished
    Content is adequately organized. Ideas are arranged reasonably with a progression of thought from paragraph to paragraph connecting to the central position. Includes required components of an introduction, body, and conclusion. For a slide presentation, one or more components of the design, font size, style, and spacing may be less than ideal for audience viewing.
    5 pts
    Developing
    Content is somewhat organized. For a paper, occasionally ideas from paragraph to paragraph may not flow well and/or connect to the central position or be clear as a whole. May be missing a required component and/or components may be less than complete. For a slide presentation, multiple aspects of the design require further development for optimal audience viewing.
    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory – Beginning
    Content lacks logical organization and impedes readers’ comprehension of ideas. For a paper, central position is rarely evident from paragraph to paragraph and/or the paper is missing multiple required components. For a slide presentation, the design lacks clarity for optimal viewing by an audience.
    15 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting and APA Formatting
    15 pts
    Exemplary
    Content is well written and uses standard English characterized by elements of a strong writing style. Basically, free from grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, or formatting errors. APA guidelines for formatting are consistently followed. Includes in-text citations and references that are written correctly.
    10 pts
    Accomplished
    Content shows above average writing style and clarity in writing using standard English. Minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, usage, and/or formatting. APA guidelines for formatting are present. In-text citations are present but may not be complete or correctly formatted. References are written using correct APA format
    5 pts
    Developing
    Content shows an average and/or casual writing style using standard English. Some errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and word usage. Use of APA guidelines are generally present, however are incorrectly formatted.
    0 pts
    Unsatisfactory – Beginning
    Content shows a below average/poor writing style lacking in elements of appropriate standard English. Frequent errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, and word usage. Lacks elements required in writing a formal APA paper: title page, references, in-text citations, headers.
    15 pts
    Total Points: 60

  • “Reducing Expiring Legal Holds in Psychiatric Acute Hospitals: An Analysis of Existing Evidence” Introduction: The issue of expiring legal holds in psychiatric acute hospitals is a significant problem that can have serious consequences for both patients and healthcare providers. These

    My assignment info is in Basis of Paper file, it is about expiring legal holds in psychiatric acute hospitals (72 hour holds placed by peace officers/nurses/physicians that expire due to understaffing) meaning the legal hold is invalid and the hospital is essentially imprisoning the patient. The paper will focus on reducing the rate of expiring legal holds by staffing and training nurses. Week 1 and 2 directions are preparation for week 3 directions. rubric included. We are on week 3, part one of capstone paper.
    ****Week 2 directions (1&3 in files)*****
    Complete a review of current nursing evidence for your practice problem. To develop a plan for your quality improvement project you will need to find out what interventions have been successful when applied to your practice problem. The evidence-based process is a problem solving approach where you will assess research, clinical guidelines, expert opinions, and other relevant information and incorporate the results into your quality improvement project. Search for a minimum of five evidence-based sources related to your practice problem. You must include two-three research studies in your review. Synthesize in your own words the evidence that supports your identified practice problem. For example, if your practice problem is reducing patient falls, you will summarize what the evidence you have found has to say about falls and how researchers have identified interventions that promote a decrease in the number of patient falls. In this example, the evidence will likely show that hourly rounding, non skid slippers, a fall risk assessment and low beds are all interventions that the research has shown to improve patient outcomes related to falls in a healthcare setting.
    Review the Week 3 Assignment Rubric
    For this Assignment, write 4-5 paragraphs that address the following:
    Analysis of Existing Evidence
    Summarize the findings from at least five evidence-based sources that support your practice problem. The goal of the analysis of existing evidence is to find the best evidence possible that support a change in practice. Identify research, clinical guidelines, expert opinions, and other relevant information and incorporate the results into your quality improvement project. You must include two-three research studies in your analysis. Using your own words synthesize the evidence that supports your identified practice problem. There should be no quotes or personal opinions included in this section.
    By Day 7 of Week 3, submit this Assignment, along with the Capstone Paper sections introduced in Week 1 and Week 3.

  • “Effective Leadership, Time Management, Delegation, and Legal Issues in Nursing: Building a Strong and Ethical Workforce”

    In week 6 you have a 2-page paper due. Your paper should be in APA format with 4 references within the last 5 years. You will include the following four topics.
     Identify the qualities of an outstanding nurse leader and how those qualities help to build and develop their workforce and units.
     Discuss the importance of time management and ways to improve your time management
    skills.
     Discuss delegation and prioritization of clients and scope of practice for RN, LPN, and
    UAP
     Identify legal issues in nursing and their impact on the care of the client.
    Your paper will be submitted to Turn it in. The plagiarism percentage report should be less than
    20% to be accepted