Category: Nursing

  • “Case Study: Patient Care at Dogwood Village Assisted Living”

    The Rubric and Case Study Paper Template are attached. Can not use I or my
    I have to talk about the two patients I assisted in clinicals at Dogwood Village Assisted Living. Each patient has to be listed by initials. The first patient is B.B., a 75-year-old female patient who was admitted on 5/ 30/24 and diagnosed with Parkinson’s’, type 2 diabetes, and 
    acute respiratory failure.  The physician ordered a regular diet excluding sugar, and her 
    activity was one-person assistance with a gait belt. The treatments were blood sugar 
    checks on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, and notify us if you are less than 60 or higher than 400.  O2 had to be at 1 1/2 – 2 1/2 L at bedtime. Based on my observations, this patient appeared healthy and had no history of falls. The patient was oriented with time, place, and date.
    The second patient is L. J, an 87-year-old female admitted on 5/27/2024. Who
    was diagnosed with Lupus, chronic pain, and dementia.  Physicians’ orders were regular 
    diet activity, with a 1% assist. Based on my observations, besides the occasional mild headaches when overactive, the patient’s health was good. 

  • Title: “Oral Health for Adults: Maintaining a Healthy Smile” Introduction: Good oral hygiene is essential for maintaining overall health and well-being. While many people associate dental hygiene with children, it is equally important for adults to take care

    Please find the attached paediatric dental hygiene presentation. Do a simpar poster but make it about adults.
    Please put 400 words in the poster powerpoint and the 600 words as poster notes.
    Please use 10 uk references.
    Please find the attached fle to find the assignment specification to follow.

  • Title: The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice on Patient Outcomes in Nursing Care

    Format: APA Format
    Data Sources: Utilize reputable data sources such as CINAHL,
    MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalKey, and The Cochrane Library, accessible
    through the FNU.edu Library page. FNU Librarians are available for
    assistance in accessing scholarly content.
    Length: Research paper should be between 850-1000 words.
    Sources:
    Utilize 3 or more scholarly
    sources.
    Sources must be within the last
    5 years.
    Include a minimum of 3 sources.
    References: All cited article sources must be included in a
    separate reference sheet.
    Bottom of Form
    important no plagiarism.

  • Using Leadership Skills to Advocate for Social and Ecological Justice: A Reflection on the Sisters of Providence

    Read the following (from the Week 6 Required Readings):
    Center for Creative Leadership. (2020, March 31). The core leadership skills you need in every role. https://www.ccl.org/articles/leading-effectively-articles/fundamental-4-core-leadership-skills-for-every-career-stage/Links to an external site.
    Wellman, J. (2019, July 17). What if you don’t want to be a leader? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/ellevate/2019/07/17/what-if-you-dont-want-to-be-a-leader/?sh=3c00ff262745Links to an external site.
    George, T. (2021, August 26). What are credible sources & how to spot them: Examples. Scribbr. https://www.scribbr.com/working-with-sources/credible-sources/Links to an external site.
    See the Week 6 Sample Paper: Earth: Using Leadership Attributes to Advocate for Sustaining It. This is a paper written by a former student for this class.
    Review how the Sisters of Providence are affecting change through Environmental & Social Justice at https://spsmw.org/about/justice/Links to an external site.
    Select one of the following social or ecological justice issues that the Sisters of Providence support that is also relevant to you. You may select a different social or ecological topic; check with the instructor to ensure it is appropriate.
    Learn more about specific issues the Sisters of Providence have addressed at https://spsmw.org/about/justice/social-justice/Links to an external site.
    From fear to tranquility: Sister Dorothy Rasche and prison ministry. https://spsmw.org/2020/01/13/from-fear-to-tranquility-sister-dorothy-rasche-and-prison-ministryLinks to an external site./
    A lifetime of meeting needs around the world and in our own backyard: Sister Patty Fillenwarth. https://spsmw.org/2020/01/13/a-lifetime-of-meeting-needs-around-the-world-and-in-our-own-backyard-sister-patty-fillenwarth/Links to an external site.
    A journey to wider acceptance and love: Sister Tracey Horan and immigration.https://spsmw.org/2020/01/13/a-journey-to-wider-acceptance-and-love-sister-tracey-horan-and-immigration/Links to an external site.
    From farming to teaching to counseling to care of Earth: Sister Ann Sullivan’s story. https://spsmw.org/2020/01/13/from-farming-to-teaching-to-counseling-to-care-of-earth:-sister-ann-sullivan’s-story/Links to an external site.
    You can also learn more about social and ecological justice in HOPE Magazine at https://spsmw.org/2020/01/13/hope-winter-2020-the-needs-in-our-backyardsLinks to an external site./
    Title page. Include a title page using the APA Student Format information. For example, the paper’s title would not be Using Leadership Roles to Advocate for Social or Ecological Justice.
    Abstract. Not required.
    Introductory Paragraph. State the purpose of this paper. Then, summarize the main points to be addressed in the paper.
    Body/Discussion. 
    Briefly describe the social or ecological issue and state your rationale for selecting this issue.
    Why is this issue important to you and the Sisters of Providence?
    What does the research say about the issue? How did you evaluate your references as credible and scholarly?
    From the reading about leadership skills, state whether you are a leader, you are not ready to be a leader, or you do not want to be a leader, and explain.
    Select one leadership skill that you use now.
    How would you advocate for a solution to this issue using your leadership skill? How does your leadership skill compare with your selected Sister of Providence?
    Conclusion. Restate the main points of the presentation. Refrain from introducing new information.
    References. Cite at least three (3) scholarly and other references to support statements in proper APA style.
    Length of paper. 4-6 pages. Do not count the title page.

  • Title: Interest Groups and Their Influence on Policy Making: A Case Study of the Emergency Nurses Association

    The goal of this assignment is to familiarize students with interest groups. Please follow the steps below to complete your assignment.
    Select an interest group (AARP, AHIP, Coalition for Health Services Research, Emergency Nurses Association, Pharma)
    Discuss how they are pushing their agenda (i.e., mechanisms used to influence policy makers), key obstacles, and spending (consult the Center for Responsible Politics, www.opensecrets.org)
    Investigate the interest group’s website and review their position statements, testimony, and consult media reports to obtain more information on the group’s lobbying efforts.
    Submission Requirements:
    Presentation is original work and logically organized. Followed current APA format including citation of references.
    PowerPoint presentation with 5-8 slides were clear and easy to read. Speaker notes expanded upon and clarified content on the slides.
    Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
    Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style.
    Your presentation will be shared with class colleagues during the ZOOM meeting.

  • “Building a Culture of Professionalism and Civility in the Workplace” Part 2 Reflection After reviewing the course outcomes and module objectives, I am excited to learn more about how to create and sustain a culture of professionalism and civility in the

    Module 7Reflection
    Part 1
    Review the course outcomes and consider the module objectives. What do you hope to learn during this module of study?
    Course Outcomes
    CO 4: Discern the leadership competencies and practices essential for building and sustaining a culture of professionalism and civility to facilitate the change process. (POs 3, 4, 5)
    Module Objectives
    Examine the concept of incivility in the workplace. (CO 4)
    Discuss behaviors that create toxic and dysfunctional work environments. (CO 4)
    Explore strategies that support a culture of civility in healthful work environments. (CO 4)
    Evaluate leadership attributes and styles that contribute to a healthful work environment. (CO 4)

  • Title: “Patient Education for Ankle Fracture: Top 5 Points and Objective Documentation”

    1.
    Patient education is extremely important for a patient with a ankle fracture.
    What are your top 5 education points with the most important elements coming first.
    ·       Provide rationale for why points 1 and 2 are in these positions – this will require you to cite the information from an authoritative source.
    2.     Scenario:
    ·       June a 26 y/o female presents to the urgent care where you are one of the providers today. The MA reports to you June was hiking and tripped over a rock and states she rolled her left ankle. She is not able to bear weight on the left foot, she borrowed a friends crutches to get around and the ankle is pretty swollen with bruising present on the outer part of the ankle. The injury happened about 48 hrs ago. Pt pain is 7/10.  
    ·       PMH: Exercise induced asthma 
    ·       Allergies: PCN
    ·       Meds: Vit C,  Mens Multivitamin
    ·       Soc Hx:  Never smoked, 3-4 beers/wine on the weekend, occasional cannabis use, usually 1 joint maybe x1/month. Works as a barista and is in grad school now for Biochemistry.
    ·       What you see when you evaluate the left ankle:
    ·      
    ·       Question to answer: 
    ·       How would you as the provider document what you are seeing in the objective physical exam section of the patients chart?
    ·       ** Use professional terminology
    ·        

  • Title: Understanding Half-Life and Dosing of an FDA-Approved Psychiatric Medication

    Choose an FDA-approved medication currently used in psychiatry.
    Explain the concept of that drug’s half-life.
    How long would it take for that drug to reach a steady state?
    How frequently should the medicalion be dosed based on the half-life?
    APA style, 2 references. Use Epocrates.com as a reference for this question.

  • “Improving Caregiver Burden and Quality of Life for Family Caregivers of Terminally Ill Patients: A Synthesis of Evidence on the Effectiveness of Support Groups”

    A synthesis is a type of literature review in which you weigh the evidence and reach a single overall conclusion to answer your EBP question(Among family caregivers of terminally ill patients receiving hospice care does participation in a caregiver support group compared to no participation in a support group improve caregiver burden and quality of life) To do this you must (1) appraise each study (source of evidence) separately that you are referencing and evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of that evidence.  In that appraisal, make sure that you include pertinent details about the study (instruments used, analysis, findings) as well as the overall findings as they apply to your EBP question.  If there are additional findings, that don’t apply to your question, it is not necessary to include those findings. Then you must (2) compare and contrast the evidence across sources [or, “synthesize” the evidence] (e.g., “Five studies concluded that this intervention was beneficial.  One study did not support this conclusion because _____.  Possible reasons for this discrepancy include ____.”).  
    In your discussion and overall conclusion, it is important that you address gaps in the literature or any points of disagreement / discordance in findings across studies, and consider what might be contributing to those disparities.  Remember that this is a synthesis of evidence that you are considering for application to practice, so definitely include your judgment regarding that in your discussion.
    The paper should be set up in the standard format for a scholarly paper with (at the minimum) the following sections (use these as section headings): 
    Title Page with your name and appropriate information (not included in 10 page limit)
    Abstract (not included in 10-page limit). See APA manual for how to write an abstract.
    Introduction (brief, includes why this topic is a problem/issue/or needs to be addressed along with your EBP question)  The introduction should be no longer than 1 page.
    Methods Brief statements about the Search Strategies that you used [about 1 or 2 paragraphs].  Include the (at least 2) search engines and databases that you used, your search terms and any inclusion or exclusion criteria 
    Review of the literature (this is essentially your “findings”)
    Discussion of your findings
    Conclusion (Based on the evidence that you present, not your clinical experience or your opinion)
    Your References, APA Format (not included in the 10-page limit)
    Your Tables of Evidence and PRISMA flowchart [as an Appendix, not included in the 10-page limit) Remember that the table does not substitute for the review of the literature section.  You need to write a brief summary of each study in the review of the literature.
    The length of your paper depends on the topic and the amount of literature that is available.  If your paper becomes long, please reevaluate and see if you could be more concise in your writing.  You should be able to do this in NO MORE THAN 10 PAGES, not counting a cover page or the reference list.  The paper must be in APA format, including a running head with your name and the page number in it.  Submit your paper through the Safe Assignment link in this folder (Assignments >> Synthesis Paper >> Synthesis Paper Assignment green checkmark).
    Note:  The focus of an evidence synthesis is quite different from a research proposal, so do not confuse the two.  Your purpose in this paper is to analyze and synthesize whatever evidence is out there to answer your EBP question.  Think of this as laying out the support for your planned practice.
    Also, do maintain an objective stance and voice in your presentation of the problem/question and in your critique and synthesis of the evidence.  And remember to use a professional writing style much like the various papers that you are reviewing and critiquing. 

  • Criteria for Health History-IPR Assignment

    CRITERIA FOR HEALTH HISTORY-IPR ASSIGNMENT
    Introduction
    In NURS-142, students will learn to conduct a health history and develop therapeutic
    relationships with clients. Students will learn effective therapeutic communication techniques
    utilizing verbal and non-verbal language between in the nurse/client. Effective therapeutic
    communication is the beginning the nurse/client relationship.
    Guidelines
    Clinical faculty will assign a student a client in the Clinical Agency. The student will perform a
    complete health history on a client. Then based on the information obtained in the health history,
    the student will identify a goal/objective, and that will be the topic of discussion in the
    interaction. The interaction should be a minimum of fifteen (15) minutes. Five minutes of the
    conversation will be written verbatim in the form of an Interpersonal Process Recording (IPR).
    The interaction will require use of active listening, observation, and a good memory. Write the
    conversation as soon as possible to ensure accurate recording. You cannot write or record during
    the nurse/client interaction. You cannot write the client’s name. You can only use the
    client’s initials.
    Each part of this assignment must be typed in APA format. Computers are available for student
    use in the Nursing Study Lab (HS 266) or in the Open Computer Lab (CL180 or DH110).
    Grading
    This assignment will be graded as pass/fail. A passing grade is defined as 75% according to the
    grading criteria. Completion of the Health History/IPR assignment is a clinical requirement and
    must be submitted to clinical faculty on the designated due date. Good grammar is required.