Category: Nursing

Build a slide presentation (PowerPoint preferred) of the
hypothetical health promotion plan you developed in the first assessment
(please see the attached paper). Then, implement your health promotion plan by
conducting a hypothetical face-to-face educational session addressing the
health concerns and health goals of your selected group. How would you set
goals for the session(Use the SMART method), evaluate session outcomes, and
suggest possible revisions to improve future sessions?
Introduction:
This assessment provides an opportunity for you to apply
teaching and learning concepts to the presentation of a health promotion plan.
Note: This is the second part of a two-part assessment. You
must complete Assessment 1 before completing this assessment.
For
this assessment, you will conclude the clinical learning activity you began in
Assessment 1 (see the attached paper).
You
will resume the role of a community nurse tasked with addressing the specific
health concern in your community. This time, you will present, via educational
outreach, the hypothetical health promotion plan you developed in Assessment 1
to your fictitious audience. In this hypothetical scenario, you will simulate
the presentation as though it would be live and face-to-face. You must
determine an effective teaching strategy, communicate the plan with
professionalism and cultural sensitivity, evaluate the objectives of the plan,
revise the plan as applicable, and propose improvement for future educational
sessions. To engage your audience, you decide to develop a PowerPoint
presentation with voice-over and speaker notes to communicate your plan.
Instruction:
Complete the following:
·       
Prepare a 10–12 slide
PowerPoint presentation with detailed speaker notes that reflects your
hypothetical presentation. This presentation is the implementation of the plan
you created in Assessment 1. The speaker notes should be well organized. Be
sure to include a transcript. The transcript can be submitted on a separate
Word document.
·       
Simulate the
hypothetical face-to-face educational session addressing the health concern (Obesity)
and health goals of your selected community individual or group.
·       
Imagine collaborating
with the hypothetical participant(s) in setting goals for the session,
evaluating session outcomes, and suggesting possible revisions to improve
future sessions.
Presentation Format and Length
You may use Microsoft PowerPoint (preferred) or other
suitable presentation software to create your presentation. If you elect to use
an application other than PowerPoint, check with your faculty to avoid
potential file compatibility issues.
The number of content slides in your presentation is
dictated by the nature and scope of your health promotion plan. Be sure to
include title and references slides per the following:
·       
Title slide:
o  
Health promotion plan
title.
o  
Your name.
o  
Date.
o  
Course number and title.
·       
References (at the end
of your presentation).
o  
Be sure to apply correct
APA formatting to your references.
Supporting Evidence
Support your plan with at least three professional or
scholarly references, published within the last 5 years, which may
include peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030
resources.
Graded Requirements
The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading
criteria in the assessment scoring guide, so be sure to address each point.
Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work
will be assessed.
·       
Present your health
promotion plan to your hypothetical audience.
o  
Tailor the presentation
to the needs of your hypothetical audience.
o  
Adhere to scholarly and
disciplinary writing standards and APA formatting requirements.
·       
Evaluate educational
session outcomes and the attainment of agreed-upon health goals in
collaboration with participants.
o  
Which aspects of the
session would you change?
o  
How might those changes
improve future outcomes?
·       
Evaluate educational
session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030
objectives and leading health indicators.
o  
What changes would you
recommend to better align the session with Healthy People 2030 objectives and
leading health indicators?
·       
Organize content with
clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published
within 5 years).
·       
Slides are easy to read
and error free. Detailed audio and speaker notes are provided. Audio is clear,
organized, and professionally presented.
Context:
Health education is any combination of learning experiences designed
to help community individuals, families, and aggregates improve their health by
increasing knowledge or influencing attitudes (WHO, n.d.). Education is key to
health promotion, disease prevention, and disaster preparedness. The health
indicator framework identified in Healthy People 2030 prompts action in health
services accessibility, clinical preventive services, environmental quality,
injury or violence prevention, maternal, infant, and child health, mental
health, nutrition, substance abuse prevention, and tobacco use cessation or
prevention.
Nurses provide accurate evidence-based information and
education in formal and informal settings. They draw upon evidence-based
practice to provide health promotion and disease prevention activities to
create social and physical environments conducive to improving and maintaining
community health. When provided with the tools to be successful, people
demonstrate lifestyle changes (self-care) that promote health and help reduce
readmissions. They are better able to tolerate stressors, including environmental
changes, and enjoy a better quality of life. In times of crisis, a resilient
community is a safer community (Flanders, 2018; Healthy People 2030, n.d.).
Competency Measure:
By successfully completing this assessment, you will
demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring
guide criteria:
·       
Competency 3: Evaluate
health policies, based on their ability to achieve desired outcomes.
o  
Evaluate educational
session outcomes in terms of progress made toward Healthy People 2030
objectives and leading health indicators.
·       
Competency 4: Integrate
principles of social justice in community health interventions.
o  
Evaluate educational
session outcomes and the attainment of agreed-upon health goals in
collaboration with hypothetical participants.
·       
Competency 5: Apply
professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead health promotion and
improve population health.
o  
Present a health
promotion plan to a hypothetical individual or a group within a community.
o  
Organize content with
clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published
within 5 years).
o  
Slides are easy to read
and error free. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided.
Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.
·       
Competency 5: Apply
professional, scholarly communication to facilitate use of health information
and patient care technologies.
o  
Deliver a professional,
effective audio tutorial on a selected quality indicator that engages new
nurses and motivates them to accurately report quality data in a timely
fashion.
o  
Follow APA style and
formatting guidelines for citations and references.
Very Important!!
·       
Presents a professional, evidence-based, and
engaging PowerPoint presentation. The plan is based on specific, identified
health needs and goals, and is well supported by error-free slides that enhance
key points and adhere to visual design best practices. The audio and speaker
notes of the details of the educational session were clear and appropriate for
the hypothetical audience.
·       
Evaluates educational session outcomes and the
attainment of agreed-upon health goals in collaboration with hypothetical
participants. Clearly explains the need for revisions to future educational
sessions.
·       
Evaluates educational session outcomes in terms
of progress made toward Healthy People 2030 objectives and leading health
indicators. Clearly explains the need for revisions to better align future
sessions with Healthy People 2030 objectives.
·       
Organizes content with clear purpose/goals.
Power point slides support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or
recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5
years).
·       
Slides are easy to read and clutter free. Slide
background is “visually” pleasing with a contrasting color for the text and may
utilize graphics. Detailed audio, transcript, and speaker notes are provided.
Audio is clear, organized, and professionally presented.
All sources will be checked so they need to be free and must
have the link in the reference page.  NO
AI generated work! NO Plagiarism! 

1. analyze the root cause of patient identification error in the hospital.
2. applly evidence based and best practice strategies to address issue.
3. create a evidence based plan for improvement.
4. Identifiy organizaitonal resources that could be leveraged to improve plan. 
APA 7th 
3 sources within 5 years 

The Clinical Problem that Needs an Answer
Although the Literature Review assignment is not due for a few weeks, I would like you to start asking questions that you might like to have answered through reviews of the available research.
Thinking about your practice, what is THE question in your clinical setting would most like to have your answer? Please talk with your supervisor or colleagues to get some ideas about what your agency considers most important. What do you think that agency would MOST like to answer? Instructions:
From practice, develop and share a clinical problem (question) in your clinical practice that needs an answer.
Title the discussion with the specific problem.
Initial post: Your post should be within a range of 75-150 words (Think about a Twitter post).
The initial post is due Wednesday at midnight. Think about what makes the problem (question) important. Use studies or examples to substantiate your claims.
What is the current practice?
What is the focus of the problem (clinical, educational, administrative)?
How was the problem identified (safety, risk, injury, quality improvement). Peer response: Identify two (2) students that may share the same interest. Welcome them to the course and make a meaningful comment on their questions. Cite your references APA 7th ed. (not included in the length of the post). I look forward to reading your questions!!
To see rubric, click on the 3-dot menu 3-dot Menu on the top-right side of screen.

Module 1: Overview
Page
Module 1: Required and Recommended Readings
Page
Module 1: Edwards Deming System of Profound Knowledge
Page
Module 1: Organizational Culture
Page
Module 1: High Reliability Organization
Page
Module 1: Magnet Designation, CMS Conditions of Participation and Price Transparency
chapter 8: Thomas, P. (2022). Organization evaluation frameworks for systems change. In Hall, & Roussel (Eds.), Evidenced-based practice: An integrative approach to research, administration, and practice (3rd ed., pp.167-185). Jones and Bartlett.
Complexity Leadership Constructing 21st-Century Health Care:   Porter O’Grady 2020.pdfDownload Porter O’Grady 2020.pdf
Culture:  Schein 2021.pdf Download Schein 2021.pdf   Focus on page 296 for a description of the theory evolution and pages 298 to 300 for the section on DEI
Recommended Resources
The recommended readings are strongly encouraged to broaden your understanding of key concepts relative to organizational science and change theory. 
Complexity Science
Warshawsky N (2020) A complexity informed model to guide nurse manager practice Nursing Administration Quarterly 44 (3), 198-204.pdfDownload Warshawsky N (2020) A complexity informed model to guide nurse manager practice Nursing Administration Quarterly 44 (3), 198-204.pdf
Clinical Microsystems_Part 1_The building blocks of Health Systems(3).pdfDownload Clinical Microsystems_Part 1_The building blocks of Health Systems(3).pdf
2008 Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Nelson et al.
Culture of Safety
IHI Framework Safe Reliable Effective Care White Paper 2017(1).pdfDownload IHI Framework Safe Reliable Effective Care White Paper 2017(1).pdf
Frankel A, Haraden C, Federico F, Lenoci-Edwards J. A Framework for Safe, Reliable, and Effective Care. White Paper. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement and Safe & Reliable Healthcare; 2017. White Paper
Leadership
Kaiser-2017-Journal_of_Nursing_Management.pdfDownload Kaiser-2017-Journal_of_Nursing_Management.pdf
Change Theory
Learn the importance of change theory as the underpinning of healthcare transformation.
Application of Kotter’s Change Theory 2017 Download Application of Kotter’s Change Theory 2017  
A Case Review Integrating Lewin’s Theory with Lean’s System Approach for Change 2016 Download A Case Review Integrating Lewin’s Theory with Lean’s System Approach for Change 2016  
What does the culture influence on change look like?  
Read this article from Dr. Landstrom describing the application of Schein’s theory to a plan for change: 
Landstrom.pdf Download Landstrom.pdf  
Landstrom, G. (2019). Interprofessional Practice: Just a trend or worthy of investment? Nurse Leader, 17(3), 220–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2019.03.004Links to an external site.
SABC News. (2013, October 28). Humble inquiry: The gentle art of asking instead of telling [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TI2V5pWI9yg&t=87s
Schein Humble Inquiry Book ExcerptDownload Schein Humble Inquiry Book Excerpt
Schein, E. (2013). Humble Inquiry. Reflections, 13(2), 1–9. https://www.solonline.org/Links to an external site.
Keynote
High Reliability Organizations
High reliability organizations (HRO) are safety oriented focusing on system improvement rather than individual improvement. Processes are dependable, meaning one sees the same outcomes with limited variability.  An example of minimal variability would be when patients’ wait times are 10 minutes on the average with a range between 5-15 minutes. So let’s take a quick look at what a HRO looks like.
High Reliability Organizations are Learning Organizations! 
watch on you tube

Create a PowerPoint presentation (a maximum of 20 slides with detailed speaker notes) for senior leadership in which four organizational leaders analyze the impact of a health care organization’s new safety and quality dashboard.

For this assessment, you will create an 8-12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more stakeholder or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in for the plan proposal you developed for the third assessment.

**** 4-6 articles within the last 10 years!
Touchstones are projects that illustrate your comprehension of the course material, help you refine skills, and demonstrate application of knowledge. You can work on a Touchstone anytime, but you must pass your Milestone before you submit it. Once you’ve submitted a Touchstone, it will be graded and counted toward your final course score.
This Touchstone provides an opportunity for you to practice developing a research plan for a real world topic that interests you. Throughout this course you will read about the results and conclusions of many different sociological studies; this Touchstone is where you can practice the skills of conducting such a study. You will use the materials you develop for this Touchstone for a later Touchstone.
This Touchstone will further strengthen your problem solving skill, while reinforcing the content from the lesson. You will analyze your research topic of choice, while applying the problem solving skills from the unit. By considering the dynamics of community groups, you will also strengthen your relationship building and self and social awareness skills.
Touchstone 1: Developing a Research Plan
SCENARIO: Imagine that you work for a nonprofit organization that is focused on increasing diversity in community groups in your area. Your supervisor asks you to develop a sociological study concerning topics of diversity and collaboration in a specific community group of your choice. Eventually, you will prepare to share your research with colleagues.
ASSIGNMENT: For Touchstone 1, you will begin by formulating a question about diversity in a community group that you have access to. Then you will use the steps of the scientific method to prepare a research plan, including a bibliography for a literature review. As you learned, sociologists follow the scientific method so that their results are both scientifically valid and useful to the greater sociological community. A literature review allows researchers to learn from completed studies and to build upon their conclusions. 
HINT
For Touchstone 3 which will be completed later in Unit 3, you must incorporate your selected community group and research question from Touchstone 1 to conduct a literature review and develop your hypothesis and research plan.
Use the following Touchstone 1 template to fill in your research plan as you develop it. When you have finished, submit this template to move on to the next unit.
Touchstone 1 Template
Touchstone 1 Sample
In order to foster learning and growth, all work you submit must be newly written specifically for this course. Any plagiarized or recycled work will result in a Plagiarism Detected alert. Review Touchstones: Academic Integrity Guidelines for more about plagiarism and the Plagiarism Detected alert. For guidance on the use of generative AI technology, review Ethical Standards and Appropriate Use of AI.
A. Directions
Step 1: Pick a Topic
Select a community group to study. Some examples of community groups you might explore include: 
An activity-based group like a book club, a soccer team, or a community choir
A religious or ideological community such as a church congregation or a local political party
A community organization like a Parent Teacher Association (PTA), a neighborhood association, or the volunteer committee at a local soup kitchen
An identity-based organization such as a social club for veterans or a fraternal type organization
It should be a group in which membership is voluntary and recreational. 
Avoid the following:
Families
Workplaces
Ethnic or racial categories
Friend groups 
You might wish to choose a group that you are a part of, or you might not. You can use your personal experience with the group to form the basis of your research question. Or you can ask members of the group about their experiences, which will help you develop your research question.
In the template, write a paragraph (approximately 6-8 sentences) describing the community group you have chosen. In particular, be sure to answer the following questions:
What is the community group?
What are the attributes or characteristics of this community group? (e.g. What activities does this group do together? What element of the members’ interests or identities brings them together? How is membership in the group defined, if at all?)
What kind of experience with or access to this community group do you have?
HINT
You will use this same topic in Touchstone 3 when you present your research plan.
Step 2: Ask a Question
Next, you will formulate a question related to this group, and to topics related to diversity and/or collaboration. You might think about diversity in terms of race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality, religion, socioeconomic status, or along multiple intersecting identities. Be sure to use what you learned in Unit 1 about the ways sociologists ask questions.
Examples:
What are the challenges of a mom’s community organization in appealing to moms with children of different ages?
How does a group of car enthusiasts reach out to the surrounding community to get support for their events?
How has the Boy Scouts accepting girls impacted their mission and programs?
Do gender segregated sports teams for kids help maintain traditional gender roles?
In the template, write the question you have formulated for your study. Be sure to identify the Independent and Dependent variables and identify them correctly.  (HINT: Refer back to Lesson 1.3.3: Asking Questionsand Lesson 1.3.5: Formulating a Hypothesis for help.)
Step 3: Prepare a Bibliography
Finally, you will begin developing a bibliography for a review of the existing literature that relates to your question. Before conducting a full literature review, a sociologist will build a bibliography, or a list of potential sources that they will read and study in greater depth in the review.
Collect 4-6 articles, books, or other resources that relate to your question and list them in your template. You don’t have to look into these materials in depth right now! You’ll review this literature more closely in Touchstone 3, and you will also be exposed to additional relevant research and frameworks in Unit 3. You’ll also be able to add to or amend your bibliography before you submit Touchstone 3 in Unit 3.
Attributes of good readings for your literature review:
They are academic, scholarly works about research findings or they are reliable journalistic reporting based on scientifically credible and reliable data.
They should have been published in the last 10 years—unless they are a landmark work on the topic and provide important background or as a comparison. 
They look at different sides of the argument and a variety of perspectives.
They do not have to be written by sociologists or published in sociology journals, but they should be academic and not popular works.
Where to find readings:
More than likely you will use a major search engine like Google Scholar. Start your search by identifying key search terms related to your research question, to generate relevant results.  Google Scholar specifically searches scholarly literature. However, keep in mind that much of this literature may have limited or paid access. Another good place to search is in a public library or university library catalog or database. You might also want to try regular Google, but you will have to be careful to screen your results and make sure you only select academic sources. Whichever way you choose to search, make sure that you are selecting credible sources. 
What makes a source credible?
Credible sources are written by authors who are well known in their field. They are based on scientific data—not opinions or with biased observations. Sources should be from reliable outlets, like major publishers, universities, think tanks, and credentialed current practitioners. (HINT: Refer back to Lesson 1.3.4: Researching Existing Sources for more guidance.)
How to format sources in your bibliography:
Sociologists use American Psychological Association (APA) format for their research. However, you will use a more simplified method to format sources for your bibliography. You will include five key elements for each source, with each element separated by a period:
Author’s name(s)
Publisher and publication date
Title of the source, in quotation marks
Page numbers (if applicable)
Source’s location for web-based texts (URL)
EXAMPLE
Alireza Behtoui. Journal of Sociology, 2015. “Beyond social ties: The impact of social capital on labour market outcomes for young Swedish people.” p. 711-724. journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1440783315581217
Refer to the checklist below throughout the writing process. Do not submit your Touchstone until it meets these guidelines.
1. Identify Community Group
❒ Have you identified and described a voluntary, recreational community group?
❒ Have you provided group attributes/characteristics of this group?
❒ Have you discussed your experience with or access to this group?
2. Research Question
❒ Have you selected a research question that is sufficiently specific to be researchable while tying in to broader themes in sociology?
❒ Have you clearly identified independent and dependent variables?
❒ Are your independent and dependent variables in the correct relationship?
3. Bibliography
❒ Have you provided 4-6 credible, relevant, recent, and properly cited sources? 
❒ Did you properly format these sources and include the five key elements for each source, with each element separated by a period:
Author’s name(s)
Publisher and publication date
Title of the source, in quotation marks
Page numbers (if applicable)
Source’s location for web-based texts (URL)
4. Conventions
❒ Have you proofread your essay for grammatical and mechanical errors?
❒ Have you used spell check or another method to check spelling?
5. Before You Submit
❒ Have you included your name and date at the top left of the page?
B. Rubric
Advanced (100%) Proficient (85%) Acceptable (75%) Needs Improvement (50%) Non-Performance (0%)
Identify Community Group (15 points)
Paragraph is well developed and answers all parts of the question.
A voluntary, recreational community group is identified and described thoroughly. Group attributes/characteristics and discussion of the student’s experience with or access to this group is provided. A voluntary, recreational community group is identified and described, with some gaps remaining. Group attributes/characteristics and discussion of the student’s experience with or access to this group is provided. A voluntary, recreational community group is identified and described insufficiently. Student discusses group attributes/characteristics or their experience with or access to this group, but not both. An inappropriate community group is identified or community group is described insufficiently. Group attributes/ characteristics and discussion of the student’s experience with or access to this group may not be provided. Did not submit a response or submitted so little work that no credit can be given.
Research Question (15 points)
Research question is well crafted.
Research question is sufficiently specific to be researchable while tying in to broader themes in sociology. Independent and dependent variables are clearly identified and are in the correct relationship. Research question is sufficiently specific for research but does not tie in to broader themes in sociology. Independent and dependent variables are clearly identified but are not in the correct relationship. Research question is too specific or too broad for research purposes, but can be revised. The relationship between the dependent and independent variables is unclear.  Research question demonstrates little understanding of the general principles of developing a research question. Did not submit a research question or submitted so little work that no credit can be given.
Bibliography (15 points)
Sources appropriate for a sociological literature review are identified. 
4-6 credible, relevant, recent, and properly cited sources are provided.  4-6 relevant and properly cited sources are provided, but may be less credible or recent. 3 relevant and properly cited sources are provided.  1-2 relevant and properly cited sources are provided.  Did not submit any credible, relevant, recent, and properly cited sources.
Conventions (5 points)
Submission follows conventions for standard written English and meets requirements. 
There are almost no errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization; all length and formatting requirements are met. There are minor errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that do not impede readability; length and formatting requirements are nearly met. There are frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that somewhat impede readability; length and formatting requirements are nearly met. There are consistent errors in grammar, punctuation, spelling, and capitalization that significantly impede readability; length and formatting requirements are not met. Submission does not meet the minimum threshold for points to be awarded.
C. Requirements
The following requirements must be met for your submission:
Use a readable 11- or 12-point font.
All writing must be appropriate for an academic context.
Composition must be original and written for this assignment.
Plagiarism of any kind is strictly prohibited.
Submission must include your name and the date.
Include all of the assignment components in a single file.
Acceptable file formats include .doc and .docx.

1Introduction
2. Define and discuss the APRN Guidance and Coaching competencies ( 1.5 -2pages)
3. APRN Guidance and Coaching Competencies ( 2-3 pages) 
Select name , and incorporate a theory that resonates with you relative to how best to guide your approach to the care of a patient ( i.e 
, with new onset disease) when employing the APRN  Guidance and Coaching in practice.  Be careful to address both Guidance and Coaching Competencies separately. 
Consider how other ARPN Core Competencies ( i.e., leadership,  evidence-based practice , ethics ,etc) and APRN characteristics ( i.e., Use of holistic care Use of reflective practice) might also be applied during your discussion with patients and families. 
Conclusion:
Write a thoughtful,  well-developed conclusion that addresses how APRN s who consistently perform these core Competencies,  especially Guidance and Coaching , could positively impact elements of the Quintuple Aim, over time.
Do your best to incorporate as many elements of the Quintuple Aim that are appropriate for your discussion. 
The paper should be 4-5 pages in length and adhere to APA guidelines ( title pages, headers, reference page required.) References should not be older than 5 years unless it is considered semina work.  APA 7th edition is required.  A minimum of 4 scholarly reference will be used to support with evidence

Plz help to provide a reflection of the patient I cared using simulation, you will find all informations related to this patient and the template to use for the reflection in attachment.

*Hi, I need someone to edit a PPT that has already been completed based on the feedback below. The PPT will be provided to you once you are selected to work on the question. Also, the chosen topic is schizophrenia.
Feedback:
There is currently only slide (slide 3) dedicated to the following prompt when there should be at least 2 slides: “What is the cognitive/mental health disease?: at least 2 slides.”
For the: “Interdisciplinary interventions: at least 3 slides,” prompt there needs to be at least 75 words in each slide note section for slides 12-14
The following prompt has not been addressed: “Discuss the impact of a patient’s value systems on management of this disease.”
The following prompt has not been addressed: “Impact of pain and the sick role.”
For the following prompt: “Identify any challenges such as learning styles, autonomy, educational preparation, or disease management: at least 3 slides,” there is only 1 slide dedicate to this section (slide 19) when there needs to be at least 3.
Some slides not have an image when they all are supposed to since the instructions state: “Please be sure to include a background and at least one image on each ppt slide whether its a photograph, statistic, graph, document etc.”
There needs to be at least 4 scholarly sources published within the last 5 years. 2 out of the four sources currently are not scholalry. In order to qualify as a scholarly source the source must be peer-reviewed journal. The sources copied and pasted below need to be either be changed or there needs to be two additional scholalry sources published within the last 5 years added to the ppt references list.
Thomas, K. A., Quittner, A. W., & Messmore, C. P. (2023). In 1952, over 70 years ago, the initial publication of the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) was released. Since that time, it has undergone several revisions; the most recent edition is the fifth edition, text revi-sion (DSM-5-TR®; APA, 2022), which was released in March, 2022. However, there were no significant changes to the diagnostic classification of elimination disorders from the DSM-5 (APA, 2013) to the DSM-5-TR. DSM-5-TR® and Family Systems, 305.
World Health Organization. (2022). Schizophrenia. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/schizophrenia
There needs to be at least one in-text citation on each slide or in each slide note section since the instructions state: “include at least one in-text citation on each slide” and “Support your content with in-text citations throughout your presentation.”
When you are finished with the edits, the ppt should be 15-20 slides (not including title, objectives, and references slides) With at Least 75 Words of Speaker Notes per body slide.
I have copied and pasted the instructions below so that you know what the assignment is all about and can double-check to make sure all of the requirements have been met in the final version of the ppt:
Please provide an answer that is 100% original and do not copy the answer to this question from any other website since I am already well aware of this. I will be sure to check this.
Please be sure that the answer comes up with way less than 18% on Studypool’s internal plagiarism checker since anything above this is not acceptable according to Studypool’s standards. I will not accept answers that are above this standard.
No AI or Chatbot! I will be sure to check this.
BSN375 Hallmark Assignment Introduction
Introduction
For this assignment, you will examine the role of the nurse in caring for clients with cognitive and/or mental health issues. You will identify your target audience (such as staff nurses, pre-licensure nursing students, etc.) and create an educational PowerPoint presentation (instructions below). This final assignment will reflect ability and achievement in the following areas:
Intentional Learning, Reflection, and Clinical Judgment
Decision Making and Evidence Based Practice
Organization and Presentation
Writing and APA Formatting
Objectives
Demonstrate collaborative standardization of safe practices through health promotion.
Integrate course concepts within management of a cognitive alteration.
Instructions
You are the nurse educator preparing an orientation on cognitive or mental health illness. There is a need to address the many clients with cognitive issues that seek healthcare services and how to better understand their needs. Choose a cognitive/mental health illness (schizophrenia) that you feel less knowledgeable about and address the following prompts by including two to three examples of each bullet point:
Choose a cognitive or mental health illness (schizophrenia).What is it? How is it diagnosed? How is it treated?
How does it differ from a physical or “visible” illness?
Address the following for your chosen diagnosis.Historical
Socioeconomic impact
Political issues or impact
Educational needs
Topographical findings
Geographical impact
Cultural impact
Include interdisciplinary interventions for this disease.
Discuss the impact of a patient’s value systems on management of this disease.
Address the following health-care practices:Acute versus preventive care
Barriers to health care
Impact of pain and the sick role
Cultural practices
Identify challenges related to:Learning styles
Autonomy
Educational preparation
Disease management
Your presentation should be 15-20 slides (not including title, objectives, and references slides) with detailed presenter notes with in-text citations for each slide with at Least 75 Words of Speaker Notes on Each Body Slide. Include at least four (4) scholarly sources published within the last 5 years. Follow best practices for PowerPoint presentations related to text size, color, images, effects, wordiness, and multimedia enhancements. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment. Audio recording is required. Be sure to completely answer all the prompts/questions. Use clear headings that allow your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the slides in your presentation. Support your content with in-text citations throughout your presentation. Make sure to reference the citations using the APA 7th Edition writing style for the presentation. Include at least one slide for your references at the end.
Assignment Expectations
Length: 15-20 slides; answers must thoroughly address the questions in a clear, concise manner. Include at least four (4) scholarly sources. Below is a recommended breakdown for the assignment.Title: 1 slide
Objectives/Introduction: 1 slide
What is the cognitive/mental health disease?: at least 2 slides
Address historical, socioeconomic, political issues, educational needs, topographical findings, geographical impact, and cultural impact: at least 4 slides
Interdisciplinary interventions: at least 3 slides
Address health care practices: at least 4 slides
Identify any challenges such as learning styles, autonomy, educational preparation, or disease management: at least 3 slides
Conclusion: 1 slide
References: 1 slide
Audio recording narration
How to create an APA 7th edition formatted PowerPoint presentation:
In-text citations are required just as with any professional writing.
Utilize detailed presenter’s notes.To open presenter’s notes, click on ‘notes’ in the bottom right-hand corner of PowerPoint.
Detailed presenter’s notes should be a minimum of 75 words per body slide.
These notes will help guide you during the audio recording.
Tips for formatting your presentation, adding slides, and applying APA 7th edition format can be foundhere.
Late submissions will receive 0 points! The hallmark assignment is due at the end of week 14 at 11:59pm.
15-20 slides (not including title, objectives, and references slides) With at Least 75 Words of Speaker Notes on Each Body Slide
Be sure to include an introduction with a clear thesis statement along with a conclusion
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation on each slide
Please be sure to include title, conclusion, and reference slides in the ppt
Please be sure to include a background and at least one image on each ppt slide whether its a photograph, statistic, graph, document etc.
Please use the 5×5 rule for the ppt slides
Requirements: Edit the completed ppt based on the feedback given to ensure that the final revised version meets all of the requirements listed APA format