Please use the screenshots or an outside resource to help write a brief description about what you learned.
Category: Nursing
-
Title: Addressing Dating Violence: A Case Study and Interventions for Vulnerable Populations
Case Study, Date Violence
Dating violence is a serious public health problem in the United States. It can have a negative effect on both mental and physical health throughout a victim’s life. Teens who are victims of dating abuse (emotional, physical, and sexual) are more likely to do poorly in school. Anger and/or stress that dating abuse victims feel may lead to eating disorders (overweight or underweight), depression, and participation in unhealthy behaviors, such as drug and alcohol use. Some teens may even consider or attempt suicide. As you consider the problem presented in the case study, reflect on other related concerns that impact the well-being of vulnerable populations.
Case
Christina is a 17-year-old high school senior. She and her boyfriend Jake have been dating for 6 months. Jake gave Christina a cell phone for her birthday last month; he calls or texts her constantly. At first, she was flattered by Jake’s attention and thought it was romantic. He never leaves her alone when they are out with others, and he becomes angry with her when she goes out alone with friends. Christina is concerned and remembers a school program on teen dating abuse. Christina visits the school nurse and describes her relationship with Jake. The nurse does a physical and mental assessment.
Questions
Discuss the questions the nurse should ask during the initial and subsequent encounters with Christina.
Discuss interventions the nurse could use at the primary, secondary, and tertiary level of intervention.
Discuss collaborative community-based initiatives that will address safety related to abuse. -
Title: Elder Abuse Assessment and Care Plan
As an indirect practice experience you will meet these objectives:
Identify the potential or actual signs of elder abuse
Analyze the findings to determine the type(s) of abuse found.
Develop a comprehensive, evidenced-based care plan for the elder client including all needed care and referrals.
INSTRUCTIONS
1. Read the Required Readings for Module 2.
2. Open a copy of the EAI tool
attached.
3. Read the case study above.
4. Complete the Elder Assessment Instrument (EAI) based on the findings presented in this case study. EAI tool in the link above is a word document that you can complete online. Information including the reference about the tool is found on the bottom of the tool.
5. Summarize your findings from the EAI and identify the next steps related to the care. Use the Elder Mistreatment template above to help you structure this paper.
You are the assessing nurse, develop a comprehensive nursing plan of care:
including all pertinent nursing care
legal reporting actions if needed
explain your clinical reasoning related to the plan of care and provide a rationale for your actions and responses using evidence-based practice guidelines found in readings and/or literature. -
Title: Management of COPD in a 72-Year-Old Male with Persistent Cough and Hemoptysis 1) Additional subjective information that should be asked of the patient includes the duration and frequency of his cough, any changes in the character
A 72-year-old male presents to the clinic with 4 weeks of productive cough. He has a 10-year history of diagnosed COPD. He has a 45-year history of two packs a day cigarette smoking. He states he quit smoking due to financial needs about 6 years ago. He complains of pain in his chest from coughing, saying it is sore. He has noticed some dark-colored blood on his tissue.
Vital Signs: BP 137/90; HR 82; RR 22; BMI 23. Chief Complaint: Persistent cough won’t go away with my normal cough medicine. Noticed blood on tissue from coughing.
Discuss the following:
1) What additional subjective information will you be asking of the patient?
2) What additional objective findings would you be examining the patient for?
3) What are the differential diagnoses that you are considering?
4) What radiological examinations or additional diagnostic studies would you order?
5) What treatment and specific information about the prescription will you give this patient?
6) What are the potential complications from the treatment ordered?
7) What additional laboratory tests might you consider ordering?
8) Will you be looking for a consult?
Submission Instructions: The post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style 7 with support from at least 2 academic sources within last 5 years. -
“An Analysis and Evaluation of the Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms: Incorporating Writing Lab Feedback” An Analysis and Evaluation of the Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms: Incorporating Writing Lab Feedback Introduction The Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms (TOUS) is
Please read and implement the writing labs feedback.
Original paper rubric and instructions
In week 1, you completed the below reading and submitted the draft of this paper to the South Writing Center. During Week 2, the Writing Center sent you feedback. You will upload 1) your South Writing Lab Feedback (the one that was emailed to you with track changes) and 2) a final draft of the paper (with all changes made per the Writing Center feedback) to the dropbox so that we can see that you incorporated the recommended changes in your final paper: Read the attached article, An Analysis and Evaluation of the Theory of Unpleasant SymptomsDownload An Analysis and Evaluation of the Theory of Unpleasant Symptoms
Consider all 19 questions and answer the bolded questions in your paper (#1, #15, #16, #19): What is the purpose of the theory?
What is the scope of the theory?
What were the origins of the theory?
What are the major concepts?
What are the theoretical propositions?
What are the major assumptions?
What is the context for use?
Are the concepts theoretically and operationally defined? Why or why not?
Are statements defined? Why or why not?
Are linkages explicit? Explain your answer.
Is the theory logically organized? Explain your answer.
Is there a model/diagram? Why or why not?
Are the concepts, statements, and assumptions consistent? Why or why not?
Are outcomes or consequences stated or predicted?
Is the theory congruent with current nursing standards? Nursing interventions?
Has the theory been tested? Is it supported by research? Explain your answer.
Is there evidence that the theory has been used? Is it socially or culturally relevant? Explain your answer.
Does the theory contribute to nursing? What are the implications for nursing related to the implementation of the theory?
How would you use the theory in a research study or in practice?
Requirements You are required to submit 2 files for this assignment. You will upload:
Your South Writing Lab Feedback (the one that was emailed to you) and
A final draft of the paper (with all changes made per the Writing Center feedback) to the dropbox. This assignment needs to be submitted following APA format (title page, headings, reference page, etc.). Citations from References that are synthesized from the assigned article, course text, evidence-based and peer-reviewed research articles, and other credible sources are required. A minimum of 3 resources are used. References must be current within 5 years, with the exception of the assigned article from 2017. This assignment will be submitted below through Canvas and automatically run through TurnItIn. Course faculty monitor for the compliance of citations with Turnitin evaluation of the assignment during the course session. Please click here for more information on TurnItIn
NOTE: Evidence of plagiarism will result in a score of 0 for this assignment. Repeat offenses of plagiarism will result in more significant repercussions per the South College student handbook. Evaluation: The following rubric will be used to score this assignment. -
“Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in Healthcare: A Case Study Analysis and Solution” “Balancing Autonomy and Professional Responsibilities in Genetic Testing: A Case Study Analysis”
Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional by applying ethical principles. Describe the issues and a possible solution in a paper of 3-5 pages.
Expand All
Introduction
Whether you are a nurse, a public health professional, a health care administrator, or in another role in the health care field, you must base your decisions on a set of ethical principles and values. Your decisions must be fair, equitable, and defensible. Each discipline has established a professional code of ethics to guide ethical behavior. In this assessment, you will practice working through an ethical dilemma as described in a case study. Your practice will help you develop a method for formulating ethical decisions.
Instructions
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
For this assessment, develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional. In your assessment:
Select one of the case studies presented in the Assessment 03 (will attach the case study at the bottom)
Note: The case study may not supply all of the information you need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any assumptions or speculations you make.
Summarize the facts in the selected case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it.
Identify which case study you selected and briefly summarize the facts surrounding it. Identify the problem or issue that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that dilemma or challenge.
Identify who is involved or affected by the ethical problem or issue.
Access the Ethical Decision-Making Model media piece and use the three components of the ethical decision-making model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) to analyze the ethical issues.
Apply the three components outlined in the Ethical Decision-Making Model media.
Analyze the factors that contributed to the ethical problem or issue identified in the case study.
Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or issue and explain how they contributed.
Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case.
In addition to the readings provided, use the Capella library to locate at least one academic peer-reviewed journal article relevant to the problem or issue that you can use to support your analysis of the situation. The NHS-FPX4000: Developing a Health Care Perspective Library Guide will help you locate appropriate references. You will select at least one current scholarly or academic peer-reviewed journal articles published during the past 3–5 years that relate to your topic.
Cite and apply key principles from the journal article as evidence to support your critical thinking and analysis of the ethical problem or issue.
Review the Think Critically About Source Quality resource.
Assess the credibility of the information source.
Assess the relevance of the information source.
Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study.
Describe how the health care professional in the case study communicated with others.
Assess instances where the professional communicated effectively or ineffectively.
Explain which communication approaches should be used and which ones should be avoided.
Describe the consequences of using effective and non-effective communication approaches.
Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study.
Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical dilemma or issue presented in the case study.
Summarize how well the professional managed professional responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case.
Discuss the key lessons this case provides for health care professionals.
Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study.
Describe the proposed solution.
Discuss how the approach makes this professional more effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within his or her organization.
Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional collaboration.
Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
Apply the principles of effective composition.
Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and mechanics.
Write using APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.
Determine the proper application of APA formatting requirements and scholarly writing standards.
Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.
Additional Requirements
Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:
Length: 3–5 typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
APA tutorial: Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] for guidance.
Written communication: Use correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least two references (the case study and an academic peer-reviewed journal article) and three in-text citations within the paper.
APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.
Case Study: Genetic Testing and Patient Autonomy
Dr. Leonard Harper, a seasoned geneticist at Hillside Medical Center, has always been an
advocate for patient autonomy. One day, he is approached by Mrs. Clara Bennett, a 38-year-old
literature professor, who is expecting her first child. Clara, having heard about the
advancements in prenatal genetic testing, wishes to undergo the procedure to determine if her
unborn child has any genetic disorders. She’s particularly concerned due to her age and a
family history of genetic anomalies.
After conducting the necessary tests, the results reveal a high likelihood that the child will have
Down syndrome. Dr. Harper schedules a private consultation with Clara to discuss the findings.
During the meeting, Clara, visibly distressed, makes an unexpected request. She asks Dr.
Harper to withhold the results from her husband, Lt. Jack Bennett, a naval officer currently
stationed overseas. Clara fears how Jack, who is eagerly awaiting the birth of their first child,
might react to the news. She’s concerned that it might add undue stress to his already
demanding and dangerous job.
Dr. Harper finds himself in a profound ethical dilemma. On one hand, he respects Clara’s
autonomy and her right to decide when and how the information is shared. On the other hand,
he believes in the importance of open communication, especially in matters that affect family
dynamics and decision-making. He worries about the strain this secret might place on the
Bennetts’ marriage and the potential implications for future medical decisions regarding the
child.
Resources for the paper:
Capella University (2024). NHS-FPX4000 Conscientious Objection and Professional
Responsibility Case Study
https://courseroom.capella.edu/courses/23023/pages/assessment-3-instructions?module_item_id=1143610
Strand, G. (2021). Pregnancy clauses. Voices in Bioethics, 7
https://doi.org/10.52214/vib.v7i.8173 -
“Enhancing Neonatal Care: Professional Development Activities on Hypothermia, Jaundice, and Hypoglycaemia”
Consist of 3, topic specific professional development activities (PDAs) These 3 x 650 word PDAs provide a concise demonstration of your learning on aspects of neonatal physiology, altered physiology and evidenced based treatment, provided in the neonatal transitional and special care setting Neonatal Hypothermia (650 words)
Neonatal Jaundice (650 words)
Neonatal Hypoglycaemia (650 words)
Referencing. I have attached information of how to write the essay and also attached examples please see and follow the method of examples. -
Title: Treatment Plan for Bipolar Disorder Using Second-Generation Medication
See attachment for case study details
Mediaction must be from 2nd generation only
Sources no more than 5 years old
Answer all the following questions below using case study information
1.Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.
a. Select one drug to treat the diagnosis(es) or symptoms.
b. List medication class and mechanism of action for the chosen medication.
c. Write the prescription in prescription format.
d. Provide an evidence-based rationale for the selected medication using at least one scholarly reference. Textbooks may be used for additional references but are not the primary reference.
e. List any side effects or adverse effects associated with the medication.
f. Include any required diagnostic testing. State the time frame for this testing (testing is before medication initiation or q 3 months, etc.). Includes normal results range for any listed laboratory tests.
g. Provide a minimum of three appropriate medication-related teaching points for the client and/or family. -
Title: Engaging Patients as Part of the Healthcare Team: A Persuasive Guide for Advanced Nurse Practitioners
Description:
For this assignment, you are an advanced nurse practitioner caring for patients. You will write a 2-3 page (not including title page and reference pages) persuasive paper to your fellow colleagues explaining how to effectively engage patients as part of the healthcare team. Answer the following questions in your paper:
Why should the patient be part of the healthcare team?
How can you, as an APNP, engage in active patient engagement? How can your colleagues? Why should this be important to them?
What informatics or system technologies can be used to engage with patients? Include a minimum of 3 solutions.
Propose a process improvement strategy that will be used to evaluate patient engagement based on the 3 solutions mentioned above
How do the AACN Essentials (2021), QSEN modules, and ANA Standards apply?
Incorporate a minimum of 3 supporting academic peer-reviewed sources (journal articles)
Requirements
This assignment needs to be submitted following APA format (title page, headings, reference page, etc.). The 2-3 page paper number count does not include the title page and reference pages. Citations from References that are synthesized from the assigned article, course text, evidence-based and peer-reviewed research articles, and other credible sources are required. A minimum of 3 resources are used. References must be current within 5 years
AACN competencies and sub-competencies must be clearly stated and appropriately applied -
Title: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on APRN Education, Preparation, and Practice
In your own words, using first person “I” and speaking to your own
experiences (past, current and future expectations) in conjunction with
course resources, the textbook, and current peer-reviewed literature):
Describe how you feel Artificial Intelligence (AI) will impact education,
preparation, and practice of APRNs?
Do a search for use of AI in education. What did you find as it related to
advanced practice nursing?