The student must then post 1 reply to another student’s post. The reply must summarize the
student’s findings and indicate areas of agreement, disagreement, and improvement. It must be
supported with scholarly citations in the latest APA format and corresponding list of references.
The minimum word count for Integrating Faith and Learning discussion reply is 250 words.
Category: Operations Management homework help
-
Integrating Faith and Learning: A Discussion on Finding Common Ground In my classmate’s post, they discussed the importance of finding common ground between faith and learning. I agree with their perspective and believe that this integration is crucial for personal and
-
Comparing Groups: Evaluating Variables and Conducting T-tests in Quantitative Analysis
7 Introduction
Overview
You will explore methods for evaluating the difference between variables. Comparing two groups of data using a range of t-tests will also be explored. Integration of Faith and Learning will be presented in a way that examines quantitative analysis in light of God’s plan for how you should handle challenging work.
Learning Outcomes
Upon successful completion of this module, you will be able to:
Analyze the appropriate inferential statistic to compare groups.
Evaluate and interpret a one-sample t-test to compare one group or sample to a hypothesized population mean.
Understand the assumptions and conditions for use of the independent samples t test.
Analyze and interpret a paired samples t test to check the reliability of a repeated measure.
Understand your view of God’s perspective on the work involved in conducting meaningful and accurate quantitative analysis.
Read: Morgan, Leech, Gloeckner, & Barrett: Chapter 9
Watch: Student’s t-Test
Discussion Thread: Comparing Groups
Respond to the following short answer questions from Chapter 9 of the Morgan, Leech, Gloeckner, & Barrett textbook:
D7.9.1 (a) Under what conditions would you use a one-sample t test? (b) Provide another possible example of its use from the HSB data.
D7.9.2 In Output 9.2: (a) Are the variances equal or significantly different for the three dependent variables? (b) List the appropriate t, df, and p (significance level) for each t test as you would in an article. (c) Which t tests are statistically significant? (d) Write sentences interpreting the academic track difference between the means of grades in high school and also visualization. (e) Interpret the 95% confidence interval for these two variables. (f) Comment on the effect sizes.
D7.9.3 (a) Compare the results of Outputs 9.2 and 9.3. (b) When would you use the Mann–Whitney U test?
D7.9.4 In Output 9.4: (a) What does the paired samples correlation for mother’s and father’s education mean? (b) Interpret/explain the results for the t test. (c) Explain how the correlation and the t test differ in what information they provide. (d) Describe the results if the r was .90 and the t was zero. (e) What if r was zero and t was 5.0?
D7.9.5 (a) Compare the results of Output 9.4 with Output 9.5. (b) When would you use the Wilcoxon test?
DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
The student will complete 8 short-answer discussions in this course and 1 long-answer
Integrating Faith and Learning discussion. In the thread for each short-answer discussion the
student will post short answers to the prompted questions. The answers must demonstrate
course-related knowledge and support their assertions with scholarly citations in the latest APA
format. Minimum word count for all short answers cumulatively is 200 words. The minimum
word count for Integrating Faith and Learning discussion is 600 words. For each thread the
student must include a title block with your name, class title, date, and the discussion forum
number; write the question number and the question title as a level one heading (e.g. D1.1
Variables) and then provide your response; use Level Two headings for multi part questions (e.g.
D1.1 & D1.1.a, D1.1.b, etc.), and include a reference section.
The student must then post 1 reply to another student’s post. The reply must summarize the
student’s findings and indicate areas of agreement, disagreement, and improvement. It must be
supported with scholarly citations in the latest APA format and corresponding list of references.
The minimum word count for Integrating Faith and Learning discussion reply is 250 words. -
Title: The Power of Business Integrity, God’s Perspective, and Decision Models: An Analysis and Reflection “Assessing the Credibility of the Author(s): A Critical Component of Academic Discourse”
Module 7: Week 7 Introduction
Overview
After carefully studying the material specified as well as related current literature, you will analyze and explain the power of business integrity. Next, you will explain God’s perspective on business integrity. Finally, you will explain your current decision models and how they have changed during the course.
Learning Outcomes
Upon successful completion of this module, you will be able to:
Analyze and explain the power of business integrity.
Explain God’s perspective on business integrity.
Explain your current decision models and how they have changed during the course.
Read: Gamble, Peteraf, & Thompson: Chapter 9
PageWatch: ABI/Inform Collection Tutorial
https://watch.liberty.edu/media/t/1_q0r4tupn
Discussion Thread: Business Integrity, God’s Perspective, and Decision Models
Demonstrating integrity is just as important for a business as it is for an individual. Those responsible for developing and executing strategy must have a solid understanding what it is and why it is important to business success. God has provided countless examples of integrity in His word and knowing how to apply those to business will help develop business integrity. Over the past several weeks you have been evaluating and trying several decision models, have you settled on one or a group of them?
For your main thread, perform the following:
Discuss the power of business integrity.
Discuss God’s perspective on business integrity.
Discuss your current decision model(s) and how they have changed through the course.
Develop an Annotated Bibliography for the additional references used in your discussion.
Support all of your factual assertions with citations.
Discussion: Business Integrity, God’s Perspective, and Decision Models Assignment Instructions
Discussion Thread:
The seventh and final discussion in this class will focus on a three questions in the areas of Integrity, God’s Perspective on Integrity, and Decision Models. The student should organize their main thread by using the bolded headings provided and then respond to the question. The student will post a reply to a single main thread and should organize their reply by using the bolded headings provided.
Demonstrating integrity is just as important for a business as it is for an individual. Those responsible for developing and executing strategy must have a solid understanding what it is and why it is important to business success. God has provided countless examples of integrity in His word and knowing how to apply those to business will help develop business integrity. Over the past several weeks you have been evaluating and trying several decision models, have you settled on one or a group of them?
Minimum of 600 words in the body
Minimum of 2 sources from the literature in addition to course texts
Use bolded headings below in the discussion.
Current APA format must be used.
Use the following outline:
· Introduction
· The Power of Business Integrity ‐ What is business integrity and why is it important to business success? Discuss business integrity and why it is important in no less than 250 words.
· God’s Perspective on Business Integrity – What is God’s perspective on business integrity and why is it important? Using the Keller text and the Bible, discuss God’s perspective on business integrity and why it important in no less than 300 words.
· Decision Models ‐ no less than 250 words
· What are my current decision model(s). Discuss your current decision model(s).
· How have your decision model(s) changed throughout the course and why? Discuss how and why your decision model(s) have changed>
· Conclusion
Support your factual assertions with citations.
Include an Annotated Bibliography, in current APA format, of the 2 additional Sources:
· Minimum of 250 words in each annotation
· Use the bolded headings below for each annotation
Use the following outline:
· Summary of Key Points
· Evaluation of the Quality of the Publication
· Evaluation of the Quality of the Author(s)
· Where this fits into the discussion -
Quantitative Analysis: Comparing Academic Tracks on Student Height, Study Hours, Work Hours, and TV Hours
Quantitative Analysis: T-Tests and Group Comparison Assignment
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS: COMPARING GROUPS WITH T TESTS, ANALYSIS OF
VARIANCE (ANOVA) AND SIMILAR NON-PARAMETRIC TESTS
SPSS Questions
Chapter 9
Using the CollegeStudentData.sav file, do the following problems. Print your outputs after
typing your interpretations on them. Please circle the key parts of the output that you use for
your interpretation.
9.1 Is there a significant difference between the academic tracks on average student height?
Explain. Provide a full interpretation of the results.
9.2 Is there a difference between the number of hours students study and the hours they work?
Also, is there an association between the two?
9.3 Write another question that can be answered from the data using a paired sample t test. Run
the t test and provide a full interpretation.
9.4 Are there differences between fast track and regular track students in regard to the average
number of hours they (a) study, (b) work, and (c) watch TV? Hours of study is quite skewed so
compute an appropriate nonparametric statistic.
Make Sure to:
1. Attach your word document for review and grading. Other file formats are not
accepted and will not be graded. Use the following filename format:
LastName_BUSI820_AssignmentX.docx
2. Include an APA title block with your name, class title, date, and the assignment number.
3. Include a table of contents and a reference section. Number your pages in the footer
along with the date. Include a header starting on page 2 with the Course and
assignment number.
4. Write the problem number and the problem title as a level one heading (Example ‐
A.1.1: Chapter 2, Problem 2.1, and then provide your response.
5. Use level two headings with short titles for multi part questions (Example ‐ A1.1.a,
Short Title, A1.1.b, Short Title II, etc.)
6. Use appropriate level headings for key elements of your discussion such as Research
Questions, Hypotheses, Descriptive Statistics, Assumptions & Conditions,
Interpretation, Results, and others. Your goal is to make your analysis easy to follow
and logical.
7. Ensure that all tables and graphs are legible and include a figure number.
8. Carefully review your document prior to submission for formatting, flow, and
readability. Keep in mind that running the statistical tests is only the first half of the
challenge; you must be able to clearly communicate your findings to the reader.
CollegeStudentData.sav -
Reply to Classmate’s Discussion on Strategy Development and Decision Models Summary: In their original thread, my classmate discussed the importance of strategy development in the decision-making process. They emphasized the need for a clear and well-defined strategy to guide decision
Discussion Reply: Strategy Development, Strategy Decisions, and Decision Models
You will reply to one of your classmate’s thread.
Minimum of 250 words in the body.
Minimum of 2 sources from the literature in addition to course texts.
Use bolded headings below in the reply.
Current APA format must be used.
Use the following Outline:
• Summary – Sumarize the author’s original thread in no less than 125 words.
• Critique – Discuss what you agreed with, did not agree with and why in no less than 125
words.
Support your factual assertions with citations. -
Quantitative Analysis: ANOVA and Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis Test Assignment A.9.5: ANOVA and Post Hoc Tests for Marital Status Groups The purpose of this analysis is to identify an example
Quantitative Analysis: ANOVA and Nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis Test Assignment
Pageof 2ZOOM
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS: COMPARING GROUPS WITH T TESTS, ANALYSIS OF
VARIANCE (ANOVA) AND SIMILAR NON-PARAMETRIC TESTS
SPSS Questions
Chapter 9
Using the CollegeStudentData.sav file, do the following problems. Print your outputs after
typing your interpretations on them. Please circle the key parts of the output that you use for
your interpretation.
Identify an example of a variable measured at the scale/normally distributed level for which
there is a statistically significant overall difference (F) between the three marital status groups.
Complete the analysis and interpret the results. Do appropriate post hoc tests.
9.5 Identify an example of a variable measured at the scale/normally distributed level for which
there is a statistically significant overall difference (F) between the three marital status groups.
Complete the analysis and interpret the results. Do appropriate post hoc tests.
9.6 Use the Kruskal–Wallis test, with Mann‒Whitney post hoc follow-up tests if needed, to run
the same problem as 9.1. Compare the results.
9.7 Do students’ heights differ depending on academic track and marital status, and do
academic track and marital status interact? Run the appropriate analysis and interpret the
results.
9.8 Do academic track and having children interact and does either seem to affect current GPA?
Make Sure to:
1. Attach your word document for review and grading. Other file formats are not
accepted and will not be graded. Use the following filename format:
LastName_BUSI820_AssignmentX.docx
2. Include an APA title block with your name, class title, date, and the assignment number.
3. Include a table of contents and a reference section. Number your pages in the footer
along with the date. Include a header starting on page 2 with the Course and
assignment number.
4. Write the problem number and the problem title as a level one heading (Example ‐
A.1.1: Chapter 2, Problem 2.1, and then provide your response.
5. Use level two headings with short titles for multi part questions (Example ‐ A1.1.a,
Short Title, A1.1.b, Short Title II, etc.)
6. Use appropriate level headings for key elements of your discussion such as Research
Questions, Hypotheses, Descriptive Statistics, Assumptions & Conditions,
Interpretation, Results, and others. Your goal is to make your analysis easy to follow
and logical.7. Ensure that all tables and graphs are legible and include a figure number.
8. Carefully review your document prior to submission for formatting, flow, and
readability. Keep in mind that running the statistical tests is only the first half of the
challenge; you must be able to clearly communicate your findings to the reader.
CollegeStudentData.sav
-
Analysis of Variance and Post-Hoc Tests in Research
8 Introduction
Overview
You will explore analysis of variance (ANOVA) including a two-way or factorial ANOVA. Also, post hoc tests to determine which groups have statistically significant differences will also be explored.
Learning Outcomes
Upon successful completion of this module, you will be able to:
Understand the assumptions and conditions for ANOVA.
Analyze and interpret a one-way (single factor) ANOVA.
Evaluate appropriate post-hoc tests for a statistically significant one-way ANOVA.
Analyze and interpret post-hoc tests to determine which pairs of means from the one-way ANOVA are significantly different.
Evaluate the results of the statistics performed in this module.
Read Article: Larson, M. (2008) Analysis of Variance. Circulation. AHA Journal.
Watch: One-Way ANOVA vs. Two-Way ANOVA
Discussion Thread: Comparing Groups
Respond to the following short answer questions from Morgan, Leech, Gloeckner, & Barrett textbook:
D.8.9.6 In Output 9.6: (a) Describe the F, df, and p values for each dependent variable as you would in an article. (b) Describe the results in nontechnical terms for visualization and grades. Use the group means in your description.
D.8.9.7 In Outputs 9.7 a and b, what pairs of means were significantly different?
D.8.9.8 In Output 9.8, interpret the meaning of the sig. values for math achievement and competence. What would you conclude, based on this information, about differences between groups on each of these variables?
D.8.9.9 Compare Outputs 9.6 and 9.8 with regard to math achievement. What are the most important differences and similarities?
D.8.9.10 In Output 9.9: (a) Is the interaction significant? (b) Examine the profile plot of the cell means that illustrates the interaction. Describe it in words. (c) Is the main effect of academic track significant? Interpret the eta squared. (d) How about the “effect” of math grades? (e) Why did we put the word effect in quotes? (f) Under what conditions would focusing on the main effects be misleading?
DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
The student will complete 8 short-answer discussions in this course and 1 long-answer
Integrating Faith and Learning discussion. In the thread for each short-answer discussion the
student will post short answers to the prompted questions. The answers must demonstrate
course-related knowledge and support their assertions with scholarly citations in the latest APA
format. Minimum word count for all short answers cumulatively is 200 words. The minimum
word count for Integrating Faith and Learning discussion is 600 words. For each thread the
student must include a title block with your name, class title, date, and the discussion forum
number; write the question number and the question title as a level one heading (e.g. D1.1
Variables) and then provide your response; use Level Two headings for multi part questions (e.g.
D1.1 & D1.1.a, D1.1.b, etc.), and include a reference section.
The student must then post 1 reply to another student’s post. The reply must summarize the
student’s findings and indicate areas of agreement, disagreement, and improvement. It must be
supported with scholarly citations in the latest APA format and corresponding list of references.
The minimum word count for Integrating Faith and Learning discussion reply is 250 words. -
“Examining the Impact of Individual and Group Decision Processes on Business Strategy Development and Execution: A Literature Review”
8 Introduction
Overview
After carefully studying the material specified and related current literature, you will analyze, evaluate, and explain how individual / group decision processes impact business decision making, the newest directions in strategy development / execution, and how your academic discipline within the business impacts strategy development / execution.
Learning Outcomes
Upon successful completion of this module, you will be able to:
Analyze, evaluate, and explain how individual and group decision processes aid or impede business decision making.
Analyze, evaluate, and explain the newest directions in the process of strategy development and execution.
Analyze, evaluate, and explain how your academic discipline, as a function within the organization, can impact the process of business strategy development and execution.
Read: Gamble, Peteraf, & Thompson: Chapters 1, 10
Watch: Business Source Complete Tutorial
Literature Review: Final Draft Assignment -
Integrating Faith and Learning: A Response Integrating Faith and Learning: A Response In response to my classmate’s post on integrating faith and learning, I want to first commend them for their insightful reflections on the topic. I agree with
Discussion Replies: Integrating Faith and Learning
The student must then post 1 reply to another student’s post. The reply must summarize the
student’s findings and indicate areas of agreement, disagreement, and improvement. It must be
supported with scholarly citations in the latest APA format and corresponding list of references.
The minimum word count for Integrating Faith and Learning discussion reply is 250 words. -
“Critical Analysis of Course Concepts through Timed Responses”
INSTRUCTIONS
timed task
• This is an open-book task. You may refer to course materials, notes, and any other academic
resources that are explicitly permitted by the course guidelines.
• Answer four (4) questions randomly selected. Each response should be at least 200 words.
• Ensure your answers critically engage with the concepts from the course, utilizing specific examples,
case studies, and theoretical frameworks provided during lectures and in your readings.
• Provide clear, structured, and detailed arguments, supporting your analysis with evidence where
applicable.
after opening the task you must solve it in 1.30 because its timed