Category: Philosophy

Was (or is) there something deeply important missing in philosophy (or in religion, or in anything we do with words and ideas — in politics or government, for example)? Did philosophy forget the first thing about itself — that it is first a self? That being a “self” means something more than just thinking and reasoning, and so on? How is it, then, that Nietzsche could say that perhaps philosophy is like a raven, inspired by a “little whiff of carrion [that is, dead flesh]”?

Do you believe that Nietzsche’s concept of the “will to power” is one that still remains relevant and meaningful today? Explain…

Nietzsche grills poor Socrates for his seemingly obsessive concern with “reason” — for his insistence, often at the expense of anyone he debated with, on providing an “account” of some crucial idea that came up in discussion. This is really clear in the Euthyphro, where Socrates does not relent in his desire for Euthyphro to provide a rational account of the “form” of holiness. And Euthyphro can’t do it! Do you think that Nietzsche’s criticism of Socrates on this point means that Nietzsche is abandoning “reason” altogether? Or is something else — possibly not even having anything to do with “reason” itself — going on? Do you think Nietzsche is advocating for irrationalism?

Question 2:
Martin Luther King and Henry David Thoreau justify civil disobedience by arguing that unjust
laws can be disobeyed because unjust laws have no moral force.
On the other hand, almost all the authors (but not all) you have read in Curtis’s two volumes
argue that laws must be obeyed, that individuals have neither the right nor the power to say
which laws are just or unjust.
Compare and contrast the two opposing positions on civil disobedience. Pick a side. Discuss
what an unjust law is. Besides discussing Thoreau and King, you must also discuss at least 1
other assigned author from the Civil Disobedience book. Do not rely on an author from Blaisdell
I did not assign. You must also use at least two authors from Curtis, but are encouraged to use as
many authors from Curtis as you wish; again, do not include authors from Curtis I have not
assigned in class.
Must use books: Essays on Civil Disobedience by Bob Blaisdell 
The Great Political Theories by Michael Curtis (both volume 1 and 2)

Develop a summary of the main concepts from the article 750 -1000 + words double spaced, Use APA 7th edition format. Do not duplicate the articles abstract. Short direct quotes are acceptable but avoid long quotes or many.
Be sure to include core points from the article. In your own words interact with the article.
Appropriate comments for the journal article should include but not be limited to, insights gained from reading the article, thoughts you may have that may enhance the discussion of the article, your subjective comments in this section must be clearly tied to main points from the article, not peripheral ideas.
You are highly encouraged to consider any other information from previous articles or textbooks youmay have read in previous courses, or in other places you have encountered information relating to the themes in the article you are reviewing, be sure to cite and reference your sources.

i have a paper that is 9 Sentence Structured Outline. i will send the reading it is short reading only 15 page and i attached the requirement. i wanna do Prompt 1.

Read chapter 3 and write 1 page answering this question: What is Taylor’s account of the relation between matter form and the potential and actual?

This essay requires you to pick a question from the list document I have submitted. Once the topic has been decided, you will use the attached articles to back up your question. I have also attached how the paper needs to be written. 4 outside sources are required as well. This essay will be graded heavily! Please use the tips on the sheet! Not all are necessary. I have also uploaded all articles that are needed to source for the essay, some questions need these articles. (Ethics overview, Frankenstein, The robot…., Robotics Dilemma… etc). Thank you!

Rewrite philosophy research paper 
-attached is an example of how the final should be written, 
-attached are all the notes on how to structer and write the essay – -attached is the rough draft that was horribly written. 
-Must be in MLA 9th edition format
-Must have a title page, followed by formal argument page, defined terms page, the work cited page, 
– find three credible sources that are within 7 years, and only edu or government website sources.
– must be clear and defined, with a well written introduction, conclusion, 3 premises, and an argument. NO THIRD PERSON perspective and not a descriptive paper

I’d prefer if you could dull the writing alike but like no big word and that I’ve sent the assignment instructions all I need to send if the text book now but the file is too lang