Category: Political science

Here is my essay prompt. In light of the evidence and arguments in the articles collected in your “midterm” module, would a utilitarian and/or a libertarian support President Biden’s student loan forgiveness program? On what grounds would both wholly accept, wholly reject, or partially accept/reject the program? Drawing on a close, careful analysis of the course texts, videos, and lectures, explain a) the conclusion BOTH a utilitarian and a libertarian would reach, b) the reasoning by which they would reach their respective conclusions, and c) the principles from which their reasoning follows. This essay should be 1800 words long and no more than 1850 words and no need for a work cited page or title page. This essay needs to revolve around the Book (Justice, what’s the right thing to do? by Michael J. Sandel) I have a pdf of the book and need to use chapters 1-5. There also articles which can be used but are more supplemental material but still important. I would like this essay to flow well and needs to have a strong thesis at the end of the intro paragraph. I can attach my writing guide also of how the essay should be with the format. There also videos which can be used for the citations but could be used for info understanding. Not every source needs to be used but what makes sense in this paper. I also included one of my previous essays that shows the format I am looking for and this was an A paper. Thank you 🙂

A research paper about japans Political Party structure, Structure of the Executive, International organization membership and Conflict involvement. as it relates to political science

Your take-home exam consists of two essay questions. Each answer is worth fifteen
points, and each answer cannot be longer than 3 double-spaced pages (a total of 6
pages). Your answers should equally integrate the assigned readings, lectures,
and outside sources. For the outside sources, I have provided a MLA Citation Guide
at the end of your syllabus. You should clearly define any abstract concepts introduced.
Political Science is at its best when applied to real life circumstances. 
1.In 2024, former President Donald J. Trump and President Joseph R. Biden are in a
dead heat in the presidential election race. Neither candidate can figure out how to pull
ahead of the other in the polls. Given that you took this voting behavior class, both
candidates come to you seeking advice on how to win the presidential election. You can
only serve on one campaign.
Using the lectures, assigned readings, and outside sources, you are to answer this
question: What three strategies would you recommend for Trump OR Biden to win the
presidential election (be sure to use textual evidence to support your claims)? For
example, find a weakness in certain demographics and explain how you would remedy
that issue for your candidate.
2. One of the central reasons our electoral system is so durable is because of the ability
of its party system to absorb the intense conflict and critical change that have developed
on occasion in its complex society. These major durable changes are a direct result of
realignment theory (including critical elections, realignments, secular realignments, and
dealignments). Based on the current political atmosphere, does it make realignment
theory less important than during past eras? To support your arguments, discuss three
factors in the realignment literature that contribute to a future realignment (or lack
thereof). Be sure to equally integrate the lectures, class readings, and outside sources.

Write a  literature review that outlines How the decisions from the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) impact the nation under their constitutional authority. Cite the following 12 scholarly articles relevant to this topic. Organize the discussion by concepts or topics rather than by discussing the articles one after another. Moreover, the literature review must discuss the issues appearing in the research on your topic to give the reader background information on that topic. 
A literature review outlines the research topic and places it in the context of previous research. Cite a minimum of 12 scholarly articles relevant to your topic. Organize the discussion by concepts or topics rather than by discussing the articles one after another. There is not a length requirement. Instead, the literature review must discuss the issues appearing in the research on your topic to give the reader background information on that topic. The Franco textbook has useful information on literature review. See also the information at the following link: https://guides.library.ucsc.edu/write-a-literature-review
Use the following 12 sources below: 
Schubert, G. A. (1958). The Study of Judicial Decision-Making as an Aspect of Political Behavior. The American Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/1951981 
Tate, C. N. (1983). The Methodology of Judicial Behavior Research: A Review and Critique. Political Behavior. http://www.jstor.org/stable/586348 
Armaly, M. T. (2018). Politicized Nominations and Public Attitudes toward the Supreme Court in the Polarization Era. The Justice System Journal. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26595677
Mindock, M. R., & Waddell, G. R. (2019). 
Vote Influence in Group Decision-Making: The Changing Role of Justices’ Peers on the Supreme Court. IZA – Institute of Labor Economics. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep59204 
Becker, T. L. (1963). “Inquiry into a School of Thought in the Judicial Behavior Movement.” Midwest Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109026 
Brisbin, R. A. (1996). “Slaying the Dragon: Segal, Spaeth and the Function of Law in Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111739 
Collins, P. M. (2008). “The Consistency of Judicial Choice.” The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002238160808081x 
Devins, N., & Baum, L. (2016). “Split Definitive: How Party Polarization Turned The Supreme Court Into A Partisan Court.” The Supreme Court Review. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26461374 
Giles, M. W., Blackstone, B., & Vining, R. L. (2008). “The Supreme Court in American Democracy: Unraveling the Linkages between Public Opinion and Judicial Decision Making.” The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381608080316 
Nelson, M. J., & Hinkle, R. K. (2018). “Crafting the Law: How Opinion Content Influences Legal Development.” The Justice System Journal. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26595668 
Pritchett, C. H. (1968). “Public Law and Judicial Behavior.” The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2128450 
Ulmer, S. S. (1960). “The Analysis of Behavior Patterns on the United States Supreme Court.” The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.2307/2126926

Assignment Instructions
Writing Assignment #2 – The President
Length: 850 words or more
80 Points
Prompt:
Imagine a scenario where Earth has been attacked by an alien civilization. The first attack results in the destruction of an entire US city, shocking the American public and drawing the entire world into a war, with the United States leading the fight to protect our planet. In this scenario, consider the various roles of the American President. Explain how the President might respond in each of these roles. What powers or resources would they possess? What constitutional limits or constraints would they face? Remember to Include:
☐ A focus on several of the roles we explored in lecture
(Head of State, Chief Executive, Commander in Chief, Chief Diplomat, Party Chief, or Chief Legislator)
☐ At least one quote from our textbook.
☐ Real examples from US history or modern politics.
☐ A well-formatted Works Cited page.
Background Details:
Although your essay will be a product of imagination, it will require you to describe the actions that a real-world President would take in the aftermath of this catastrophic event. Remember to base your analysis in the actual powers and constitutional limits of the American President.
Be sure to answer the prompt fully, use examples, and write at least 850 words. You may draw upon materials covered in class, including the course textbook, as well as outside articles and resources that you find. Please be sure to quote and cite properly. This assignment will be submitted as a .doc, .docx, or a .pdf file. When you are ready to submit your assignment, click on the submit button and upload your assignment file. Formatting Guidance:
Font: Times New Roman (size 12) or Calibri (size 11)
Page Margins: No greater than 1 inch. Spacing: Double Spaced
Style: Chicago or MLA preferred.

The entire essay prompt with Martin Luther King’s excerpts from his letter from Birmingham Jail.
Please apply concepts of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill to King’s letter using ONLY the textbook readings that will also be attached. 

The research paper assignment will ask you to research a law or policy that in some way has impacted the LGBTQ community, either in the US or abroad. The assignment will consist of a research paper proposal, research paper, and presentation. I will provide a list of suggested topics in addition to the assignment prompt during the semester. Students are also welcome to select their own topic. The research proposal will be 1 page, single- spaced in length and the research paper will be 10-12 pages, double-spaced in length. 

Need help editing my essay. This was written last year and I need it updated so it is up to date with current times. Absolutely no plagiarism or AI technology. I don’t need u to write a whole new paper pls edit the paper I provided about Russia and Ukraine. Chicago style formatting. Just edit and add/ remove information to make it up to date and better. Please finish on time and again no plagiarism or AI pls. Thank you very much.

Under what circumstances should
employers be able to refuse to provide health insurance that includes contraceptive
coverage for women employees? 

The pdf titled POL S SPR24 final Paper Prompt is the directions. The links bellow are the resources allowed for refrences and citations supporting the prompt.