Category: Political science

Directions: Write an essay of about 2-3 pages in exact MLA FORMAT for each essay question. but be sure to label each question number. The title can be Final Exam. 
You may, of course, use three separate MLA headings if you prefer.
YOU DO NOT NEED A WORKS CITED PAGE AS LONG AS YOU ONLY USE MATERIALS FROM OUR CLASS: BlackBoard and of course the textbook.
REMEMBER, CHOOSE THREE QUESTIONS. 
1. Using Chapter 9 in American Government, by Krutz, in the textbook in the Course Textbook module, write a SHORT (perhaps 1-1/2 to 2 MLA STYLE PAGES) review of the chapter. What did you learn from reading it? What are some of the most important topics covered? DUE: JUNE 26, 2024
2. Read Article I; Section 8, of the Constitution, which lists eighteen powers that Congress has. Select the TWO powers that Congress has that YOU THINK ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT ONES AND EXPLAIN WHY YOU HOLD YOUR POSITION. 
This is an OPINION question based on Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution. See the Appendix Section (back) of the Krutz textbook or the web link to the Constitution.
3. Using the notes called POST-1763 CLASS NOTES, select TWO laws that Parliament passed that YOU THINK must have been most angering to the colonists. Explain why you hold your position. If you “quote from the notes use my last name and the page number” (Clock 2). Refer: Class Notes pdf too 
4. Read ahead in the Krutz textbook, and write a review of Chapter 13, “The Courts.” What are the main points YOU LEARNED from reading the chapter on your own? Use at LEAST ONE MLA STYLE “QUOTATION FROM THE KRUTZ TEXTBOOK” (Krutz 126).
5. What is ONE CURRENT EVENTS ISSUE FACING THE UNITED STATES TODAY? YOU choose the issue, and tell why it is important. You can get your information from any news source that you want, but your essay must explain the issue, why you chose it, and why you think it is important to our nation today. THIS IS AN OPINION QUESTION, SO PLEASE CHOOSE THE CURRENT EVENTS ISSUE YOURSELF.

The journal will be 7 pages, basically a page per day.
Arrival in Mexico City
1. **Describe Your First Impressions:**
– How do you feel upon arriving in Mexico City?
– What are your initial thoughts on the city’s atmosphere, sights, sounds, and people?
Exploring the City
2. **First Day of Exploration:**
– Where did you go and what did you see on your first full day in the city?
– Highlight a particular place, food, or experience that stood out to you.
Teotiuchan
Virgin de Guadalupe
First Day at UNAM
3. **First Day of Classes:**
– What were your initial thoughts on UNAM and the campus?
– Describe your classes, professors, and any notable interactions with fellow students.
Huge campus
Own Mexican league soccer team
Very formal (not sure if it was due to use being Boston students or if every class is like that)
Balancing Study and Exploration
4. **Daily Life and Studies:**
– How are you balancing your studies with exploring the city?
– Reflect on the academic environment at UNAM compared to your home institution.
Human Right Commission
A lot more on the go, but it’s hard to compare since we were there to explore and site see
Cultural Experiences
5. **Immersing in Local Culture:**
– What cultural experiences have you had so far (e.g., local festivals, museums, art)?
– How do these experiences enhance your understanding of Mexico?
Frida Kahlo house
Chapultepic Castle
Bellas Artes
Xochimilto
Local Cuisine
6. **Culinary Adventures:**
– What local foods have you tried, and what are your thoughts on Mexican cuisine?
– Share a memorable meal or dining experience.
Mexican cuisine isn’t new to me
I love tacos al pastor but it wasn’t on a lot of menus at the restaurants we went
My favorite meal might have been at the second rooftop (lettuce wrap shrimp taco, CHICKEN AND SPINACH AGNOLOTTI WITH ROASTED TOMATO CREAM AND CRISPY ONION, or green enchiladas in Coyocan)
Reflecting on the Experience
7. **Reflections and Learnings:**
– Reflect on your overall experience studying and living in Mexico City.
– What have you learned about the city, its culture, and yourself during this time?
Truly see the class division
Who are the street vendors and who are the elite or the college educated
The students at the UNAM are parents with good jobs “lawyers, engineers, professors, etc) in comparison to many students I know in Boston that are first generation college students

Answer the following question by referring to these topics :
1. Question: What were the major weaknesses in the Articles of Confederation? Cite at least TWO weaknesses.
Refer topic: The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, Appendices A, and B in Krutz: Class Textbook: AMERICAN GOVERNMENT by Krutz
2. Question: What two features of Dual Federalism do you think are most important? Which two features of Cooperative Federalism do you think are most important?
Refer to topic: Read Chapter 3 in the Krutz textbook. Pay close attention to national and state sovereignty. understand the idea of Federalism and the theories of how it operates.

You will provide a single-spaced TYPED (12 Times New Roman font) SUMMARY of the readings you are assigned.  Next, write down no less than 4 Key Terms that you find to be of interest.  Please provide each key term’s source, page number, and DEFINITION.  Finally, develop no less than 5 questions from the readings. Questions should comprise in-depth attempts of trying to better understand the material you are responsible for.   

The paper should be up to seven (7) double-space pages long, deal with an aspect relevant to
women and politics, and include a title page and a list of bibliographical references at the back.
(The title page and bibliography page are included in the ten pages.) Select a research question
that interests you and try to answer it convincingly, supporting your views with assigned readings
and other materials pertinent to the subject. Try to be analytical, rather than descriptive; think
of “why,” not only “what” and make an effort to back up your statements with some kind of
evidence more than offer your own opinions.
In sum, ask why things happen the way they happen, do not only describe various situations,
countries and cases. Do not list bits of information, but think critically about them and develop
an argument that is coherent and based on the information you amass from various sources. This
paper should be a piece of individual research whose argument is based on concrete evidence,
not an opinion piece that makes statements without backing. Whether you use the Chicago or
MLA style, your writing style and reference list must be consistent. In other words, do not use
both footnotes and endnotes. If, at any point during researching and writing your paper, you
have questions, do not hesitate to contact me by email or through Moodle.
Tip: Do not worry so much about the length of the paper; worry more about its content and the
strength of its argument. Do not just list references at the back of the paper – use them to
construct your argument, and include them in the body of your paper.
Checklist for research papers:
• Is your assignment double-spaced?
• Did you include the cover page (with title and your name)?
• Does your paper have a clear and distinct introduction, argument and conclusion? Does your introduction state the research question, define the most important
concepts/terms, and briefly mention the steps of the argument (sections of the paper)?
• Did you include both footnotes and endnotes? You should not. Use one or the other, but
not both
• Does your paper read like an opinion piece? It should not. Try to bring some kind of
evidence in support of your argument.
• Is your argument backed by research (other authors)? It should be.
• Did you incorporate your references into the paper or just listed them at the back? You
should.
• Did you include a bibliography at the back?
• Are the references in the bibliography arranged alphabetically by authors’ family names?
• Did you plagiarize or paraphrased anybody else’s work? You should not.
• Is your assignment not longer than ten (10) pages? Please note: Before handing in your assignments, check your grammar and spelling. Proofread
your work and make sure sentences are correct grammatically. A well written paper conveys your
thoughts better than a negligently written text. Plagiarism and paraphrasing are not acceptable,
and you should give credit to authors for their ideas and interpretations. The textbook we used for this class was Women, Politics, and Power by Pamela Paxton. Either the 3rd or 4th edition of the book will work. I need the base of the paper to be supported by the textbook, but any academic sources or news articles can also be used to support the paper. I planned to write the paper on the influence of education on women political participation, but if you would like to narrow it down and specifically talk about one or two countries ( perhaps a contrast one with goof education systems for women and one without) The paper is to be written in MLA formatting with references at the end for everything used please. 

Please help me! Please you have to look for a journal article in the last page of the chapter to discuss on the assignment.
Reading Assignment:
– Rahm Ch. 14
– At least one journal article that is referenced in Rahm Ch. 14 (For references, see pp. 368-370. Search at least one journal article that you find helpful for you to deepen your understanding Rahm Ch. 14 at Maxwell Library and read that article.)
2023. “AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023.” Read “Summary for Policymakers.” https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/
Please do not forget to go the the document I uploaded is chapter 14 of Rahm book
Important Info
The order was placed through a short procedure (customer skipped some order details).
Please clarify some paper details before starting to work on the order.
Type of paper and subject
Number of sources and formatting style
Type of service (writing, rewriting, etc)

Political science course. YOu need to do only CR1-CR4 and the 4 assignments in the pic. All other things, I will do. Please put 35 days

You will write this as a
mini essay, keep the following instructions in mind when writing:
For the discuss the readings component of the
Academic Brief write about an issue that you found interesting in the
readings that precede the assignment due date
or that on the same week of the assignment due date. For example, if the due
date is on the 5th week of the class you
can use material from the 5th , 4th , 3rd, 2nd,
or 1st week
of the class.
2.     Choose
one of the readings, required or recommended. Using your own words, and in a
critical and scholarly manner, identify and critically engage with one idea/concept/issue
you found of interest in the reading.
3.     Ensure
you have a clear thesis and supporting arguments. Refer to the Assignment
Evaluations section of this syllabus. It is important to critically engage
with the ideas in a scholarly manner. You should have a thesis, prove your
thesis, and include reference to one or two other scholarly works.
4.     Create 2
questions that relate to the article and larger issues discussed in the class.
These questions may be used for in-class discussion and debate. Do not answer
the question, rather craft a compelling question that can be further discussed
in class
Use this reading here: Giraudy, Agustina, Eduardo Moncada, and Richard Snyder. “Subnational Research in Comparative Politics: Substantive, Theoretical, and Methodological Contributions.” Chapter. In Inside Countries: Subnational Research in Comparative Politics, edited by Agustina Giraudy, Eduardo Moncada, and Richard Snyder, 2–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019. doi:10.1017/9781108678384.001.

write an argumentative essay in the topic of politics specifically international bans on chemical weapons. requirements are attached below. 3 pages only. everything needs to be brief (citations)

Question
The Terry Schiavo case http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/25/schiavo.qa/
(Links to an external site).
riveted the nation during the first half of 2005. This case centered on
her husband Michael’s decision to remove her feeding tube, and her parent’s fight to keep her alive. One side of the argument suggests that
Terry possessed a fundamental right to die https://time.com/3763521/terri-schiavo-right-to-die-brittany-maynard/
(Links to an external site)., while the other suggests she had a fundamental right to be given food and water.
Both arguments find support in the concept of substantive due process. The former would point to the concept that there is a fundamental right to privacy under the 5thand 14thAmendments, while the latter would argue that the 5thand 14thamendments guarantee citizens will not be denied life without due process of law.
Assume that a case similar to the Schiavo one reaches the U.S. Supreme Court and you are a justice. How would you rule if both parties argued that their side was supported by the concept of substantive due process? Does one side hold more legal weight than the other? Why or why
not? If you find that substantive due process is not implicated in this
case, how would you rule? Why?
Instructions
Respond to the above prompt with a thoughtful essay of about 1,000 words. Cite your sources appropriately, taking care to give credit where credit is due. Please use Chicago style
Links to an external site.;
you’re free to choose between the notes system (in which case you do not need a separate bibliography) or the author-date system (in which case you’ll use in-text citations and a bibliography is required).
Submission
Submit your response by uploading a document from your computer (PDF or Microsoft Word).