Category: Political science

An annotated bibliography is a list of sources (Total of 7.  5 are in the word document, please add 2 more), each of
which is accompanied by a summary and a description of its relevance to your
research paper. You must include the following information:
o   
A complete citation of
the source. Cite your sources in a consistent style format (APA Style)
o   
A summary of each of
source (2–3 lines).
o   
A detailed explanation
of how the source adds to the main arguments in your paper (6–7 lines).
o    Please add 2 more peer-reviewed academic sources along with the  5 sources attached in word document.

Lincoln (2012) by Steven Spielberg. (FILM)
Based on only the film, where would you put the director on the ideological spectrum? (Radical? Liberal? Moderate? Conservative? Reactionary?) Explain your arguments with evidence from the film. 
Also, what is the film trying to say about politics? (Provide evidence from the film to support your argument.) 
Lastly, critique the film’s political message or the way the director delivered it, and offer specific suggestions on how he could have improved that message or its delivery in the film.

The paper will be a five-page paper analyzing an international phenomenon comparing two theoretical schools of thought. A rubric will be included during the semester to give students an idea of the criterion I will use to grade the papers. A textbook is also provided in canvass without purchase that may help students in their paper writing: Martin Griffiths, et. al. Thinkers in International Relations (New York: Routledge, 2009) 

The last paragraph needs to be rewritten. It says By combining the elements of consequentialism, virtue ethics, and deontology When the elements we learned and talked about are Utilitarianism, Rights, Justice-fairness,Virtue ethics. So please fix the last paragpah.
it also also says Jane is a good-hearted individual, and since virtue ethics indicate her character is virtuous, she should take the ethical and morally just action because of the possible consequences later. In the last paragraph you said this. This is not a good enough reason. Besides these mistakes please reread the whole essay and make sure everything is perfect
Also make sure in the first few paragpahs you have 
PARAGRAPH 1. Optionally, start with shocking anecdote or intriguing statistic.
Something that sucks the reader into the paper, as in, “wow that’s superinteresting, I want
to know more!” [Be super-brief, however: don’t have this anecdote or statistic run on and
on and on.]
PARAGRAPH 2. Briefly and succinctly describe the moral agent and the binary decision
that constitutes a moral dilemma. [Note, this could very well be your first paragraph.]
PARAGRAPH 3. Briefly and succintly describe the empirical puzzle. [Note, this
paragraph could be merged with the previous paragraph.]
PARAGRAPH 4. Roadmap. First I will cover some background information. Then I’ll
cover the PRO ACTION arguments, as I run through the four normative ethics principles
with a special emphasis on utilitarianism. Then I’ll cover the CON ACTION (PRO
INACTION) arguments, as I once again run through the four normative ethics principles,
this time with a special emphasis on justice-fairness. Then I’ll conclude which side, PRO
or CON, is morally right. [Note, the following paragraphs need to be consistent with this
roadmap!]
Please look at the prompt and make sure everything needed is there

Your final exam will consist of one essay question and will cover the material we have studied thus far.  This is an open-note (but closed colleague) exam, and all work must be your own. You are required to integrate course materials in your essay. You are also encouraged to draw on credible outside sources to supplement your answers, though these are not required for successful completion of the exam.
Your answer must state your thesis and be supported with relevant information (including specific examples, material from assigned course readings, material from other online course resources, and credible outside sources that you have identified on your own). 
The following essay prompts, one of which you must complete, will enable you to reflect on your work in the course to date and demonstrate your understanding of the theoretical concepts and past and present realities in topics in comparative politics.  Be sure your essay includes an introduction, body, and conclusion. Your conclusions should follow logically from the information you have presented in your essays.  Any quotations, specific information, and ideas drawn from outside sources (including course materials) must be cited and referenced in APA format or some other standard citation format. 
Your essay should be between 1,500-2,000 words in length, not including references. Essays should be double-spaced, with 1-inch margins, and in a standard 12-point font (such as Times New Roman, Calibri, Garamond, etc.).
Upload your completed essay to the assignment portal on Canvas.
Your essay will be graded on a 100-point scale. Your essay will be evaluated based on evidence of critical thinking and analysis, integration of course concepts, evidence of mastery of course concepts, accuracy of the information provided, essay organization, and quality of writing (including proper citation of sources).
Essay prompt 3                                      
Comparative politics tends to focus on states and those institutions and values that are central to understanding states. In what ways does globalization challenge this focus? What is globalization? Identify at least three ways that globalization forces us to rethink comparative politics.  Cite real-world examples in your response. Present your ideas and argument in an essay of between 1,500 and 2,000 words. Cite course readings and outside sources as appropriate.
* Please use sources provided and additional **

Hi! I need to complete those two assignments, would you mind please looking through them. There are math calculations together with writing

For this week’s writing assignment, apply the multi-actor and the multi-level perspective to make an overview of the following real-life case:
Hurricane Katrina
Content
Each assignment must contain:
1) a brief description of the case by providing a timeline of most important events and important contextual and historical factors in play.
2) a comprehensive overview of the various levels of governance involved in this case. Describe which governance levels were involved in preparing for and responding to hurricane Katrina and in what way. Mention three governance levels and indicate how these are related to the case.
3) a comprehensive overview of the most relevant actors involved in this case. Describe which actors were involved in preparing for and responding to hurricane Katrina and in what way. Mention at least five actors and describe their interests in this case.
Word limit: 1000 (±10%)
Useful links
For more background information on this case, please watch the following documentaries:
Seconds from Disaster – Hurricane Katrina
History Channel – Hurricane Katrina
Grading Criteria Overview
Review criteria
Students will use a grading rubric to evaluate and score each other’s assignment. The rubric consists of two categories: Content and Clarity.The following criteria are used by students to evaluate each other’s essays.
Description
2 points: The assignment includes a precise, clear description of the case.
1 point: The assignment includes a generic description of the case.
0 points: The description contains nothing relevant to the assignment.
Multi-level
4 points: The assignment includes a precise, comprehensive overview of relevant levels of governance involved.
3 points: The assignment includes a clear overview of relevant levels of governance involved, but lacks some precision or clarity.
2 point: The assignment includes a basic overview of relevant levels of governance involved which lacks some detail.
1 point: The assignment includes a weak overview of relevant levels of governance involved which lacks significant detail.
0 points: The overview of the different levels of governance contains nothing relevant to the assignment.
Multi-Actor
4 points: The assignment includes a precise, comprehensive overview of relevant actors involved.
3 points: The assignment includes a clear overview of relevant actors involved, but lacks some precision or clarity.
2 point: The assignment includes a basic overview of relevant actors involved which lacks significant detail.
1 point: The assignment includes a weak overview of relevant actors involved which lacks significant detail.
0 points: The overview of the different actors contains nothing relevant to the assignment.

I have a summary that I have already written. However, my director has given me some feedback and I need some help to implement it. I will upload the summary and additional information that may assist you with this task. Also, be sure to take a neutral tone in the summary. This is for my internship. 
**This is the sidenote from my director to implement in the summary**. 
I mentioned another email regarding the summary. You did a very nice job and I appreciate the work! I have one last tweak for you to consider. Your review appears to be a heavy lean on the need for pathways to re-entry. That is a reasonable point to have. What I did not see is the neutral view that also shares that perhaps it is prudent related to some infractions that the person is not a good fit in certain occupations for the future. The balance that is needed to assess the rehabilitation and training of the person as a way to prevent recidivism but also the need to protect the public. Ex. A person convicted as a pedophile perhaps should never work in a school setting. That is an extreme example, but I wanted to be clear that we are looking at what states do with a neutral lens. I think just a review to provide a neutral tone where prudent would be the needed tweak.

What are the defining features of the American liberal tradition? How well do you think the
American government has protected the freedom and rights of its people throughout American history?
Make sure you discuss the civil liberties protected by the U.S. Constitution, and the legal and political
changes brought on by the end of the Civil War and then 100 years later the Civil Rights Movement  

This prompt is part of a two-prompt final essay-exam. I will write the first prompt on my own, but the second prompt is listed below:
Discuss human rights in Latin America, with close attention to the spread of human rights norms. How has human rights law changed in Latin America, what were the major drivers, and how does our understanding of human rights in Latin America reflect on the region in relation to the Global North and other international understandings of human rights law?
The essay should reflect the two readings attached and should at least mention Alberto Fujimori and/or Hugo Chavez, as those figures will be the focus of the first prompt (that I will write on my own). It is not neccessary to write the entire essay focusing on only those two figures, but a mention of it would better connect the two in a cohesive response.