Category: Psychology

  • “Disaster Psychology: A Case Study of Community Impact and First Responder Resilience”

    **Can’t be a power point as that was already used**
    Week 8 Assignment: Case Study Assignment
    This assignment is due by Sunday of Week 8 at 11:55 pm ET
    You have been invited to be an expert guest lecturer at a local university in a disaster psychology class. Your job is to give a presentation based on a disaster from the last 20 years. Your lecture needs to include consideration of the following factors: the scope of the disaster, community impact, psychological and health risks to first responders, psychological assessment, impact on psychological functioning of first responders and civilian victims, and the need for community outreach.
    Include the following components in your presentation:
    1). Select a different format than you did for the Week 4 presentation assignment. Create an Adobe Sparks, Smore Newsletter, PowerPoint, Concept Map or Word Document include your name, class title, name of the assignment & date at the beginning of the assignment.
    2). Identify and present a disaster that occurred in the past 20 years. As part of this discussion, include how relevant media sources and political events influenced the response to this disaster. NOTE: You may reference the 9/11 case study provided as part of the course materials as a guide, but you cannot copy information directly from this article.
    3). Discuss the impact of the disaster on the community/civilian victims and identify the psychological and health risks to first responders. Key components must be given for this specific disaster.
    4). Explain how you would assess for trauma-induced psychiatric disorders in first responders following this disaster. What factors might challenge this process?
    5). Identify how community resources were strong and areas in which they were lacking following the disaster. What suggestions for community outreach efforts would you make?
    6). Add at least 4 pictures (illustrations/charts/graphics or videos) and give a caption to indicate which requirement relates to that picture. 
    7). Add at least 4 scholarly references in APA (7th Edition) format. 
    The APUS Writing Center at Writing@APUS and APUS Library both offer a wealth of information for writing and APA formatting. 
    Resources:
    Select the FREE Plan for Adobe Sparks. 
    https://www.adobe.com/products/spark.html 

    Home


    How to Create a PowerPoint
    https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/create-a-presentation-in-powerpoint-422250f8-5721-4cea-92cc-202fa7b89617
    For Free Stock Pictures:
    Adobe Sparks offers free photos without copyright that can be used within this program. 
    https://pixabay.com/photos/
    Google Images
    APUS Library
    Here are free resources to help develop a concept map. Just note that you must be able to save and upload the file into the course for review. 
    https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/video-create-and-change-smartart-393bd987-c33a-4821-aaea-fd9ea71916cd

    Best Mind Mapping Software For Classrooms and Learning


    https://gitmind.com/concept-map-maker.html
    https://templatelab.com/concept-map/

  • Title: Exploring Causal Attributions: Observing Others and Reflecting on Our Own Behavior

    As you recall, behavior can be influenced by both the person and the situation. For this assignment, we are focused on causal attributions- the process of trying to determine the cause of people’s behavior. Making a causal attribution can be a bit like conducting a social psychology experiment- we observe a person(s) we are interested in, record their behavior, draw conclusions, and note any limitations. As a “social psychologist in training” it is your job to determine which of these two causes (dispositional or situational) more strongly determined the behavior. You will need to complete BOTH parts below. 
    PART 1 (DATA COLLECTION):
    You will need to identify a total of FIVE different targets (people) to observe- it would be best if you could try and balance it between people that you know well (i.e., friend, family member, co-worker, etc.) and those that you do not (i.e., stranger, acquaintance, etc.). You do not need to announce that you are observing them, and your observation does not need to be long- it can just be a quick snapshot of their behavior in a particular situation/circumstance. For each target person (five total), you will need to identify the following:
    Who did you observe (i.e., roommate, cashier, coworker, sales associate, mother, etc.- you don’t need to include their specific name)? If it was a someone you didn’t already know, also mention what you noticed first about them (i.e., physical feature(s), social category membership(s), and trait(s)).
    What was the setting/situation?
    What was the target person’s behavior that you observed?
    What was your initial attribution? Would you label this as dispositional or situational?
    What are the limitations in your observation/are there any alternative attributions that you could have made?
    Now, I want you to do the same with yourself for two recent situations (i.e., I arrived late to work, I yelled at my kid, I complimented a friend on their sunglasses, etc.) For each situation, answer the same four items above that you completed when observing others.
    *If it is easier for you to record this all in a table, you can do so     
    PART 2 (ANALYSIS OF DATA COLLECTED):
    I want you to think about the data that you collected and write a reflection (at least 250 words) that connects to some of the content you read this week in your textbook about perceiving others (chapter 5). For instance, you might consider answering some of the following questions:
    Were there differences in the types of attributions you made for yourself vs. others? How about others that you know vs. strangers? Why?
    When is it easier to make a personal attribution? Situational attribution?
    Explain what biases occurred (or could occur) when you make attributions (i.e., fundamental attribution error, actor-observer bias, trait ascription bias, self-serving bias). Why did they occur?
    Did the covariation principle explain the type of attribution that you made about any of your targets? Describe the type of information that you used (i.e., consistency, distinctiveness, consensus).
    Was there any specific nonverbal behavior(s) that you relied on more heavily when making a particular attribution?
    If you were to have engaged in the same behaviors as your targets, would any of your attributions be different? Explain.

  • Criticisms and Personal Perspectives on Theories of Successful Aging Introduction The concept of successful aging has been a topic of interest and debate in the field of gerontology for decades. It refers to the process of aging in which individuals maintain physical,

    Theories of successful aging have been criticized over the years. In this reflective paper, I would
    like you to start the paper with a discussion on the criticisms of the main theories that have been
    put forth by Rowe and Khan and Baltes and Baltes. Please use a minimum of six scholarly
    references from peer reviewed journals for this part of the paper. Then, I would like you to
    discuss briefly what successful aging means to you. Finally, talk to an older person in your life
    (65 year of age and older) and find out what successful aging means to them. Include their view
    in your paper. The paper should be a minimum of seven pages but no more than eight pages in
    length including title page and references. Makes sure that you include an introduction and a
    conclusion. This is approximately 2000 words. Please use APA style 7th edition for your
    formatting and references.  

  • “Examining Eyewitness Identification and Testimony: Issues, Interventions, and Biblical Perspectives”

    OVERVIEW
    You will develop a well-reasoned discussion of the issues associated with that topic and your
    suggestions and recommendations for appropriate interventions, policy changes, etc. as well as
    biblical support for your suggestions and recommendations. Include an introduction that
    describes the purpose of the paper, the context of the discussion, and the central issues; also,
    address the central issues and use headings to clearly delineate your points. Your paper needs to
    include the integration of sources to support your points and demonstrate your thinking through
    the complexities of the issues in discussion of the central issues and your recommendations.
    Your paper should have a substantive conclusion that summarizes your key points.
    INSTRUCTIONS
    This assignment is to write a research paper on Eyewitnesses Identification and Testimony.
    • The research paper shall be a minimum of 8 to 10 pages and must follow current APA
    guidelines.
    • The page count does not include the title page, abstract, or reference section.
    • It must include 10–15 sources with at least 1 source being the Holy Bible and no more
    than two (2) books.
    • The student should have a specific section in the paper dedicated to a synthesis of
    Christian Worldview and their topic.
    • See the assignment instructions and grading rubric for additional instructions and
    guidance.
    Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

  • “Exploring the Ethical Dilemma in Case Seven: Martin”

    Your Assignment: Case Seven: Martin . You should answer application questions 1-5 and the case should be typed, double-spaced, and 12 font and follow APA format (running head and page numbers). 

  • Title: “Perceptions of Economic Inequality: A Literature Review of High and Low Class Perspectives” Introduction Economic inequality, defined as the unequal distribution of wealth and resources among individuals and groups, has long been a topic of concern in

    A literature review of articles highlighting the perception of economic inequality by the high and low classes.
    Apa style with 10 citations The tutor must also provide a ai plagiarism report from turnitin .

  • “Ethical Considerations in Psychological Practice: A Case Analysis of Three Scenarios”

    Instructions
    Please respond to one of the scenarios.  
    Scenario 1: A professor requires students to participate in a research study. 
    Scenario 2: A psychologist provides treatment to a neighbor’s teenage child. 
    Scenario 3: A psychologist posts psychological test questions on her website. 
    In the case analysis, please include the following information:
    Description of at least 3 ethical and/or legal issues in the vignette
    Identification of relevant ethical codes
    Explanation of 3 courses of action to resolve the issue
    Description of the decision-making process using one of the models identified in the Week 1 Lesson (Pope or Fisher)
    Assessment of option that best upholds the ethical standards of the profession
    The paper should be 5 to 6 pages, and include a minimum of 3-5 scholarly resources.
    Due on Jun 23, 2024 11:55 PM

  • Title: “Exploring the Life of [Name]: A Book Report on [Title] by [Author]”

    Book Report(BR)
    a.      Selecte any complete, published biography/autobiography book not a fiction or a novel–give me the title/author between lectures. (online students-send info inside online course email system only).  These  type of books usually have a great deal of psychological material, but makes sure it includes childhood.
    1. Pick anybody whose life you have wanted to know more about.
    2. You must use the BR Template
    b.  Length/Organization.
    1. Six pages in length, Times New Roman font, with normal font size (12), and normal margin of one inch all round.
    2.  Paragraphs are internally single spaced, but not between.
    3. Use proper, traditional English grammar, spelling, spacing, writing rules.
    C. Format/Layout:  Online student – Must  use the BR Template, with no modification. The book report is one whole piece, not two.
    1. TEMPLATE- Write the data in list format in the following section (I, II, III, IV) (take about 1/2 page):
    a.  I.  Title/author/publisher/publication date/ISBN.
    b.  II.  Main characters.
    c.  III.  Setting/time.
    d.  IV.  Main theme.
    2.  Write the following sections(V/VI) in paragraphform, with proper grammar and spelling 5-1/2 page):
    e.  V.  Summary – which is the bulk of the report. 
    f.  VI.  Conclusion – what you learned, your  thoughts, your analysis.
    Also, Turnitin service automatically analyses all papers submitted in Canvas. They provide a score plus the sites that the paper coincides with, i.e., a ‘plagiarism’ score. A 0% indicates a totally original paper, and a 90% indicates extremely high linking.

  • Title: “Exploring Psychological Testing: A Comparative Analysis of the MBTI and MMPI Instruments”

    part 1 personality test PERSONALITY TESTS”
    Use the questions below as headings (i.e., copy and paste the question and then provide your answer underneath). Read and study chapter 13 in your text.
    Would you prefer to use the MMPI, CPI, or 16 PF in a private practice counseling office? Why or why not?
    In what context and with which population would you use each?
    Research each of these and share your perspectives.
    Part 2 you are to write a 1200-word research paper on psychological testing using one of the following instruments: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator or the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory.This paper is worth 15% of your grade.Use the APA format and cite at least four (4) scholarly sources.Assignment Requirements (Use as a checklist):
    You will select one of the above testing instruments:MBTI
    MMPI
    Assignment Requirements (Use as a checklist and section headings in the paper):
    You will select one of the above testing instruments and research and discuss the following aspects of the test:Development and Description
    Uses
    What does it measure
    Strengths
    Weaknesses
    Reliability
    Validity
    Administration
    Use a 10 or 12 pt Arial or Times New Roman Font
    Double-space paper
    Minimum of 1200 words. No more than 2,000 words
    Minimum of four (4) cited sources
    Use APA format (title page, headings, in-text citations, references)

  • “Revisiting Theories of Successful Aging: Criticisms and Personal Perspectives”

    Theories of successful aging have been criticized over the years. In this reflective paper, I would like you to start the paper with a discussion on the criticisms of the main theories that have been put forth by Rowe and Khan and Baltes and Baltes. Please use a minimum of six scholarly references from peer reviewed journals for this part of the paper. Then, I would like you to discuss briefly what successful aging means to you. Finally, talk to an older person in your life (65 year of age and older) and find out what successful aging means to them. Include their view in your paper. The paper should be a minimum of seven pages but no more than eight pages in length including title page and references. Makes sure that you include an introduction and a conclusion. This is approximately 2000 words. Please use APA style 7th edition for your formatting and references.